Checklists production

CAD 17 Center gating 39 Chamfer 100 Charpy test 28 Checklist, product 109 Clamping mechanism 42 Collapsible cores 85 Compression molding 5 Compressive strength 28 Computer-aided design 17 Concept review 20 Container, deep 34 margarine 24 pail 79... 

Running unbal- Preventive maintenance and operator checklist anced, vibration inspections due to worn bear-, effective vibration monitor/shutdown device ings or other mechanical problem such as product accumulation behind filter screen. ... 

This checklist presents a number of questions to assist in identifying environmental and health and safety issues at facilities where ABC Co. product(s) are manufactured (all or m part) by another company or where ABC Co. produces) are licensed to another company. 

Seek the opinions of customers about your organization s products and services provided through questionnaires or interview checklists. 

The standard does not require you to use statistical techniques but identify the need for them. Within your procedures you will therefore need a means of determining when statistical techniques will be needed to determine product characteristics and process capability. One way of doing this is to use checklists when preparing customer specifications, design specifications, and verification specifications and procedures. These checklists need to prompt the user to state whether the product characteristics or process capability will be determined using statistical techniques and if so which techniques are to be used. 

Advanced product qualify planning and control plan reference manual ANFIA evaluation of quality systems - checklist ANFIA evaluation of quality systems - guidelines for use Benchmarking, Sylvia Coding (Gower, 1998)... 

This analysis forms the basis of a widely used industry consensus standard, American Petroleum Institute, Recommended Practice 14C, Analysis, Design, Installation, and Testing of Basic Surface Systems for Ofi- i orc Production Platforms (RP14C), which contains a procedure tor dcicnniniiig required process safety devices and shutdowns. The procedures ilescribed here can be used to develop checklists for devices not covered by RP14C or to modify the consensus checklists presented in RP14C in areas of the world where RPI4C is not mandated. 

The most common hazards control technique is a checklist. The checklist is prepared by experienced personnel who are familiar with the design, construction and operation of similar facilities. Checklists are relatively easy to use and provide a guide to the evaluator of items to be considered in evaluating hazards. API RP 14J has examples of two checklists which can be used to evaluate facilities of different complexity. Because production facilities are very similar and have been the subject of many hazard analyses, a checklist analysis to assure compliance with standard practice is recommended for most production facilities. The actual procedure by which the checklist is considered and the manner in which the evaluation is documented to assure compliance varies from case-to-case. 

Everyone learned this in school, but many people overlook its value in real life. A solid outline helps keep proposals focused and can also be used as a checklist to assure that all key points are covered. In addition, a detailed outline can be useful as a tool for midpoint review with colleagues or superiors whose input would improve the finished product. 

With regard to evaluating these factors, it is recommended that structured checklists be used, such as those provided by the HFAM method described in Chapter 2. These checklists provide an explicit link between the direct causal factors and management policies. Figure 2.12 shows how these checklists could be used to investigate possible procedures deficiencies, and the policies that led to the deficiencies, as part of the incident investigation. Similar checklists can be used to investigate possible culture problems (e.g., inappropriate trade-offs between safety and production) that could have been implicated in an accident. 

The requirements for a NADA are set out in 21 CFR 514.1 and summarised in Figure 7.7. A F DA-35 6v form must accompany each submission (see Figure 7.8). This is similar to the form used for human drug submissions in that it captures basic information on the submission and provides a checklist for accompanying documents or materials. The labelling should include instmetions on how to use the drug in the manufacture of medicated feeds, where such use is intended. The CVM may request samples of the dmg product itself reference materials or standards, and samples of food produce from treated animals in order that they can, in conjunction... 

Only those sections of 21 CFR Part 11 that describe technical controls required for 21 CFR Part 11 compliance of closed systems are included in this checklist (Table 26.1). Sections that describe only procedural controls [11.10(i), (j), (k) 11.100(b), (c) 11.300(c)] that cannot be implemented by a software product or additional controls for open system (11.30) are not included. Procedural controls can only be exercised during the implementation of a 21 CFR Part 11-compliant system of which the software is a component. 

Pharmaceutical packaging is the means of providing protection, presentation, identification and information, containment, and convenience to encourage compliance with a course of therapy. The period from product manufacture to ultimate use or administration lies within the product shelf life interval. Criteria for selecting a satisfactory packaging system for pharmaceutical products are established by addressing a checklist of basic considerations ... 

A traditional checklist analysis uses a list of specific items to identify known types of hazards, design deficiencies, and potential accident scenarios associated with common process equipment and operations. The method can be used to evaluate materials, equipment, or procedures. Checklists are most often used to evaluate a specific design with which a company or industry has a significant amount of experience, but they can also be used at earlier stages of development for entirely new processes to identify and eliminate hazards that have been recognized through operation and evaluation of similar systems. To be most useful, checklists should be tailored specifically for an individual facility, process, or product. 

An effective management system to ensure process integrity is essential and must include up-to-date operating procedures, product changeover instructions, and checklists that cover instrumentation, equipment arrangement, and procedures procedures must also include adequate checks and reviews to ensure the required changeover modifications have, in fact, been made when required. 

The facility is subjected to a process hazard analysis commensurate to the level of hazard the facility represents (i.e., Checklist, PHA, HAZOP, What-If review, Event Tree, FMEA, etc.). The results of these analyses are fully understood and acknowledged by facility management. Where high risk events are identified, quantifiable risk estimation and effects of mitigation measures should be evaluated and applied if productive. 

In many companies there is an intrinsic lack of understanding between business development and R D. Business development pretends that R D develops primarily new products for which there is no market, whereas R D s position is Our resources do not allow the development of a suitable synthesis for the kind of new products that business development proposes. In order to overcome this impasse, the creation of a new product committee has proved very useful. The committee has the task of evaluating all new product ideas following a standard checklist (see Appendix A.2). It decides whether a new product idea should be taken up in research, and thus becomes a project (see also Section 6.2, on project initiation), and whether an ongoing research project should be abandoned. A warning signal would be if the chance of both a commercial and a technical process diminish continuously over a period of several months ... 

The main remit of this chapter is to provide reference and plant source details of new flavone and flavonol 0-glycosides discovered since 1991, i.e., covering the years 1992 to 2003. A checklist of all (as far as possible) known structures is also included in Appendices A and B. A series of reviews, which include most of the data on new 0-glycosylflavones and flavonols presented here, have appeared in Natural Product Reports and cover the years 1992 to 1994, 1995 to 1997, and 1998 to 2000, and with a fourth (2001 to 2003) " in press. Other useful sources of data are The Phytochemical Dictionary,The Handbook of Natural Flavo-noids, and for general background reading Jeffrey Harborne s Comparative Biochemistry of the Flavonoids. 

This checklist of chalcones, dihydrochalcones, and aurones contains compounds of these classes reported in the literature as natural products to the end of 2003. Compounds published before 1992 are cross-referenced to numbered entries in volumes 1 and 2 of the Handbook of Natural Flavonoidf using the abbreviations H1 and H2, respectively. Compounds published from 1992 to 2003 are cross-referenced to Table 16.1-Table 16.15 using numbers in bold type. The compounds are listed according to the system outlined in Section 16.1.1, with the exception that isoprenylated derivatives are included under the heading of aglycones. Bn, benzyl. 

The following checklist of isoflavonoids contains compounds reported in the literature as natural products to the end of 2004. Compounds published before 1991 are referenced to numbered entries in Volume 2 of the Handbook of Natural Flavonoids (J.B. Harborne and H. Baxter), John Wiley Sons, Chichester, 1999, using a number consisting of four digits. Compounds published in the period 1991-2004 are referenced with numbers having F as prefix before the number of the publication found in the reference list. The various isoflavo-noid classes are shown in Figure Al. 

The checklist provided in Table 6 [15] is intended to aid in the systematic GMP audit of a facility that manufactures drug components or finished products. 

Van Mansvelt, J.D. and van der Lubbe, M.J. 1999. Checklist for Sustainable Landscape Management Pinal Report of the EU Concerted Action AIR3-CT93-1210 The Landscape and Nature Production Capacity of Organic-Sustainable Types of Agriculture. Elsevier, Amsterdam. 

The checklist is divided into three areas 1) Material Storage and Handling, 2) Production Processes and 3) Treatment Alternatives. Material degradation, samples, spills, storage, and inspections are addressed in the first section. Production processes include source reduction for process bath solutions and rinse systems, resource recovery and recycling, and solvent management. Treatment Alternatives focuses on process water pretreatment, modification of conventional wastewater treatment, and alternative waste treatment methods. Each of these subsections follow the question and answer format. 

There is no definition or checklist which will tell you, now you have an operating discipline. It is several different things. It is all the knowledge needed to operate a plant to produce a quality product safely, efficiently, and without insult to the environment. It also is the training required to equip the entire work force to achieve that goal. And it is the orderly conduct and self-control which leads to that achievement. 

Servicing standards will also provide advice on safety, checklists for inspections, product operating conditions, inhibitor reserves to be maintained, and provide methods of sampling, analysis, monitoring, reporting, etc. 

---