Sulfur production methods

Sulfur can be produced direcdy via Frasch mining or conventional mining methods, or it can be recovered as a by-product from sulfur removal and recovery processes. Production of recovered sulfur has become more significant as increasingly sour feedstocks are utilized and environmental regulations concerning emissions and waste streams have continued to tighten worldwide. Whereas recovered sulfur represented only 5% of the total sulfur production ia 1950, as of 1996 recovered sulfur represented approximately two-thirds of total sulfur production (1). Recovered sulfur could completely replace native sulfur production ia the twenty-first century (2). 

Other mixed esters, eg, cellulose acetate valerate [55962-79-3] cellulose propionate valerate [67351-41-17, and cellulose butyrate valerate [53568-56-2] have been prepared by the conventional anhydride sulfuric acid methods (25). Cellulose acetate isobutyrate [67351-38-6] (44) and cellulose propionate isobutyrate [67351-40-0] (45) have been prepared with a 2inc chloride catalyst. Large amounts of catalyst and anhydride are required to provide a soluble product, and special methods of delayed anhydride addition are necessary to produce mixed esters containing the acetate moiety. Mixtures of sulfuric acid and perchloric acid are claimed to be effective catalysts for the preparation of cellulose acetate propionate in dichi oromethane solution at relatively low temperatures (46) however, such acid mixtures are considered too corrosive for large-scale productions. 

All gaseous sulfur products obtained as a result of incubation of sulfur-treated fruit were oxidized with alkaline hydrogen peroxide, precipitated as barium sulfate, and counted with a thin window Geiger counter. The peel and peel proteins were oxidized with magnesium nitrate, the sulfur was precipitated as barium sulfate according to standard methods, and counted as in the case of the gaseous products. Counting data, as reported, are fully corrected. 

PEC. The patent includes the production method for the biocatalyst, with a characteristic inhibitory effect on certain enzyme expression. The expression recombinant vector contains a promoter free from manifesting inhibition due to an inorganic sulfur compound or a sulfur-containing amino acid. The recombinant microorganism also contains a gene for desulfurizing the sulfur-containing heterocyclic compound. 

Bromination of quinoline in sulfuric acid containing silver sulfate gives in good yield almost equal amounts of 5- and 8-bromoquinoline. With an excess of bromine and silver sulfate 5,8-dibromoquinoline becomes the major product. The dibromo compound is similarly formed from 5- and 8-bromoquinoline. Further bromination gives 5,6,8-tribromoquinoline (Scheme 7). With 3-bromoquinoline as starting material, formed, for example, from bromine in carbon tetrachloride (see Chapter 2.05), the silver sulfate/sulfuric acid method converts it into 3,5-dibromo- and 3,5,8-tribromo-quinoline. Bromination with... 

Volcanic and Other Surface Deposits. Sulfur is recovered from volcanic and other surface deposits by a number of different processes, including distillation, flotation, autoclaving, filtration, solvent extraction, or a combination of several of these processes. The Japanese sulfur deposits are reached by tunnel, and mining is done by the room-and-pillar, chamber-and-pillar with filling, and cut-and-fill systems. Sulfur was historically extracted from the ore by a distillation process performed in rows of cast-iron pots, each containing about 180 kg of ore. Each row of pots is connected to a condensation chamber outside the furnace. A short length of pipe connects each pot with a condenser. Brick flues connect combustion gases under the pots. Sulfur vapor flows from the pots to the condensation chamber where the liquid sulfur is collected. The Japanese ore contains 25—35 wt % sulfur. This method has been superseded by other sources of sulfur production. 

Another route to corrin via 4,5-seco intermediates has been established (Scheme 88).250,255 It was shown by X-ray structure analyses of the Ni-4,5-secocorrin, and its cyclization product, that the pyrrolic A and B rings are properly oriented for the reaction.250 A sulfur extrusion method was employed in the B12 synthesis of Woodward and Eschenmoser.253... 

Concentration Profiles. The relative fluorescence intensity profiles for OH, S2, SH, SO, and SO2 were converted to absolute number densities according to the method already outlined. Resulting concentration profiles for a rich, sulfur bearing flame are exhibited in Figure 17. H-atom densities were calculated from the measured OH concentrations and H2 and H2O equilibrium values for each flame according to Equation 6. Similar balanced radical reactions were used to calculate H2S and S concentrations 6). Although sulfur was added as H2S to this hydrogen rich flame, the dominant sulfur product at early times in the post flame gas is S02 ... 

The oldest nitric acid production method involved the reaction of NaNOj with sulfuric acid in heated cast iron retorts. The evolved nitric acid vapors were condensed and collected in stoneware vessels. 

Sulfur dioxide is generated in flue gas as a result of combustion of fossil fuel in, for example, thermal plants. Although the sulfur dioxide content in the flue gas is usually small, namely below about 0.1-0.4 vol.% [86], the volume of the produced gas is so large that considerable amounts of sulfur dioxide contaminate the atmosphere, and therefore proper desulfurization becomes important. Here, absorption of SO2 by the sodium method is considered as part of the combined chemical/biological process shown in Fig. 9.21. The process includes SO2 removal, NaHCCh recovery, and elemental sulfur production [70]. 

ABSTRACT Calcium-enriched bio-oil (CEB) can be used for flue gas desulfurisation in coal and waste combustion chambers. It is produced by mixing biomass derived fast pyrolysis oil with calcium oxide. The aim of the proposed project is to develop a technology i) to produce calcium-enriched bio-oil with a calcium content of 13 wt,%, and ii) to test the CEB in a combustion chamber by co-firing it with a sufur-containing fuel. In this paper the production method of CEB will be elucidated, and small-scale experiments related to CEB spraying will be presented. Finally, co-combustion experiments of a sulfur-containing fuel with CEB in a small flame tunnel (20 kW, ) will be reported. 

If a wet method for collection is selected, such as a wet electrostatic precipitator, fiber-type self-draining mist eliminator, or wet scrubber, ammonia can be regenerated from the salt solution by reaction with a readily available metal oxide such as lime or zinc oxide with formation of a stable sulfur product for disposal. These metal oxides, however, as well as their reaction products, are insoluble and could cause deposition on heat transfer surfaces and/or clogging in the regenerating equipment. Therefore, as indicated in Figure 2, to ensure continuity and reliability of the process, a soluble metal oxide was utilized (in the form of sodium hydroxide solution) to regenerate the ammonia in the experimental work described. This procedure also allows more eflFective utilization of the metal oxide the soluble oxide (NaOH) can be regenerated in batch equipment outside the continuous portion of the process by reaction with either the aforestated insoluble reactants, lime, or zinc oxide. Better control is aflForded in a batch reactor with more eflBcient use of reactants. However, in full-scale equipment undersirable deposition of reactant and product may be controllable so that batch operation may not be necessary. 

The thereby formed sulfuric acid is neutralized by adding magnesium hydroxide. Independently of the production method, the precipitated uranium concentrate is washed to remove adhering salt solution and then dried. The precipitates produced with ammonia are subsequently calcined in a multiple hearth kiln at 750°C, ammonia, sulfite and chloride being driven off and U3O8 being formed ... 

Diverse methods have been used to recover this element commercially to cope with the varied forms in which sulfur occurs (Table 9.2). For example, about 85% of Canada s sulfur production is from sulfides removed from natural gas to sweeten it. It results from, or is an involuntary by-product of natural gas production and not a product sought for its own sake. Poland, on the other hand, obtains about 80% of its annual sulfur by employing Frasch recovery of natural sulfur which is more directly responsive to markets in its volume of production. 

For a solid sulfur product, the sulfur layer is pumped to large outside vats where it is allowed to cool. The simplest containment for this method consists of a vertical sheet metal rim which is used to hold the molten sulfur until it solidifies. Once the product is solid, the metal rim is moved upward ready to receive the next layer of molten sulfur. The large, compact dense masses of product thus formed represent one of the least expensive and best environmentally controlled forms of storage of excess sulfur inventory. For delivery, the large mass is broken up using small explosive charges or mechanical means. 

Extensive dust removal facilities are required to clean up the sulfur dioxide stream from these sources, which adds substantially to the capital cost of the plant and offsets the raw material cost advantage obtained from these sulfur sources. Sometimes, hydrogen sulfide is simply burned to produce sulfur dioxide when the source of the hydrogen sulfide is near a producing sulfuric acid plant. If this method is used then the need for elemental sulfur production by the Claus process is bypassed. 

In attempting to prepare iso-butyl bromide by the hydro-bromic, or hydrobromic-sulfuric, acid methods, the yields were always poor and not reproducible. In all the above cases the product is purer and the yields better than when the hydro-bromic, or hydrobromic-sulfuric, acid method is used. When tertiary butyl bromide is prepared by the above method it is difficult to get a pmre product. 

The two depolymerization methods which have been used most are pyrolysis and hydrogenation. Thiophenes and sulfides were the major sulfur components of tars from coal pyrolysis hydrogen sulfide and the lower mercaptans and sulfides were found in the volatiles299. Hydrogen sulfide and thiophenes were practically the only sulfur products of coal hydrogenation300 hydrogen sulfide is produced in char hydrodesulfurization301. ... 

One of the major restrictions to the sulfuric acid method of hydration has been the cost of reconcentrating the sulfuric acid. The necessity for this reconcentration is brought about by the fact that the strong acid used for absorption of the olefin must be diluted prior to the distillation of the alcohol from the solution. In locations where the dilute acid may be used in conjunction with the production of synthetic ammonia for the formation of ammonium sulfate fertilizers, the hydration operation may be made more profitable by this outlet for the spent acid. 

---