Deposition of sulfur

This disproportionation is catalysed by alkali, and even traces dissolved from the surface of glass containers is sufficient to effect deposition of sulfur. They are also degraded by sulfite and by cyanide ions ... 

Suppose you wish to calculate the mass of sulfuric acid that can be obtained from an underground deposit of sulfur 1.00 km2 in area. What additional information do you need to make this calculation ... 

Fig. 4-13 Calculated and observed annual wet deposition of sulfur in mgS/m per year. (Reprinted from "Atmospheric Environment," Volume 30, Feichter, J., Kjellstrom, E., Rodhe, H., Dentener, F., Lelieveld, and Roelofs, G.-J., Simulation of the tropospheric sulfur cycle in a global climate model, pp. 1693-1707, Copyright 1996, with permission from Elsevier Science.)...

Galloway, J. N. (1985). The deposition of sulfur and nitrogen from the remote atmosphere. In The Biogeochemical Cycling of Sulfur and Nitrogen in the Remote Atmosphere" (J. N. Galloway, R. J. Charlson, M. O. Andreae, and H. Rodhe, eds). Reidel, Dordrecht. 

Colletti LP, Teklay D, Stickney JL (1994) Thin-layer electrochemical studies of the oxidative underpotential deposition of sulfur and its application to the electrochemical atomic layer epitaxy deposition of CdS. J Electroanal Chem 369 145-152... 

Alanyahopu M, (Jakal H, Oztiirk AE, Demir U (2001) Electrochemical studies of the effects of pH and the surface stracture of gold substrates on the underpotential deposition of sulfur. J Phys Chem B 105 10588-10593... 

Figure 4. Top The percentage of ecosystem area protected (i.e., non-exceedance of critical loads) from acidifying deposition of sulfur and nitrogen in 1990 (left) and in the year 2010 according to current emission reduction plans in Europe (right). Bottom The accumulated average exceedance (AAE) of the acidity critical loads by sulfur and nitrogen deposition in 1990(left) and 2010 (right). Sulfur deposition data were provided by the FMEP/MSC-W (Posch etal., 1999).

The Comprehensive Acid Deposition Model (CADM) has been created for calculation of dry and wet deposition of sulfur species over South Korea (Park et al 1997,1999a). This model presents quantitative assessment of the acidity loading and alterations in deposition rates. 

When passed through a solution of alkali or ahtahne earth metal sulfide, the corresponding carbonate is produced with deposition of sulfur ... 

Figure 8.3 summarizes the pathways that must be considered for S02 oxidation and for the deposition of sulfur compounds (Lamb et al., 1987). The focus of this chapter is on the chemistry converting S02 to sulfate in both the gas and condensed phases. 

In short, as is the case for acids formed in VOC-NO chemistiy, the chemical and physical processes associated with the formation and deposition of sulfuric acid are also quite complex. 

The results of a global 3-dimensional model simulation also suggest that in the boundaiy layer in the United States, a 50% reduction in anthropogenic S02 emissions in the United States will result in a similar (53%) annual reduction in the total (wet plus dry) deposition of sulfur (Chin and Jacob, 1996). 

Traces of sulfur can be eliminated prior to entering the main reformer, due to the lower operating temperatures of the prereformer, which favors the deposition of sulfur on the Ni-based pre-reforming catalyst. 

Storm water runoff from cities and villages presents another problem. This runoff contains salts from road deicing, street refuse, animal waste, food litter, residue from atmospheric deposition of sulfuric and nitric acid, metals, asbestos from automobile brakes, rubber from tires, hydrocarbons from motor vehicle exhaust condensates, oil and grease, soil and inorganic nutrients from construction sites, and a variety of other chemicals. Research shows a heavy impact of urban nonpoint pollution on freshwater quality (World Resources Institute, 1988). 

L. M. Goss, A Demonstration of Acid Rain and Lake Acidification Wet Deposition of Sulfur Dioxide, J. Chem. Ed. 2003,80, 39. 

The product decomposes on long standing, especially in air, with the deposition of sulfur. 

Hydrogen sulfide Dirty yellow deposit of sulfur is produced in acidic solutions... 

Deposition of sulfur in regions where the soils are deficient in sulfur may be considered a beneficial effect all of the other effects of sulfur air pollution are considered adverse. They include effects on human health, materials degradation, vegetation, and atmospheric visibility, and acidification of soils, watersheds and freshwaters. Limitations on the scope of this paper will greatly restrict our discussions of the details of these effects see the References 1-11 for more detailed information. 

The dependence of SCR activity of CuHM31 on its sulfur content with respect to reaction temperatures also shows the similar behavior to HM catalyst as shown in Fig. 4B. The catalytic activity reveals an exponential decrease with the sulfur content of the catalyst at 250 °C, while no deactivation is observed at 400 °C, despite the deposition of sulfur up to 1.78 wt.% on the catalyst surface. As discussed in the previous study, it is probably due to the deposition location of the deactivating agents on the pores of catalyst structure (ref 1). 

At present, we cannot say with certainty that reductions in emissions of S02 and NO will cause a proportional decrease in deposition of sulfur and nitrogen species. 

However, even this statement was not accepted by some critics, especially those of the Department of Energy laboratories (12), who requested and received major funding for the PRECP project designed to investigate "non-linear" dependence of deposition of species upon emissions. Even if one accepts the conclusion of the NAS/-NRC Committee, there is still a question of the distance scale for transport and deposition of sulfur and nitrogen species. For example, if emissions are reduced in Ohio, will the effects be mostly local, or will they extend appreciably into upper New York State and New England ... 

Yamartino (6) has summarized the applications of this approach, which include determining the sources of CO at an airbase, the sources of SO2 in West Berlin, and the wet deposition of sulfur in Eastern Northern America. The last application required estimates of rate constants as well as meteorological data to be inputted to calculate the transfer coefficients. 

A trial program has been initiated to test inferential methods for measuring dry deposition. Although present capabilities are very limited, preliminary results for sulfur deposition at a few selected locations confirm expectations that submicron particle deposition contributes far less sulfur than does sulfur dioxide gas exchange at the surface. Overall, average total deposition of sulfur by dry mechanisms appears to be much the same as by wet deposition in the northeast, although the short-term difference can be large (in either direction) at any particular location. 

Figures 3, 4, and 5 illustrate month by month comparisons between wet and dry deposition of sulfur, as derived from the dry deposition operation described here and from the published records of the MAP3S precipitation chemistry network. For the dry deposition, inferred values of the deposition of sulfur as sulfur dioxide have been added...

Figure 6 is a plot of particulate sulfur deposition versus the gaseous component. It is often claimed that the deposition of sulfur as submicron particles is small in comparison to the deposition as gaseous sulfur dioxide. Inspection of the diagram reveals that the present data and analysis are in support of this common contention. 

Differences are also noticed in the values of the surface pH and amounts of preadsorbed water. The pH values for the exhausted samples after subsequent SOj and HjS adsorption runs are much lower than those after HjS adsorption followed by SOj adsorption. This suggests differences in the surface reaction products. These differences are also reflected in the amount of water adsorbed after the first runs in the breakthrough tests. After SOj adsorption much more water is preadsorbed before the next run than after adsorption of HjS. This once again indicates differences in the chemistry of inorganic phase. After SO2 adsorption it is likely that still some oxides able to adsorb water are present (hydrophilic surface) whereas reactions with HjS and deposition of sulfur [12,14] almost totally "screen" active centers for water adsorption. 

Coal generally contains a mineral fraction that amounts to 5-20 wt.%. During combustion, most of the minerals are transformed into dust-sized, glassy particles and, along with some unaltered mineral grains and unburned carbon, are emitted from the smoke stacks. These particles contribute to the smog problem, are eye- and respiratory irritants, and act as substrates for the deposition of sulfuric and nitric acid. 

Aggrading forests contribute to surface-water acidification in a number of ways. Water discharge decreases because of enhanced evapotran-spiration, causing evaporative concentration of pollutants. Hydrological pathways become modified (Waters and Jenkins, 1992), and coniferous afforestation commonly raises DOC. Dry deposition of acidifying pollutants to a forest canopy increases as the canopy develops. Total deposition of sulfur and other pollutants in throughfall in forests is typically several times higher than bulk deposition outside the forest (Beier et al., 1993 Hansen et al., 1994 Rustad et al., 1994). Episodic acidification caused by marine aerosols... 

Driscoll C. T., Likens G. E., and Church M. R. (1998) Recovery of surface waters in the Northeastern US from decreases in atmospheric deposition of sulfur. Water Air Soil Pollut. 105, 319-329. 

Galloway J. N., Norton S. A., and Church M. R. (1983) Freshwater acidification from atmospheric deposition of sulfuric acid a conceptual model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 17, 541-545. 

Hydrogen sulfide gas when mixed with sulfur dioxide gas makes water and a deposit of sulfur. The balanced equation is shown. 

---