Specific adhesion, description

Numerous standard test methods have been developed by various government, industrial, and university investigators. Many of these have been prepared or adopted under the auspices of the ASTM Committee D 14 on Adhesives or other professional societies. Reference to the appropriate standards will adequately equip one with the background necessary to conduct the test or a version of it. Several of the more common standard tests are described in this section. Numerous variations exist for specific applications or materials. In these descriptions, the emphasis is on understanding of the reasons for the test, its relationship to a specific adhesive property, advantages and limitations of the test, and possible variations or extrapolations of the test method. The detailed description of the test mechanics is kept to a minimum, since they are adequately covered in the existing standards and specifications. 

Although numerous studies (1-3) have described work aimed at establishing criteria for the durability of adhesive joints, a thorough understanding of effects of the chemical and mechanical properties, on the durability of adhesive bonds is lacking. More specifically, the effects of surface preparation and dynamic loading, especially under environmental service conditions, has not been explored in detail for automotive structures. In this paper, a description of the effects of environment on the durability of adhesive bonds is presented. Particular attention is given to... 

A selective method of preventing the expression of adhesion molecules or cytokines is the use of antisense oligonucleotides. These oligonucleotides are short sequences of nucleic acids complementary to mRNA sequences of specific proteins of interest. If delivered to the cytoplasmic compartment of cells these oligonucleotides are able to form a complex with their target mRNA. In this way the translation of mRNA into protein by ribosomes is inhibited. The subsequent mRNA degradation by RNAse H results in reduced expression of the protein (see also Chapter 5 for a description of antisense ohgonucleotides as therapeutic modalities). 

The following section offers a brief description of how certain additives and formulation parameters are used to control the characteristics of adhesive systems. The roles of specific additives are defined in Chaps. 6 through 10. 

While the composition and sequence of the amino acids have been known since 1983 (2,3), methods for increased-scale extraction were not developed until 1985. This scaled production has allowed for the development of single-part adhesive systems (Cell-Tak adhesive) for the immobilization of biologically active moieties to inert substrates. It has also permitted research on two-part adhesive formulations for the bonding of tissues. This paper specifically addresses the biocompatibility issue with descriptions of the immobilization of cells to Cell-Tak protein-coated plasticware, methods for wound closure, and preliminary toxicology data. 

In the following description of the most important reactive adhesives it will be particularly referred to their allocation to one of these two groups. Furthermore, additional advice will be given regarding the specific properties of the adhesives, their application conditions and essential chemical formulas. 

In this paper, we present test results of two methods for surface pretreatment which are generally applicable under atmospheric conditions and which can be integrated in the production line. Pragmatic approaches for the numerical description of the material behavior of adhesives according to specific loading conditions are given. Furthermore, we present model parameters for some commercial adhesive systems which were tested in relevant conditions. A concept of knock-down factors and characteristic values which is widely used in component design will be discussed. Experimental results were used to manufacture a fuUy bonded structural component of a rail vehicle. Test results are compared with FE-model predictions. 

There are three main modes of interaction between a polymer solution and a solid surface. The first interaction mode is depletion [2,3]. If the monomers are repelled by the surface (or in other words if the attractive interaction between the solvent molecules and the surface is larger than the interaction between the monomers and the surface), the polymer concentration in solution decreases as the surface is approached and a region depleted in polymer exists in the vicinity of the surface. The size of this region is the size of the polymer chain if the solution is dilute and the size of the correlation length of the solution if the solution is semidilute (if the polymer chains overlap). When two surfaces are brought in close contact, the density in the gap between the surfaces is smaller than the bulk concentration and the osmotic pressure in the gap is smaller than the bulk osmotic pressure. This osmotic pressure difference induces an attraction between the surfaces. The depletion interaction is not specific to polymers and exists with any particle with a size in the colloidal range [4]. It has sometimes been used to induce adhesion between particles of mesoscopic size such as red blood cells. The only limitation to this qualitative description of the depletion force is that at equilibrium the polymer chains (or any other particles) must leave the gap as the surfaces get closer. There is no attractive depletion force if they remain trapped in the gap. We will not consider further the depletion interaction. 

In the remainder of this chrqrter we describe recent trends in corona and low pressure plasma modification of polymer surfaces and interfaces, which we illustrate with results and examples fiom our own laboratories. Section 2 deals with a brief description of plasma-chemical principles and plasma-surface interactions, hr section 3, we describe how si ace modification can be characterized in terms of chemical structure, wettalnlity, etc., following which section 4 is devoted to adhesion of specific materials combinations, Ulustrated by case examples from these laboratories. In the concluding section, we comment on technological aspects and industrial scaleup. 

Description Gypsum-impregnated fabric coverings, used with adhesive that crystallizes plaster for a permanent bond to the wall. Very strong, high tensile strength, impact and abrasion resistant. Can t be pulled loose. Attractive product line. May be used to permanently cover deteriorated surfaces, or as surface preparation for more lead-specific encapsulant. 

In conclusion, a description of a wide variety of test techniques can provide direction in choosing an appropriate test. The tests described in this section are under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D-14 on adhesives. It is suggested that before applying any of these test techniques, references should be made to the specific ASTM standard for detailed procedures. 

If we set out to unravel surface chemical functionalities with high spatial resolution down to atomic detail, we also encounter various practical (technical) problems. It is fair to say that the technique development for direct space analysis (again, we exclude Fourier space methods) is still lagging much behind. Chemical force microscopy can be considered as a first step in the direction of a true description of surface chemical functionalities with high spatial resolution in polymers, primarily based on the chemically sensitive analysis of AFM data via adhesion mapping. At this point the detailed theory for force spectroscopy is not developed beyond the description of London forces. The consideration of the effect of polar functional groups in force spectroscopy (similar to difficulties with solubihty parameter and surface tension approaches for polar forces, as well as specific interactions) is still in its infancy. Instead, one must still rely on continuiun contact mechanics to couple measured forces and surface free energies. 

Concluding the thermodynamic analysis, we would like to note that all the approaches are based on the general principles of thermodynamics and they do not account for specific features of pol3oner behavior used to explain properties of polymer solutions, adsorption, mechanical properties, etc. We believe that the science of adhesion should be transformed from general and qualitative descriptions to the quantitative analysis of the interphase phenomena based on statistical theories. It is also desirable to distinguish between adhesion at various phase borders such as non-polymeric solid-polymer, polymeric adhesive-an-other polymer (in any phase or aggregate state). 

The molecular description of the formation of an adhesive layer does not take into account the polymeric structure of adhesives either. It is based on determination of the number of adhesion or molecular bonds, n, per unitary area of a true contact surface and the energy of a single bond between two surfaces. During the formation of such bonds the adhesion strength. A, can be expressed by a specific work spent on the destruction of the adhesive joint ... 

The fundamental mechanism that determines how one material adheres to another material has not been unambiguously identified. Indeed, it appears that different mechanisms might be active in different adhesive joints depending on a variety of factors. Despite extensive and careful research, no definitive, universally accepted relationship has been established between specific atomic or molecular parameters at or near an interface and the strength of an adhesive bond. While the purpose of this chapter is to explore the measurement of mechanical properties of joints, a brief description of proposed mechanisms, or theories, responsible for adhesion is presented to provide insight into the interpretation of physical test results. Details of these theories are available in references [1-4], The following six theories are perhaps the most widely accepted mechanisms for one material adhering to another. 

Even though this CA model does not employ any of the previously presented mathematical descriptions of cell cycle or adhesion/migration, it must be noted that migration speeds, persistence of movement, and division times can be measured directly through time-lapse observation of cell migration [123-125]. In addition to the average values, these time-lapse techniques measure the distributions of these important parameters and, thus, provide a measure of the heterogeneity of the specific cell populations. 

The inherent properties of polymers of the poly isobutylene family, particularly the chemical inertness, age and heat resistance, long-lasting tack, flexibility at low temperatures, and the favorable FDA position on selected grades, make these products commercially attractive in a variety of pressure-sensitive and other adhesives, in automotive and architectural sealants, and in coatings. An added dimension is achieved in the blendability of the polyisobutylene polymers with each other and with other adhesive polymers such as natural rubber, styrene-butadiene rubber, EVA, low molecular weight polyethylene, and amorphous polypropylene to achieve specific properties. They can, for example, be blended with the highly unsaturated elastomers to enhance age and chemical resistance. A description of poly isobutylene polymer family use in adhesive and sealant applications follows. 

---