Polarization forces

Molecular interactions are the result of intermolecular forces which are all electrical in nature. It is possible that other forces may be present, such as gravitational and magnetic forces, but these are many orders of magnitude weaker than the electrical forces and play little or no part in solute retention. It must be emphasized that there are three, and only three, different basic types of intermolecular forces, dispersion forces, polar forces and ionic forces. All molecular interactions must be composites of these three basic molecular forces although, individually, they can vary widely in strength. In some instances, different terms have been introduced to describe one particular force which is based not on the type of force but on the strength of the force. Fundamentally, however, there are only three basic types of molecular force. 

The theory of molecular interactions can become extremely involved and the mathematical manipulations very unwieldy. To facilitate the discussion, certain simplifying assumptions will be made. These assumptions will be inexact and the expressions given for both dispersive and polar forces will not be precise. However, they will be reasonably accurate and sufficiently so, to reveal those variables that control the different types of interaction. At a first approximation, the interaction energy, (Ud), involved with dispersive forces has been calculated to be... 

Two Molecules Interacting and Held Together by Dispersive Forces and Polar Forces from Permanent Dipoles... 

The term "hydrophilic force", literally meaning "love of water" force, was introduced as a complement to "hydrophobic force". Hydrophilic forces are equivalent to polar forces, and polar solvents that interact strongly with water are called hydrophilic solvents. 

LW) interactions refer to the purely physical London s (dispersion), the Keesom s (polar) and Debye s (induced polar) interactions and correspond to magnitudes ranging from approximately 0.1 to 10 kJ/mol (but in rare cases may be higher). The polar forces in the bulk of condensed phases are believed to be small due to the self-cancellation occurring in the Boltzmann-averaging of the multi-body... 

The induction (polarization) forces arise from the effeet of a moment in a polar molecule inducing a charge separation in an adjaeent molecule. The average potential energy funetions are... 

The main difference between a molecule-molecule (M-M) collision and an ion-molecule (M+-M) collision is the presence of a polarization force in the latter system owing to the attraction between the static charge on M+ and the dipole moment induced on M. For a large inter molecular separation, the polarization energy is known as... 

The effect of molecular interactions on the distribution coefficient of a solute has already been mentioned in Chapter 1. Molecular interactions are the direct effect of intermolecular forces between the solute and solvent molecules and the nature of these molecular forces will now be discussed in some detail. There are basically four types of molecular forces that can control the distribution coefficient of a solute between two phases. They are chemical forces, ionic forces, polar forces and dispersive forces. Hydrogen bonding is another type of molecular force that has been proposed, but for simplicity in this discussion, hydrogen bonding will be considered as the result of very strong polar forces. These four types of molecular forces that can occur between the solute and the two phases are those that the analyst must modify by choice of the phase system to achieve the necessary separation. Consequently, each type of molecular force enjoins some discussion. 

Polar forces also arise from electrical charges on the molecule but in this case from permanent or induced dipoles. It must be emphasized... 

If the materials of interest are adsorbed on the surface of the solid impurities by polar forces, for example, due to contamination by substances such as silica, aluminum silicate or metal oxide, then they... 

Studies of Wetting and Capillary Phenomena at Nanometer Scale with Scanning Polarization Force Microscopy... 

Other noncontact AFM methods have also been used to study the structure of water films and droplets [27,28]. Each has its own merits and will not be discussed in detail here. Often, however, many noncontact methods involve an oscillation of the lever in or out of mechanical resonance, which brings the tip too close to the liquid surface to ensure a truly nonperturbative imaging, at least for low-viscosity liquids. A simple technique developed in 1994 in the authors laboratory not only solves most of these problems but in addition provides new information on surface properties. It has been named scanning polarization force microscopy (SPFM) [29-31]. SPFM not only provides the topographic stracture, but allows also the study of local dielectric properties and even molecular orientation of the liquid. The remainder of this paper is devoted to reviewing the use of SPFM for wetting studies. 

FIG. 1 Schematic representation of the operation of the scanning polarization force microscope (SPFM). An electrically biased AFM tip is attracted toward the surface of any dielectric material. The polarization force depends on the local dielectric properties of the substrate. SPFM images are typically acquired with the tip scanning at a height of 100-300 A. (From Ref. 32.)... 

As we have shown, the polarization force depends not only on the topography [through the f(R z) term] and dielectric constant e, but also on the local contact potential 4). As we shall see now, ac bias modulation and lock-in detection allow these contributions to be separated. 

Surface ions are thus expected to substantially contribute to the polarization force at low frequencies. Also, one expects different ions to have different solvation properties and mobility. These phenomena can be explored by SPFM. They are important in surface reactions, ionic exchange processes between surface and bulk ions, rock weathering, ion sequestration, and other enviromnental problems. 

The next two chapters are concerned with wetting and capillarity. Wetting phenomena are still poorly understood contact angles, for example, are simply an empirical parameter to quantify wettability. Chapter 6 reviews the use of scanning polarization force... 

The basic principles are described in many textbooks [24, 26]. They are thus only sketchily presented here. In a conventional classical molecular dynamics calculation, a system of particles is placed within a cell of fixed volume, most frequently cubic in size. A set of velocities is also assigned, usually drawn from a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution appropriate to the temperature of interest and selected in a way so as to make the net linear momentum zero. The subsequent trajectories of the particles are then calculated using the Newton equations of motion. Employing the finite difference method, this set of differential equations is transformed into a set of algebraic equations, which are solved by computer. The particles are assumed to interact through some prescribed force law. The dispersion, dipole-dipole, and polarization forces are typically included whenever possible, they are taken from the literature. 

The surfactants used as textile auxiliaries can be divided into four major groups, depending on the type and distribution of the polar forces, an arrangement broadly resembling the ionic classification of dyes. The general scheme is shown in Table 8.1. 

A bar of talc feels like a bar of soap which is why it is often called soapstone. Its exceptional softness (it is the softest of the Mohs minerals) is a direct result of its unusual crystal structure. This consists of sheets of silicate tetrahedra without metal ions between the sheets. Thus the sheets are bonded only by London polarization forces. The latter are particularly weak because silicate tetrahedra have relatively small polarizabilities. 

Although the behavior of the base perfume, and thus the odor value (OV) of each component, can be known, the OV in the new mixture will change because the OV depends largely on the solvent and the remaining aromatic components present in the perfume mixture. This is due to molecular size and in great extent to physical interactions at the molecular level, such as polarity forces (i.e. ion-dipole, dipole-dipole, hydrogen bonding forces, and others), in other words to the structure. 

Hansen (2007) has shown that the solubility parameter proposed by Hildebrand and Scott does not take into account the contribution of polar forces and hydrogen bonding, therefore, a more complex solubility parameter has been proposed ... 

---