THE FUNDAMENTAL MECHANISMS

Fluid mixing is a unit operation carried out to homogenize fluids in terms of concentration of components, physical properties, and temperature, and create dispersions of mutually insoluble phases. It is frequently encountered in the process industry using various physical operations and mass-transfer/reaction systems (Table 1). These industries include petroleum (qv), chemical, food, pharmaceutical, paper (qv), and mining. The fundamental mechanism of this most common industrial operation involves physical movement of material between various parts of the whole mass (see Supplement). This is achieved by transmitting mechanical energy to force the fluid motion. 

Basic Principles of Operation RO and NF are pressure-driven processes where the solvent is forced through the membrane by pressure, and the undesired coproducts frequently pass through the membrane by diffusion. The major processes are rate processes, and the relative rates of solvent and sohite passage determine the quality of the product. The general consensus is that the solution-diffusion mechanism describes the fundamental mechanism of RO membranes, but a minority disagrees. Fortunately, the equations presented below describe the obseiwed phenomena and predict experimental outcomes regardless of mechanism. 

Model Development PreHminary modeling of the unit should be done during the familiarization stage. Interactions between database uncertainties and parameter estimates and between measurement errors and parameter estimates coiJd lead to erroneous parameter estimates. Attempting to develop parameter estimates when the model is systematically in error will lead to systematic error in the parameter estimates. Systematic errors in models arise from not properly accounting for the fundamentals and for the equipment boundaries. Consequently, the resultant model does not properly represent the unit and is unusable for design, control, and optimization. Cropley (1987) describes the erroneous parameter estimates obtained from a reactor study when the fundamental mechanism was not properly described within the model. 

The combustion-flow interactions should be central in the computation of combustion-generated flow fields. This interaction is fundamentally multidimensional, and can only be computed by the most sophisticated numerical methods. A simpler approach is only possible if the concept of a gas explosion is drastically simplified. The consequence is that the fundamental mechanism of blast generation, the combustion-flow interaction, cannot be modeled with the simplified approach. In this case flame propagation must be formalized as a heat-addition zone that propagates at some prescribed speed. 

In the preceding sections, combustion was modeled as a prescribed addition of energy at a given speed. The fundamental mechanism of a gas explosion, namely, feedback in combustion-flow interaction, was not utilized. As a consequence, the behavior of a freely propagating, premixed, combustion process, which is primarily determined by its boundary conditions, was unresolved. 

One promising extension of this approach Is surface modification by additives and their Influence on reaction kinetics. Catalyst activity and stability under process conditions can be dramatically affected by Impurities In the feed streams ( ). Impurities (promoters) are often added to the feed Intentionally In order to selectively enhance a particular reaction channel (.9) as well as to Increase the catalyst s resistance to poisons. The selectivity and/or poison tolerance of a catalyst can often times be Improved by alloying with other metals (8,10). Although the effects of Impurities or of alloying are well recognized In catalyst formulation and utilization, little Is known about the fundamental mechanisms by which these surface modifications alter catalytic chemistry. 

Mass transfer of a solute dissolved in a fluid is not only the fundamental mechanism of mixing processes, it also determines the residence-time distribution in micro fluidic systems. As mentioned in Section 1.4, in many applications it is desir-... 

The fundamental mechanisms of free radical reactions were considered in Chapter 11 of Part A. Several mechanistic issues are crucial in development of free radical reactions for synthetic applications.285 Free radical reactions are usually chain processes, and the lifetimes of the intermediate radicals are very short. To meet the synthetic requirements of high selectivity and efficiency, all steps in a desired sequence must be fast in comparison with competing reactions. Owing to the requirement that all the steps be fast, only steps that are exothermic or very slightly endothermic can participate in chain processes. Comparison between addition of a radical to a carbon-carbon double bond and addition to a carbonyl group can illustrate this point. 

The primary factor controlling how much gas is in the form of discontinuous bubbles is the lamellae stability. As lamellae rupture, the bubble size or texture increases. Indeed, if bubble coalescence is very rapid, then most all of the gas phase will be continuous and the effectiveness of foam as a mobility-control fluid will be lost. This paper addresses the fundamental mechanisms underlying foam stability in oil-free porous media. 

Ackeskog et al. (1993) made the first heat transfer measurements in a scale model of a pressurized bubbling bed combustor. These results shed light on the influence of particle size, density and pressure levels on the fundamental mechanism of heat transfer, e.g., the increased importance of the gas convective component with increased pressure. 

Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain HIAR the cleavage of protein-protein cross-links,3,6 the disruption of cross-links involving calcium ions,5 an increase in tissue permeability for antibodies, and the removal of trace amounts of paraffin in the tissues. However, recent studies have indicated that the fundamental mechanism of HIAR is based on the cleavage of protein-protein cross-links. 

The size of the activation energy gives some insight into the fundamental mechanism of a chemical reaction. Consider the rearrangement reaction... 

Meeting these design criteria requires a sound knowledge of the fundamental mechanisms of electron transfer processes. Although ET is the most fundamental of all chemical reactions, it is by no means simple This realization is particularly evident in the case of long-range ET processes which forms the basis of this essay. 

Figure 1.27 Double-walled silica nanotubes with monodisperse diameters self-orga-nize into highly ordered centimetre-sized fibres, using a synthetic octa-peptide as a template. The growth mechanism is proposed to be the fundamental mechanism for growth processes in biological systems. (Reproduced from ref. 53, with permission.)...

Vesely [2b] concluded that since the value of 1/DP obtained (by extrapolation) at [A1C13] = 0, was approximately the same as that obtained from Norrish and Russell s results with stannic chloride [5], the fundamental mechanism of polymerisation by both catalysts must be the same. Whilst this may be so, it does not follow from this evidence, because the extrapolations are afflicted by considerable uncertainty and, moreover, it is now known that the transfer coefficients which determine the intercept depend on the nature of the catalyst. 

The identification and characterization of the processes of GPCR activation and inactivation have defined the genomics of the accessory proteins necessary to these processes. This has accelerated progress in understanding the fundamental mechanisms involved in GPCR synthesis, transport to the membrane, ligand binding, and activation and inactivation by GRK-mediated (and other) phosphorylation (192). 

It has not been possible to cover all aspects of the principles of fluidization. A number of comprehensive texts on fluidized bed behaviour are available and inevitably I have drawn heavily on these. The reader who wishes to go into greater depth about the fundamental mechanisms at work in fluidized beds should consult those works by Davidson and Harrison (1971), Botterill (1975), Davidson, Clift and Harrison (1985), Kunii and Levenspiel (1991) and more recently Gibilaro (2001). Full references can be found at the end of Chapter 1. In addition, I have concentrated on gas-solid fluidized beds somewhat to the exclusion of liquid-solid fluidization although an indication of how particulate fluidization can be applied to biochemical reactors is given in Chapter 7. 

Several different physicochemical models have been proposed to predict and explain the retention behavior in liquid-solid chromatography. The models can be divided into two groups depending on the assumptions made concerning the fundamental mechanism of the chromatographic process. The two assumptions are as follows ... 

Fluoropyrimidine-radiation interactions can best be understood in terms of the fundamental mechanisms by which fluoropyrimidines lead to DNA damage and ultimately cell death. Two such mechanisms have been described as ... 

---