Risk assessment contamination

The proposed method can be applied to the speciation analysis of environmental solids for risk assessment of their contaminants as well as to design of effective leaching schemes. 

Personal exposure Predictions of exposure of occupants to airborne contaminants for risk assessment, inhaled doses, or time-integrated concentration values. 

Most human or environmental healtli hazards can be evaluated by dissecting tlie analysis into four parts liazard identification, dose-response assessment or hazard assessment, exposure assessment, and risk characterization. For some perceived healtli liazards, tlie risk assessment might stop with tlie first step, liazard identification, if no adverse effect is identified or if an agency elects to take regulatory action witliout furtlier analysis. Regarding liazard identification, a hazard is defined as a toxic agent or a set of conditions that luis the potential to cause adverse effects to hmnan health or tlie environment. Healtli hazard identification involves an evaluation of various forms of information in order to identify the different liaz.ards. Dose-response or toxicity assessment is required in an overall assessment responses/cffects can vary widely since all chemicals and contaminants vary in their capacity to cause adverse effects. This step frequently requires that assumptions be made to relate... 

Chronic. Continuous exposure occurs over long periods of time, generally several mondis to years. Concentradons of inlialed (toxic) contaminants are usually reladvely low. This subject area falls in die general domain of healdi risk assessment (HRA) and it is diis subject tliat is addressed in die next five chapters. Thus, in contrast to the acute (short-term) exposures dial predominate in hazard risk assessments, cliroiiic (loiig-temi) exposures are the major concern in health risk assessments. 

An appropriate sampling program is critical in the conduct of a hcaltli risk assessment. This topic could arguably be part of the exposure assessment, but it has been placed within hazard identification because, if the degree of contamination is small, no further work may be necessary. Not only is it important that samples be collected in a random or representative manner, but the number of samples must be sufficient to conduct a statistically valid analysis. The number needed to insure statistical validity will be dictated by the variability between the results. The larger the variance, tlic greater the number of samples needed to define tire problem, ... 

Uncertainty on tlie other hand, represents lack of knowledge about factors such as adverse effects or contaminant levels which may be reduced with additional study. Generally, risk assessments carry several categories of uncertainly, and each merits consideration. Measurement micertainty refers to tlie usual eiTor tliat accompanies scientific measurements—standard statistical teclmiques can often be used to express measurement micertainty. A substantial aniomit of uncertainty is often inlierent in enviromiiental sampling, and assessments should address tliese micertainties. There are likewise uncertainties associated with tlie use of scientific models, e.g., dose-response models, and models of environmental fate and transport. Evaluation of model uncertainty would consider tlie scientific basis for the model and available empirical validation. 

The risk assessment steps and the risk characterization are influenced by uncertainty and variability. Variability arise from heterogeneity such as dose-response differences within a population, or differences in contaminant levels in tlie environment. Uncertainty on tlie other lumd, represents lack of knowledge about factors such as adverse effects or contaminant levels. 

Contamination of the production vessel leads to serious financial penalties and each step in the inoculum train is monitored for contamination. To reduce the risk of contamination during sampling it is usual to take a sample from the residue left in each vessel after its contents have been transferred to the next reactor. Since these contamination checks are retrospective, a heavy reliance is placed on the growth characteristics of the production organism. Kinetic variables such as growth rate and oxygen consumption rate are also used to assess the quality of the inoculum. 

Appendices This section is most likely to contain additional data associated with biological-based products. It should contain information as regards the facilities and equipment used for the manufacture of biotech products. Assessment of the risk of contamination from adventitious agents such as transmissible spongiform encephalopathy agents (TSEs), bacteria, mycoplasma, fungi or viruses should also be provided. Additional information on novel excipients that have not been used before should also be included in this section. 

Clewell HJ, Gentry PR, Gearhart JM, et al. 1995. Considering pharmacokinetic and mechanistic information in cancer risk assessments for environmental contaminants Examples with vinyl chloride and trichloroethylene. Chemosphere 31 2561-2578. 

Fan AM. 1988. Trichloroethylene Water contamination and health risk assessment. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 101 55-92. 

Chemical contaminants are usually not reduced or removed by processing steps. Chemical risks must preferably be controlled as early as possible in the agri-food chain. Food color additives (Section 7.1.3) are chemical compounds and are considered potential risks. Therefore a safety evaluation is part of the approval of a food colorant before its use is acknowledged by legislation (see also Section 7.1.6). This section explains the principles of risk assessment and includes an example of such an assessment of a specific food colorant. 

Cyanide contamination creates special public information problems, e.g. it is difficult to explain why cyanide is not included in the current drinking water standards but that aquatic organisms are affected at relatively low cyanide concentration. There is confusion on whether fresh water standards are based on free or complexed cyanides. Fortunately, the provision of a permanent drinking water supply to each affected household removed risk assessment as a major issue. 

Although there are many biocide alternatives available on the market, for example enzyme technology or bio-dispersants, there appears to be a continued requirement for the use of biocides in order to reduce the levels of microbiological contamination entering the paper making process. The increased awareness of environmental and safety aspects will continue to play an important role on the selection of biocides for paper making processes. The use of legislation to select biocides must be done in parallel with each plants internal risk assessment. No one biocide active will meet all the criteria set out by different European countries and hence the use of these actives must be carefully assessed on a plant by plant basis. 

Soil contamination was not perceived as a problem until the 1970s, when incidents in the U.S. and Europe (Love Canal, NY Times Beach, MO Lekkerkerk, the Netherlands) awakened public awareness about the serious threats posed to human health and the environment by abandoned or improperly managed hazardous wastes. In response to the growing public concern, the U.S., the Netherlands, and a number of other European countries started a systematic effort beginning in 1980 to identify potentially contaminated sites, assess the level of contamination, establish priorities for remediation based on risk assessment studies and gradually implement the required remedial actions. 

Many policies and practices have been adopted by European countries for the management of contaminated sites. Information about the various national polices, the technical approaches for risk assessment, and the progress of rehabilitation activities in Europe has been compiled in the framework of two European networks—CARACS (Concerted Action for Risk Assessment for Contaminated Sites) and CLARINET (Contaminated Land Rehabilitation Network for Environmental Technologies)—which were funded by the European Commission. A detailed description of European national policies can be found in relevant publications2 3 and in the CLARINET website (http //www.clarinet.at). 

Source From NATO/CCMS, Evaluation of Demonstrated and Emerging Technologies for the Treatment and Clean Up of Contaminated Land and Groundwater, NATO CCMS Pilot Study, Phase III, 1999 Annual Report, EPA 542/R-99/007, no. 235,1999 Ferguson, C. and Kasamas, H., Eds., Risk Assessment for Contaminated Sites in Europe, Vol. 2. Policy Frameworks, LGM Press, Nottingham, UK, 1999. With permission. 

Ferguson, C.C., Assessing risks from contaminated sites Policy and practice in 16 European countries, Land Contam. Reclamat., 7, 33-54, 1999. 

Ferguson, C. and Kasamas, H., Eds., Risk Assessment for Contaminated Sites in Europe, Vol. 2. Policy Frameworks, LGM Press, Nottingham, UK, 1999. 

The exposure pathways of concern identified during the baseline risk assessment include direct contact, with the possible ingestion of contaminated soil (1 x 10 3 4 associated excess cancer risk), and potential ingestion of contaminated groundwater in the future through existing or newly installed offsite wells (2 x 11 0 2 associated excess cancer risk). 

The MCL for TCE (5 pg/L) has been determined to be a relevant and appropriate remediation level for the contaminated groundwater at this site because the groundwater is used as a source for drinking water. Based on the site-specific risk assessment, the MCL has been determined to be sufficiently protective as the aquifer remediation goal. 

The risk assessment has also concluded that a level of 200 mg/kg for lead in the soil will be a protective level for expected site exposures along with an excess cancer risk level for TCE-contaminated soil (56 pg/L). Based on investigations of activities at the site, the TCE-contaminated soil has not been determined to be a listed RCRA hazardous waste, as the cleaning solution records indicate the solution contained less than 10% TCE. However, the lead-contaminated soil is an RCRA hazardous waste by characteristic in this instance due to extraction procedure (EP) toxicity. None of the waste is believed to have been disposed at the site after November 19, 1980 (the effective date for most of the RCRA treatment, storage, and disposal requirements). 

Rosenblatt, D.H. "Environmental Risk Assessment for Four Munitions-related Contaminants at Savanna Army Depot Activity," Technical Report 8110, U.S. Army Medical Bioengineering Research and Development Laboratory, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD, November 1981, AD A116650. 

In order to achieve that an environmental fate model is successfully applied in a screening level risk assessment and ultimately incorporated into the decisionmaking tools, the model should have computational efficiency and modest data input. Moreover, the model should incorporate all relevant compartments and all sources of contamination and should consider the most important mechanisms of fate and transport. Although spatial models describe the environment more accurately, such models are difficult to apply because they require a large amount of input data (e.g., detailed terrain parameters, meteorological data, turbulence characteristics and other related parameters). Therefore, MCMs are more practical, especially for long-term environmental impact evaluation, because of their modest data requirements and relatively simple yet comprehensive model structure. In addition, MCMs are also widely used for the comparative risk assessment of new and existing chemicals [28-33]. 

For human health risk assessment, it is necessary to elaborate realistic scenarios. Knowledge of real scenarios where the contaminant is emitted to the environment will help to obtain information about the fate and transport of the contaminant once emitted to the environment and the route of exposure for the human beings living in this scenario of concern. There are different types of exposure, i.e., direct, indirect (as is the case of food contaminated by the air, water, or soil contaminated by the emission), occupational exposure, and consumer goods coming from outside the scenario of concern. Depending on the objective of the study, it will be necessary to consider in the exposure assessment one or more types of exposure. 

---