Risk analysis exposure

European Commission for these and other substances by nominated dates. The toxicological data and estimation of exposure will form the basis of risk analysis and deterrnination of the appropriate restriction and control of substances in the workplace (58). Restriction of the sales of dangerous substances and preparations to the general pubHc is enforced under Directive 76/769 EC (59). 

Cliapter 10 Healdi Hazard Idendfication Cliapter 11 Dose-respoiise/Toxicity Assessment Cliapter 12 Exposure Assessment Cliapter 13 Risk Analysis and Characterizadon... 

Three approaches to risk analysis will be presented here for the available chlorpyrifos exposure data, namely (1) the single point, margin of safety approach (2) probability analysis and (3) Monte Carlo simulation. 

Although selection of the appropriate analysis techniques is often very problem specific, the basic elements of human health risk analysis are few, as presented in Figure 1. The figure shows that the aggregate risk to human health from exposure to an airborne pollutant results from two factors (1) the spread of the primary agent (and/or its... 

Each of the main risk analysis elements consists of three interactive studies. Exposure estimates result from the integration of pollutant dispersion patterns and human population patterns. The dispersion patterns, in turn, result from the joint action of emissions and dispersion processes. 

If linear (dose) models without thresholds are to be used for carcinogen (or other) risk assessment, estimation of exposure at specified levels becomes irrelevant to risk assessment or, at least, its use is nonintuitive. For example, a carcinogen risk analysis may be based on a linear, nonthreshold health effects model. The total health risk would thus be proportional to the long-term exposure summed for all affected people for the identified period, and exposure of many people at low concentrations would be equivalent to exposure of a few to high concentrations. The atmospheric dispersion that reduces concentrations would also lead to exposure of more people therefore, increments... 

Any analysis of risk should recognize these distinctions in all of their essential features. A typical approach to acute risk separates the stochastic nature of discrete causal events from the deterministic consequences which are treated using engineering methods such as mathematical models. Another tool if risk analysis is a risk profile that graphs the probability of occurrence versus the severity of the consequences (e.g., probability, of a fish dying or probability of a person contracting liver cancer either as a result of exposure to a specified environmental contaminant). In a way, this profile shows the functional relationship between the probabilistic and the deterministic parts of the problem by showing probability versus consequences. 

Each application has revealed new aspects that had not been considered previously (Table I). Nevertheless, the examples share one characteristic common to toxic chemical risk analysis an acceptable exposure level must be combined with a relationship between source concentration and estimated degree of exposure. This concept has been published previously(1,2,3) ... 

For the ecological assessment, risk analysis was based on the traditional PEC/ PNEC ratio (Hazard Quotient) where PEC is the predicted environmental concentration (resulting from chemical analysis) and PNEC the predicted no-effect concentration. Ecological assessment for aquatic species was based on rainbow trout or fathead minnow while terrestrial assessment was based on small rodents like mice rats and rabbits. Exposures associated with HQ<1 were considered negligible. 

EQS-QN] criteria for aquatic life and human health protection to characterise reference conditions and to prove ecological status class boundaries in surface water Exposure Exposure Exposure Risk analysis Risk estimate... 

Risk is the product of the probability of a release, thepjpbability of exposure, and the consequences of the exposure. Risk is usually described graphically, as shown in Figure 11-15. All companies decide their levels of acceptable risk and unacceptable risk. The actual risk of a process or plant is usually determined using quantitative risk analysis (QRA) or a layer of protection analysis (LOPA). Other methods are sometimes used however, ORA and LOPA are the methods that are most commonly used. In both methods the frequency of the release is determined using a combination of event trees, fault trees, or an appropriate adaptation. 

In formal EcoRA framework three phases of risk analysis are identified problem formulation, analysis, and risk characterization followed by risk management. The analysis phase includes an exposure assessment and an ecological effects assessment (see Figure 2). 

In the final phase of risk analysis—risk characterization—one integrates outputs of effects and exposure assessments. Risk is expressed in qualitative or quantitative estimates by comparison with reference values (e.g., hazard quotient). The severity of potential or actual damage should be characterized with the degree of uncertainty of risk estimates. Assumptions, data uncertainties and limitations of analyses are to be described clearly and reflected in the conclusions. The final product is a report that communicates to the affected and interested parties the analysis findings (Byrd and Cothern, 2000). 

Our assignment for EPA was to apply quantitative risk analysis methods to the determination of risk for a particular chemical. The health risks for perchloroethylene turned out to be highly uncertain, but by using decision analysis concepts we were able to display this uncertainty in terms of alternative assumptions about the dose response relationship. Similar methods might be used to characterize uncertainties about human exposure to a chemical agent or about the costs to producers and consumers of a restriction on chemical use. 

Islam MS, Zhao L, McDougal JN, et al. 1995. Uptake of chloroform by skin during short exposures to contaminated water. Risk Analysis 15(3) 343-352. 

The Risk Assessment process includes four steps hazard identification, hazard characterization (related term dose-response assessment), exposure assessment, and risk characterization. It is the first component in a risk analysis process. 

Paxton MB, Chinchilli VM, Brett SM, et al Leukemia risk associated with benzene exposure in the pliofilm cohort. II. Risk estimates. Risk Analysis 14 155-161, 1994... 

The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) report Intolerable Risk Pesticides in Our Children s Food focused on the increased risk of the adverse effects of pesticides on children. This was in part because of the smaller size of the child relative to the adult and because of different food consumption practices. Relative to their size, children eat, drink, and breathe more than adults in part because they are growing. The use and regulation of pesticides illustrate the complexities of risk analysis and risk management and the difficulties in determining an acceptable level of exposure with acceptable risks. In the United States approximately 1 billion pounds of pesticides (with about 600 different active ingredients) are used annually in the agricultural sector, and worldwide approximately 4 billion pounds are used. There are a range of human health and environmental health effects associated with the use of pesticides. 

Early risk evaluation often just looked at death as the main endpoint, asking if a particular action or exposure led to increases in death or reduced number of working years. Advances in the biological sciences have required that more complex risk analysis be undertaken to evaluate quality of life issues and not just death as an endpoint. The challenge for both risk assessment and risk management will be to take into consideration quality of life and individual values into the decisionmaking process. 

A number of potential risks are associated with plant-based pharmaceuticals these include allergen exposure to the public, pollen transfer to wild species, nontarget organism exposure due to persistence of genetically engineered material in the environment, interspecies gene flow, and contamination of nontransgenic crops intended for human consumption. The role of risk analysis with respect to the impact of plant-based biopharmaceuticals on human health and the environment are discussed in this chapter. 

Since risk analysis plays an important role in public policy decision making, efforts have been made to devise a means by which to identify, control, and communicate the risks imposed by agricultural biotechnology. A paradigm of environmental risk assessment was first introduced in the United States by Peterson and Arntzen in 2004. In this risk assessment, a number of assumptions and uncertainties were considered and presented. These include (1) problem formulation, (2) hazard identihcation, (3) dose-response relationships, (4) exposure assessment, and (5) risk characterization. Risk assessment of plant-made pharmaceuticals must be reviewed on a case-by-case basis because the plants used to produce proteins each have different risks associated with them. Many plant-derived biopharmaceuticals will challenge our ability to define an environmental hazard (Howard and Donnelly, 2004). For example, the expression of a bovine-specihc antigen produced in a potato plant and used orally in veterinary medicine would have a dramatically different set of criteria for assessment of risk than, as another example, the expression of a neutralizing nonspecihc oral antibody developed in maize to suppress Campylobacter jejuni in chickens (Peterson and Arntzen, 2004 Kirk et al., 2005). 

Remember that animal data are the basis for the calculation of the risks created by exposure. Thus, any risk analysis exercise might be of questionable value. 

Travis, Curtis C., and Sheri T. Hester. 1990. Backgrormd Exposure to Chemicals What Is the Risk Risk Analysis 10 463-66. 

Wallace, Lance. 1993. A Decade of Studies of Human Exposure What Have We Learned Risk Analysis 13 (April) 135-39. 

---