Hazard Identihcation

Hazard identihcation, oral slope factors, and oral and inhalation unit risks for carcinogenic effects... 

Since risk analysis plays an important role in public policy decision making, efforts have been made to devise a means by which to identify, control, and communicate the risks imposed by agricultural biotechnology. A paradigm of environmental risk assessment was first introduced in the United States by Peterson and Arntzen in 2004. In this risk assessment, a number of assumptions and uncertainties were considered and presented. These include (1) problem formulation, (2) hazard identihcation, (3) dose-response relationships, (4) exposure assessment, and (5) risk characterization. Risk assessment of plant-made pharmaceuticals must be reviewed on a case-by-case basis because the plants used to produce proteins each have different risks associated with them. Many plant-derived biopharmaceuticals will challenge our ability to define an environmental hazard (Howard and Donnelly, 2004). For example, the expression of a bovine-specihc antigen produced in a potato plant and used orally in veterinary medicine would have a dramatically different set of criteria for assessment of risk than, as another example, the expression of a neutralizing nonspecihc oral antibody developed in maize to suppress Campylobacter jejuni in chickens (Peterson and Arntzen, 2004 Kirk et al., 2005). 

Hazards identihcation inclndes (1) spillage and accidental release measures (2) proper methods of handling, storage, transportation, and waste disposal (3) personal protection and (4) first-aid measures and hre fighting. 

Health risk assessment has 4 major components hazard identiHcation dose-response assessment exposure assessment and, risk characterization. 

Hazard identihcation is the most important safety process in that, if it fails, all other processes are likely to be ineffective. (245)... 

The expected benehts of hazard identihcation are a decrease in incidents of injuries, a decrease in lost workdays and absenteeism, a decrease in workers compensation costs, increased productivity, and better cooperation and communication. The baseline for determining the benefit of the hazard identification can be formulated from existing company data on occupational injuries/illnesses, workers compensation, attendance, proht, and production. 

Super or near-critical water is being studied to develop alternatives to environmentally hazardous organic solvents. Venardou et al. utilized Raman spectroscopy to monitor the hydrolysis of acetonitrile in near-critical water without a catalyst, and determined the rate constant, activation energy, impact of experimental parameters, and mechanism [119,120]. Widjaja et al. tracked the hydrolysis of acetic anhydride to form acetic acid in water and used BTEM to identify the pure components and their relative concentrations [121]. The advantage of this approach is that it does not use separate calibration experiments, but stiU enables identihcation of the reaction components, even minor, unknown species or interference signals, and generates relative concentration profiles. It may be possible to convert relative measurements into absolute concentrations with additional information. 

The following are the major subjects of the book the various institutions, agencies, and programs involved in chemicals regulation (Chapter 2). The data for hazard assessment (Chapter 3) and the hazard assessment process, i.e., identihcation and characterization of the various toxicological effects and the associated test methods (Chapter 4). Standard setting for threshold effects (Chapter 5) and non-threshold effects (Chapter 6). Exposure assessment (Chapter 7) and risk characterization (Chapter 8). Regulatory standards set by various bodies (Chapter 9) and combined actions of chemicals in mixture (Chapter 10). 

The U.S. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 required careful analysis of the consequences of any federally funded project. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 established guidelines for handling, transport, and hauling of hazardous materials, such as required in cleanup of soil contaminants. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 established, for the hrst time, strict mles on legal liability for soil contamination. CERCLA stimulated identihcation and cleanup of thousands of contaminated land sites, and consequently raised awareness of property buyers and sellers to make soil contamination a focal issue of land use and management practices (US-EPA 2007c). 

HACCP is a systematic approach to the identihcation, evaluation, and control of food safety hazards. This methodology, which in effect seeks to plan out unsafe practices, differs from traditional produce and test quality assurance methods which are less successful and inappropriate for highly perishable foods. HACCP is used in the food industry to identify potential food safety hazards, so that key actions, known as critical control points (CCPs) can be taken to reduce or eliminate the risk of the hazards being realized. HACCP is a systematic preventative approach to food safety that addresses physical, chemical, and biological hazards as a means of prevention rather than finished product inspection. The system is used at all stages of food production and preparation processes. HACCP is also being applied to industries other than food, such as cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. 

PHA analysis is both a system safety analysis type and technique for identifying for the early identihcation of hazards and potential mishap risk. The PHA provides a methodology for identifying and collating hazards in the system and estabhshing the initial SSRs for design from preliminary and limited design information. The intent of the PHA is to affect the DFS as early as possible in the development process. The PHA normally does not continue beyond the SSHA time frame. 

---