Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Formulation problems

Many design scholars do not distinguish between problem identification and problem formulation. The Author believes, however, that there is a fundamental difference between these two activities that should be understood well by inventive engineers. [Pg.134]

Problem identihcation may be understood as the process of the acquisition of knowledge that is relevant to a given inventive problem. This knowledge may be in multiple forms since it is intended for the humans who will use it to understand the problem before they attempt to solve it. This body of knowledge is universal, and it is not associated with any specific inventive design method. [Pg.134]

For all these reasons, in the following chapter we will discuss problem formulation in the context of various inventive design methods. [Pg.135]

We confine our attention to the case where the cracks lie along a single line in an infinite viscoelastic medium. This line is taken to be the x-axis. The problem [Pg.140]

Consider the stress distribution in such a problem. Let us subtract from this the applied stresses at infinity, thus giving the distribution for the problem where the stresses tend to zero at infinity and have uniform applied stresses, of the same magnitude and opposite sign, on the open crack faces. It is clear that this distribution also obeys the dynamical equation (1.8.17), since the applied stresses, which are independent of position, contribute nothing. This latter problem is more convenient in the context of the methodology introduced in the present chapter, and will be adopted as the statement of the problem. The stress distribution of final interest may be deduced trivially, once the problem is solved. [Pg.141]

Problems involving a crack in a field of bending will also be considered, where the neutral axis is the y-axis. For such problems, the stress is zero on the open crack face and linear in x along the A -axis, at large distances from the origin. By subtracting this linear term, we obtain a linear stress distribution on the open crack face and no divergent stresses at infinity. Also, the equilibrium equations still hold. [Pg.141]

The method which we shall use here in fact applies to quite general distributions of stress over the open crack face, so there is no difficulty about the space dependence of the stresses in the case of a crack in a field of bending. In the development of the methodology, no assumptions will be made concerning the stress distribution on the crack face. This generality is not entirely spurious in that it will be useful for theoretical reasons in Sect. 4.7. [Pg.141]

Our approach is based on the viscoelastic Kolosov-Muskhelishvili equations, as in the case of contact problems. Consider the general form, given by (2.8.9). These relations must hold over the entire complex plane, where 0(z, /) V ( 0 are analytic everywhere, except on some or all of the real axis, and go to zero at infinity as 1/z, according to (2.8.12). [Pg.141]

As mentioned before, the ecological risk assessment is characterized by a problem formulation process, analysis containing characterizations of exposure and effects, and a risk characterization process. Several outlying boxes serve to emphasize the importance of discussions during the problem formulation process between the risk assessor and the risk manager, and the critical nature of the acquisition of new data, verification of the risk assessment, and monitoring. The next few sections detail each aspect of this framework. [Pg.362]

Stressor characteristics form an important aspect of the risk assessment process. Stressors can be biological, physical, or chemical in nature. Biological stressors could include the introduction of a new species or the [Pg.362]

Schematic of the framework for ecological risk assessment (U.S. EPA1992). Especially important is the interaction between exposure and hazard and the inclusion of a data acquisition, verification, and monitoring component. Multivariate analyses will have a major impact on the selection or assessment and measurement endpoints and will play a major role in the data acquisition, verification, and monitoring phase. [Pg.363]

Problem formulation. This part of risk assessment is critical because of the selection of assessment and measurement endpoints. The ability to choose these endpoints generally relies upon professional judgment and the evaluation of the current state of the art. However, a priori selection of assessment and measurement endpoints may prevent the risk assessor from consideration of unexpected impacts. [Pg.364]

Stressors vary not only in their composition but in other characteristics derived in part from their use patterns. These characteristics are usually listed as intensity (concentration or dose), duration, frequency, timing, and scale. Duration, frequency, and timing address the temporal characteristics of the contamination while the characteristic scale addresses the spatial aspects. [Pg.364]

We consider systems consisting of two electrons and an infinitely massive nucleus of charge Z, moving subject to the nonrelativistic Hamiltonian (in hartree atomic units, me = it = c = 47r o= 1) [Pg.409]

Here r, (with magnitude r,) describes the position of electron i relative to the nucleus, rj2 is the interelectron distance ri —r2l, and V, is with respect to the coordinates of r,. We will later refer to the momentum operators p, = — iV,-. [Pg.409]

The ground-state wavefunction will be antisymmetric in the spin coordinates of the two electrons and symmetric in their spatial coordinates. It will also have zero orbital angular momentum (an S state) the most general S state can be shown to depend only on the interparticle distances ri, r2, and ri2 [11]. We construct it from a basis of functions of the form [Pg.409]

The basis we have chosen is not that which has been used in the majority of the studies of three-body systems. The most-used basis, often called a Hylleraas basis, consists of functions of the form [Pg.409]

Optimum values of the y, were then determined variationally, [Pg.410]

The model of the plate considered in this section actually corresponds to a shallow shell having zeroth curvatures. The gradient of the punch surface is assumed to be rather small, so that the nonpenetration condition imposed in the domain is the same as in the usual case for a plate. Meanwhile, the restriction imposed on the crack faces contains three components of the displacement vector. [Pg.95]

Denote next by % = (IT, w) a displacement vector of the mid-surface points of the plate, where W = is horizontal displacements and w is [Pg.96]

Assume that the equation 2 = x,y) describes a punch shape, x,y) G 0, G 6 (0). A nonpenetration condition for the plate-punch system can be written as [Pg.96]

The equilibrium problem for the plate contacting with the punch z = x, y) [Pg.97]

In view of the convexity and the differentiability of H, this problem is equivalent to the next one find the function % = (IF,w) G satisfying [Pg.97]

The construction of the CID allows the evaluation of exchangeable loads for each stream in each composition interval. Hence, one can create a TEL for the waste streams in which the exchangeable load of the ith waste stream within the itth interval is defined as [Pg.127]

On the other hand, since the flowrate of each MSA is mfltnown, exact capacities of MSAs cannot be evaluated. Instead, one can create a TEL per unit mass of the MSAs for the lean streams. In this table, the exchangeable load per unit mass of the MSA is determined as follows  [Pg.127]

The above program (P6.1) is a linear program that seeks to minimize  [Pg.128]

The dephenolization problem was described in Section 3.2. The data for the waste and the lean streams are summarized by Tables 6.1 and 6.2. [Pg.128]

Stream Description Flowrate Gi (kg/s) Supply composition yf Target cor7ipH sition y i [Pg.129]

Although we do not advocate a strictly linear approach, it is most easily communicated through a series of steps, each comprising simple checklists that the risk assessor and manager might usefully adopt. [Pg.12]

Problem formulation will logically continue into the specification stage. The specification makes operational the issues identified in the problem formulation whereas problem formulation sets out what needs to be done, the specification sets out how this is to be achieved. [Pg.13]

Process measurements are subject to errors. These errors give rise to discrepancies in material and energy balances. [Pg.76]

Data reconciliation is the process of adjusting or reconciling the process measurements to obtain more accurate estimates of flowrates, temperatures, compositions, etc., that are consistent with material and energy balances. [Pg.76]

Let us first define the models to be used in our formulation of the data reconciliation problem. [Pg.76]

In the absence of gross errors, the measurement vector can be written as [Pg.76]

Note that x and y e 91, that is, we are assuming that all process variables are measured. [Pg.76]

Chemical production networks consist of a number of chemical production sites where multiple interdependent plants are located. At each site multiple chemicals are produced and/or consumed. For each chemical and at each site, tanks are available for intermediate storage. Local deficits or surpluses of chemicals have to be balanced by imports or exports of chemicals. It is assumed that aU sites are capable to use rail transports for balancing, i.e. ah sites have a rail road access as well as shunting and turnover fecilities for RTCs. For each chemical, a fieet of RTCs is available for transportation. Transports are performed by rail operators offering train capacities in regular intervals. Therefore, complete trains are composed at the sites which are handed over to the rail operator. [Pg.90]

On the operational level it is assumed that parameters are known and deterministic. It is to decide about the short-term distribution of the considered chemicals in the network such that the total operational costs for transport, turnover, and storage are minimized. More precisely, it is to decide about [Pg.90]

The task of selecting a set of movable gates is shared by many timing-driven placement algorithms. Since our transformation can be enacted by any high-level con- [Pg.68]

After the set of movable gates has been determined, we precompute a discrete set of candidate assignments for each. Our method imposes no restrictions on how these candidates are obtained, as there are several possible strategies ranging from simple to exotic. In the case of placement, examples include the following  [Pg.69]

Although our experiments are limited to multi-move placement, it is important to note that candidate assignments need not necessarily be new physical locations for instance, cell / is shown to have two possible sizes, indicating different candidate power levels for the gate. Similar assignments can be obtained if considering dual [Pg.69]

5 Gate Sizing During Timing-Driven Placement [Pg.70]

Alternatively, if rebuffering will not occur, more elaborate and accurate timing models are appropriate. For instance, the Elmore delay model captures a quadratic function of wirelength on 2-pin nets  [Pg.71]

The first step in ctetermining the MOC is to construct the CID for the problem to r resent the waste streams along with the process and external MSAs. The CID is shown in Fig. (6.1) for the case when the minimum allowable cmnposition differences are 0.001. Hence, one can evaluate the exchangeable loads for the two waste streams over each composition interval. Diese loads are calculated dnough Eqs. (6.2) and (6.3). The results are illustrated by Table 6.3. [Pg.129]

We will start by discussing the smooth ODE case. DAEs and discontinuous system dynamics will be considered in Secs. 7.3.1, 7.3.2, respectively. [Pg.244]

Other than in the simulation task, where the behavior of a mechanical system could be studied even before it has been build, the PI problem requires a set of measurements on the real life mechanical system in order to improve the mathematical model and the knowledge about the parameters therein. [Pg.244]

Let us be given a mathematical model for a multibody system with the states x together with a model for the measurement (output function) y. Let us assume that in this model there are ne unknown model parameters 0 E [Pg.244]

The solutions x,y depend on the parameter 0 and the initial value x to) = 5o-Often, the initial value is an unknown system parameter too, which has to be identified. Thus the complete set of quantities to be identified is [Pg.244]

The measurements are in general polluted by some random measurement error Sij, We make the following assumptions. [Pg.244]

Essentials of Toxic Chemical Risk Science and Society [Pg.162]

Palm-based biomass i with flowrate is split into the potential technology j with the flowrate of W and the potential technology g in the CHP with the flowrate of W.  [Pg.67]

Palm-based biomass i is converted into intermediate k via technology at the production [Pg.67]

the intermediate k can be distributed to potential technology / for further process to produce palm product q. The spUtting constraint of intermediate k is written as [Pg.67]

Palm product q can be determined by converting intermediate k at the conversion rate of via the technology f  [Pg.68]

The total production rate of palm product q is written as [Pg.68]


As already discussed, variations of a field unknown within a finite element is approximated by the shape functions. Therefore finite element discretization provides a nat ural method for the construction of piecewise approximations for the unknown functions in problems formulated in a global domain. This is readily ascertained considering the mathematical model represented by Equation (2.40). After the discretization of Q into a mesh of finite elements weighted residual statement of Equ tion (2.40), within the space of a finite element T3<, is written as... [Pg.42]

The result given below provides the solvability of the optimal control problem formulated. [Pg.180]

The considered problem is formulated as a variational inequality. In general, the equations (3.140)-(3.142) hold in the sense of distributions. In addition to (3.143), complementary boundary conditions will be fulfilled on F, X (0,T). The exact form of these conditions is given at the end of the section. The assumption as to sufficient solution regularity requires the variational inequality to be a corollary of (3.140)-(3.142), the initial and all boundary conditions. The relationship between these two problem formulations is discussed in Section 3.4.4. We prove an existence of the solution in Section 3.4.2. In Section 3.4.3 the main result of the section concerned with the cracks of minimal opening is established. [Pg.212]

If the problem formulation is too large in scope, (a) break it up into manageable parts and/or (b) simplify the objective function and model. [Pg.742]

Many techniques exist for solution of the equilibrium, buckling, and vibration problems formulated in the preceding subsections. The techniques range from fortuitous exact solutions that are obtained essentially by observation through numerical approximations such as finite element... [Pg.288]

Solutions of this nature ignore practical considerations of noise, hazardous areas, etc. unless these are specifically entered as constraints. Furthermore, if the site is geometrically complex, then additional detail will need to be included in the problem formulation. [Pg.71]

Some of these questions have strict and unambiguous answers, in a mathematical model, to other answers are derived from extensive empirical material. The present paper will discuss the problems formulated above, but concerning only rheological properties of filled polymer melts, leaving out the discussion of specific hydrodynamic effects occurring during their flow in channels of different geometrical form. [Pg.71]

In the unrestricted treatment, the eigenvalue problem formulated by Pople and Nesbet (25) resembles closely that of closed-shell treatments.-On the other hand, the variation method in restricted open-shell treatments leads to two systems of SCF equations which have to be connected in one eigenvalue problem (26). This task is not a simple one the solution was done in different ways by Longuet-Higgins and Pople (27), Lefebvre (28), Roothaan (29), McWeeny (30), Huzinaga (31,32), Birss and Fraga (33), and Dewar with co-workers (34). [Pg.334]

In this paper we present a meaningful analysis of the operation of a batch polymerization reactor in its final stages (i.e. high conversion levels) where MWD broadening is relatively unimportant. The ultimate objective is to minimize the residual monomer concentration as fast as possible, using the time-optimal problem formulation. Isothermal as well as nonisothermal policies are derived based on a mathematical model that also takes depropagation into account. The effect of initiator concentration, initiator half-life and activation energy on optimum temperature and time is studied. [Pg.322]

In order to define and compare in a concise way the different problem formulations, let s designate as... [Pg.141]

In this alphabet, each batch is assigned its own symbol. The problem formulation allows for the same combination of product and size to be selected multiple times. Hence the schedules that have the same batch type in two or more different positions will be enumerated multiple times, even though they represent schedules which are indistinguishable from one another. [Pg.277]

Thus, the next step in the problem-solving analysis is to use information about the domain of the problem, in this case flowshop scheduling, and information about dominance and equivalence conditions that is pertinent to the overall problem formulation, in this case as a state space, to convert the experience into a form that can be used in the future problem-solving activity. [Pg.300]

The type of theories we will be using to prove dominance and/or equivalence of solutions will not be specific to the particular problem domain, but will rely on more general features of the problem formulation. Thus, for our flowshop example, we will not rely on the fact that we are dealing with processing times, end-times, or start-times, to formulate the general theory. The general theory will be in terms of sufficient statements about the underlying mathematical relationships, as described in Section III. [Pg.309]

Expressing this theory shifts the emphasis of creating specific knowledge for each problem formulation, to developing pieces of theory for more general problems. The method allows the computer to put these pieces together, based on the specific details of the problem, and the opportunities that the problem solving reveals. [Pg.314]


See other pages where Formulation problems is mentioned: [Pg.121]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.1242]    [Pg.1278]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.320]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.322 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.19 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.76 , Pg.77 , Pg.277 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.59 ]




SEARCH



Alternative Formulation of the Variational Problem

An Alternative Formulation of the Variational Problem

Conduction, heat problem, variational formulation

Control Problem Formulation

Design problem formulation

Documenting Problem Formulation

Ecological risk assessment problem formulation

Electrostatics, different formulations problem

Energy problem formulation

Environmental problem formulation

FIGURE 2.1 The main components of problem formulation

Facilitate formulation problem

First problem formulation

Formulation of Multi-objective-Optimization Problem

Formulation of Physicochemical Problems

Formulation of Pseudo-distribution Problem

Formulation of Reactor Problems

Formulation of a Reduced Reconciliation Problem

Formulation of forward and inverse problems for different geophysical fields

Formulation of the Functional Estimation Problem

Formulation of the Learning Problem

Formulation of the MOO Problem

Formulation of the Nonorthogonal Div-Curl Problem

Formulation of the Parameter Estimation Problem

Formulation of the Problem for a Three-Component System

Formulation of the boundary problem

Formulation of the elastic field inverse problem

Formulation of the inverse problem in general mathematical spaces

Formulation of the nonlinear inverse problem

Formulation of the nonlinear wavefield inverse problem

Formulation of the problem

Formulation of the three-body ionisation problem

Formulation of the timing problem

Formulation solubility problems

Freedom Analysis and Problem Formulation

General Formulation of the Optimization Problem

General Formulation of the Problem

General problem formulation

Generic Problem Formulations

Genetic algorithm problem formulation

Green Matrix Formulation of the Problem

Hamiltonian problem formulation

Integral Formulation of Viscoelastic Problems

Learning Problem Formulations

Many-body problem statistical formulation

Mathematical Formulation of the Order Allocation Problem

Methane problem formulation

Mixed-integer dynamic optimization problem formulation

Molecule, design problem formulation

Multi-objective Optimization Problem Formulation

One Level Optimisation Problem Formulation for Binary Mixtures

Optimisation Problem Formulation

Optimisation Problem Formulation and Solution

Optimization problems problem formulation

Order scheduling problem formulation

Phase Equilibria I Problem Formulation

Phase equilibria formulation of problems

Phase equilibria problems, formulation

Presentation of problem formulation

Probabilistic ecological risk assessments problem formulation

Problem Statement for the Zero Effluent Scheduling Formulation

Problem formulation level

Problem formulation regulatory policies

Reinforced steep slopes definition and formulation of the problem

Solubility problems in formulation

Stage 2 Problem formulation

Steady-State Pipeline Network Problems Formulation

The Hencky model. Problem formulation

Three-Dimensional Mixed Formulation for Creeping Flow Problems

Two Dimensional Penalty Formulation for Creeping Flow Problems

Understanding the Procedure to Approach, Formulate, and Solve Material Balance Problems

Variational formulation of the problems

What Are the Implications of Probabilistic Methods for Problem Formulation

© 2024 chempedia.info