Risk analysis evaluation

Mark Cook is a Reservoir Engineer and Petroleum Economist. He has worked on international assignments mainly in Tanzania, Oman, the Netherlands and the UK. His main focus is in economic evaluation of field development projects, risk analysis, reservoir management and simulation. After 11 years with a multinational company he co-founded TRACS International of which he is Technical Director. 

It is essential that good techniques be developed for identi ng significant hazards and mitigating them where necessaiy. Hazards can be identified and evaluated using approaches discussed in the section on hazard and risk analysis. 

In the past, qualitative approaches for hazard evaluation and risk analysis have been able to satisfy the majority of decision makers needs. In the future, there will be an increasing motivation to use QRA. For the special situations that appear to demand quantitative support for safety-related decisions, QRA can be effective in increasing the manager s understanding of the level of risk associated with a company activity. Whenever possible, decision makers should design QRA studies to produce relative results that support their information requirements. QRA studies used in this way are not subject to nearly as many of the numbers problems and limitations to which absolute risk studies are subject, and the results are less likely to be misused. 

The acronym for chemical process quantitative risk analysis. It is the process of hazard identification followed by numerical evaluation of incident consequences and frequencies, and their combination into an overall measure of risk when applied to the chemical process industry. It is particularly applied to episodic events. It differs from, but is related to, a probabilistic risk analysis (PRA), a quantitative tool used in the nuclear industry... 

Quantitative risk analysis (QRA) is a powerful analysis approach used to help manage risk and improve safety in many industries. When properly performed with appropriate respect for its theoretical and practical limitations, QRA provides a rational basis for evaluating process safety and comparing improvement alternatives. However, QRA is not a panacea that can solve all problems, make decisions for a manager, or substitute for existing safety assurance and loss prevention activities. Even when QRA is preferred, qualitative results, which always form the foundation for QRA, should be used to verify and support any conclusions drawn from QRA. 

The American Chemistry Council, formerly the Chemical Manufacturers Association (CMA), and the American Institute of Chemical Engineers Center for Chemical Process Safety (AIChE/CCPS) have jointly published Evaluating Process Safety in the Chemical Industry User s Guide to Quantitative Risk Analysis. This is a revised and updated edition of Evaluating Process Safety in the Chemical Industry A Manager s Guide to Quantitative Risk Analysis, published in 1989 by CMA. 

Erdmann, R. C. et al., 1976, ATWS A Reappraisal Part If Evaluation of Societal Risks Due to Reactor Protection System Failure Vol IIBWR Risk Analysis EPRINP-265,. ugust. 

Kdly, J. E. et al 1976, ATWS, A Reappraisal Part II, Evaluation of Societal Risks due to Reactor Protection System Failure Vol.3 PWR Risk Analysis, EPRINP 265, August. 

A Safety Case is a narrative that literally makes the case that an adequate level of safety has been reached for an installation. It requires looking at all potential hazards which could lead to a loss of the installation, a loss of life, or a major pollution event. A risk analysis is performed on each hazard evaluating the probability of the event occurring and describing the magnitude of the consequences. A discussion is then given of the measure undertaken to lower the probability of occurrence or to mitigate the consequences and a case is made that the risk for the installation meets the ALARP safety criteria. 

The purpose of this analysis was to assess the risk of operating Limerick Station, specifically with regard to its location near a high population density area. These risks were evaluated to determine whether they represent a disproportionately high segment of the total societal risk from postulated nuclear reactor incidents. 

Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis(CPQRA) The numerical evaluation of both incident consequences and probabilities or frequencies and their combination into an overall measure of risk. 

Risk analysis The development of a quantitative estimate of risk based on engineering evaluation and mathematical techniques for incident consequences or frequencies. 

Chapter 14 Introduction to Hazard Risk Assessiiiciit Chapter 15 Evcnt/Haaird Identification Chapter 16 Accident Causes and Probability Chapter 17 Accident Consequences and Evaluation Chapter 18 Hazard Risk Analysis... 

As a general rule, clinical data are required as evidence to support conformity with the requirements of the Active Implantable Medical Devices (AIMD) and the Medical Device (MD) directives with regards to safety and effectiveness under the normal conditions of use, evaluation of undesirable side effects, and the acceptability of the benefit/risk ratio. Risk analysis should be used to establish key objectives that need to be addressed by clinical data, or alternatively to justify why clinical data are not required (mainly for Class I devices). The risk analysis process should help the manufacturer to identify known (or reasonably foreseeable) hazards associated with the use of the device, and decide how best to investigate and estimate the risks associated with each hazard. The clinical data should then be used to establish the safety and effectiveness of the device under the intended use conditions, and to demonstrate that any of the residual risks are acceptable, when weighed against the benefits derived from use of the device. 

This chapter provides general information for performing qualitative or quantitative risk assessments on buildings in process plants. For detailed guidance on risk assessment techniques, the user is referred to other CCPS books on this subject, including Reference 3, Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures, Second Edition, and Reference 4, Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis. 

Palarski J. and Lutynski M. Capacity of an abandoned coal mibe converted into high pressure C02 reserovir. Economic evaluation and risk analysis of mineral projects, London, UK. 2008 Taylor Francis. 

The terminology used varies considerably. Hazard identification and risk assessment are sometimes combined into a general category called hazard evaluation. Risk assessment is sometimes called hazard analysis. A risk assessment procedure that determines probabilities is frequently called probabilistic risk assessment (PRA), whereas a procedure that determines probability and consequences is called quantitative risk analysis (QRA). 

Although risk analysis of new facilities is required by Ref. 39, the method of conducting the analysis is left quite open. The reference suggests fault hazard analysis, fault tree analysis, or sneak circuit analysis. Ref. 41 is an example of a thorough hazards evaluation and risk analysis for a new facility at Radford Army... 

F. T., "Hazard Evaluation and Risk Analysis of the NC Thermal Dehy Facility - Bldg. 3507," Report No. HA-79-R-2, Hercules Aerospace Division, Radford Army Ammunition Plant, Radford,... 

It is difficult to identify all of the possible events and their consequences in a complex chemical processing plant without the application of systematic procedures and proper management techniques. Several hazard evaluation procedures have been developed. Most of these procedures are described in other AIChE/CCPS publications such as Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures [2,3] and Guidelinesfor Quantitative Risk Analysis [4]. Other publications on hazard evaluation techniques include [246,247]. 

It is most important that the whole life cycle of a process plant can be evaluated on safety. Safety and risk analyses evaluate the probability of a risk to appear, and the decisions of necessary preventative actions are made after results of an analysis. The aim of the risk estimation is to support the decision making on plant localization, alternative processes and plant layout. Suokas and Kakko (1993) have introduced steps of a safety and risk analysis in Figure 2. The safety and risk analysis can be done on several levels. The level on which the analysis is stopped depends on the complexity of the object for analysis and the risk potential. 

---