Qualitative Results

There are some theoretical developments and practical implementations of methods, allowing to solve 3D reconstruction problem. They differ on their technical characteristics, scheme of data collecting and processing, qualitative results of the obtained images. 

There are three modihed intermediate neglect of differential overlap (MINDO) methods MINDO/1, MINDO/2, and MINDO/3. The MINDO/3 method is by far the most reliable of these. This method has yielded qualitative results for organic molecules. However its use today has been superseded by that of more accurate methods such as Austin model 1 (AMI) and parameterization method 3 (PM3). MINDO/3 is still sometimes used to obtain an initial guess for ah initio calculations. 

The modihed neglect of diatomic overlap (MNDO) method has been found to give reasonable qualitative results for many organic systems. It has been incorporated into several popular semiempirical programs as well as the MNDO program. Today, it is still used, but the more accurate AMI and PM3 methods have surpassed it in popularity. 

The smallest basis sets are called minimal basis sets. The most popular minimal basis set is the STO—3G set. This notation indicates that the basis set approximates the shape of a STO orbital by using a single contraction of three GTO orbitals. One such contraction would then be used for each orbital, which is the dehnition of a minimal basis. Minimal basis sets are used for very large molecules, qualitative results, and in certain cases quantitative results. There are STO—nG basis sets for n — 2—6. Another popular minimal basis set is the MINI set described below. 

STO—nG n = 2—6) n primitives per shell per occupied angular momentum s,p,d). STO—3G is heavily used for large systems and qualitative results. The STO—3G functions have been made for H with three primitives (3.v) through Xe(15.vl2/i6r/). STO—2G is seldom used due to the poor quality of its results. The larger STO—nG sets are seldom used because they have too little flexibility. 

You can use the information obtained from semi-empirical calculations to investigate many thermodynamic and kinetic aspects of chemical processes. Energies and geometries of molecules have clear relation ships to chemical ph en om ena. 0ther quan tities, like atomic charges and Frontier Orbitals, are less defined but provide useful qualitative results. 

J Chem. Phys., 52, 431 (1970)] is a relatively inexpensive one and can be used for calculations on quite large molecules. It is minimal in the sense of having the smallest number of functions per atom required to describe the occupied atomic orbitals of that atom. This is not exactly true, since one usually considers Is, 2s, and 2p, i.e., five functions, to construct a minimal basis set for Li and Be, for example, even though the 2p orbital is not occupied in these atoms. The 2sp (2s and 2p), 3sp, 4sp, 3d,. .., etc. orbitals are always lumped together as a shell , however. The minimal basis set thus consists of 1 function for H and He, 5 functions for Li to Ne, 9 functions for Na to Ar, 13 functions for Kand Ca, 18 functions for Sc to Kr,. .., etc. Because the minimal basis set is so small, it generally can not lead to quantitatively accurate results. It does, however, contain the essentials of chemical bonding and many useful qualitative results can be obtained. 

With a favorable isotherm and a mass-transfer resistance or axial dispersion, a transition approaches a constant pattern, which is an asymptotic shape beyond which the wave will not spread. The wave is said to be self-sharpening. (If a wave is initially broader than the constant pattern, it will sharpen to approach the constant pattern.) Thus, for an initially uniformly loaded oed, the constant pattern gives the maximum breadth of the MTZ. As bed length is increased, the constant pattern will occupy an increasingly smaller fraction of the bed. (Square-root spreading for a linear isotherm gives this same qualitative result.)... 

TABLE 8. Examples of Possible Conclusions Using Qualitative Results... 

Quantitative risk analysis (QRA) is a powerful analysis approach used to help manage risk and improve safety in many industries. When properly performed with appropriate respect for its theoretical and practical limitations, QRA provides a rational basis for evaluating process safety and comparing improvement alternatives. However, QRA is not a panacea that can solve all problems, make decisions for a manager, or substitute for existing safety assurance and loss prevention activities. Even when QRA is preferred, qualitative results, which always form the foundation for QRA, should be used to verify and support any conclusions drawn from QRA. 

We have been discussing a class of penetration problems that are accurately modeled by two-dimensional calculations. There are many three-dimensional problems, however, that can be well approximated by two-dimensional analyses, and the greatly reduced computer memory and time requirements for such calculations make them attractive alternatives for scoping studies, or for parameter sensitivity studies. Although good quantitative predictions may not be obtained with such approximations, the calculations can be expected to reveal trends and qualitative results that will carry over to the full three-dimensional problem. 

Although experimental results could be fitted well with irreversible rate models, ignoring thermodynamic facts could be disastrous. Although reversibility moderated the maximum temperature at runaway, it was not the most important qualitative result. In fact, the one dimensional (directional, or irreversible, correctly) model was not realistic at these conditions. For the prediction of incipient runaway and the AT ax permissible before runaway, the reversibility was obviously important. 

This section describes how both hypothetical and real accidents are analyzed. These methods varying greatly in complexity and resource requirements, and multiple methods may be used in an analysis. A simple method is used for screening and prioritization followed by a more complex method for significant accident scenarios. Some methods give qualitative results more complex methods give quantitative results in the form of estimated frequencies of accident scenarios. The process systems in Figures 3.3.1-1 and 3.3.1-2 are used in the examples. 

Qualitative results of checklist analyses vary, but generally the analysis produces the answers yes, no, not applicable, or needs more information. The checklist is included in the PrHA report to summarize the noted deficiencies. Understanding these deficiencies leads to sa fety improvement alternatives for consideration, and to identified hazards with suggested actions. I igtires 3.3,1-4 and 3.3.1-5 present checklist analyses of the Dock 8 HF Supply and the Cooling tower chlorination respectively. 

The same qualitative results based on steric and electronic properties of the steroid ring system are found regardless of the structure of the peracid. Thus, although the generality of stereochemistry can be discussed with regard to all peracids, a quantitative comparison is valuable in some instances. 

Inspection of the HRA event tree reveals that the dominant human error is Error A the operator failing to isolate the propane valves first. The other potential human errors are factors only if a propane isolation valve sticks open. Based on these qualitative results alone, a manager rrught decide to periodically train operators on the proper procedure for isolating a failed condenser and to ensure that operators are aware of the potential hazards. The manager might... 

A system checklist is useful to identify compliance problems and also tliose areas of die system diat require furdier hazard evaluation. The niediod is easy to use and can be applied to any component of a given system such as equipment, instrunientation, materials, and procedures. Tliis mediod, which produces qualitative results, must be prepared by an engineer dioroughly experienced with die system once die checklist is prepared, however, it can be used by engineers or managers who may have less tecluiical experience widi die system. ... 

STO-3G [H-Xe] Minimal basis set (stripped down in the interest of performance) use for more qualitative results on very large systems when you cannot afford even 3-21G. 5 1 6D... 

As defined above, F consists of three operators acting simultaneously on the state G >. More generally, one may prescribe any of 10 possible time-orderings to the operators H, and. That is, specify certain intermediate state dependencies, so that, for example FilG >= (H )( G >) would in general be expected to yield results different from, say, F2 G > H( ( G>)). While we will be solely concerned with the synchronous time ordering defined above, we do not expect the qualitative results to depend critically on this choice. 

Earlier in this chapter we considered the effect of orbital interactions on a previously noninteracting system. But suppose now we take as starting point two interacting orbitals 4>A and B of equal energy and we introduce a change in electronegativity at centers A and B. The qualitative results of such a perturbation are again well known from elementary quantum chemistry ... 

Although the exact pH at the stoichiometric point depends on what weak acid is being titrated, the qualitative result of Example is reproduced for every titration of a weak acid with a strong base. At the stoichiometric point of a weak acid titration, the exact value of the pH is determined by for the conjugate base, and it is always greater than 7.0. 

The goal in this chapter has been to show that it is possible to perform simulations relevant to electrochemistry-based ab initio surface calculations, without including all known physical effects. Focusing on trends and differences rather than absolute values, the approach in some cases yields not only qualitative results, but also (semi)-quantitative predictions. 

Examples of tunneling in physical phenomena occur in the spontaneous emission of an alpha particle by a nucleus, oxidation-reduction reactions, electrode reactions, and the umbrella inversion of the ammonia molecule. For these cases, the potential is not as simple as the one used here, but must be selected to approximate as closely as possible the actual potential. However, the basic qualitative results of the treatment here serve to explain the general concept of tunneling. 

Most of the SFE-SFC devices developed are designed to obtain qualitative results. However, various quantitative analyses of polymer additives have been reported [82,87,91-93], The ability to remove the SCF is particularly important when SFE is coupled on-line... 

Various authors have described on-line LC-SFC coupling [947,948]. Coupling of LC to SFC with conventional-size LC columns, where only a small fraction of the peak of interest is transferred to the SFC, allows only for qualitative results, and does not address the need for improved sensitivity in cSFC. Cortes et al. [948] have described relatively large-volume sample introductions (>10 xL) into cSFC, using microcolumn LC in the first dimension. LVI-LC-cSFC provides enhanced sensitivity compared with conventional cSFC injection techniques. LC-cSFC is expected to be of utility in the characterisation of complex samples, and in the determination of components which are thermally labile do not contain significant chromophores or do not have sufficient volatility to be analysed by GC. 

---