Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Repeatability trace analysis

It is a well-known fact that the precision in trace analysis decreases with diminishing concentration in a similar way as it does with decreasing sample weight (Sect. 2.1). The dependency of the repeatability and reproducibility standard deviation on the concentration of analytes has been investigated systematically at first by Horwitz et al. [1980] on the basis of thousands of pieces of interlaboratory data (mostly from food analysis). The result of the study has been represented in form of the well-known Horwitz trumpet which is represented in Fig. 7.3. [Pg.207]

The introduction of EU directives on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment and Reduction of Hazardous Substances has highlighted the need for precise and repeatable elemental analysis of heavy metals in the plastics production process. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectroscopy has emerged as the most economical and effective analytical tool for achieving this. A set of certified standards, known as TOXEL, is now available to facilitate XRF analyses in PE. Calibration with TOXEL standards is simplified by the fact that XRF is a multi-element technique. Therefore a single set of the new standards can be used to calibrate several heavy elements, covering concentrations from trace level to several hundred ppm. This case study is the analysis of heavy metals in PE using an Epsilon 5 XRF spectrometer. [Pg.30]

To recognise ion suppression reactions, the AE blend was mixed together either (Fig. 2.5.13(a) and (b)) with the cationic quaternary ammonium surfactant, (c, d) the alkylamido betaine compound, or (e, f) the non-ionic FADA, respectively. Then the homologues of the pure blends and the constituents of the mixtures were quantified as presented in Fig. 2.5.13. Ionisation of their methanolic solutions was performed by APCI(+) in FIA-MS mode. The concentrations of the surfactants in the mixtures were identical with the surfactant concentrations of the blends in the methanolic solutions. Repeated injections of the pure AE blend (A 0-4.0 min), the selected compounds in the form of pure blends (B 4.0—8.8 min) and their mixtures (C 8.8— 14.0 min) were ionised and compounds were recorded in MID mode. For recognition and documentation of interferences, the results obtained were plotted as selected mass traces of AE blend (A b, d, f) and as selected mass traces of surfactant blends (B a, c, e). The comparison of signal heights (B vs. C and A vs. C) provides the information if a suppression or promotion has taken place and the areas under the signals allow semi-quantitative estimations of these effects. In this way the ionisation efficiencies for the pure blends and for the mixture of blends that had been determined by selected ion mass trace analysis as reproduced in Fig. 2.5.13, could be compared and estimated quite easily. [Pg.181]

Earlier, we considered in some detail how the three Ish orbitals on the hydrogen atoms transform. Repeating this analysis using the short-cut rule just described, the traces (characters) of the 3 x 3 representation matrices are computed by allowing E, 2C3, and... [Pg.679]

Typically splitless injection is used for trace analysis by capillary GC. Splitless injections can exhibit problems with carryover, poor repeatability, and labile analytes. Penton (1991) reports improved results with the temperature-programmable injector. With a temperature-programmable injector, samples are injected into a glass insert at an injector temperature below the boiling point of the analysis solvent the injector temperature is then rapidly programmed to a higher value. Penton reported this technique offered greater ease of optimization and improved precision. [Pg.248]

The reaction products are separated and ignited the tritium content of the polymer, as determined by radiation trace analysis, is proportional to the number of metal—polymer bonds. A part of these bonds was generated by transfer to organometal (see Chap. 7, Sect. 5.1). The measurement is therefore repeated several times at various conversions. The number of active... [Pg.428]

When first put into use—and every few months thereafter— the flow conditions for optimum response of the FID should be determined. This can be done by the time-honored method of repeated injections while varying the flow rate of air and especially of hydrogen or by a faster method recently publicized (18). This test takes but a few minutes to execute but can improve analytical results considerably. To even mention FID optimization may well be redundant. It has been my experience, however, that most gas chromatographs equipped with flame ionization detectors are run under less than ideal flow conditions. In trace analysis, this oversight may be crucial. [Pg.42]

The real difficulties remain in the determination of U. It is relatively simple to determine the method uncertainty of nondestructive analysis as repeated measurements can be performed on the same sample [39]. It is far more difficult with destructive methods and in particular in organic trace analysis. In the latter case, all the steps in the procedure rarely allow one to achieve a repeatability with a relative standard deviation of less than several percent. The methods often require a large sample intake as samples of a few milligrams are not easy to handle in extraction systems. [Pg.139]

The attractive features of splitless injection techniques are that they allow the analysis of dilute samples without preconcentration (trace analysis) and the analysis of dirty samples, since the injector is easily dismantled for cleaning. Success with individual samples, however, depends on the selection of experimental variables of which the most important sample size, sample solvent, syringe position, sampling time, initial column temperature, injection temperature and carrier gas flow rate, often must be optimized by trial and error. These conditions, once established, are not necessarily transferable to another splitless injector of a different design. Also, the absolute accuracy of retention times in splitless injection is generally less than that found for split injection. For splitless injection the reproducibility of retention times depends not only on chromatographic interactions but also on the reproducibility of the sampling period and the evaporation time of the solvent in the column inlet, if solvent effects (section 3.5.6.2) are employed. The choice of solvent, volume injected and the constancy of thermal zones will all influence retention time precision beyond those for split injection. For quantitative analysis the precision of repeated sample injections is normally acceptable but the method is subject to numerous systematic errors that may... [Pg.185]

The experimental technique for the trace analysis of metals simply involves the production of an emitter of acceptable quality. In general, 10 /im tungsten wires are activated at high temperature with benzonitrile in a multiple activation device. As the result of such an activation process, the tungsten wire is covered with dendrites of partially ordered pyrocarbon. Due to the small radii of curvature of the tips of the microneedles, the field strength is enhanced to a. level suitable for FDMS. These emitters are mechanically stable, which is important for repeated use they can also be chemically and thermally strained. This property is a prerequisite for the pyrolysis of the organic matrix and desorption of the metal cations, and last not least, the surface area of the emitter is sufficient for sample application. [Pg.22]

Like any analytical procedure, trace analysis is subject to sources of error that can lead to systematic and random falsification of the observed values or test results. The reliability of results is therefore determined by the accuracy and precision. Measures of the precision are repeatability and reproducibility. [Pg.113]

Jahr [55] used Autoloop-GC-MS for the trace analysis of phenols in water at the low-ng/L level. The phenols were derivatized by in-sample acetylation with acetic acid anhydride prior to automated SPE GC MS. The method was validated with 26 alkyl-, chloro-, and mononitrophenols these included 4-nonyl-phenol and 17-ethinylestradiol. Repeatability was good and the sensitivity in the time-scheduled SIM mode was excellent. [Pg.183]

First of all optimise the data. Data should be expanded to a scale where transitions of interest can be clearly seen in the context of the trace. It may be helpful to slope the data so that areas of flat response are shown as flat. The eye can interpret more easily from the horizontal. The process of sloping simply pivots the data graphically it is not a curve fitting or smoothing process so has no effect on transitions or calculations performed. Sometimes transitions are missed simplybecause they are very small compared to a major transition. Inspect the whole trace carefully if looking for small events. Remember, if a transition cannot be repeated it is imhkely to be real. If in doubt repeat the analysis. [Pg.40]

This recrystallised acid is pure in the norm y accepted sense of the word, namely it has a sharp m.p. and gives on analysis excellent values for carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen. If however it is subjected to one-dimensional paper chromatography (p. 53), the presence of traces of unchanged anthranilic acid can be detected, and repeated recrystallisation is necessary to remove these traces. [Pg.223]

The distribution of impurities over a flat sihcon surface can be measured by autoradiography or by scanning the surface using any of the methods appropriate for trace impurity detection (see Trace and residue analysis). Depth measurements can be made by combining any of the above measurements with the repeated removal of thin layers of sihcon, either by wet etching, plasma etching, or sputtering. Care must be taken, however, to ensure that the material removal method does not contaminate the sihcon surface. [Pg.526]

The next level of presentation is a technical summary that gives details of the risks including the system s importance measures systems, effects of data changes, and assumptions that are critical to the conclusions. It details the conduct of the analysis - especially the treatment of controversial points. The last level of presentation includes all of the details including a roadmap to the analysis so a peer can trace the calculations and repeat them for verification. [Pg.238]


See other pages where Repeatability trace analysis is mentioned: [Pg.410]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.6311]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.6310]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.2964]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.1082]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.714]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.537]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.88]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.113 ]




SEARCH



Trace analysis

© 2024 chempedia.info