Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Rankings

Once a given lead compound is selected, the design project for a safer analog is defined. In all, the whole computer-aided process can be simply described in six major steps  [Pg.595]

manipulation and optimization of lead compound(s) and soft drugs  [Pg.595]

calculation of the necessary electronic properties and charge distributions [Pg.595]

calculation of log Po and log W using either equations from regression analysis or neural network approaches  [Pg.595]

Following synthesis and experimental testing of a few best candidates, further refinements are possible for example, experimental results might suggest different weighting for properties used in ranking. Some illustrative examples are provided in the following chapter. [Pg.595]


Clearly, the conflicts that have arisen in this problem have not been too helpful in identifying sequences which are candidates for further evaluation. A little more intelligence could be used in apphcation of the heuristics, and they could be ranked in order of... [Pg.134]

Equation (5.8) tends to predict vapor loads slightly higher than those predicted by the full multicomponent form of the Underwood equation. The important thing, however, is not the absolute value but the relative values of the alternative sequences. Porter and Momoh have demonstrated that the rank order of total vapor load follows the rank order of total cost. [Pg.137]

Rank order Total vapor flow (kmol h )... [Pg.139]

Solution Table 5.4 gives the total vapor flow for difierent sequences in rank order. The sequence with the lowest total vapor flow is shown in Fig. 5.4. [Pg.139]

Had only one of the four heuristics been used throughout, the rank order for the sequence from each heuristic would have been... [Pg.139]

Heuristic Rank order of sequence from Table 5.4... [Pg.139]

In Example 5.3, heuristic 4 seemed to be the most important. Had heuristic 4 been used exclusively for this example, the sequence ranked fifth in Table 5.6 would have been obtained. [Pg.140]

The properties of the various coals in this ranking will vary considerably and many are used only for specific purposes. [Pg.103]

For similar molecular weights, the following are ranked by order of decreasing solubility ... [Pg.168]

The parametric method is an established statistical technique used for combining variables containing uncertainties, and has been advocated for use within the oil and gas industry as an alternative to Monte Carlo simulation. The main advantages of the method are its simplicity and its ability to identify the sensitivity of the result to the input variables. This allows a ranking of the variables in terms of their impact on the uncertainty of the result, and hence indicates where effort should be directed to better understand or manage the key variables in order to intervene to mitigate downside and/or take advantage of upside in the outcome. [Pg.168]

One significant feature of the Parametric Method is that it indicates, through the (1 + K 2) value, the relative contribution of each variable to the uncertainty in the result. Subscript i refers to any individual variable. (1 + K ) will be greater than 1.0 the higher the value, the more the variable contributes to the uncertainty in the result. In the following example, we can rank the variables in terms of their impact on the uncertainty in UR. We could also calculate the relative contribution to uncertainty. [Pg.169]

Figure 6.12 Ranking of impact of variables on uncertainty in reserves... Figure 6.12 Ranking of impact of variables on uncertainty in reserves...
Keywords reducing uncertainty, cost-effective information, ranking sources of uncertainty, re-processing seismic, interference tests, aquifer behaviour, % uncertainty, decision tree analysis, value of information, fiscal regime, suspended wells, phased development. [Pg.173]

The same procedure may be used to rank the parameters themselves (GRV, N/G, ((>, S, Bg, recovery factor), to indicate which has the greatest influence on the HCIIP or ultimate recovery (UR). [Pg.176]

The ranking process is an important part of deciding an appraisal programme, since the activities should aim to reduce the uncertainty in those parameters which have the most impact on the range of uncertainty in HCIIP or UR. [Pg.176]

Keywords economic model, shareholder s profit, project cashflow, gross revenue, discounted cashflow, opex, capex, technical cost, tax, royalty, oil price, marker crude, capital allowance, discount rate, profitability indicators, net present value, rate of return, screening, ranking, expected monetary value, exploration decision making. [Pg.303]

With unlimited resources, the investor would take on all projects which meet the screening criteria. Project ranking is necessary to optimise the business when the investor s resources are limited and there are two or more projects to choose between. [Pg.324]

At discount rates less than 18%, Proposal 1 is more favourable in terms of NPV, whereas at discount rates above 18%, Proposal 2 is more attractive. NPV is being used here as a ranking tool for the projects. At a typical cost of capital of, say, 10%, Proposal 1... [Pg.324]

The plot immediately shows whioh of the parameters the 10% NPV is most sensitive to the one with the steepest slope. Consequently the variables can be ranked in order of their relative impact. [Pg.327]

When considering exploration economics, the possibility of spending funds with no future returns must be taken into account. A typical world-wide success rate for rank exploration activity is one commercial discovery for every ten wells drilled. Hence a probabilistic estimation of the reserves resulting from exploration activity must take into account the main risks and uncertainties in the volume of hydrocarbons in place, the recoverable hydrocarbons, and importantly the risk of finding no hydrocarbons at all. [Pg.327]

H. Schmidli. Reduced Rank Regression. Physica-Verlag, 1995. [Pg.893]

The multipole moment of rank n is sometimes called the 2"-pole moment. The first non-zero multipole moment of a molecule is origin independent but the higher-order ones depend on the choice of origin. Quadnipole moments are difficult to measure and experimental data are scarce [17, 18 and 19]. The octopole and hexadecapole moments have been measured only for a few highly syimnetric molecules whose lower multipole moments vanish. Ab initio calculations are probably the most reliable way to obtain quadnipole and higher multipole moments [20, 21 and 22]. [Pg.188]

There are higher multipole polarizabilities tiiat describe higher-order multipole moments induced by non-imifonn fields. For example, the quadnipole polarizability is a fourth-rank tensor C that characterizes the lowest-order quadnipole moment induced by an applied field gradient. There are also mixed polarizabilities such as the third-rank dipole-quadnipole polarizability tensor A that describes the lowest-order response of the dipole moment to a field gradient and of the quadnipole moment to a dipolar field. All polarizabilities of order higher tlian dipole depend on the choice of origin. Experimental values are basically restricted to the dipole polarizability and hyperpolarizability [21, 24 and 21]. Ab initio calculations are an imponant source of both dipole and higher polarizabilities [20] some recent examples include [26, 22] ... [Pg.189]

The exponential fiinction of the matrix can be evaluated tln-ough the power series expansion of exp(). c is the coliinm vector whose elements are the concentrations c.. The matrix elements of the rate coefficient matrix K are the first-order rate constants W.. The system is called closed if all reactions and back reactions are included. Then K is of rank N- 1 with positive eigenvalues, of which exactly one is zero. It corresponds to the equilibrium state, witii concentrations r detennined by the principle of microscopic reversibility ... [Pg.790]

Figure Bl.12.11. Angular variation of the second- and fourth-rank Legendre polynomials. Figure Bl.12.11. Angular variation of the second- and fourth-rank Legendre polynomials.

See other pages where Rankings is mentioned: [Pg.135]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.976]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.717]    [Pg.1181]    [Pg.1190]    [Pg.1191]    [Pg.1271]    [Pg.1469]    [Pg.1479]    [Pg.1484]    [Pg.1503]    [Pg.1505]    [Pg.1505]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.423 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.168 , Pg.169 , Pg.170 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.31 , Pg.43 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.171 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.257 , Pg.260 , Pg.281 , Pg.309 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.12 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.189 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.171 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.224 , Pg.226 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.49 , Pg.446 , Pg.478 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.49 , Pg.446 , Pg.478 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.6 , Pg.8 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.94 , Pg.96 , Pg.97 , Pg.98 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.171 , Pg.175 , Pg.176 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.65 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.203 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.193 ]




SEARCH



A Ranking Approach to Multiple Stressor, Wide-Area Ecological Risk Assessment

Absolute rank

Advantages and Dangers of the Ranking Approach

Affinity Ranking in Compound Mixtures

Affinity ranking

Averaged rank

Biological rank-ordered

Boiling-point rankings

Bond cleavage, ranking

Carbon Acids and Ranking of Electron-Withdrawing Groups

Case Study 1 Ranking of Suppliers

Catalyst ranking

Classification by rank

Coal Types, Ranking, and Analysis

Coal low-rank

Coal rank

Coal rank defined

Coal rank density

Coal rank properties

Comparison of Ranking Methods

Competitive Rankings and Analysis

Competitive rankings

Compound, compounds ranking

Concordant ranked

Correlation analysis, Spearman Rank

Coxeter Schemes of Finite Valency and Rank

Criticality ranking

Crystal structure prediction stability ranking

Cumulative ranking equations

Cycle rank

Cycle rank density

Cycle rank theory

Data matrix rank

Degeneracy matrix rank

Delplot rank

Density variation with rank

Design space ranking

Dimension and rank

Direct Method for Discovering and Ranking Multiple Ligands

Discordant ranked

Down rank

Economics process ranking

Effect of Composition and Rank

Electrical properties ranking of GRTP

Electron sources ranking

Electron-withdrawing groups ranking

Element ranking list

Energy rank

Evaluating and Ranking the Options

Evidence ranking level

Evolutionary rank analysis

Example Facility Ranking Process

Excitation rank

Experimental ranking

Factor full-rank method

Factor local rank methods

Family rank

Feature Selection and Ranking

First-rank tensor operator

Flammability hazard ranking

Fourth-rank tensor

Fourth-rank tensor invariants

Fracture Energy ranking

Frequency analysis importance ranking

Full-rank factorization

Full-rank method

Gauss-Jordan Elimination, Rank and Singularity

General Observations on Five Highly Ranked Options

Generalized Ranking of Electron Sinks

Generalized Ranking of Electron Sources

Generalized rank annihilation

Generalized rank annihilation factor analysis

Generalized rank annihilation factor analysis (GRAFA)

Generalized rank annihilation method

Generalized rank annihilation method GRAM)

Geologic ranking

Geologic ranking factors

Geologic ranking process

Group Supplier Rankings

Hazard Ranking Methods

Hazard Ranking System, remediation site

Hazard probability ranking, qualitative

Hazard ranking system

Hazards ranking

High moisture low-rank coal

High-rank bituminous coal

Higher rank tensor

Image total rank

Importance ranking

Individual Supplier Rankings

Influence of Coal Rank

Intensity ranking

Kendall’s Rank Correlation

Laboratory Studies Part 4 - Ranking Test

Local rank constraint

Local rank pixel

Log-rank test

Low-rank coals, liquefaction

MPI Comm rank

Matrix generic rank

Matrix rank analysis

Maximal rank

Maximum rank

Maximum rankings, comparison

Mean rank

Measurement ranked

Median rank

Median rank equation

Merit ranking method

Minimum rank

Model ranking evaluation

Multi-Criteria Ranking Methods

Multi-Criteria Ranking Methods for Supplier Selection

Multidimensional ranking

Net Flow and Rough Sets Two Methods for Ranking the Pareto Domain

Network rank

Newman projections ranking the stability

Nucleophilicity ranking

Operator rank

Operators Second-rank tensor

Order of rank

Order parameters fourth rank

Organizing and Ranking Available Exposure Information

Overall Rankings

Oxidation and Rank

Paired alternate ranking

Pareto parameter/ranking

Pareto ranking

Partial order ranking

Particle rank

Pharmaceutical properties ranking

Phenol different ranks with

Phenomena Identification and Ranking

Phenomena Identification and Ranking Table

Pollution prevention ranking

Poly sulfide rank

Polysulfide sulfur rank

Potential Losses and Risk Ranking of Probabilities

Potential erroneous ranking

Preliminary ranking of the factors

Process safety analysis ranking methods

Product rank

Project ranking

Project screening and ranking

Rank

Rank

Rank 1 case

Rank 1 update

Rank Risks

Rank algorithm

Rank analyses

Rank analyses Kruskal-Wallis test

Rank analysis, three dimensional

Rank and Eigenvalues

Rank annihilation

Rank annihilation factor analysis

Rank clearance

Rank coefficient

Rank correlation

Rank correlation analysis

Rank curve

Rank deficiency

Rank estimates

Rank fitness

Rank function

Rank numbers

Rank of a critical point

Rank of a matrix

Rank of coal

Rank of matrix

Rank of operators

Rank of the algebra

Rank of the matrix

Rank of three-way arrays

Rank of two-way arrays

Rank order function

Rank order of potency

Rank order tests

Rank ordering

Rank pulse shearometer

Rank reduction

Rank sums

Rank test

Rank value

Rank, percentage conversion

Rank, tensor properties

Rank-based selection

Rank-deficient problem

Rank-nullity theorem,

Rank-one connection

Rank-one correction

Rank-order

Rank-order approach

Rank-order approach exceptions

Rank-order correlation

Rank-ordered biological data

Rank/status/dominance

Ranke, Leopold

Ranked data

Ranked solvents

Ranking Hazard Controls

Ranking Suppliers

Ranking and Prioritizing Pesticides in Terms of Risk to the Environment

Ranking common plastics

Ranking equations

Ranking factor

Ranking function

Ranking functions for mass spectra

Ranking hazards by risk

Ranking index

Ranking materials

Ranking methods

Ranking model

Ranking model quality

Ranking needs

Ranking of Acids and Bases, the pKa Chart

Ranking of Functions

Ranking of Suppliers

Ranking of Synthesis Plans

Ranking of molecular formulas

Ranking of steps

Ranking of structural formulas

Ranking of the Criteria

Ranking power

Ranking probability

Ranking process

Ranking rule-based

Ranking scale

Ranking scheme and battery of tests approach

Ranking systems

Ranking table

Ranking team tasting

Ranking test

Ranking tests, applications

Ranking the Four Factors

Ranking the Options

Ranking the Potential

Ranking the Priority for Attention

Ranking the Stability of Newman Projections

Ranking unit, definition

Rankings Within Industry Groups

Ranks in Tsarist Russia

Ranks’ effect

Reactivity ranking

Reduced rank regression

Reflectance variation with rank

Relative Ranking of Potencies

Relative ranking techniques

Risk Ranking Tools

Risk Ranking of Near Miss Incidents

Risk Ranking of the Hydraulic Winch System

Risk ranking

Risk ranking features

Risk ranking matrix

Risk ranking methods

Risk ranking types

Risk-Based Ranking

Risk-Ranking Approach

Risks Ranking Table

Screening applicants ranking candidates

Signed rank test

Similarity Search Results, Ranking

Similarity ranking

Software rank correlations

Spearman rank correlation

Spearman rank correlation coefficient

Spearman’s rank -order correlation

Spearman’s rank correlation

Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient

Spearman’s rank correlation test

Structure Ranking

Subbituminous rank

Submatrix Ranking Operators

Suitability rankings

Sulfur rank

Summary of Ranking Results

Symmetric rank 1 update

Symmetrical rank

System safety risk ranking

THE CHEMISTRY OF LOW-RANK COALS

Tensor first rank

Tensor of rank

Tensor rank zero

Tensor second rank

Tensor third-rank

Test chambers ranking

The Rank of a Matrix

The Wilcoxon signed rank test

Thermal properties ranking

Third-rank spin tensor

Tied ranks

Total order ranking method

Transformation second-rank tensor

Triboelectric rank

Uncertainty ranking

United States Ranking table

Up rank

Use of Lp Metric for Ranking Alternatives

Use of Lp Metric for Ranking Suppliers

Variables ranked

Variables ranked according to clinical importance

Vitrinite reflectance limits and ASTM coal rank

When Rank Category

Wilcoxon rank sum test

Wilcoxon signed rank test

Wilcoxon’s signed rank test

© 2024 chempedia.info