Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Ranking unit, definition

Ranking Unit. "Ranking unit" refers to an environmental issue at a facility. The definition of a ranking unit is derived directly from its use in the Environmental Survey. A ranking unit is a composite of similar and related environmental problems located in approximately the same geographic location. There can be, and often are, multiple ranking units at each DOE site. Each ranking unit may have multiple exposure modes (e.g., multiple release locations, different release methods, different pathways). [Pg.202]

As noted above, the structure for definition of cases for analysis by MEPAS starts with the facility. A facility may have one or more environmental issues (ranking units). The environmental issues may be composed of one or more releases into the environment (release units). These releases may then travel and impact people in one or more ways (scenarios). To start the sequence of defining environmental problems, the user positions the selector bar on the FACILITY designation, and presses RETURN. In the next screens that appear, the user either defines a new facility or selects a previously defined facility. For a new facility, a duplicate of the entire database for a previously defined facility may be used. The definition of a facility involves facility location descriptors and relevant users and reviewers names. [Pg.205]

The SCENARIO selection activates screens for definition of the transport and exposure scenario to be used in evaluation of the environmental problems. The user can select from a list of scenarios already set up for the current ranking unit or choose to add one. To add a scenario, the user must choose the pathway that most closely represents the actual problem and then select those waste unit constituents that are transported by this particular pathway add or select receptors and match the receptors with exposure routes, such as ingestion, bathing, and direct contact. [Pg.206]

We proceed as follows for a complex P, we count the number of real parameters which completely define the entire matrix from this number, we subtract the number of real conditions imposed by TV-representability (i.e. hermiticity, rank N and unit eigenvalues). The remaining number of parameters represents the number of real (experimental) conditions required to complete the definition of the projector considered. Such a number is the solution to the problem posed in this paper. Later on, we shall consider the two other cases previously mentioned, that is, complex independent parameters of a complex , and real independent parameters of a real . [Pg.141]

The rank two BFGS and DFP formula form two non-unit eigenvalues on the first update, again reflecting the rank two nature of the update. Both formula, as expected, preserve the positive definite nature of the Hessian. [Pg.275]

By definition it is a symmetric second-rank tensor. The stress tensor ffy, i,j= 1,3), is also a symmetric second-rank tensor defined as follows (Landau and Lifchitz ) the element Oy is the i component of the force acting on the unit area normal to the axis x. The symmetry of the stress tensor is imposed by the condition of mechanical equilibrium. [Pg.349]

By definition the components of the second-rank Cartesian tensor ax transform under rotation just like the product of coordinates xy (e.q., see Jeffreys, 1961) The motivation for what ensues springs from the observation that the spherical harmonics Ym (0, ft) (where 6, ft) are the polar and azimuthal angles of the unit vector (r/1 r )) can be written in terms of the coordinates (x, y, z) of the vector r, for example,... [Pg.156]

There are a few challenges for risk ranking. These are too many risks, too many definitions of risks, and too many possible units of risks. Before main discussions on risk ranking, first the various challenges for risk ranking should be discussed. [Pg.24]

Tasks are denoted by F/, where r is the rank of a task and F is the set of functions (or sub-tasks). The task is considered in the context of both a module and a plant. The task of a module is the set of functions performed by the equipment units in the module. Equipment tasks are derived from the process definition. A set of equipment tasks may correspond to one or more process tasks, and visa versa. The task of a plant is the full set of functions leading to the general objective (set of process tasks) of the plant. The rank of the task is the number of the functions performed. [Pg.50]

In Eq. 9, E is the interfacial tension, p the pressure, Vy the undisturbed velocity gradient tensor and Vy its transpose, tjm is the viscosity of the continuous phase, V is the total volume of the system, n is the unit vector orthogonal to the interface between the two phases, u is the velocity at the interface, dA is the area of an interfacial element and the integrals are evaluated over the whole interfadal area of the system, A. Since the constituents are assumed to be Newtonian all nonlinear contributions to the stress a(t) are caused entirely by the deformation of the droplet interface. The unit vectors n and u describe this deformation and can be computed using the Maffettone-Minale (MM) model for different frequencies and amplitudes. The MM model uses a second rank, symmetric and positive definite... [Pg.125]


See other pages where Ranking unit, definition is mentioned: [Pg.208]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.753]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.623]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.569]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.632]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.624]    [Pg.11]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.196 , Pg.198 ]




SEARCH



Rank

Ranking

Units definitions

© 2024 chempedia.info