Tied ranks

As with the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum, too many tied ranks inflate the false... 

Too many tied ranks will decrease the power of this test and also lead to increased false-positive levels. 

The effect of adjusting for tied ranks is to slightly increase the value of the test statistic, H. Therefore, omission of this adjustment results in a more conservative test. 

A table of data is set up with each of the two variables being ranked separately. Tied ranks are assigned as demonstrated earlier under the Kruskall Wallis test. From... 

Pearson s product-moment correlation coefficient (r) is the most commonly used correlation coefficient. If both variables are normally distributed, then r can be used in statistical tests to test whether the degree of correlation is significant. If one or both variables are not normally distributed you can use Kendall s coefficient of rank correlation (t) or Spearman s coefficient of rank correlation (rs). They require that data are ranked separately and calculation can be complex if there are tied ranks. Spearman s coefficient is said to be better if there is uncertainty about the reliability of closely ranked data values. 

The ranking of these results presents an obvious difficulty, that of tied ranks. There are two results with the numerical value 0.2, two with a numerical value of 0.4, and two with a numerical value of 0.7. How are the ranks to be calculated This problem is resolved by giving the tied values average ranks, with appropriate signs. Thus the ranking for the present data is ... 

The use of an average value is necessary in the case of tied ranks in sample 2 (see Section 6.5). The sums of the ranks for the three methods A, B and C are 5.5, 8.5 and 10 respectively. These sums should total nk k + l)/2, where k is the number of methods (three here) and n the number of samples (four here). The rank sums are squared, yielding 30.25, 72.25 and 100 respectively, and these squares are added to give the statistic R, which here is 202.5. The experimental value of is then calculated from ... 

The first step in the calculation is to convert the sulphur dioxide concentrations from absolute values into ranks (tied ranks are averaged as described in previous sections) ... 

Another rank correlation coefficient, due to Kendall, was introduced in 1938. it claims to have some theoretical advantages over the Spearman method, but is harder to calculate (especially when tied ranks occur) and is not so frequently used. 

It has already been shown that the Cone calorimeter smoke parameter correlates well with the obscuration in full-scale fires (Equation 1). At least four other correlations have also been found for Cone data (a) peak specific extinction area results parallel those of furniture calorimeter work [12] (b) specific extinction area of simple fuels burnt in the cone calorimeter correlates well with the value at a much larger scale, at similar fuel burning rates [15] (c)maximum rate of heat release values predicted from Cone data tie in well with corresponding full scale room furniture fire results [16] and (d) a function based on total heat release and time to ignition accurately predicts the relative rankings of wall lining materials in terms of times to flashover in a full room [22]. 

This is a nonparametric test in which the data in each group are first ordered from lowest to highest values, then the entire set (both control and treated values) is ranked, with the average rank being assigned to tied values. The ranks are then summed for each group and U is determined according to... 

A. ordinal form of an observation set A same with rank ties... 

D Spearman s Z)-statistic, defined by Eq.(2) D the same with rank ties, defined by Eq.(8)... 

FM Friedman s statistic, defined by Eq.(14), without rank ties... 

The Z)-statistic concept can be readily extended to the two-factor case, where (A, B,) are corresponding ranks, i.e. if A and B are the ordinal form of observation sets (the A7B notation is used instead of Lehman s (R.S) notation in order to avoid confusion between similar symbols). If rank positions are tied, they are replaced by their mid-rank, yielding modified distributions A and B. By a straightforward extension of Eq.(6), the modified Z)-statistic is computed as [17]... 

FM modified Friedman statistic for ties in ranks, defined as FM... 

Spreadsheet 2.2 and figure 2.7 give an example of 10 titration values. Notice how the ranking is done. The Excel function =RANK (x, range, direction) does not quite work, as ties are given the lower number, not the higher. If there are sufficient data to warrant automating this step, the cal-... 

The calculation for the Rankit plot is shown in spreadsheet 3.3. The effects are ordered from most negative to most positive. A column of the rank of each effect is then created, with ties (none here) taking the higher rank (e.g., 1, 2, 4, 4, 5). The column headed z is the point on the cumulative normal distribution of the rank/(A + 1), where N is the number of experiments. The z score is calculated by the function =N0RMSINV (z). When this is plotted against the effect (see figure 3.16), it is clear that copper and lead do, indeed, appear to be off the line, and all the other effects are concluded to be insignificant. 

Instructions Rank the following statements according to how they describe the manner in which this employee carries out duties and responsibilities. Rank 1 should be given to the most descriptive and rank 5 to the least descriptive. No ties are allowed. 

If the chemical composition of the samples is known or at least partly known (in a stepwise TIE approach) or existing data allow for QSAR calculation, the samples can be ranked by TUs. Arts et al. (2006) studied, in 12 outdoor ditch mesocosms, the effects of sequential contamination with 5 pesticides in a regression design. They applied dosages equivalent with 0.2%, 1%, and 5% of the predicted environmental concentration (PEC) subsequently over 17 weeks. Endpoints recorded over 30 weeks included community composition of macroinvertebrates, plankton, and macrophytes, and leaf litter decomposition as functional ecosystem parameters. TUs were calculated in relation to acute toxicity data for the most sensitive standard species Daphnia magna and Lemna minor. Principal response curves (PRCs), a special form of constrained PCA, and Williams test (NOEC, class 2 LOEC) were used to identify the most sensitive taxa. Next to direct effects on certain species, also indirect effects, for example, how the change in abundance of a sensitive species affects the abundance of another, more tolerant species, can be detected only in mesocosm or in situ experiments. All observed effects were summarized in effect classes in a descriptive manner. 

Rank - the position of a data value when all the data are placed in order of ascending magnitude. If ties occur, an average rank of the tied variates is used. Thus, the rank pf the datum 6 in the sequence 1,3,5,6,8,8,10 is 4 the rank of eaehdatum with value 8 is 5.5. 

Rank Among 20 Superfruits 2nd (tied with fig) u r ent Content 5/5 Phytochemical Content 4/5 Medical Research Activity 4/5 Position in Research Pyramid 4/5 Popularity 5/5... 

---