Catalyst ranking

This work provides conclusive evidence that transient catalyst characterization tests can result in erroneous catalyst ranking. For example, USY catalysts show higher activity than REY catalysts in the laboratory tests but lower activity in a steady state riser. Although emphasis in this paper is placed mainly on the coke-conversion selectivity, the analysis is also extended to yields of other FCC products. 

Table II. Catalyst Ranking Based on Experimental Data...

Table I. Passivation of Metals on FCC Catalysts Ranking of Elements for Reduction of Hydrogen...

Table X demonstrates this, showing how the catalyst ranking can be influenced by the deactivation procedure used.

Table X. Influence of catalyst ranking by type of deactivation procedure.

Most oil streams in a refinery must be hydrotreated consequently, hydrotreating is the largest application in industrial catalysis based on the amount of material processed per year. On the basis of the amount of catalyst sold per year, hydrotreating catalysts rank third after exhaust gas catalysts and fluid cracking catalysts. 

Activity, selectivity, and yield are key catalyst performance characteristics. The recommended measure of catalyst activity is turnover frequency. Turnover frequency (or rate) is defined as the number of molecules that react per active site per unit time. Activity can also be defined as (1) the reaction rate per unit mass or volume of the catalyst, (2) the space velocity at which a given conversion is achieved at a specified temperature, (3) the temperature required to achieve a given conversion level, or (4) the conversion achieved under specified reaction conditions. Alternative 2 is practical for catalyst ranking. Alternatives 3 and 4 are rather uninformative. For rapid catalyst screening the latter two criteria are acceptable, but no catalyst should be eliminated from further consideration if it is only marginally inferior based on these criteria. 

The largest variation in catalyst ranking occurred when comparing these catalysts on the basis of coke selectivity (Figure 9). For clarity a high coke selective catalyst is taken to be one that produces a high level of coke per unit of activity. The reciprocal of this is referred to as the dynamic activity (5). 

The great importance of the Diels-Alder and hetero-Diels-Alder reactions in synthesis is a strong stimulus for finding new aspects about them, especially those methodologically related, and chiral catalysts rank high in such a context. Accordingly, 145, ID, and 146 are valuable additions to the list of the metal-free entities, even ID is somewhat inferior due to relatively low asymmetric induction (up to 70% ee) it tenders during the reaction of anthro-nes and maleimides. 

The up-flow unit used in collecting the experimental data is shown schematically in Figure 1. This unit has earlier been demonstrated to be well suited for catalyst testing, not only in catalyst ranking, but also in terms of production planning and product quality [7]. 

As far as catalytic properties are concerned, nickel and cobalt catalysts rank among those most often described and used in the production of primary amines from higher fatty acids via the hydrogenation of the corresponding nitriles. It was also assumed in previous papers that when nickel is deposited on a support, only the degre of nickel dispersion is affected and there is no substantial modification of the selectivity (5). 

The most effective Lewis-acid catalysts for the Diels-Alder reaction are hard cations. Not surprisingly, they coordinate to hard nuclei on the reacting system, typically oxygen atoms. Consequently, hard solvents are likely to affect these interactions significantly. Table 1.4 shows a selection of some solvents ranked according to their softness. Note that water is one of the hardest... 

Strike ranked it 3 in the Top Ten from the first edition because Strike didn t think people would bite at the idea of using such an expensive catalyst as PdCl2. Street chemists are often tightassed when that is the last thing they should be when it comes to production. But this has not been the case with this procedure as Strike has happily found out. At 7.00- 9.00/g, PdCb is still pretty pricey but this has not been a deterrent as many chemists have found. Nor should it be. This procedure works so well that it would, in fact, be stupid not to do it should one happen to work in an accredited, licensed research lab. The following is what Strike first wrote about it. 

Laboratory catalyst testing is sometimes done under conditions that are far removed from exhaust gas conditions, and can be a very unreliable guide to the utility of a catalyst. For instance, noble metals may rank below base metal oxides in oxidation activity at low temperatures, but the ranking reverses at high temperatures. These and other hazards were pointed out by Schlatter et al. (53). Laboratory catalyst testing is usually done by the catalyst manufacturers, resulting in the rejection of a vast majority of formulations. 

Nowadays, based on the amount of processed material, hydrotreating is the largest process in heterogeneous catalysis. On the basis of catalysts sold per year, hydro-treating ranks third after automotive exhaust and fluid catalytic cracking [R. Prins, V.H.J. de Beer and G.A. Somorjai, Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng. 31 (1989) 1]. 

A micro mixer-tube reactor set-up, in which pulses of substrates and catalysts were injected (Figure 4.64), fulfilled that criterion [111]. By this means, a ranking of substrate reactivity was possible. It was shown that the different reactivities of the 10 substrates found were due to their varying solubility in the aqueous phase where the catalyst is provided. 

The different catalysts may be ranked according to their relative activity ... 

Both commercial and laboratory-synthesized polymers were used. Those made in the laboratory were generally prepared by solution polymerization, refluxing commercially available monomers in toluene using benzoyl peroxide as the catalyst. Other preparations were made in which azo-bis-isobutyronitrile (AIBN) was used as initiator, ethanol was employed as the refluxing medium, and monomers were especially synthesized in the laboratory. These variations in preparative procedure did not significantly affect the ranking of the polymers with respect to their tendency to crosslink, as reported in Table I. 

Similar to the intramolecular insertion into an unactivated C—H bond, the intermolecular version of this reaction meets with greatly improved yields when rhodium carbenes are involved. For the insertion of an alkoxycarbonylcarbene fragment into C—H bonds of acyclic alkanes and cycloalkanes, rhodium(II) perfluorocarb-oxylates 286), rhodium(II) pivalate or some other carboxylates 287,288 and rhodium-(III) porphyrins 287 > proved to be well suited (Tables 19 and 20). In the era of copper catalysts, this reaction type ranked as a quite uncommon process 14), mainly because the yields were low, even in the absence of other functional groups in the substrate which would be more susceptible to carbenoid attack. For example, CuS04(CuCl)-catalyzed decomposition of ethyl diazoacetate in a large excess of cyclohexane was reported to give 24% (15%) of C/H insertion, but 40% (61 %) of the two carbene dimers 289). 

Chemistry as a subject has developed through the synthesis of individual compounds in a number of distinct steps. Recently it has benefited from the introduction of combinatorial/parallel chemistry techniques as well as microwave-enhanced technology but so far these studies have not been combined [80]. Lockley and coworkers [81-83] have shown very nicely how parallel chemistry techniques can be used for the rapid screening and ranking of catalysts using the hydrogenation of 3-methyl-3-butenylisonicotinate as the model reaction (Scheme 13.8). 

Schemel3.8 Parallel screening and ranking of catalysts for the reduction ofisobutenyl groups.

---