Mean rank

Two values must be calculated for each pair of groups the difference in mean ranks, and the probability level value against which the difference will be compared. To determine the difference in mean ranks we must first arrange the data within each... 

Hi sum of the /-th treatment rank in two-factor analysis if mean rank in the / -th treatment... 

The differences in mean ranks are displayed in Table 11.9. Differences in mean ranks that are greater than the MSD are considered significantly different. 

As the difference in mean ranks exceeds the MSD for the comparison of 10 vs 20 mg and 10 vs 30 mg, we can conclude that these distributions differ in location. This testing procedure ensured that the overall type 1 error did not exceed 0.05. To interpret the clinical relevance of the differences detected by the test requires some additional point estimates. As the initial procedure was a nonparametric one, the differences in sample means are not appropriate. A more reasonable choice would be to compare the medians as an estimate of the treatment effect. 

Managers may also be interested in the comparative differences between perspectives provided by rank summary statistics such as median rank, mean rank, and midrange of ranks. The rank range approach can also provide an interesting alternative for conducting such comparative analysis. The statistics of interest can be treated as second-order multiple indicators for the units instead of using the indicator data from which the statistics were derived. Poset Cl level and rank range analyses are then conducted in a parallel manner to the procedures described above. It would not be informative, however, to consider the end-member elimination effects in this... 

Mean rank derived from these statistics Positive deviation from 50% identified as significant (95% confidence limits)... 

Pre-analysis In order to sum up the opinion of the entire group, a mean rank calculation is performed The dispersion of the ranks can also be displayed... 

In order to address the first research question (How does the problem-based learning (PBL) chemistry laboratory course influence students attitudes to science learning in the dimensions of openness, curiosity, criticism, cooperativeness, voluntariness, persistence, and creativity compared to students in the comparison group who were instructed in the traditional course ), a nOTiparamettic Mann— Whitney U test was conducted to compare the posttest mean rank scores of the two groups for each of the dimensions as well as for the combined instrument. 

In the case of the treatment group, the pretest-posttest mean ranks were statistically significantly different p < 0.05) for four of the seven dimensions—openness, criticism, cooperativeness, and creativity—and the overall instrument. In addition, the approximate effect size (as categorized by Cohen, 1988) of the difference between the posttest and the pretest for the comparison group was small or very small for five dimensions, with relatively average effect sizes for... 

Table 3 Posttest-pretest mean rank comparisons of the treatment group on the scientific attitude questionnaire using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test (AT = 20)...

A valid alternative to the median rank is the mean rank, which is given by the equation... 

---