Quality Control QC Samples

This is the simplest type of control chart. It is typically used to monitor day-to-day variation of an analytical process. It does so by monitoring the variation of a quality control (QC) sample or standard when measured by the process. Measurement value is plotted on the v-axis against time or successive measurement on the x-axis. The measurement value on the v-axis may be expressed as an absolute value or as the difference from the target value. The QC sample is a sample typical of the samples usually measured by the analytical process,... 

In the new vision, assay cycle time is dramatically reduced and the criteria used to measure assay acceptability are matched to sample type. Early screening samples may be assayed using simple methods and minimum numbers of standards. Samples from early preclinical PK studies in rats and other species may require additional standards. Finally, for PK studies performed in the lead characterization phase, one might add quality control (QC) samples. One set of rules for non-GLP assays has been codified in a recent publication.16 These rules make it possible to match the assay cycle time with the in-life cycle time in order to minimize the total discovery cycle time. 

For most of the laboratories, additional quality control (QC) samples were inserted within each batch of samples sent. These included sample site duplicates, sample splits for analytical duplicates, a suite of USGS-prepared standard reference materials (SRMs), and... 

Procedures carried out in the laboratory, as opposed to proficiency testing or other interlaboratory collaborations, are known as in-house or internal quality control procedures. When running batches of samples with calibration solutions and unknowns, there are a number of extra samples that can be analyzed that cover different aspects of quality control (QC samples). These QC samples should be documented in the quality manual and be part... 

The analysis of quality control (QC) samples with the construction of quality control charts has been suggested as another way of performing PQ. Control samples with known amounts are interdispersed among actual samples at intervals determined by the total number of samples, the stability of the system, and the precision specified. The advantage of this procedure is that the system performance is measured more or less continuously under conditions that are very close to the actual application. 

In a period of 6h, 96 samples plus standards and quality control (QC) samples are analyzed with this method. Other assays have been performed with 2 min cycle times. Unattended analysis of six... 

This experiment demonstrates application of a batch process in which multiple samples are analyzed simultaneously with a quality control (QC) sample. For yield measurement, 90Sr tracer is added to the QC sample this is an alternative to the conventional carrier yield determination described in Experiment 13. This substitution of external for internal tracer yield measurement requires great care in processing as similarly as possible all samples in a batch. Any deviation of the individual yield from the QC-sample yield by more than 10% will be detected by measuring the recovered weight of the strontium carrier, and should stimulate examination of the procedure for irregular losses. 

What type of quality control (QC) samples are needed... 

NOTE The injection volume for all sample extracts, blanks, quality control (QC) samples and calibration solutions shall he the same. 

When the analytical method has been validated for routine use, its accuracy and precision should be controlled regularly to ensure that the method continues to work satisfactorily. For this purpose, a number of separately prepared (from different weightings than the ones used for the standard curve) quality control (QC) samples should be analyzed in each run [16], The QC samples are often duplicates at three concentrations (low, medium and high) within the range. At least four of the six QC samples should be within 20% of there respectively nominal value, and at least one at each concentration level [16, 89], Also a standard curve should be processed during each run [89],... 

Due to the high workload of analysing such large series, trueness is usually not determined during method validation, but rather from the results of a great number of quality control (QC) samples during routine application or in interlaboratory studies. 

The test samples should always be analyzed in random order to avoid the introduction of unwanted biases and time trends. A way to monitor such unwanted effects is to utilize quality control (QC) samples as a means to effectively examine system performance. QC samples are often made by pooling together subaliquots of biological test samples (29-31). This way a representative bulk sample is generated that should contain all metabolites present in the test samples. QC samples are typically analyzed through the analytical batch and data from the QC injections are scrutinized as a separate dataset by both multivariate analysis but also as typical LC-MS data. Data should pass certain criteria to ensure adequate quality of the dataset, that is, the number of zero values (which should be less than 40%), the CV% of the peak areas (should be less than 30% for a trustworthy peak), the number of peaks that pass the 30% CV filter (which should be higher than 70% in the dataset), the repeatability of retention times and peak areas, and so forth (29). 

The analyte may be present in a variety of matrices such as plasma, serum, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), urine, or other biological fluid, all of which contain a multitude of interfering factors that can impact the method s performance. As mentioned earlier in the chapter, LBA samples are not pretreated prior to analysis, thus calibrators and quality control (QC) samples should also be prepared in the study matrix to best mimic these samples and ensure accurate measurements. The ideal matrix (1) has low background signal in the assay (OD <0.1 for chromogenic end points), (2) has minimal or no analyte-like activity, (3) is devoid of interfering factors, and (4) demonstrates a response that is proportional to the concentration of the spiked analyte. Access to a prototype method using an assay buffer of defined composition as a reference helps to identify an appropriate matrix. 

Included in these components for possible change will be calibration standards and quality control (QCs) samples. A thorough understanding of how changing these parts of a kit may impact upon the results that a method may generate is required to avoid pitfalls or, at worst, potential misinterpretation of results. Moreover, we will also... 

Inherent to macromolecules is the associated variability (i.e., glycosylation and deamidation) of the material from different preparations. Therefore, it is not usually feasible to obtain a reference standard for a macromolecule drug for use in bioanalysis. Typically, what is obtained is a well-characterized product. Therefore, it is important to clearly state the source of the material and to refer to any documentation describing characteristics of that material. Whenever possible, the standards, the validation samples, and quality control (QC) samples should be prepared from separate vials of the same source material. In the case of lyophilized material, it is preferred to reconstitute two separate vials to prepare standards and QCs. In... 

Quality control (QC) sample Prestudy or in-study samples with a known (nominal) concentration that are treated as unknowns in the assay. During in-study runs, QC samples are used as the basis for run acceptance or rejection. 

Reference standards, on the other hand, require a more simple preparation regime. The standard of interest is usually prepared by direct immersion in a suitable solvent. It should be noted, however, that it is recommended that at least one reference standard solution be subjected to the same extraction processes that are applied to the sample. This standard solution will act as a quality control (QC) sample in order to check the extraction processes. 

Quality Control (QC) Samples Aliquots of blank matrix spiked with known amounts of analytical standard, similar to calibrators but prepared using independent weighings. These are interspersed in a sample set to provide an independent check on the accuracy and precision of the determinations, and also in the validation of a new analytical method. 

Time Series A time series is a sequence of observations that are ordered in time (or possibly space). A relevant example would be the analytical data obtained for a quality control (QC) sample or a certified reference material (CRM) on a weekly basis. If such measurements are made as a function of time, it is sensible to display the data in the order in which they were obtained, best in a scatter plot in which the measured value x is plotted as a function of time as the independent variable (in this case, however, something over which we have little control ). There are two kinds of time series data, continuous in which data are recorded at every instant of time (e.g., temperature and/or humidity in a climate-controlled laboratory), and discrete in which data are recorded at (usually regularly) spaced intervals, e.g, the QC analyses mentioned above. 

Quality Control (QC) Sample A spiked sample used to monitor the performance of a bioanalytical method and to assess the integrity and validity of the results of the unknown samples analyzed in an individual batch. 

In the best of instruments, isotope ratio errors may occur as a result of inefficient counting, from mass bias, and other causes. Correction standards at approximately the same concentrations as quality control (QC) samples and unknown samples are used to correct for these sources of error. A natural uranium spike is used because low-concentration endogenous uranium in the base urine and any small amounts of contamination from environmental sources are presumed to be natural, thus will not affect the true ratio in the event of environmental contamination. Correction with an unadulterated isotope ratio is assured. Considering the nature of the urine sample and the problems that must be overcome for uranium accurate isotope ratio analysis with acceptable sample throughput, two sample preparation... 

Quality Control (QC) Samples Specimens, the value of which is unknown to the analyst, but is known to the appropriate QA/QC personnel of a participating laboratory when used as part of a laboratory QA/QC program, the theoretical values of these samples should not be known to the analyst until the analyses are complete. QC samples are to be run in sets consisting of one QC sample from each pool (see definition of pools above). 

For an accurate quality check. Quality Control (QC) samples are interspersed among actual samples at intervals determined by the total number of samples and the precision and reproducibility of the method. The control sample frequency will depend mainly on the known stability of the measurement process, a stable proce.ss requiring only occasional monitoring. Huber [10] recommends that 5 % of sample throughput should consist of quality control samples for routine analysis and 20-50% for more complex procedures. 

---