Analytical batch

Oldershaw, C. F. (1941) Ind. Eng. Chem. (Anal, ed.) 13, 265. Perforated plate columns for analytical batch distillations. 

Blind samples are types of sample which are inserted into the analytical batch without the knowledge of the analyst - the analyst may be aware that blind samples are present but not know which they are. Blind samples may be sent by the customer as a check on the laboratory or by laboratory management as a check on a particular system. Results from blind samples are treated in the same way as repeat samples - the customer or laboratory manager examines the sets of results to determine whether the level of variation, between repeat measurements on the blind sample or between the observed results and an expected value, is acceptable, as described in Section 5.4.3. 

To date, the WACHEM database contains 24,200 analyses made up of 323 separate analytical batches sourced from eleven laboratories. In order to maintain a dynamic database, the contents of available data are updated daily using a series of stored procedures, with each data download appropriately time stamped. 

System suitability determination of instrument performance (e.g., sensitivity and chromatographic retention) by analysis of a reference standard prior to running the analytical batch. 

System suitability allows the determination of system performance by analysis of a defined solution prior to running the analytical batch. System suitability should test the entire analytical system, chromatographic performance as well as the sensitivity of the mass spectrometer for the compounds of interest. Some LC-MS SOPs reference analytical methods as the source of operating details for a given analysis. This works particularly well for quantitative analysis, where analytical methods include critical details on instrument parameters and special calibrations that might be required for a particular analyte. Thus, system suitability testing provides the daily [3] checking of the system. 

Calibrations were carried out for the GC/PID or the GC/MS daily. Calibration standards were prepared based on standard reference materials obtained from Supelco Chromatography products. A check standard was analyzed every ten samples to assure calibration and accuracy. A reagent blank was included in each analytic batch of samples. Blanks were made from reagent or make-up water and matrix similar to the sample. A spiked sample was analyzed every twenty samples. This was done by splitting an appropriate sample into two subsamples and adding a known quantity of TCE to one of the split samples. The purpose of a spiked sample is to determine the extent of matrix bias or interference on TCE recovery and sample to sample precision. Accuracy was assessed by analysis of external reference standards (separate from calibration standards) and by percent recoveries of spiked samples. Precision was assessed by means of replicate sample analysis. It is expressed as relative percent difference (RPD) in the case of duplicates or relative standard deviation (RSD) for triplicate (or more) analyses. Recovery was 96% or more for all spiked samples, and RPD/RSD are less than 7% for all samples. 

Precision control charts may, alternatively, be constructed by plotting the RPDs of duplicate analysis measured in each analytical batch against frequency of analysis (or number of days). The mean and the standard deviation of an appropriate number (e g., 20) of RPDs are determined. The upper and lower warning limits and the uppper and lower control limits are defined at 2 and 3.v, respectively. Such a control chart, however, would measure only the quality of precision in the analysis. This may be done as an additional precision check in conjunction with the spike recovery control chart. 

After analysts have determined from the LIMS (or by other means of communications) that samples have been prepared and ready for analysis, they retrieve extracts or digestates from storage and assemble an analytical batch. An analytical batch is a group of samples, extracts or digestates that are analyzed sequentially using the same instrument calibration curve and that have common analytical QC checks. The number of samples in an analytical batch is not limited. 

Organize Analytical Batches—These include analytical QC checks (instrument blanks and other QC checks as required by the method), CCV standards, prepared field samples, and laboratory QC samples. 

Prepare the Analytical Sequence—Using the computer that controls the analytical instrument, the analyst creates an analytical sequence, which is a list of all samples in the analytical batch. The entered information for each sample may include laboratory sample ID, the volume or weight used for preparation, the final extract volume, and a dilution factor, if the extract was diluted. 

An analytical batch is a group of samples, extracts or digestates, which are analyzed sequentially using the same calibration curve and which have common analytical QC checks. These are the samples that are bracketed by the same CCVs, have the same instrument blanks, and other QC checks that may be required by the method (for example, the DDT and Endrin breakdown product check in organochlorine pesticide analysis by EPA Methods 8081). If the CCV or any of the analytical QC checks are outside the method acceptance criteria, the whole analytical batch or only the affected samples are reanalyzed. 

The preparation or analytical batch should not be confused with the Sample Delivery Group or SDG, a CLP SOW term used to describe a group of up to 20 samples of the same matrix received at a CLP laboratory within a 14-day period. Non-CLP laboratories often use this term interchangeably with the Work Order or Laboratory Project Number that they assign to a group of samples from the same COC Form. 

Preparation and analytical batches must be clearly identified with a unique number in laboratory bench sheets, notebooks, and computer systems. The same applies to QC check samples associated with each batch. During data quality assessment, the data user will determine the quality of the field sample data based in the results of the batch QC check samples that are part of the preparation and analytical batches. The data user will examine batch QC check samples first and, if they are acceptable, will proceed to individual sample QC checks. A complete examination of these QC checks will enable the data user to evaluate the quantitative DQIs (accuracy and precision). A combination of acceptable batch QC checks and individual QC checks makes the data valid on condition that the qualitative DQIs (representativeness and comparability) are also acceptable. 

The calibration blank in trace element analysis is prepared by acidifying reagent water with the same concentrations of the acids used in the preparation of standards and samples. It serves as a calibration point in the initial calibration. As part of an analytical batch, the calibration blank is analyzed frequently to flush the analytical system between standards and samples in order to eradicate memory effects. Calibration blanks are also used in inorganic compound analysis, where they are prepared with the chemicals specified by the method. 

Limited sample clean-up could overload the analytical column, and residual matrix components can accumulate on the column after multiple injections. The residual matrix components can also solidify and deposit over a period of time in the LC-MS ionization source or vacuum interface, resulting in a decrease in ion transfer efficiency. The decrease in instrumentation performance (i. e., signal intensity) can be monitored by the signals of system-suitability samples dispersed within an analytical batch. The practice of replacing the pre-column in every run and scrubbing the analytical column periodically with a cleaning mobile phase will help to maintain instrument performance. 

Create the technology package (process/analytical batch information, safety requirements, training/operating protocols, projected timelines, etc.). 

An effective but simple way of graphically illustrating the variability associated with the analytical data is to plot x—y plots of the duplicate and replicate pairs. Most statistical packages will have an option for plotting simple x—y plots. The G-BASE project uses MS Excel running a macro that will automatically plot duplicate-replicate and duplicate-duplicate results. Figure 5.8 shows three examples from the G-BASE East Midlands atlas area duplicate-replicate data for soils. This method gives an immediate visual appreciation of any errors present in an analytical batch and an indication of within site variability, as shown by the duplicate pairs, or the within sample variability, as indicated by the replicate pairs that demonstrate... 

The test samples should always be analyzed in random order to avoid the introduction of unwanted biases and time trends. A way to monitor such unwanted effects is to utilize quality control (QC) samples as a means to effectively examine system performance. QC samples are often made by pooling together subaliquots of biological test samples (29-31). This way a representative bulk sample is generated that should contain all metabolites present in the test samples. QC samples are typically analyzed through the analytical batch and data from the QC injections are scrutinized as a separate dataset by both multivariate analysis but also as typical LC-MS data. Data should pass certain criteria to ensure adequate quality of the dataset, that is, the number of zero values (which should be less than 40%), the CV% of the peak areas (should be less than 30% for a trustworthy peak), the number of peaks that pass the 30% CV filter (which should be higher than 70% in the dataset), the repeatability of retention times and peak areas, and so forth (29). 

Apart from monitoring for time trends, QC samples can also be used to correct them for example, QC data were used to correct for retention time drifts (32), but also to help fuse the data from different analytical batches (e.g., different time periods of data). A number of QC injections are often implemented at the beginning of the analytical run in order to condition the system (5,30,31). 

For each method, the laboratory should establish data that reflect the relative precision (or imprecision). Within-run (or batch) precision is the variability found when the same material is analyzed repetitively in the same analytical run or, alternatively, when duplicate analyses are made within an analytical batch. This can be extended to within-day precision and then further to day-to-day or between-day (or both/ between batches) precision measurement when the variability found is for the same material analyzed on different days. 

One half of the PTFE filters were used for the WS trace metal analysis. The WS metals were extracted by ultrasonicating for an hour at room temperamre with 20 ml of ultrapure water. The extracts were passed through a 0.45 mm pore size filter before analysis. Both extracts were analyzed for 14 metals, i.e., Al, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Pb, Cd, Ni, As, Ag, Ti, Zn and V, with the ELAN 6100 Inductive Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer (ICP-MS, PerkinEhner, Inc., MA, U.S.A.). Prior to each analytical batch, the ICP-MS was cafibrated with multi-element standards at different concentrations, prepared from serial dilution of 1,000 mg/1 of individual standard solutions, and its response was regularly verified by a calibration standard. The instmmental settings used for the analysis were similar to those recommended by the manufacturer. 

Analytical batch The basic unit of analytical quality control, defined as samples that are analyzed together with the same method sequence and the same lots of reagents and with the manipulations common to each sample within the same time period or in continuous sequential time periods. Samples in each batch should be of similar composition (e.g., groundwater, sludge, ash). 

System suitability checks should be performed before the first injection of the analytical batch and, for some methods, it is advisable to repeat this check when the analyses are completed. A detailed discussion of system suitability is given in Section 9.8.3, but the following description of a practical check procedure for LC-MS/MS systems has been found to be fit for purpose in many situations. 

---