Process simulation component specification

In optimization using a modular process simulator, certain restrictions apply on the choice of decision variables. For example, if the location of column feeds, draws, and heat exchangers are selected as decision variables, the rate or heat duty cannot also be selected. For an isothermal flash both the temperatures and pressure may be optimized, but for an adiabatic flash, on the other hand, the temperature is calculated in a module and only the pressure can be optimized. You also have to take care that the decision (optimization) variables in one unit are not varied by another unit. In some instances, you can make alternative specifications of the decision variables that result in the same optimal solution, but require substantially different computation time. For example, the simplest specification for a splitter would be a molar rate or ratio. A specification of the weight rate of a component in an exit flow stream from the splitter increases the computation time but yields the same solution. 

Throughout this book, we have seen that when more than one species is involved in a process or when energy balances are required, several balance equations must be derived and solved simultaneously. For steady-state systems the equations are algebraic, but when the systems are transient, simultaneous differential equations must be solved. For the simplest systems, analytical solutions may be obtained by hand, but more commonly numerical solutions are required. Software packages that solve general systems of ordinary differential equations— such as Mathematica , Maple , Matlab , TK-Solver , Polymath , and EZ-Solve —are readily obtained for most computers. Other software packages have been designed specifically to simulate transient chemical processes. Some of these dynamic process simulators run in conjunction with the steady-state flowsheet simulators mentioned in Chapter 10 (e.g.. SPEEDUP, which runs with Aspen Plus, and a dynamic component of HYSYS ) and so have access to physical property databases and thermodynamic correlations. 

Programs such as Excel and MATLAB allow us to easily solve for the specific volumes. However, one advantage of process simulators like Aspen Plus is that the physical properties of many components are saved in a database that users can access. In fact, users do not need to look up the numbers because Aspen Plus will do that when it needs them. The next section illustrates how to use each of these programs to solve equations of state. 

Simulation in Process Engineering requires specific scientific knowledge among we may cite accurate description of physical properties of pure components and complex mixtures, models for a large variety of reactors and unit operations, as well as numerical techniques for solving large systems of algebraic and differential equations. 

In the development of the process automation and control system, the required testing of that control system and the factory-assembled components, and the process simulation program must be established with the general functional specifications. In an API facility, many of the control systems perform process functions that require strict validation. The functional description for the automation system should require a complete factory acceptance test (FAT). This test should simulate the entire process and process failures and alarms. The FAT should also check and verify that the control system cabinets and controllers operate as designed. The factory acceptance testing of the process automation system prior to shipment and installation in the field is a critical step in the validation and start-up of the facility. 

Dow has developed a pultrusion simulation modeling (PSM) service designed to help fabricators achieve higher levels of productivity and reliability. Process variables such as pull speed, part and die temperature, heater output and pulling force can affect the quality of pultruded components. The PSM tool allows fabricators to predict processing performance for specific applications, and is accurate to within 10% of actual performance. The tool has been validated in customer trials and allows the pultrusion process to be optimized quickly. 

Open Aspen Properties User Interface program, and include the required chemical components (New - Chemical Processes - Chemicals with Metric Units All Items - Components - Specifications - Selection). Run the simulation (using F5 key) and save it as Aspen Properties Backup file (name NGSep.aprbkp)... 

The blue boxes to the left of each item in the list indicate the Project Components. The yellow arrows inside the boxes indicate that the equipment item was obtained from the mapping of a process simulation unit, whose name appears after its box. Note that by default Aspen IPE lists all of the equipment items in the Workbook Mode, as shown above. The List tab at the bottom of the Main window denotes that the equipment items are listed in the Workbook Mode. Also note that user-inputted equipment items, such as a reboiler pump (not included in the above frame), are represented in the Workbook by blue boxes without the yellow arrow. To add these equipment items, see the section Adding Equipment. The OK in the Status column of the Workbook indicates that the minimum required information for costing the equipment is available. When one or more items are missing, a question mark appears instead, alerting the user to provide a specification(s) so that the equipment-sizing step can proceed. 

For process simulators, a more sophisticated way is chosen which makes sure that the caloric properties are consistent even if chemical reactions occur. This is the case if the standard enthalpy of formation Ab° is taken as the reference point, This is explained in detail in the Section 3.1,5 and Chapters 6 and 12, The standard enthalpy of formation refers to the standard conditions To = 298,15 K and Po = 101325 Pa in the state of ideal gases (see Section 2.3), Therefore, the reference point for the specific enthalpy for a pure component is... 

For the use in a process simulator. Eq. (C.242) is not appropriate as an expression for the Wilson equation, as the specific volumes have an influence on the activity coefficients. When the binary parameters Akij are stored, they are related to the specific volumes that were used in the parameter regression run. If the pure component values are changed, maybe due to an improved data situation, the binary parameters would have to be refitted, which is usually not considered by the user. In process simulation programs, the Wilson equation is therefore written in a different way which avoids these disadvantages. Starting with Eq. (C.242), we can write... 

What is the minimum number of variables to specify fully a stream A stream can be defined as the flow of material between two units in a flowsheet. The variables normally associated with a stream are its temperature, pressure, total flow, overall mole fractions, phase fractions and phase mole fractions, total enthalpy, phase enthalpies, entropy, etc. Assuming phase and chemical equilibrium, how many of those variables must be specified to completely fix the stream Without further considerations, for this case, intuition gives us the correct answer. We know without writing equations that if we specify temperature, pressure, and individual component flows, the stream is fully specified. Of course, a priori we cannot know the final state of the stream (i.e., multiphase or single phase liquid, vapor, solid, or a mixture of them). If we are interested in a stream with some specific conditions like saturated liquid, we cannot specify simultaneously pressure and temperature but pressure (or temperature) and phase fraction. A convention in process simulators is that when vapor (liquid) phase fraction is specified to zero or one, saturated conditions are assumed (bubble point or dew point). However, when vapor or liquid phase fractions are calculated, a value of one (zero) does not mean saturated conditions but that the stream is in vapor (liquid) phase. 

Reaction models are necessary in the chemical process industries for a number of purposes which are most often related to the modeling, simulation and control of production processes process synthesis, process simulation, plant optimization and production control are typically some of the domains concerned with the use of reaction models within unit operation models. To provide interoperability of reaction models within a number of software applications, a specific part of the CAPE-OPEN standard has been devoted to these simulation components called Reactions Packages. CAPE-OPEN Reactions Packages are described in terms of the interfaces that they must support, their interaction with a process modelling environment and the functionality they are expected to support. The interfaces defined support both kinetic and electrolyte reactions. 

A reaction model is a typical component of simulation systems, along with unit operations, thermodynamic servers, physical properties databanks, etc. The reaction model may provide information on how it is built, or can choose not to provide such information but Just to provide computation mainly of reaction rates so that these terms may be readily used in mass balances within unit operation models. The same applies for energy terms. By implementing a common interface standard, a reaction model component may be deployed on its own, independently of the process simulator it is used in. That develops the reusability of reaction models throughout unit operations and process simulators. A reaction model is contained by a Reactions Package software component exhibiting the specific CAPE-OPEN interfaces discussed here. 

When we work with the crude in the process simulator, we deal with specific cuts based on the boiling point distribution of a particular cmde feed as shown in Figure 2.7. Each individual bar represents a hypothetical component with pseudo properties (such as critical points, heats of vaporization, heat capacity) calculated from a correlation. These correlations typically rely on boiling point and specific gravity or density. The goal is to find a minimum number of hypothetical compo-... 

All custom components shall be designed based on previous similar applications and proven technologies. Their design shall be simple and follow a structured development process, including requirement specifications, design specifications, prototypes, simulations, reviews and testing cases. 

A linear dependence approximately describes the results in a range of extraction times between 1 ps and 50 ps, and this extrapolates to a value of Ws not far from that observed for the 100 ps extractions. However, for the simulations with extraction times, tg > 50 ps, the work decreases more rapidly with l/tg, which indicates that the 100 ps extractions still have a significant frictional contribution. As additional evidence for this, we cite the statistical error in the set of extractions from different starting points (Fig. 2). As was shown by one of us in the context of free energy calculations[12], and more recently again by others specifically for the extraction process [1], the statistical error in the work and the frictional component of the work, Wp are related. For a simple system obeying the Fokker-Planck equation, both friction and mean square deviation are proportional to the rate, and... 

This is a technique developed during World War II for simulating stochastic physical processes, specifically, neutron transport in atomic bomb design. Its name comes from its resemblance to gambling. Each of the random variables in a relationship is represented by a distribution (Section 2.5). A random number generator picks a number from the distribution with a probability proportional to the pdf. After physical weighting the random numbers for each of the stochastic variables, the relationship is calculated to find the value of the independent variable (top event if a fault tree) for this particular combination of dependent variables (e.g.. components). 

For the first kind of application, the focus is on certain elements of the HVAC component under consideration. The simulation is used to study and optimize design-specific aspects such as the pipe size and spacing or wetted area and fin geometry in a heat exchanger. This kind of modeling requires detailed knowledge on many input parameters and the related physical processes. 

---