Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Common Interfaces

The early developed LC/MS interfaces as described above have played important roles in the evolution of LC/MS interfaces. However, their apphcability, sensitivity, and robustness are very limited. The overwhelming popularity of LC/MS today is largely due to the development of atmospheric pressure ionization (API) interfaces, including ESI and APCI. [Pg.288]


Figure 9.2 Common interfaces for 6C/MS. Effusion separator (A), jet separator (B) and a membrane separator (C). Figure 9.2 Common interfaces for 6C/MS. Effusion separator (A), jet separator (B) and a membrane separator (C).
The most common interfaces for MS coupling to cSFC and pSFC are given in Table 7.37. There is no universal, ideal SFC-MS interface. Mobile-phase-eliminating and direct-coupling interfaces are compared in Table 7.38. [Pg.480]

Directory Many components need access to directory services—for example, to locate resources on a network or subcomponents within a component. They must be based on a common interface, with a uniform way to reference entities inside different components and across different naming schemes. [Pg.419]

The solution is to forward these tasks to separate specialist strategy objects that implement different policies behind a common interface [Gamma95] this is the essence of good polymorphic design. [Pg.496]

Ensure a common interface for plug-ins. To build new collaborations, designers couple principals to collaborations. [Pg.504]

Assuming a PS to be a system of cavities with a mean size d. and particles with that of D, and taking into account their common interface, one can write [3,61]... [Pg.293]

Processes related to y and 0 are adhesion, cohesion and spreading. We consider two phases A and B without specifying their physical state their common interface is AB. We can distinguish the following processes as they affect a unit area using a connotation given by Hiemenz (1986). [Pg.144]

Sometimes interdiffusion between two metals is uneven and may lead to the creation of vacancies or voids. This type of imbalance is the result of possible unequal mobilities between a metal couple. These voids occur individually near the common interface. The voids, like bubbles, coalesce, resulting in porosity and loss of strength. Many thin-fihn couples exhibit this phenomenon, which is referred to as Kirkendall void creation. Al-Au, Cu-Pt, and Cu-Au are just a few examples. To be specific, it has been found (7), for instance, that in the case of Au-Ni, about five times more Ni atoms diffuse into Au than Au atoms diffuse into Ni. [Pg.312]

ChemSage have developed a common interface with the direct aim of enabling such applications (Eriksson et al. 1994). Recently, the PMLFKT code, developed for the Lukas programmes (Lukas et al. 1982) and extended by Kattner et al. (1996), has been directly coupled with the complex finite element package ProCAST (Samonds and Waite 1993) to predict heat evolution and solidification paths during casting (Banneijee et al. 1997). [Pg.482]

The last terms in each of Eqn. (5.2-9) and Eqn. (5.2-10) represent the divergence of the deviatoric stress including viscosity and pseudo-turbulence. The quantities /n L and uG are effective viscosities of each phase including bulk and shear viscosities. Fl and Fg represent the volume-averaged forces exerted on the liquid-and gas-phase (respectively) by the other phases across the common interfaces. [Pg.269]

The definition of a solid state reaction implies that the reaction product is a solid. If, for example, one of the reactants is a fluid, no deviatoric stresses are transmitted across the common interface. This situation simplifies the mechanical boundary condition significantly and explains why studies on boundary morphology are often performed with solid/fluid systems. [Pg.267]

At the very top of Figure 12.15 is an abstract class Lsi. Lsi is the base class of all concrete Lsi classes—Parent ID, Compound ID and Sample ID. All of its methods are declared abstract. It defines common interfaces of the component and composite in the Lsi class hierarchy. Parent ID is the smallest possible unit and therefore is a component. Both Compound ID and Sample ID can have another type of Lsi as a component and therefore are composites. The source code of the abstract base class Lsi is as follows ... [Pg.112]

The design aspect of host-guest chemistry mandates the knowledge-based construction of novel compounds possessing desired properties. The concept of structure seems indispensable in this enterprise, although the term is ill-defined and the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC),for instance, consciously avoids the close specification. As a corollary, many fields in science have developed their own interpretation of structure, which sometimes clash with each other and lead to misunderstandings when issues at the common interface of subdisciplines are in need of rationalization. [Pg.15]

It should also be emphasised that an initial period of interaction of elementary substances when there is still no compound layer and consequently there is only one common interface at which substances A and B react directly, is outside the scope of the proposed macroscopic consideration. The stage of nucleation of a chemical compound between initial phases is to be the subject of examination within the framework of a microscopic theory which would have to provide, amongst other parameters of the process, a minimal thickness sufficient to specify the interaction product formed at the A-B interface as a layer of the chemical compound ApBq possessing its typical physical and chemical properties. However, it can already now be said with confidence that this value is small in comparison with really measured thicknesses of compound layers and therefore can hardly have any noticeable effect on the shape of the layer thickness-time kinetic dependences observed in practice. [Pg.6]

Thus, at x > x fl and y > the ApBq layer grows at the expense of diffusing A atoms and subsequent partial chemical reaction (2.12), while the ArBs layer grows at the expense of diffusing B atoms and subsequent partial chemical reaction (2.2]). Both reactions take place at their common interface 2 (Fig. 2.12). [Pg.102]

In the diffusion controlled regime the growth of each of two compound layers is due to one partial chemical reaction taking place at its common interface with another growing layer. In this case, only the A atoms diffuse across the ApBq layer adjacent to initial phase A, while only the B atoms diffuse across the ArBs layer adjacent to initial phase B. No partial chemical reactions proceed at the A ApBq and ArBs-B interfaces in view of the lack of appropriate diffusing atoms. [Pg.119]

The layers of no more than two compounds can grow simultaneously in the diffusion controlled regimes. The layer adjacent to substance A or the y4-enriched phase grows at the expense of diffusion across its bulk of only A atoms. The layer bordering with substance B or the / -enriched phase grows at the expense of diffusion across its bulk of only B atoms. Both layers thicken at their common interface. [Pg.177]

When two droplets - one of surfactant solution and the other of oily soil - are set on a solid surface, on the basal plane two wetting tensions jA and jB will act [3]. When the two droplets approach each other, so that a common interface is formed, at the contact line the difference of the wetting tension will act. This parameter is called oil displacement tension ... [Pg.58]

TABLE 3 Some Common Interfaces for Hyphenated Techniques... [Pg.138]

Three-phase boundary — Whereas two phases can share one common interface, three adjacent phases can only share one common line (Fig. 1). This line is called... [Pg.673]

The laboratory front end device looks conspicuously like a personal computer to a network. In fact there are other interesting parallels between the growth of terminals to personal computers and the evolution of laboratory front ends. At this time the most common interfaces are RS-232, RS-422, IEEE-488, and parallel... [Pg.45]

Interface layer Common interfaces to stored information. There may be several for different kinds of information. [Pg.182]

Equation (1.12) indicates that the magnitude of Wa directly reflects the intensity of interactions between A and B atoms across the common interface. Obviously, in real systems, the relation between Wa and bond energies is more complicated than equation (1.12) suggests. However, the physical meaning of Wa remains the same. [Pg.7]

A precise analogy would be a bilayer of two-dimensional worlds in 3D space, shown in figure 15. They are in contact everywhere, but oblivious of each other, despite their common interface. There is no freedom of motion,... [Pg.245]

Figure 7.15 Two flat worlds with a common interface. Figure 7.15 Two flat worlds with a common interface.
An ideal interface should not cause extra-column peak broadening. Historical interfaces include the moving belt and the thermospray. Common interfaces are electrospray ionization (ESI) and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCl). Several special interfaces include the particle beam—a pioneering technique that is still used because it is the only one that can provide electron ionization mass spectra. Others are continuous fiow fast atom bombardment (CF-FAB), atmospheric pressure photon ionization (APPI), and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (M ALDl). The two most common interfaces, ESI and APCI, were discovered in the late 1980s and involve an atmospheric pressure ionization (API) step. Both are soft ionization techniques that cause little or no fragmentation hence a fingerprint for qualitative identification is usually not apparent. [Pg.147]

Positive (-I-) and Negative (-) Features of Most Common Interfaces Used for IPC-MS Combination... [Pg.148]

ESI is the most common interface since IPC and MS were coupled initially. By 2008, most applications IPC-MS used the ESI interface [58,68-82] because analytes amenable to IPC are usually already ionic in the column effluent that enters the interface. Examples of APCI-MS applications [83,84] include two-fold use of both interfaces [85] they gave similar results in the determination of polyunsatured fatty acid monoepoxides [86]. For determining mono- and di-sulfonated azo dyes, ESI proved to give the best performance in terms of sensitivity and reproducibility [83]. Joining negative APCI-MS and ESI-MS unambiguously identified several acidic oxidation products of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene in ammunition, wastewater, and soil extracts [61]. [Pg.149]


See other pages where Common Interfaces is mentioned: [Pg.238]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.540]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.288]   


SEARCH



Common gateway interface

Common user interface project

Commonly Used Techniques for Analysis of Surfaces and Interfaces

© 2024 chempedia.info