Priority pollutants, separation

Separation of a Series of Priority Pollutants with Programmed Fluorescence Detection... 

Another useful standard Is SRM 1647, priority pollutant polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (in acetonitrile). It can be used to calibrate liquid chromatographic Instruments (retention times. Instrument response), to determine percent recoveries, and to fortify aqueous samples with known PAH concentrations. Figure 8 Illustrates the HPLC separation and UV detection (fluorescence is also used extensively) for the 16 priority pollutants. 

Figure 8. Reversed-phase HPLC separation of SRM 1647, priority pollutant polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (In acetonitrile), using UV detection.

There are six primary in-plant control methods for removal of priority pollutants and pesticides in pesticide manufacturing plants. These methods include steam-stripping, activated carbon adsorption, chemical oxidation, resin adsorption, hydrolysis, and heavy metals separation. Steam-stripping can remove volatile organic compounds (VOCs) activated carbon can remove semi volatile organic compounds and many pesticides and resin adsorption, chemical oxidation, and hydrolysis can treat selected pesticides [7]. Heavy metals separation can reduce toxicity to downstream biological treatment systems. Discussion of each of these methods follows. 

At least three pesticide plants use priority pollutant metals separation systems in the United States [7]. One plant uses hydrogen sulfide precipitation to remove copper from its pesticide wastewater. The operating system consists of an agitated precipitator to which the H2S is added, a soak vessel to which sulfur dioxide is added, a neutralization step using ammonia, and a gravity separation and centrifuging process. Copper is removed from an influent level of 4500 mg/L to 2.2 mg/L. 

Under proper conditions, biological treatment effectively removes priority pollutants, nonconventional pollutants (TOC), and conventional pollutants (e.g., BOD). The mechanism of pollutant removal may be one or more of the following (a) biological degradation of the pollutant, (b) adsorption of the pollutant onto sludge, which is separately disposed, or (c) volatilization of the pollutant into the air. 

Clarification is the process of agglomerating the solids in a stream and separating them by settling. Chemicals that are commonly added to the clarification process do not contain any of the listed priority pollutants. 

Many contributions regarding silica monolithic columns were published by the group of Tanaka [93,189,196]. In their early work, they reported on the successful separation of alkyl benzenes, which are representative for the separation of many low-molecular-weight compounds, containing aromatic groups. Tanaka et al. also combined a conventional column in the first dimension with a silica rod column for the fractionation of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons [197]. The successful separation of the 16 EPA priority pollutants PAHs was carried out by Nunez et al. [93] and is shown in Eigure 1.15. 

FIGURE1.15 Separation of the 16 EPA priority pollutants PAHs with ODS column using an acetonitrile water 70 30 (v/v) solution as mobile phase. Thiourea was used as standard. Detection performed at 254 nm and 30°C. PAHs 1, naphthalene 2, acenaphtylene 3, fluorene 4, acenaphthene 5, phenanthrene 6, anthracene 7, fluoranthene 8, pyrene 9, chrysene 10, benz(a)anthracene 11, benzo(fc)fluoranthene 12, benzo(l )fluoranthene 13, benzo(a)pyrene 14, dibenz(a,/i)anthracene 15, indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene and 16, benzo(g,/j,/)perylene). (Reprinted from Nunez, O. et al., J. Chromatogr. A, 1175, 7, 2007. Copyright 2007, with permission from Elsevier.)... 

In particular, the priority pollutant phenols (PPP), identified by EPA since the 1970s are widespread water pollutants that must receive the greatest attention due to their recognized toxicity. For the separation of eleven PPP, an ion-interaction reagent (HR) RP HPLC/UV method has been developed that allows limits of detection lower than 30 J,g in river waters, after LLE in dichlo-romethane and a 500-fold pre-concentration [82]. Through on-line SPE followed by both UV and electrochemical detection [83], 16 priority phenols have been determined in water samples with the LOD value for chlorophenols lower than 1 ng L [84]. LODs at ng L levels were obtained for all the PPPs in samples of river water, employing a relatively small volume of sample through an on-line SPE HPLC/MS method with an APCI source. 

Consider an HPLC method for the separation of 11 priority pollutant phenols using an isocratic system. The aqueous mobile phase contains acetic acid, methanol and citric acid. From preliminary studies, it was established that the mobile phase composition was critical to ensure maximum resolution and to minimise tailing. The overall response factor, CRF, was measured by summing the individual resolutions between pairs of peaks. Hence, the CRF will increase as analytical performance improves. 

Method 625 for Semivolatiles. This method is a solvent extraction method intended to determine as many of the organic semivolatile priority pollutants as possible. To accomplish this, the sample is serially extracted, first at a pH greater than 11 and then at pH 2. Figure 1 shows a flow diagram of the procedure. The two fractions, base-neutrals and acids, are independently determined by using two separate GC columns. The base-neutrals are determined on a 1.8-m X 2-mm i.d. glass column packed with Supelcoport (100-120 mesh) coated with 3%... 

Two analytical methods for priority pollutants specified by the USEPA (38) use HPLC separation and fluorescence or electrochemical detection. Method 605, 40 CFR Part 136, determines benzidine and 3,3-dichlorobenzidine by amperometric detection at +0.80 V, versus a silver/silver chloride reference electrode, at a glassy carbon electrode. Separation is achieved with a 1 1 (v/v) mixture of acetonitrile and a pH 4.7 acetate buffer (1 M) under isocratic conditions on an ethyl-bonded reversed-phase column. Lower limits of detection are reported to be 0.05 /xg/L for benzidine and 0.1 /xg/L for 3,3-dichlorobenzidine. Method 610, 40 CFR Part 136, determines 16 PAHs by either GC or HPLC. The HPLC method is required when all 16 PAHs need to be individually determined. The GC method, which uses a packed column, cannot adequately individually resolve all 16 PAHs. The method specifies gradient elution of the PAHs from a reversed-phase analytical column and fluorescence detection with an excitation wavelength of 280 nm and an emission wavelength of 389 nm for all but three PAHs naphthalene, acenaphthylene, and acenaphthene. As a result of weak fluorescence, these three PAHs are detected with greater sensitivity by UV-absorption detection at 254 nm. Thus, the method requires that fluores-... 

In alumina column cleanup, the column is first preeluted with ether-pentane mixture (30 70) before the sample extract is transferred onto the column. It is then successively eluted with ether-pentane mixture of 30 70 and 50 50% composition, respectively. This separates A-nitrosodiphenylamine. The latter elutes into the first fraction, from the interfering substance diphenylamine which goes into the second fraction along with the analytes A-nitrosodimethylaminc and A-nitrosodi-n-propy lamine. A small amount of the latter compound is also eluted into the first fraction. A cleanup procedure for other nitrosamines (not classified under U.S. EPA s priority pollutants) should generally be the same as described above. The composition of ether-pentane mixture and the elution pattern, however, must be established first before performing the cleanup. 

Analytical Properties Separates phenols and EPA priority pollutants often used with metal ions (such as iron (III)) as chelate ligands 8-quinolinol has a high affinity for oxygen moieties and will form complexes with upwards of 60 metal ions often with an acidic aqueous mobile phase Reference 48-50... 

PAHs to demonstrate the excellent potential of CEC by resolving in under 10 min in isocratic mode 16 PAHs classified as priority pollutants by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Yan et al. employed laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) for the detection of PAHs [80]. The limits of detection (LOD) for individual PAHs ranged between 1 nM and 10 pM, as the linear response spanned 4 orders of magnitude in concentration. A sample of 16 PAHs was also tested by Ngola et al. [26] on a new hydrophobic monolith (Figure 16, from Ref. 26). The synthetic procedure was readily transferable to the chip format and the first CEC separations on a chip were reported [26,81] (Figure 17). 

An example of the use of a simple fluorescence detector is afforded by the separation of the mixture of priority pollutants shown in figure 2. The separation was actually monitored by the fluorescence sensor of the TriDet detector the design of which will be discussed later. The excitation light was approximately monochromatic at 254 nm and all the fluorescent light was focused on the photo cell. It is seen that an excellent sensitivity is obtained. 

Separation of the Priority Pollutants Monitored by the Simple Fluorescence Detector Courtesy of the Perkin Elmer Corporation... 

Residence time for supercritical water oxidation systems may be as short as several minutes at temperatures of 600 to 650°C. More than 99.9 percent conversion of EPA priority pollutants such as chlorinated solvents has been achieved in a pilot-scale plant with retention time less than 5 minutes. The system is limited to treatment of liquid wastes or solids less than 200 microns in diameter. Char formation during reaction may impact the oxidation time of the organics, while separation of inorganic salts during the process may be a problem. Typical materials for the reactor are Hastelloy C-276 and Iconel 625 (high nickel alloys), which can withstand high temperatures and pressmes and the corrosive conditions. 

Numerous lists of priority pollutants exist. It is Important to note that both concentration limits and the list of priority/regulated contaminants are undergoing constant review and are often superseded by local and state regulations. In this context, we have not tried to tabulate a comprehensive list in this section. Rather, it is our objective to simply identify some of the more important contaminants. This is Important from the perspective of determining the proper emphasis in the development of separations technology. 

The above-mentioned plate count Is was obtained with analysis time of 6 hours 54 minutes. Alternatively, a single column (330 ym diameter) packed with 3 ym C g reverse phase packing can yield up to 110,000 plates for 1 meter length. Separation of priority pollutant mixture of 15 PAH components was demonstrated by Yang on one such column ( ). 

Figure 1. Separation of an EPA priority pollutant PNA sample using a 1 m X 320 laro, 3 pm Cjg reverse phase fused-slllca column. Mobile solvent was 70% ACN H20 at 0.95 pi/mln. On-column UV detection at 254 nm and 0.01 A was used. Peak Identifications are 1, naphthalene 2, acenaphthalene 3, acenaphthene 4, fluorene 5, phenanthene 6, anthracene 7, fluoranthene 8, pyrene 9, benzo(a)anthracene 10, chrysene 11, benzo(b)fluoran-thene 12, benzo(k)fluoranthene 13, benzo(a)pyrene 14, dlbenzo-(a,h)anthracene 15, benzo(ghi)perylene.

Purge and trap (PAT), Chapter 33, involves bubbling a gas through a liquid which contains volatile or semivolatile compounds. These compounds transfer into the gas bubble based on the second law of thermodynamics systems tend to maximum disorder, or compounds go from high concentration to low concentration. In this case, the inside of the gas bubble is at zero concentration so volatile compounds in the liquid transfer into the bubble in the form of a vapor. The bubbles of gas rise to the surface, pass through an adsorption tube, and the contents trapped. This is not only a separation technique, but it is valuable in concentrating trace materials. The most common use of this technique is to separate EPA s priority pollutants from water supplies. 

In each of the above cases, the initial concentration of any of the components in the gas bubble will be 0%, and any component in the sample with a vapor pressure will be at a higher concentration and tend to move into the gas bubble. Theoretically, every component in the mixture will move some molecules into the gas bubble. However, only those with the higher vapor pressures will be concentrated to a significant extent and those desired can be trapped selectively. The gas chromatograph will further separate the trapped components, and the mass spectrometer can be set to detect only the desired components. Such an operation is done many times daily for the priority pollutants and requires about 3 hours from the start to the final calculations. 

---