Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Other Surface Preparation Methods

Although abrasive blasting and water jetting are widely used for plants, ships, bridges and other large systems there is a great variety of other methods that can be used to prepare a surface for the final coating application. [Pg.659]

For certain surfaces, it is only necessary to wipe the surface with a selected solvent to remove oil, grease, and loose dirt. The use of detergent solutions, isopropanol, ketones, and aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons for this purpose can be effective. The major requirement for the process is that the wipe shall not leave a residual contaminant, but rather a clean, dry metal surface. Such a cleaning procedure is used on previously cleaned steel, stainless steel surfaces, and old paint films before overcoating, or on dirty steel prior to abrasive blasting. [Pg.660]

The process of flame cleaning has found greater favor in Europe than in America. A wide oxy-acetylene flame is played on the surface of steel parts to produce two effects. First, the heavier portions of rust scale or mill scale will pop from the surface because of the thermal expansion difference between the scale and the substrate. Secondly, the surface is freed of moisture if sufficient heat is applied to the substrate. Removal of loose rust particles after the treatment, followed by prompt coating can produce an adequate coating procedure for certain applications. When using an open flame for cleaning, extreme caution must be used to prevent fires and explosions. [Pg.660]

Manual or power tool cleaning of an oxidized surface is sometimes the least thorough and slowest means of surface preparation. However, cost, location of the part, or the availability of tools often dictates the use of such a technique. Normally, only the top loose layers of rust on a piece of steel are removed through this method. Moisture and other contaminants remain in the residual scale. It is important to consider the compatibility of the tool with the substrate when using brushes or grinding wheels. For instance, the use of steel or bronze brushes to clean [Pg.660]

Great quantities of sheet, plate, coil stock, and other forms of metal are pickled in production mills or by metal recyclers. On steel products, the goal is the removal of the mill scale formed on the surface during hot processing ( 575°C). The bath is an aqueous hot hydrochloric, sulfuric, or less frequently phosphoric add solution containing an inhibitor. The inhibitor must allow uniform attack on the metal, as little metal loss as possible, and when pickling steel, must leave a clean surface free of carbon smut. [Pg.661]


Other catalyst preparation methods include cementation of iron oxide powders with compounds such as Al3(N03)j potasaum waterglass or sodium borate. The imprecation of high surface-area supports such as silica or alumina gels with metal salts have also been investigated. These methods usually lead to catalysts of low activity. [Pg.62]

For the best possible performance, joints should be specifically designed for adhesive bonding. In a few cases only can an adhesive be used on a joint not specifically designed for adhesives - mainly cylindrical joints. Bond stresses, materials, type of adhesive, surface preparation, methods of application and production requirements can then all be considered in relation to each other at the outset. The designer should consider especially the effect of shear, tension, cleavage and peel stresses upon the joint (Fig. 1) (see Joint design strength and fracture perspectives). [Pg.266]

To make an economical and practical joint, the surface preparation methods must also meet several other requirements. They must be safe to handle and should not be flammable or toxic. They should be inexpensive and provide fast processing times. The prebond processes should be easy to monitor and control in a production situation. In addition, the process should not in itself leave a weak boundary layer. If chemical solutions are used, they should rinse off easily and not continue to react with the surface past the time when the bond is made. The surface preparation process should allow for practical working time between preparation and application of the adhesive or sealant. Finally, the surface provided by the treatment should not change once the assembled joint is made and placed into service. [Pg.540]

Bond stresses, materials, type of cyanoacrylate, surface preparation, method of application and production requirements should all be considered in relation to each other at the... [Pg.269]

Different specimen types yield a range of results upon ion or plasma etching. Multiphase polymers generally etch differentially, enhancing the contrast. Melt crystallized polymers can be etched to reveal the spherulites. Surface protuberances and particulate fillers can and do form cones or ridges when etched. Oriented semicrystalline polymers, on the other hand, appear to be the most controversial with respect to the resulting surface textures. Clearly, in such cases the specimen should be prepared by other methods for comparison, and control experiments are essential. There are problems in the industrial laboratory that can be solved, in part, by microscopy of surfaces prepared by etching techniques however, these are far fewer than those addressed by other specimen preparation methods. [Pg.113]

On the other hand, as the surface preparation method varies, the element concentrations, especially for carbon and aluminum, also vary significantly in the tests with mode mixity G /G higher than 14%, and the trend of the variation... [Pg.416]

As shown in Table 5, in the mode I test, the thicknesses of the residual adhesive layer on the failure surfaces were about 250 xm for all the specimens with different surface preparations, which indicated that the failures all occurred in the middle of the adhesive layer in the test regardless of the surface preparation method since the total thickness of the adhesive of the specimens was 0.5 mm. When the phase angle increased as in the asymmetric DCB test with h/H = 0.75, which contains 3% of mode II fracture component, a layer of epoxy film with a thickness of around SO xm was detected on the failure surfaces of all the specimens. Although the failure was still cohesive, the decrease in the film thickness on the metal side of the failure surfaces indicated that the locus of failure shifted toward the interface due to the increase in the mode mixity. On the other hand, because the failure was still cohesive, no significant effect of interface properties on the locus of failure was observed. When the mode mixity increased to 14% as in the asymmetric DCB test with h/H = 0.5, where the mode mixity strongly forced the crack toward the interface, the effect of interface properties on the locus of failure became pronounced. In the specimen with adherends prepared with acetone wipe, a 4-nm-thick epoxy film was detected on the failure surfaces in the specimen with adherends treated with base/acid etch, the film thickness was 12 nm and in the P2 etched specimen, a visible layer of film, which was estimated to be about 100 nm, was observed on the failure surfaces. This increasing trend in the measured film thickness from the failure surfaces suggested that the advanced surface preparation methods enhance adhesion and displace failure from the interface, which also confirmed the indications obtained from the XPS analyses. In the ENF test, a similar trend in the variation of film thickness was observed. [Pg.418]

Selection of the exact surface preparation method to use for a particular adherend requires careful evaluation. A number of factors, some obvious and others not, influence the choice. The size of component parts and the availability of equipment and facilities are obvious considerations. Less obvious factors include the rapid depletion of active chemicals in an immersion bath or the accumulation of foreign materials in the bath that gives rise to weak boundary layers. ... [Pg.49]

PE has a non-polar, nonporous, and inert surface. For this reason, adhesives cannot link chemically or mechanically to untreated PE surfaces. Although PE is relatively inert to most solvents, solvent cementing cannot be used. For bonding to itself or to other materials, an adhesive with a suitable surface preparation method must be used. There are a number of surface treatment techniques in use, including chemical, electronic, flame, and primer methods. Oxidation treatments are the most successful. These include immersion in a chromic-acid solution, exposure to corona discharge, flame oxidation, immersion in an aqueous solution of chlorine, or exposure to chlorine gas in the presence of ultraviolet light. The chromic acid oxidation method is probably the most convenient for use with molded plastic parts of diverse contour. [Pg.116]

An important newer use of fluorine is in the preparation of a polymer surface for adhesives (qv) or coatings (qv). In this apphcation the surfaces of a variety of polymers, eg, EPDM mbber, polyethylene—vinyl acetate foams, and mbber tine scrap, that are difficult or impossible to prepare by other methods are easily and quickly treated. Fluorine surface preparation, unlike wet-chemical surface treatment, does not generate large amounts of hazardous wastes and has been demonstrated to be much more effective than plasma or corona surface treatments. Figure 5 details the commercially available equipment for surface treating plastic components. Equipment to continuously treat fabrics, films, sheet foams, and other web materials is also available. [Pg.131]

Surface preparation of the dental implant prior to implantation wiH have an effect on corrosion behavior, initial metal ion release, and interface tissue response (316). The titanium and titanium aHoy dental implants in present use have many forms to assist bone ingrowth attachment including cylinders with holes, screw threaded surfaces, porous surfaces, and other types of roughened surfaces. Methods used to produce porous surfaces iaclude arc plasma... [Pg.495]

The considerations applicable to corrosion test methods also apply to tests for inhibited products. The metals and alloys used, their surface preparation, the temperature, flow rate, composition of the test medium, the presence of heat transfer, and so on, must all be relevant to the proposed use of the inhibited product. As with other test methods there are those tests... [Pg.1082]

Certain British Standards, e.g. for galvanising or metal spraying", contain detailed sections on surface preparation. Others are concerned with acid pickling but the chief method of preparing iron and steel for a long-life protective system is by blast cleaning see Section 12.4). [Pg.1159]

The metals of the Pt-group constitute a particular case. Their catalytic activity has long frustrated the determination of the pzc because of interference from adsorbed hydrogen and oxygen. Nevertheless, estimated values of pzc for polycrystalline Pt are included in all compilations in Table 26. However, after the publication by Frumkin and Petrii14 of a summary of pzc values forPt, Rh, Ir, and Pd, no further progress was made for about 20 years until recently UHV techniques of surface preparation have enabled pzc determinations using methods other than the traditional... [Pg.152]

In this section of our review, we shall discuss the morphological aspects and structure-property relationships of a few specific copolymeric systems which we think will represent the general features of siloxane containing multiphase copolymers. More detailed discussions about the properties of each copolymer system may be found in the references cited during our review of the copolymer preparation methods. On the other hand an in-depth discussion of the interesting surface morphology and the resultant surface properties of the siloxane containing copolymers and blends will be provided. [Pg.64]

The other method of monolayer transfer from the air/water interface onto solid substrates is illustrated in Figure 2. This method is called the Langmuir-Schaefer technique, or horizontal lift. It was developed in 1938 by I. Langmuir and V. Schaefer for deposition of protein layers. Prepared substrate horizontally touches the monolayer, and the layer transfers itself onto the substrate surface. The method is often used for the deposition of rigid monolayers and for protein monolayers, hi both cases the apphcation of the Lang-muir-Blodgett method produces defective films. [Pg.142]

Gold has been recently demonstrated to be active in many catalytic reactions as reviewed by Bond and Thompson [1], However, as highlighted by Haruta [2], many different parameters play a role in determining activity (i.e. particle size and shape, preparation methods, nature of support) sometimes making difficult the comparison of experimental results. For example, catalytic activity evaluated against different units showed different trends, showing convincingly that beside total surface area, some other size-dependent factor has to be involved. [Pg.355]

Results obtained by CPAA for composition and partial mass thickness have been shown to be consistent with the results obtained via other analytical methods. The main advantage of the use of CPAA as a surface characterization method are its purely instrumental character, requiring no sample preparation, its high accuracy, and its low detection limits. [Pg.125]

The main advantages of CPAA as a surface characterisation method are that it requires no sample preparation, its high accuracy and its low detection limits. It is an independent method, because no standard samples calibrated by other methods are needed, so that its value may lie in its ability to calibrate standard samples for other, more routine analytical methods. [Pg.210]

There is now available a substantial amount of information on the principles and techniques involved in preparing evaporated alloy films suitable for adsorption or catalytic work, although some preparative methods, e.g., vapor quenching, used in other research fields have not yet been adopted. Alloy films have been characterized with respect to bulk properties, e.g., uniformity of composition, phase separation, crystallite orientation, and surface areas have been measured. Direct quantitative measurements of surface composition have not been made on alloy films prepared for catalytic studies, but techniques, e.g., Auger electron spectroscopy, are available. [Pg.184]


See other pages where Other Surface Preparation Methods is mentioned: [Pg.659]    [Pg.659]    [Pg.638]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.667]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.641]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.1126]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.1705]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.490]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.549]    [Pg.603]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.1848]   


SEARCH



Other Preparation Methods

Other Preparations

Other Preparative Methods

Others methods

Surface method

Surface preparation

© 2024 chempedia.info