Interface properties

A convenient way to understand particle dispersion is to consider the process in four successive parts the nature of particles and surfaces, adsorption onto particles, interface properties, and forces of attraction and repulsion. 

The interface properties can usually be independently measured by a number of spectroscopic and surface analysis techniques such as secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), specular neutron reflection (SNR), forward recoil spectroscopy (FRES), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), infrared (IR) and several other methods. Theoretical and computer simulation methods can also be used to evaluate H t). Thus, we assume for each interface that we have the ability to measure H t) at different times and that the function is well defined in terms of microscopic properties. 

Th. Dretschkow, Th. Wandlowski, in Solid/Liquid Interface Properties and Processes, ed. by K. Wandelt, Springer, Berlin, 2001, in press. 

Surfactant solutions critical micelle concentration distribution of reactants among particles surfactant aggregation numbers interface properties and polarity dynamics of surfactant solutions partition coefficients phase transitions influence of additives... 

CNTs have extremely high stiffness and strength, and are regarded as perfect reinforcing fibers for developing a new class of nanocomposites. The use of atomistic or molecular dynamics (MD) simulations is inevitable for the analysis of such nanomaterials in order to study the local load transfers, interface properties, or failure modes at the nanoscale. Meanwhile, continuum models based on micromechan-ics have been shown in several recent studies to be useful in the global analysis for characterizing such nanomaterials at the micro- or macro-scale. 

Microcomposite tests have been used successfully to compare composites containing fibers with different prior surface treatment and to distinguish the interface-related failure mechanisms. However, all of these tests can hardly be regarded as providing absolute values for these interface properties even after more than 30 years of development of these testing techniques. This is in part supported by the incredibly large data scatter that is discussed in Section 3.2.6. 

The fiber fragmentation test is at present one of the most popular methods to evaluate the interface properties of fiber-matrix composites. Although the loading geometry employed in the test method closely resembles composite components that have been subjected to uniaxial tension, the mechanics required to determine the interface properties are the least understood. 

Fig 3.8 shows the interface shear bond strength, tb, determined from Eq. (3.7), which is not a material constant but varies substantially with embedded fiber length, L. However, to evaluate all the relevant interface properties properly, which include the interface fracture toughness, Gic, the coefficient of friction, p, and the residual clamping stress, qo, it is necessary to obtain experimental results for a full range of L and plot these characteristic fiber stresses as a function of L. More details of the... 

In view of the fact that the above techniques examine single fibers embedded in a matrix block, application of the experimental measurements to practical fiber composites may be limited to those with small fiber volume fractions where any effects of interactions between neighboring fibers can be completely neglected. To relate the interface properties with the gross performance of real composites, the effects of the fiber volume fraction have to be taken into account. To accommodate this important issue, a modified version of the fiber pull-out test, the so-called microbundle pull-out test, has been developed recently by Schwartz and coworkers (Qui and Schwartz, 1991, 1993 Stumpf and Schwartz, 1993 Sastry et al., 1993). In... 

In addition to the direct measurements of fiber-matrix interface properties discussed in Section 3.2, a number of testing techniques have been devised to assess the fiber-matrix interface bond quality by inference from the gross mechanical properties such as interlaminar shear strength (ILSS), translaminar or in-plane shear strength, and transverse tensile strength. These testing techniques invariably employ... 

Interface properties of carbon fiber-epoxy matrix composites and Weibull parameters of carbon fibers"... 

Microcomposite tests including fiber pull-out tests are aimed at generating useful information regarding the interface quality in absolute terms, or at least in comparative terms between different composite systems. In this regard, theoretical models should provide a systematic means for data reduction to determine the relevant properties with reasonable accuracy from the experimental results. The data reduction scheme must not rely on the trial and error method. Although there are several methods of micromechanical analysis available, little attempt in the past has been put into providing such a means in a unified format. A systematic procedure is presented here to generate the fiber pull-out parameters and ultimately the relevant fiber-matrix interface properties. 

The results presented in Section 4.3.6 suggest that the shear lag models based on a single fiber composite is inadequate for modelling a composite with a high fiber f). From the experimental viewpoint, to measure the relevant fiber-matrix interface properties, the fiber volume fraction in single fiber pull-out tests is always very low (i.e. Ff <0.01). This effectively means that testing with these specimens has the... 

---