Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface differences

For many studies of single-crystal surfaces, it is sufficient to consider the surface as consisting of a single domain of a unifonn, well ordered atomic structure based on a particular low-Miller-mdex orientation. However, real materials are not so flawless. It is therefore usefril to consider how real surfaces differ from the ideal case, so that the behaviour that is intrinsic to a single domain of the well ordered orientation can be distinguished from tliat caused by defects. [Pg.285]

Attack associated with nonuniformity of the aqueous environments at a surface is called concentration cell corrosion. Corrosion occurs when the environment near the metal surface differs from region to region. These differences create anodes and cathodes (regions differing in electrochemical potential). Local-action corrosion cells are established, and anodic areas lose metal by corrosion. Shielded areas are particularly susceptible to attack, as they often act as anodes (Fig. 2.1). Differences in concentration of dissolved ions such as hydrogen, oxygen, chloride, sulfate, etc. eventually develop between shielded and nearby regions. [Pg.9]

The scientific study of surfaces, and the full recognition of how much a surface differs from a bulk structure, awaited a drastic improvement in vacuum technique. The next Section is devoted to a brief account of the history of vacuum. [Pg.404]

The hydrophobicity of the gel surface differs depending on the type of gel. In polymer-based series, the GPC KF series has the most hydrophobic gel surface whereas the SB-HQ series has the most hydrophilic gel surface. In order to obtain an ideal GFC separation mode, a suitable column should be chosen whose gel surface has hydrophobicity similar to that of the sample. [Pg.172]

The capillary tube cases are readily proved directly, for it is evident from Fig. 43 that the pressure just beneath the concave surface is less than that just beneath the plane surface by an amount hjv, whereas the vapour-pressures just above these surfaces differ by h/Y. Hence... [Pg.203]

On the other hand, potential measurements at the free surface of purified water have shown50 that the value for a flowing surface differs by about 0.3 V from that for a quiescent surface, as a result of adsorption of surface-active residual impurities in the solution (probably also coming from the gas phase). Since emersed electrodes drag off the surface layer of the solution as they come out of the liquid phase, the liquid layer attached to emersed solid surfaces might also be contaminated. [Pg.14]

The friction coefficient of Sample 2 is quite different from the other samples this can be attributed to the surface difference. The previous research shows that the friction coefficient of DLC is related to the deposition parameter [29]. In this study, in order to evaluate the surface properties in the same condition, we designed Layer A as the outermost layer for all the multilayer samples. Among all the samples, only the surface of Sample 2 is from Layer B. [Pg.204]

The metal surface is polycrystalline and has a rather complex profile. Because of different crystallite orientations at the surface, different crystaf faces are exposed, such as smooth fow-index faces and stepped high-index faces. Surface texture where a particufar kind of face is predominant can devefop in individual cases. Microcracks and various lattice defects (dislocations, etc.) will also emerge at the surface. [Pg.298]

The influence of Pt modihcations on the electrochemical and electrocatalytic properties of Ru(OOOl) electrodes has been investigated on structurally well-defined bimetallic PtRu surfaces. Two types of brmetalhc surfaces were considered Ru(OOOl) electrodes covered by monolayer Pt islands and monolayer PtRu/Ru(0001) surface alloys with a highly dispersed and almost random distribution of the respective surface atoms, with different Pt surface contents for both types of structures. The morphology of these surfaces differs significantly from that of brmetaUic PtRu surfaces prepared by electrochemical deposition of Pt on Ru(0001), where Pt predominantly exists in small multilayer islands. The electrochemical and electrocatal5d ic measurements, base CVs, and CO bulk oxidation under continuous electrolyte flow, led to the following conclusions ... [Pg.496]

Ultraviolet Examination. When the surface of many materials is illuminated by ultraviolet light, it emits fluorescence (see Textbox 22). Since no two materials exhibit the same form of fluorescence, the inspection of surfaces under ultraviolet light is often appropriate for determining the nature of the surface differences between an original surface, repaired areas, patches, and repaints are normally clearly shown by differences in fluorescence the technique is not suitable, however, for detecting entire fakes. Objects made of... [Pg.462]

When investigating opaque or transparent samples, where the laser light can penetrate the surface and be scattered into deeper regions, Raman light from these deeper zones also contributes to the collected signal and is of particular relevance with non-homogeneous samples, e.g., multilayer systems or blends. The above equation is only valid, if the beam is focused on the sample surface. Different considerations apply to confocal Raman spectroscopy, which is a very useful technique to probe (depth profile) samples below their surface. This nondestructive method is appropriate for studies on thin layers, inclusions and impurities buried within a matrix, and will be discussed below. [Pg.529]

The great importance of minerals in prebiotic chemical reactions is undisputed. Interactions between mineral surfaces and organic molecules, and their influence on self-organisation processes, have been the subject of much study. New results from Szostak and co-workers show that the formation of vesicles is not limited to one type of mineral, but can involve various types of surfaces. Different minerals were studied in order to find out how particle size, particle shape, composition and charge can influence vesicle formation. Thus, for example, montmorillonite (Na and K10), kaolinite, talc, aluminium silicates, quartz, perlite, pyrite, hydrotalcite and Teflon particles were studied. Vesicle formation was catalysed best by aluminium solicate, followed by hydrotalcite, kaolinite and talcum (Hanczyc et al., 2007). [Pg.273]

The intensity factor - the specific activity of the filler at its interface with the rubber. This is dependant upon the filler s physical structure and the chemical nature of its surface. Different rubbers will behave differently to the same filler. [Pg.142]

On the basis of crystallochemistry consideration and taking into account electron microscopy observations of the surface of crystals upon which some polymer was formed,99 Arlman and Cossee13 concluded that the active sites are located on crystal surfaces different from the basal (001) ones. In particular, these authors considered in detail active sites located on crystal surfaces parallel in the direction a — b of the unit cell defined as in Ref. 98. Figure 1.13 illustrates that, if we cut a TiCl3 layer parallel to the direction defined above, which corresponds to the line connecting two bridged Ti atoms, electroneutrality conditions impose that each Ti atom at the surface of the cut be bonded... [Pg.39]

Active sites located on crystal surfaces different from the basal (001) ones were also proposed by Allegra14 for which the Ti atom at the surface of the cut would be bonded to four Cl atoms only (bridged to further metal atoms) (Figure 1.14). In this case both octahedral sites of coordination for the monomer and growing chain (indicated by arrows in Figure 1.14) are equivalent because the surface atoms with relevant nonbonded interactions at the catalytic site are locally related by a twofold axis (dashed line in Figure 1.14). It is worth noting that this model site presents a local C2 symmetry as the isospecific metallocenes of the previous section. [Pg.40]

The purpose of this section is to point out how the electronic properties of the surface differ from those of the bulk. In the next section we explain how the electronic properties are involved in chemisorption, and why promoters can help molecules to chemisorb and react on surfaces [6-8]. [Pg.300]

Obviously, many combinations arise different boundary conditions for different species on the same surface, different boundary conditions on different adjacent surfaces (mixed boundary conditions) for the same species, prescribed combinations of flux and concentrations at a certain surface, etc. [Pg.124]

In the particular case dealt with now (fully labile complexation), due to the linearity of a combined diffusion equation for DmCm + DmlL ml, the flux in equation (65) can still be seen as the sum of the independent diffusional fluxes of metal and complex, each contribution depending on the difference between the surface and bulk concentration value of each species. But equation (66) warns against using just a rescaling factor for the total metal or for the free metal alone. In general, if the diffusion is coupled with some nonlinear process, the resulting flux is not proportional to bulk-to-surface differences, and this complicates the use of mass transfer coefficients (see ref. [II] or Chapter 3 in this volume). [Pg.182]

Hydroxyapatite and fluoroapatite surfaces differ from oxide surfaces in as far as they are expected to carry two different classes of surface groups (Wu et al., 1991). From a simple pictorial presentation... [Pg.66]

It is commonly agreed that E2 is different from E0 because the resultants of the forces acting on elementary particles (i.e. electrons, atoms, ions, etc.) near the rupture surface differ from those in the bulk of the material the bulk is more symmetrical than the surface layer. [Pg.12]

Even if a same azide is used as the sensitizer, such properties of the photoresist as photosensitivity, photocurability and adhesion to base surfaces differ depending on the property of the base polymer. That is, degree of cyclization, content of the unsaturated groups and molecular weight of the polymer affect the photoresist properties mentioned above. H.L.Hunter et al. have discussed the dependence of the sensitivity of polybutadiene photoresist on the polymer structure, and have concluded that a higher sensitivity was obtained when 1,2- and 3, -isomers were used( 7.) ... [Pg.185]

The initial conditions and those at semi-infinite distance are the same as for the reversible case. The conditions at the electrode surface differ. In this case they are ... [Pg.59]

Similar discrepancies can be found in regard to the inner-layer capacitance at electrode surface, different supporting electrolytes used, and various methods of preparing the single crystals. Valette showed that fluorides are specifically though weakly adsorbed on silver electrodes, an effect not observed by Vitanov et... [Pg.19]


See other pages where Surface differences is mentioned: [Pg.242]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.958]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.495]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.339]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.149 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info