Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Quality control final method

A final component of a quality control program is the certification of an analyst s competence to perform the analysis for which he or she is responsible. Before an analyst is allowed to perform a new analytical method, he or she may be required to successfully analyze an independent check sample with acceptable accuracy and precision. The check sample should be similar in composition to samples that the analyst will routinely encounter, with a concentration that is 5 to 50 times that of the method s detection limit. [Pg.708]

Finally, the textbook concludes with two chapters discussing the design and maintenance of analytical methods, two topics of importance to analytical chemists. Chapter 14 considers the development of an analytical method, including its optimization, verification, and validation. Quality control and quality assessment are discussed in Chapter 15. [Pg.815]

In current practice the fluorescence assay is often followed by the use of hybridization techniques when more selectivity is required. We have for instance used the fluorescence techniques to obtain data on the nucleic acid content of malaria vaccine proteins produced in Escherichia coli. The rapid turnaround time of the fluorescence assay is particularly useful during the early stages of purification to determine the optimal process conditions. After the final process has been arrived at and a variety of methods used to assess the nucleic acid content (including the hybridization techniques), the fluorescence method can be developed for routine quality-control purposes. In certain cases, particularly at high protein concentrations, the dye may bind to the protein with... [Pg.48]

Finally, it is very difficult to keep standard solutions for monitoring or recalibration purposes. Control batches should be purged and kept with a dry, inert gas. As long as results are reproduced, the system is considered to be in calibration. The relatively long extraction times usually prohibit the use of these methods for quality control analysis applications in a plastics manufacturing plant. [Pg.59]

While the decrease in extraction time is favourable for laboratories in general, it can be critical when laboratory analyses are used in feedback control of production cycles and quality control of manufacturing processes. The volume of solvents used in PFE can be some 10 times less than traditional extraction methods (cf. Table 3.36). PFE cuts solvent consumption by up to 95 %. Because so little solvent is used, final clean-up and concentration are fast direct injection in analytical devices is often possible. Automated PFE systems can extract up to 24 sample cells. [Pg.120]

All aspects of the laboratory s work which might affect the validity of the final result should be inspected. This will include, for example, documentation, equipment, calibrations, methods, materials, record keeping, sample recording, labelling, quality control checks and log of daily checks, among many others. Some aspects, however, are outside the scope of such an audit, such as safety and security matters, which usually have separate arrangements for auditing. [Pg.235]

In the new vision, assay cycle time is dramatically reduced and the criteria used to measure assay acceptability are matched to sample type. Early screening samples may be assayed using simple methods and minimum numbers of standards. Samples from early preclinical PK studies in rats and other species may require additional standards. Finally, for PK studies performed in the lead characterization phase, one might add quality control (QC) samples. One set of rules for non-GLP assays has been codified in a recent publication.16 These rules make it possible to match the assay cycle time with the in-life cycle time in order to minimize the total discovery cycle time. [Pg.207]

For the dissolution test to be used as an effective drug product characterization and quality control tool, the method must be developed with the various end uses in mind. In some cases, the method used in the early phase of product and formulation development could be different from the final test procedure utilized for control of the product quality. Methods used for formulation screening or BA and/or bioequivalency evaluations may simply be impractical for a quality control environment. It is essential that with the accumulation of experience, the early method be critically re-evaluated and potentially simplified, giving preference to compendial apparatus and media. Hence, the final dissolution method submitted for product registration may not necessarily closely imitate the in vivo environment but should still test the key performance indicators of the formulation. [Pg.353]

Eollowing finalization of drug substance synthetic routes and drug product formulation, the focus shifts to the development of robust and transferable methods for post-approval support at quality control units. It is important to remember during the final stage of method development that achievement of separation conditions is only one of the necessary parameters for successful method implementation. Extensive studies to measure robustness and quantitative method performance are conducted to assure that the method performs as intended in quality control laboratories. It should be emphasized that successful method development requires extensive cooperation between the development laboratory and the receiving quality control laboratories. [Pg.5]

Final methods are developed for transfer to operational quality control (QC) laboratories for the release testing of production batches. Additionally, the methods are intended to be applied during Registration Stability studies and for the release of the DP or DS validation batches during the pre-approval development stage. The analytical methods should last for the entire product lifetime therefore, the aim of final method development is to generate fast, robust, reliable, and transferable HPLC methods (preferably isocratic and at low cost). [Pg.166]

The strict regulations of the pharmaceutical industry have a significant effect on the quality control of final products, demanding the use of reliable and fast analytical methods. The capacity that the technique has for the simultaneous determination of several APIs with no need of, or with minimum, sample preparation has considerably increased its application in pharmaceutical analytical control. The main limitation of NIR is the relatively low sensitivity that limits the determination of APIs in preparations when their concentration is less than 0.1%. Nevertheless, instrumental improvements allow the determination below this limit depending on the nature of the analyte and the matrix, with comparable errors to the ones obtained with other instrumental techniques. The reference list presents an ample variety of analytical methodologies, types of samples, nature of analyte and calibration models. A detailed treatment of each one is beyond the scope of... [Pg.483]

Quality control and assurance Final product must be made under current good manufacturing process (cGMP)— emphasis placed on the final bulk product The product is the manufacturing process —cGMPs from seed stock or first step onward evaluated with equal scrutiny Regulated under analytical procedures and method validation, chemistry, manufacturing and control (CMC) documentation... [Pg.16]

There are many reasons for the need to validate analytical procedures. Among them are regulatory requirements, good science, and quality control requirements. The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 311.165c explicitly states that the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of test methods employed by the firm shall be established and documented. Of course, as scientists, we would want to apply good science to demonstrate that the analytical method used had demonstrated accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility. Finally management of the quality control unit would definitely want to ensure that the analytical methods that the department uses to release its products are properly validated for its intended use so the product will be safe for human use. [Pg.728]

Samples are to be taken during and/or after each critical manufacturing step. All control parameters for the manufacturing process have to be monitored and recorded. Each sample analysis will be performed in duplicate using validated or accepted pharmacopeia methods. The sample results will be used to confirm in-process and final product quality attributes as defined by the preestablished specifications. Conformance with specifications will justify the appropriateness of the critical parameters used during the process validation. [Pg.825]

Analytical potency method development should be performed to the extent that it is sufficient for its intended purpose. It is important to understand and know the molecular structure of the analyte during the method development process, as this will facilitate the identification of potential degradation impurities. For example, an impurity of M + 16 in the mass spectrum of a sample may indicate the probability of a nitrogen oxide formation. Upon successful completion of method development, the potency method will then be validated to show proof that it is suitable for its intended purpose. Finally, the method validated will be transferred to the quality control laboratory in preparation for the launch of the drug substance or drug product. [Pg.11]

Intralaboratory Quality Control. In its efforts to establish minimum intralaboratory quality control, the USEPA has incorporated certain mandatory quality control practices into each of the 600-series organic methods promulgated as part of final rule making on October 26, 1984 (10). These quality control practices are found in Section 8 of each EMSL method. [Pg.86]

Quality assurance is concerned with maintaining the quality of products to set standards. This embraces the control of incoming materials, the control of compounds produced, the control of manufacturing processes and guaranteeing as far as possible the quality of the final product. Quality assurance schemes utilise physical testing methods as a most important part of their system. In fact most of the standardised test methods are principally... [Pg.16]


See other pages where Quality control final method is mentioned: [Pg.467]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.747]    [Pg.669]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.674]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.529]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.626]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.626]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.729]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.762]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.1092]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.230]   


SEARCH



Control methods

Final method

QUALITY method

Quality control method

© 2024 chempedia.info