Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Final Rule

For the final rule, another parameter, K, the coefficient of variation, is introduced. [Pg.169]

FDA has pubHshed two final rules for hair products as of this writing (69). Any over-the-counter (OTC) dmg product labeled or promoted for external use as a hair grower or for hair loss prevention is regarded as a new dmg and must be the subject of an approved new dmg appHcation (NDA). Products making these claims without an NDA are considered to be ia violation of the Federal Food, Dmg and Cosmetic Act and are also mislabeled. [Pg.461]

Occupational Exposure to Formaldehyde, Final Rule," Fed. Reg, Part 11, Dept, of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 29 CFR, Part 1910, May 27, 1992. [Pg.537]

Nonattamment. EPA issued final rules for the Emission Offset PoHcy governing development in nonattainment areas. A new source must apply the lowest achievable emission rate (LAER) for the problem poUutant and must obtain a more than equivalent offsetting emission reduction from existing sources. Either the existing sources can be owned by the same company, or the reduction can be bought from other companies. In this way, new growth is ahowed while air quahty improvement is achieved. [Pg.77]

US Coast Guard, Compatibility of Cargoes, published in 46 CFR Ch. 1 (10-1-93 ed.)—Part 150 with changes that appeared in the Federal Register dated April 11, 1994 as a Final Rule by Coast Guard (USCG-D-92-100) for Bulk Hazardous Materials. [Pg.157]

Federal Register, Part II, Environmental Protection Agency, 40 CFR Part 300, Hazard Ranking System Final Rule, Vol. 55, No. 241, December 14, 1990. [Pg.240]

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Final Rule, Control of Air Pollution From New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicle Engines Refueling Emission Regulations for... [Pg.266]

Qccupational Safety and Health Administration (QSHA) (1992). 29 CFR Part 1910. Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals Explosives and Blasting Agents Final Rule. Federal Register 57, 36 (February 24), 6356-417. [Pg.143]

In addition, manufacturers obtained language allowing federal standards to preempt state efforts in most cases. Pursuant to this legislation, the Carter Administration proposed appliance standards in mid-1980, but was unable to issue a final rule before the Reagan Administration took over. [Pg.78]

In April of 1998, the EPA published a final rule for emission of oxides of nitrogen (NOx), hydrocarbons (EIC), carbon monoxide (CO), particulate matter (PM), and smoke opacity for newly manufactured and rcmanufacturcd locomotives. The rulemaking took effect in 2000 and is estimated by the EPA to cost the railroads 80 million per year—about 163 per ton of NOx reduced, according to EPA figures. The emissions standards for the several pollutants will be implemented in three tiers—for locomotives... [Pg.730]

EPA. 2001. Methyl parathion notice of pesticide tolerance revocations final rule. Department of Health and Human Services. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 40 CFR Part 180. Federal Register 66(4) 1242-1246. [Pg.207]

OSHA. 1989a. Air Contaminants. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Federal Register. 54 FR 2608. Final Rule. January 19, 1989. [Pg.309]

FDA. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21 Food and Drugs, Part 11 Electronic Records Electronic Signatures Final Rule, Fed Regr 62 (54), 13429-13466 (20 March 1997). [Pg.64]

Final Condition - The leaves of the explanation and the top level goal. Fig. 13. Explanation structure with unified bindines and the final rule. [Pg.325]

Medicare program revisions to pa3mient policies under the physician fee schedule for calendar year 2003 and inclusion of registered nurses in the personnel provision of the critical access hospital emergency services requirement for frontier areas and remote locations. Final rule with comment period. Fed Regist 2002 67 79965-80184. [Pg.232]

EPA. 198 le. Hazardous waste management system Identification and listing of hazardous waste Final rule. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Federal Register 46 4614-4620. [Pg.263]

USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. Standards of performance for new and existing stationary sources electric utihty steam generating units Final Rule. Fed Reg 70, Wednesday, May 18, 2005/Rules and Regulations. 40 CFR Parts 60, 72, and 75. [OAR-2002-0056 FRL-7888-1]. RIN 2060-AJ65... [Pg.11]

US EPA, HERA, Good Laboratory Practice Standards, Final Rule (40 CFR Part 160 [OPP-300165A FRL-3518-2]) RIN 2070-AB68, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC... [Pg.726]

CFR, Part 160, Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Good Laboratory Practice Standards Final Rule, August 17, 1989, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC (1989). [Pg.1025]

This regulation including its preamble and the final rule itself detailed the minimal requirements. The interpretation of the rule is stronger than the printed word. The goal of FDA was to require electronic records and e-signatures to be reliable, trustworthy, and available to the Agency for inspection. [Pg.1077]

Electronic Records, Electronic Signatures Final Rule, 21 CFR Part 11, Federal Register, Vol. 62, No. 54, US Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD (1997). Also available on the World Wide Web http //www.fda.gov/ora/compliance refypartll/default.htm. [Pg.1085]

Israelsen LD, Blumenthal M. FDA issues final rules for structure/function claims for dietary supplements under DSHEA. HerbalGram 48 32-38, 2000. [Pg.744]

On June 19, 1998, U.S. EPA finalized the first phase of the MACT rule. This final rule includes the comparable fuels exclusion and amendments to the permit modification procedures for combustion facilities. [Pg.978]

U.S. EPA promulgated MACT standards for most HWCs on September 30, 1999. These emission standards created a technology-based national cap for HAP emission from the combustion of hazardous waste in these devices. A number of parties, representing both industrial and environmental communities, requested judicial review of this rule, and challenged its emission standards and several implementation provisions. On July 24,2001, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated the emission standards however, it allowed EPA to promulgate interim standards that were in place since February 13, 2002. U.S. EPA issued the new Final Rule and standards on April 20, 2004. Today s standards30 31 shown in Tables 23.5 and 23.6 result from the above judiciary and regulatory actions. [Pg.979]

Source U.S. EPA, Fact Sheet—Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Standards, EPA530-F-05-018, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, September 2005 and U.S. EPA, 40 CFR Parts 9, 63, 260, 264, 265, 266, 270 and 271, National emission standards for hazardous air pollutants Final standards for hazardous air pollutants for hazardous waste combustors, final rule, Federal Register, 70, 196, October 12, 2005. a Standards expressed as mass of pollutant per million Btu contributed by the hazardous waste. [Pg.981]


See other pages where Final Rule is mentioned: [Pg.503]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.1029]    [Pg.1079]    [Pg.1085]    [Pg.1537]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.967]    [Pg.975]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.75 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.106 ]




SEARCH



Electronic records final rule

Final Military Munitions Rule

Final Rule for Process Safety Management

© 2024 chempedia.info