Diameter column

The cross-sectional area Aq and diameter d for a rectification unit, result from a flow equation in which the vapor is the reference phase 

Semicontinuous rectification processes are of practical importance for vapor mixtures generated in a discontinuous chemical reaction. These then have to be separated into a component continuously fed back to the reactor and a discharging fraction. For example, the main task during the transesterification of dimethyl teraphthalate with ethylene glycol is to continuously separate methanol from the reaction mixture. The reaction equilibrium is then shifted toward the product. Methanol is the top product of the column which is connected directly to the transesterification reactor. The high-boiling, or heavy, bottom product. 

It is recommended to compare the result from the calculations for four reference cross sections the cross section at the column head, the cross sections above and below the feed tray and the cross section of the column bottom. 

The maximum allowed vapor velocity Wg au depends on the type and geometry of the column internals, on the reflux load, and the properties of the phases in contact. 

In order to reach the most possible intensive contact between the counterflow phases (vapor and reflux) and hence good mass and heat transfer, the rectification column is equipped with internals. Internals include trays, rotating devices and packing. Columns with stepwise phase contact, e. g., tray columns, and columns with rotating internals, and wetting columns with a continuous phase contact, e.g., packed columns can he distinguished. 

The effect of the column diameter on the shapes of elution curves was studied with use of hard particles (Toyopearl HW55F) for gel chromatography [7] and soft particles (Matrex Blue A) for affinity chromatography [8], The results showed that Hs did not vary for column diameters of 1.0-9.0 cm in the former case, nor for column diameters of 1.65-18.4 cm in the latter case. 

When soft compressible particles are used, the pressure drop increases substantially with the velocity of the mobile phase above a certain velocity because of compression of the particles, thus limiting allowable velocity. Such compression of particles becomes significant with increases in the column diameter. 

In a gel chromatography column packed with particles of average radius 22 pm at an interstitial velocity of the mobile phase 1.2 cm min, two peaks show poor separation characteristics, that is, Rs = 0.85. 

The gas-liquid mass transfer coefficient and gas holdup tend to decrease with increasing BC diameter in the homogeneous and transition flow regime (Zahradnik et al., 1997) up to a critical value (Deckwer, 1992 Shah et al., 1982 Zahradnik et al., 1997), which is usually cited to be = 0.15m (Kantarci et al., 2005)  

Although Ae slug flow regime is defined by low gas holdup and is observed in small BCs, small BCs do not necessarily have low gas holdup. The smaller BC diameter may limit the bubble size distribution, which can lead to smaller bubbles, increase stability, and sustain a higher gas holdup. Once the column diameter is 

The gas velocity must, therefore, be less than the flooding velocity. However, if it is much less, the mass transfer between the two phases will be less efficient and, hence, taller columns will be required to perform a given separation. The advantage of low gas velocities is lower liquid pressure losses and, thus, lower pumping cost to operate the column. A balance in gas velocity is needed between the liquid pumping power costs and the fixed cost and practicality of excessively tall columns. Typically, a column is designed to operate at one-half the flooding velocity. 

Because the gas throughput (mass or volumetric flow) in an absorption process is typically a set design parameter, a variable other than gas flow must be adjusted to maintain an acceptable velocity. The column diameter is the chosen parameter. According to 

Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering. Reproduced with permission of McGraw-Hill companies. 

For a given gas with solute and liquid solvent pair, thQ Gx/Gy or L/G ratio can be set using a comparison of the equilibrium line to the operating line. This concept will be discussed later in the chapter. These two ratios are equal because the area term cancels 

More details on selection and scale-up of columns are available [3]. 

Most of the factors that affect column operation are due to vapor flow conditions either excessive or too low. Vapor flow velocity is dependent on column diameter. Weeping determined the minimum vapor flow required, while flooding determines the maximum vapor flow allowed. The incorrect ratio 

Aj is the cross-sectional area of the downcomer. Rearranging the equation for tower inside cross-sectional area  

The ratio of the down comer cross-sectional area to tray cross-sectional area  

The flooding velocity (lif) is computed based on a force balance on a suspended liquid droplet. 

Capacity value, Cgg values for 24 in tray spacing (Adapted from Fair R. J., 1961. Petro./Chem. Egn., 33 45-52.) 

Bata required for judging the number of separating stages 

Section (a) Packed columns (b) Plate columns (c) Columns with various elements 

2 Length of packing Active column length Active column length 

4 Reflux ratio and amount of reflux referred to the free cross-section (ml/cm h)  

8 Shape, material Plate distance Description of operation 

---

Vapor density increases, giving a smaller column diameter. 

Large heat loads will cause high vapor rates, and these require large column diameters. 

The effect of increasing column diameter is to increase the tendency for circulation, and hence to increase the axial mixing (62,63). However, extremely few measurements of axial mixing at the industrial scale are available, so large-scale contactor design must still rely quite heavily on empirical experience with the particular type of equipment. 

The effective interfacial area depends on a number of factors, as discussed in a review by Charpentier [C/j m. Eng.J., 11, 161 (1976)]. Among these factors are (1) the shape and size of packing, (2) the packing material (for example, plastic generally gives smaller interfacial areas than either metal or ceramic), (3) the liquid mass velocity, and (4), for smaU-diameter towers, the column diameter. 

Packed columns must be provided with good initial distribution of liquid across the column cross section and redistribution of liquid at various height intei vals that decrease with increasing column diameter. A wide variety of distributors and redistributors are available. Packed columns should be considered when ... 

Packed columns are almost always used for column diameters less than 762 mm (30 in) but other wise generally need not be considered when ... 

The downcomer zones generally occupy 10 to 30 percent of the total cross section. For segmental downcomers, weir length ranges from 60 to 80 percent of the column diameter, so that the downcomer zone on each end of the plate occupies from 5 to 15 percent of the total cross section. 

The peripheral stiffening zone (tray ring) is generally 25 to 50 mm (1 to 2 in) wide and occupies 2 to 5 percent of the cross section, the fraction decreasing with increase in plate diameter. Peripheiy waste (Fig. 14-28) occurs primarily with bubble-cap trays and results from the inabihty to fit the cap layout to the circular form of the plate. Valves and perforations can be located close to the wall and little dead area results. Typical values of the fraction of the total cross-sectional area available for vapor dispersion and contact with the liquid for cross-flow plates with a chord weir equal to 75 percent of the column diameter are given in Table 14-6. 

Disperser System Column diameter, ft Tray spacing, in Pressure, psia Static submergence, in Efficiency, % Remarks Ref. 

Comparison of Efficiency of Various Plates Several studies of various plates have been carried out under conditions such that direct and meaningful comparisons are possible. Required conditions include identical system, same pressure, same column diameter, and equivalent submergence. Standart and coworkers [B/ Chem. Eng., 11 (11), 1370 (1966) Sep. Sci, 2, 439 (1967)] used the methanol-water system at atmospheric pressure in a 1.0-m (3.3-ft) column. For a plate spacing of 0.4 m (15.7 in) they studied the following ... 

Testing of plates and other devices is carried out by Fractionation Research, Inc. for industrial sponsors. Some of the test data for sieve plates have been published for the cyclohexane//i-heptane and isobu-tane//i-butane systems. Representative data are shown in Fig. 14-43. These are taken from Sakata and Yanagi Jn.stn. Chem. Engis. Symp. See. No. 56, 3.2/21 (1979)] and Yanagi and Sakata [Jnd. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Devel, 21, 712 (1982)]. The column diameter was 1.2 m, tray spacing was 600 mm, and weir height was 50 mm. 

FIG. 14-62 Comp arisen of composition profiles at different bed freights and two sizes of ceramic rascfiig rings. Column diameter =1.2 m, eyelofiexane/ n-fieptane system at 1,65 bar and total reflux, [Silvey and KaUet- I, Chem, E, Synrp, Ser, No, 32, 2.96.9,]... 

FK . 14-63 Efficiency of beds of 51 mm Pali rings with two different distributors. Column diameter =1.2 m, cyclohexane/n-heptane system at 1.65 bar and total reflux. [Shariat and Kunesh, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 34 1273 (1995).] Reproduced with permission. Copyright 1995, American Chemical Society. 

Efficiency data for a representative structured packing at two column diameters are shown in Fig. 14-74. The Max-Pak packing has a surface area of 246 m /m (7.5 ft /fE). The same test mixture (cyclo-hexane//i-heptane) and operating pressure was used for both tests. It would appear that column diameter does not have an influence in this range of values (0.43 to 1.2 m). 

FIG. 14-74 HETP values for Max-Pak structured packing,. 35 kPa (5 psia), two column diameters. Cyclohexane/n-heptane system, total reflux. For 0.4.3 m (1.4 ft) column perforated pipe distributor, 400 streams/m2, 3.05 m (10 ft) bed height. For 1.2 m (4.0 ft) column tubed drip pan distributor, 100 streams/m ,. 3.7 m (12 ft) bed height. Smaller column data. University of Texas/Austin Larger column data. Fractionation Research, Inc. To convert (ft/s)(lb/ft ) to (m/s)(kg/m ) , multiply by 1.2199. (Couiiesy Jaeger Troducts, Inc., Housion, Texas.)... 

Use U.S. customary units only in this equation. In sizing the column diameter, it is ususlly assumed that the continuous phase velocity will set at 40 percent of this value, and therefore the column diameter is calculated by ... 

Once the column diameter is determined, the stage geometry can be fixed. The geometiy of a stage is a complex function of the column diameter in the pilot (0.075 ni) column the stage height to diameter ratio is on the order of 1 3 on a 3-m diameter column it is on the order of 1 8. 

Karr, Holmes, and Cusack have given comparisons of the Karr column volumetric efficiency with other types of extractors. In Table 15-10 are data showing the values of HETS and volumetric efficiency over a range of column diameters from 1-36 in (0.025-0.9 m) Fig. 15-51... 

Column diameter in. Amplitude, in. Plate spacing, in. Agitator speed, strokes/min Extractant Dispersed phase Minimum HETS Throughput, gal hr- ft-2 Volumetric efficiencies V/HETS,h" ... 

Calculation of column diameter (for packed columns, this is usually based on flooding conditions, and, for plate columns, on the optimum gas velocity or the liquid-handling capacity of the plate)... 

Here are two quick approximation methods for bubble cap tray column diameter. 

Smith recommends obtaining the settling height (tray spacing minus clear liquid depth) by applying the familial Francis Weir formula. For our purposes of rapidly checking column diameter, a faster approach is needed. 

A flood factor of. 65 to. 75 should be used for column diameters under 36" to compensate for wall effects. Larger columns are typically designed for about 80% of flood. 

Once packing heights are determined in other sections from HETP (distillation) or Koa (absorption), the height allowances for the internals (from Figure 1) can be added to determine the overall column height. Column diameter is determined in sections on capacity and pressure drop for the selected packing (random dumped or structured). 

First let s discuss column diameter. There is a minimum column diameter for a given sized packing. Table 5 shows this relationship. 

Table 6 show s maximum liquid loading rates per fr of column diameter. Minimum liquid rate runs 0.5 to 2gpm/ft ... 

Methods for quick sizing trayed fractionation and absorption column diameter have been reduced here to equations to facilitate programming for calculators or computers. Three methods are discussed and it is not a bad idea to compare results with all three. 

F Factor. The use of the F factor for fractionating column diameter quick estimation is shown in Reference 3. The developed equation for the F factor is ... 

---