Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

The initial distribution

At very short times, very little motion of reactants has occurred so that little, if any, reaction will have taken place. But the manner of creation of the mixture of A and B reactants should be considered. A very simple means of preparing a reaction mixture is by photolysis. For instance, consider a solution of anthracene and carbon tetrabromide. Photostimulation of anthracene with an extremely short duration light pulse produces excited singlet (and triplet) states. The carbon tetrabromide quenches the excited singlet state fluorescence very efficiently. Just before the photostimulation event, the quencher (i.e. B) is randomly distributed throughout the system volume and for a short time after photostimulation, it remains randomly distributed. With the exception of the location where the fluorophor A is, there is no preferred location of the quencher B. No [Pg.10]


In a reservoir at initial conditions, an equilibrium exists between buoyancy forces and capillary forces. These forces determine the initial distribution of fluids, and hence the volumes of fluid in place. An understanding of the relationship between these forces is useful in calculating volumetries, and in explaining the difference between free water level (FWL) and oil-water contact (OWC) introduced in the last section. [Pg.120]

Smoluchowski theory [29, 30] and its modifications fonu the basis of most approaches used to interpret bimolecular rate constants obtained from chemical kinetics experiments in tenus of difhision effects [31]. The Smoluchowski model is based on Brownian motion theory underlying the phenomenological difhision equation in the absence of external forces. In the standard picture, one considers a dilute fluid solution of reactants A and B with [A] [B] and asks for the time evolution of [B] in the vicinity of A, i.e. of the density distribution p(r,t) = [B](rl)/[B] 2i ] r(t))l ] Q ([B] is assumed not to change appreciably during the reaction). The initial distribution and the outer and inner boundary conditions are chosen, respectively, as... [Pg.843]

We set the initial distribution to be canonical, however, other distributions may be used as well. We further define the average with respect to the path ... [Pg.277]

The initial distribution of binding fluid can have a pronounced influence on the size distribution of seed granules, or nuclei, which are formed from fine powder. Both the final extent of and the rate at... [Pg.1879]

Liquid Holdup The major factor influencing this property is the liquia flow rate, but the shape, size, and wetting characteristics of the particles and the gas rate and the initial distribution of liquid also enter in. One of the simpler correlations is that of Midoux et al. (J. [Pg.2121]

What is remarkable about this very simple appearing rule is that one can show that it is capable of univer.sal computation. This means that with a proper selection of initial conditions (i.e. the initial distribution of live and dead cells). Life can be turned into a general purpose computer. This fact fundamentally limits the overall predictability of Life s behavior. [Pg.14]

The simplest approximation to make is simply that the initial distribution of live" sites is completely random and that any site-site correlations are negligible i.e. we first take a conventional Mean-Field approach (see section 7.4). In this case, the equilibrium density can be written down almost by inspection. The probability of a site having value 1 (= p) is equal to the probability that it had value 1 on the previous time step multiplied by the probability that it stays equal to 1 (i.e. the probability that a site has either 2 or 3 live neighboring sites) plus the probability that the site was previously equal to 0 multiplied by the probability that it become 1 (i.e. that it is surrounded by exactly 3 live sites). Letting p and p represent the density at times t and t + 1, respectively, simple counting yields ... [Pg.364]

We could explain the results of this experiment die way we did before die final distribution is clearly much more probable than the initial distribution. There is, however, another useful way of looking at this process. The system has gone from a highly ordered state (all the H2 molecules on the left, all the N2 molecules on the right) to a more disordered, or random, state in which the molecules are distributed evenly between the two bulbs. The same situation holds when marbles rather than molecules are mixed (Figure 17.3). In general, nature tends to move spontaneously from more ordered to more random states. [Pg.453]

It is seen that in the steady state the total mass is distributed between the two reservoirs in proportion to the sink coefficients (in reverse proportion to the turnover times), independent of the initial distribution. [Pg.69]

Fig. 128.—Calculated distribution for each of eight fractions separated from the initial distribution shown by the uppermost curve. Dotted lines represent distribution of polymer remaining in the dilute phase after each successive precipitation with =10 in each case. The distribution for each fraction, obtained as the differences between successive dotted curves, is shown by a solid curve. (Schulz. )... Fig. 128.—Calculated distribution for each of eight fractions separated from the initial distribution shown by the uppermost curve. Dotted lines represent distribution of polymer remaining in the dilute phase after each successive precipitation with =10 in each case. The distribution for each fraction, obtained as the differences between successive dotted curves, is shown by a solid curve. (Schulz. )...
The activity of CoSx-MoSx/NaY (2. IMo/SC) is shown in Fig.5 for the HYD of butadiene as a function of the Co/Mo atomic ratio. The HYD activity decreased slightly on the addition of Co up to Co/Mo = ca. 1, followed by a steep decrease at a further incorporation of Co. The HYD/HDS activity ratio decreased with increasing Co content and reached the ratio for CoSx/NaY at the Co/Mo atomic ratio of the maximum HDS activity (Fig.3). The product selectivity in the HYD of butadiene shifted from t-2-butene rich distribution to 1-butene rich one on the addition of Co, as presented in Fig.6. It is worthy of noting that at the Co/Mo ratio of the maximum HDS activity, the butene distribution is close to that for CoSx/NaY. It should be noted, however, that these product distributions are not the initial distributions of the HYD over the catalyst but the distributions modified by successive isomerization reactions. It was found that MoSx/NaY showed high isomerization activities of butenes even in the... [Pg.507]

Step 2 Calculate the initial distribution oftoluene in the subsurface. The initial distribution of toluene can be calculated using equations 1 to 5 from Table 14.3 and taking into consideration that the organic phase is a pure compound, i.e., X = 1, m = 1, and y = 1. The total quantity of contaminant per unit soil Ct can be estimated from the known amount of spill Afspill and the volume of the contaminated zone ... [Pg.532]

Wettability is defined as "the tendency of one fluid to spread on or adhere to a solid surface in the presence of other immiscible fluids" (145). Rock wettability can strongly affect its relative permeability to water and oil (145,172). Wettability can affect the initial distribution of fluids in a formation and their subsequent flow behavior. When rock is water-wet, water occupies most of the small flow channels and is in contact with most of the rock surfaces. The converse is true in oil-wet rock. When the rock surface does not have a strong preference for either water or oil, it is termed to be of intermediate or neutral wettability. Inadvertent alteration of rock wettability can strong alter its behavior in laboratory core floods (172). [Pg.27]

If the system evolves according to some stochastic scheme, each initial point can lead to a multitude of trajectories. We note, however, that as long as each trajectory is initiated from an equilibrium distribution, (8.46) can still be rewritten as an average over the initial distribution ... [Pg.299]

We start with some background on existing methods that alter the initial distributions in the reactant basin, focusing in particular on the puddle jumping method of Tully and coworkers [69, 110], which is the inspiration for the skewed momenta method developed in the following section. We continue with a description of the skewed momenta method, as applied to (8.48), with numerical examples for each case. We end with a concluding discussion. [Pg.301]

Of prime importance is the initial distribution of solids at the top of the apparatus. Figure 14 shows the bullet-head solids distributor designed for this purpose. Solids fed from a nearly point source falls on a bullet-shaped target from which they bounce off to land at some distance below, on a fall-breaker baffle which either straightens the particles into essentially vertical paths or simply redistributes them. [Pg.516]

The eigenvalue method was extended by Abell and Funabashi (1973) to investigate the effect of the initial distribution. This only required an integration over that distribution. However, the authors also used the effect of an external field on the free-ion yield as a further probe of the initial distribution. The... [Pg.235]

Dodelet and Freeman (1975) divide the geometry of a multiple-ion-pair spur into spherical concentric shells such that exactly one electron is contained in each shell with respect to the initial distribution/(r)—that is,... [Pg.299]

With an increase of E beyond a certain value specific to the liquid, the free-ion yield increases sublinearly with the field, eventually showing a saturation trend at very high fields (see Mathieu et al.,1967). Freeman and Dodelet (1973) have shown that a fixed electron-ion initial separation underestimates the free-ion yield at high fields, and that a distribution of thermalization distance must be used to explain the entire dependence of Pesc on E. Therefore, the theoretical problem of the variation of free-ion yield with external field is inextricably mixed with that of the initial distribution of electron-cation separation. [Pg.305]

The first way is to obtain the transition probability density by the solution of Eq. (2.6) with the delta-shaped initial distribution and after that averaging it over the initial distribution Wo(x) [see formula (2.4)]. [Pg.363]

This situation is depicted in Fig. 3, where the decision interval [c, d] is chosen in accordance with the concrete stated task and may involve or not involve the initial distribution W(x, 0) = 8(x — xo). [Pg.398]


See other pages where The initial distribution is mentioned: [Pg.89]    [Pg.1057]    [Pg.3011]    [Pg.541]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.603]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.561]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.308]   


SEARCH



Averaging over the initial distribution

Entry to the Environment and Initial Distribution

Other initial distributions and the Greens function

The infinite medium an arbitrary initial distribution

© 2024 chempedia.info