Affinity binding

Micellization is a second-order or continuous type phase transition. Therefore, one observes continuous changes over the course of micelle fonnation. Many experimental teclmiques are particularly well suited for examining properties of micelles and micellar solutions. Important micellar properties include micelle size and aggregation number, self-diffusion coefficient, molecular packing of surfactant in the micelle, extent of surfactant ionization and counterion binding affinity, micelle collision rates, and many others. 

Gilson et al., 1997] Gilson, M., Given, J., Bush, B., and McCammon, J. The statistical-thermodynamic basis for computation of binding affinities A critical review. Biophys. J. 72 (1997) 1047-1069... 

The problems that occur when one tries to estimate affinity in terms of component terms do not arise when perturbation methods are used with simulations in order to compute potentials of mean force or free energies for molecular transformations simulations use a simple physical force field and thereby implicitly include all component terms discussed earlier. We have used the molecular transformation approach to compute binding affinities from these first principles [14]. The basic approach had been introduced in early work, in which we studied the affinity of xenon for myoglobin [11]. The procedure was to gradually decrease the interactions between xenon atom and protein, and compute the free energy change by standard perturbation methods, cf. (10). An (issential component is to impose a restraint on the... 

The critical factor for any method involving an approximation or an extrapolation is its range of application. Liu et al. [15] demonstrated that the approach performed well for mutations involving the creation or deletion of single atoms. The method has also been successfully applied to the prediction of the relative binding affinities of benzene, toluene and o-, p-, and m-xylene to a mutant of T4-lysozyme [16]. In both cases, however, the perturbation to the system was small. To investigate range over which the extrapolation may... 

Aqvist, J., Medina, C., Samuelsson, J. -E. A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design. Prot. Eng. 7 (1994) 385-391... 

The calculation of the binding affinity with con.sidcration of all tbc.se effects for virtual screening is not possible. In order to circumvent thus difficulty, scoring functions arc used instead, c.g., the Liidi scoring function [80, or consensus scoring functions derived from FlevX score, DOCK score, GOLD score, ChemScore, or PMF score [81 ]. 

Fig. 11.6 The SC24/halide system. (Figure adapted from Lybrand T P, ] A McCammon and G Wipff 1986. Theoretical Calculation of Relative Binding Affinity in Host-Guest Systems. Proceedings of the National Al adeniy of Sciences USA 83 833-835.)...

Aqvist J, C Medina and J-E Samuelsson 1994. A New Method for Predicting Binding Affinity Computer-aided Drug Design. Protein Engineering 7 385-391. 

Guo Z and C L Brooks III 1998. Rapid Screening of Binding Affinities Application of the A-Dynamics Method to a Trypsin-Inhibitor System. Journal of the American Chemical Society 120 1920-1921. 

Hansson T, J Mturelius and J Aqvist 1998. Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction by Linear InteracHor Energy Methods. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 12 27-35. 

Jones-Hertzog D K and W L Jorgensen 1997. Binding Affinities for Sulphonamide Inhibitors witl Human Thrombin Using Monte Carlo Simulations with a Linear Response Method. Journal o Medicinal Chemistry 40 1539-1549. 

A, C W Murray, D E Clark, D R Westhead and M D Eldridge 1998. Flexible Docking using Tabu rch and an Empirical Estimate of Binding Affinity. Proteins Structure, Function and Genetics 167-382. 

Eldridge M D, C W Murray, T R Auton, G V Paoliniand R P Mee 1997. Empirical Scoring Functions 1 The Development of a Fast Empirical Scoring Fimction to Estimate the Binding Affinity of Ligand in Receptor Complexes. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 11 425-445. 

Poso A, R Juvonen and J Gynther 1995. Comparative Molecular Field Analysis of Compounds wii CYP2A5 Binding Affinity. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships 14 507-511. 

The coordination of bidentate ligands is generally more efficient than expected on the basis of the binding affinity of monodentate analogues. This is referred to as the chelate effect. For reviews, see (a) Schwarzenbach, G. Helv. Chim. Acta, 1952, 35, 2344 (b) reference 75. 

Quantitative Structure—Activity Relationships. Many quantitative stmcture—activity relationship (QSAR) studies of progestins have appeared in the Hterature and an extensive review of this work is available (174). QSAR studies attempt to correlate electronic, steric, and/or hydrophobic properties to progestational activity or receptor binding affinity. A review focusing on the problems associated with QSAR of steroids has been pubUshed (175). 

---