Application layer

Abbreviated from International Standards Organization-Open System Interconnection. They are the physical, data link, network, transports session, presentation, and application layers. Only the physical, data link, and application layers are present in the mini-MAP. 

A considerable number of systems have been used to separate chlorophylls on thin layers [30,31]. The most readily applicable layers are prepared from cellulose, silica, or sucrose and use hydrocarbon carriers with a polar modifier, usually acetone, in the developing solvent. However, silica layers cause a level of decomposition that is unacceptable for preparative work. Sucrose layers offer no particular advantages in separation and are neither commercially available nor recommended. 

This section should describe the application layer services snpported by the WAN. It shall describe the follows services, e.g.. Electronic Messaging Systems, Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP), etc. 

Application layer Presentation layer Session layer Transport layer... 

Finally, the Application layer allows access to network services. This is the layer at which file services and print services operate. It also is the layer that workstations interact with, and it controls data flow and, if there are errors, recovery. 

Figure 8.10 shows the complete OSI model. Note the relation of each layer to one another and the function of each layer. Also note that when data is sent from one computer to another, the transmission starts above the Application layer and passed down to the Physical layer. Each layer, as it receives information from the layer above, adds its own information and passes the amended packet to the next layer down. At the bottom, the Physical layer places the packet on the wire. The receiver does the exact opposite procedure. The Physical layer takes the packet off the wire, removes the Physical layer header, and transfers the information to the layer above. Each layer reads the information given to it by the transmitting counterpart layer, removes its header, and passes the remained up the stack until the data being transmitted is received by the Application layer. 

Application layer half-duplex communication resource... 

Application layer The seventh, or highest, layer in the International Organization for Standardization s Open Systems Interconnection (ISO/OSI) model for computer-to-computer communications. This layer uses services provided by the lower layers, but is completely insulated from the details of the network hardware. It describes how application programs interact with the network operating system, including database management, e-mail, and terminal emulation programs. 

There is usually a big gap between the application layer and the layer of external models of tools (see again Fig. 1.6 separation line a) Tools only support minor or primitive parts of the work processes of developers, support does not fit to the task to be solved, the presentation of results is not evident, or the communication between developers is done outside of tool environments (phone, meetings, etc.). Work processes are mostly manual and tedious. 

Projects Al, A2, A3, II, 12, and 14 mainly contributed the application layer of this model. BI, B2, B3, and B4 addressed the internal and conceptual models for tool development, and projects Cl and C2 contributed to the platform layer. Of course, there was also a cooperation of projects on any of these layers in order to discuss the models on each layer. Even more, there was a cooperation in order to discuss the transitions of the models from one layer to the next, from top to bottom. 

In Chap. 3, we have discussed novel tools for supporting chemical engineering design processes. The development process of these tools essentially contributes to the PPM, because any tool construction process has to use the application layer of the PPM model. It has to extend it on lower levels, to fulfill the needs of tool implementation. This is the main message of this chapter which is discussed in the following three sections. 

Formal and refined document contents models are needed to supply all information which is later used for the definition of integration rules. Currently, only type hierarchies are used, defining all entities and relationships that are to be considered during integration. Future work will deal with adding more structural information. These models are similar to the document content models of the application layer which, at the moment, are not elaborated. However, they are much more detailed and have to be formal. Also, further information is needed here that is of no interest on the application domain layer. 

It is very unlikely that the interdocument relationships of the application layer are complete in the sense that no additional ones are needed. This is due to two reasons Firstly, many of the languages commonly used for application domain modeling do not support the definition of complex many-to-many relationships. Secondly, from the application point of view, it is sufficient to depict the most important relationships. A complete set of inter-document relationships is only needed when actually building an integrator. 

The transition between application models to executable tool models cannot be easily reahzed. For example, some information which is necessary in a tool model might not be explicitly modeled on the application layer, as different aspects are targeted at both layers. In the following section, we describe how all necessary information is obtained by either adding additional information or by deriving the information from existing apphcation models. 

B) On the application layer, also some problems remain, as it was shown in Sect. 2.6 ... 

C) Which parts of the model are required for tool construction and are not covered by the application domain model Examples include missing model parts (e.g. for version/variant/configuration control) or semantic details of models and tools (e.g. developer task synchronization). They are typically not introduced on the application layer. If all these details were included, this layer would not only give application domain models, but ultimately specify tools and their behavior. 

There are only partial answers to the problem how to distinguish between general and specific models. This problem has to be addressed on the application layer, as well as on the conceptual tool models layer below. 

The question of parameterization is closely related to the distinction between general and specific models of the last subsection. Again, we have partial results on the application layer as well as in the tool construction case studies. Parametrization means not only to distinguish general and specific determinations. It, even more, means to have suitable mechanisms to easily formulate the specific determinations and to add them to the general part of a model. 

On the application layer ((a) in Fig. 6.1) we should parameterize on model construction time between domain knowledge and specific organizational knowledge. 

H) As stated above in (G). there are results on the application layer as well as in the tool models of the case studies, but there is no general and uniform solution at hand for parameterization, which distinguishes between the general model and specific parts on every layer and serves for the transformations between layers (see Fig. 6.11). This is due to the fact that different modeling techniques and different forms of specification mechanisms for general and specific determinations are used at different locations of the PPM. 

Vandalore, B., Feng, W., Jain, R., Fahmy, S. A survey of application layer techniques for adaptive streaming of multimedia. Real-Time Imaging 7(5), 221-235 (2001)... 

---