Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Model different

This sum, when divided by the number of data points minus the number of degrees of freedom, approximates the overall variance of errors. It is a measure of the overall fit of the equation to the data. Thus, two different models with the same number of adjustable parameters yield different values for this variance when fit to the same data with the same estimated standard errors in the measured variables. Similarly, the same model, fit to different sets of data, yields different values for the overall variance. The differences in these variances are the basis for many standard statistical tests for model and data comparison. Such statistical tests are discussed in detail by Crow et al. (1960) and Brownlee (1965). [Pg.108]

Equation XVII-78 turns out to ht type II adsorption isotherms quite well—generally better than does the BET equation. Furthermore, the exact form of the potential function is not very critical if an inverse square dependence is used, the ht tends to be about as good as with the inverse-cube law, and the equation now resembles that for a condensed him in Table XVII-2. Here again, quite similar equations have resulted from deductions based on rather different models. [Pg.628]

The central quantity of interest in homogeneous nucleation is the nucleation rate J, which gives the number of droplets nucleated per unit volume per unit time for a given supersaturation. The free energy barrier is the dommant factor in detenuining J J depends on it exponentially. Thus, a small difference in the different model predictions for the barrier can lead to orders of magnitude differences in J. Similarly, experimental measurements of J are sensitive to the purity of the sample and to experimental conditions such as temperature. In modem field theories, J has a general fonu... [Pg.753]

Figure Bl.9.9. Comparison of the distance distribution fiinction p(r) of a RNA-polymerase core enzyme from the experimental data (open circle) and the simulation data (using two different models). This figure is duplicated from [27], with pennission from Elsevier Science. Figure Bl.9.9. Comparison of the distance distribution fiinction p(r) of a RNA-polymerase core enzyme from the experimental data (open circle) and the simulation data (using two different models). This figure is duplicated from [27], with pennission from Elsevier Science.
Table 2 shows the results of our preliminary calculations of the pKa of the Cys403 residue, for several different models of the enzyme, based on two structures available from the PDB. In the case of the YPT structure, a crystal water molecule is close to Cys403 and was included in some of the calculations as part of the protein (i.e. it was treated with the same internal dielectric as that of the protein). Simulations denoted as -I-H2O in Table 2, include a crystallographically resolved, buried water molecule, situated 3.2lA from... [Pg.191]

Table 2. Predicted intrinsic and apparent pKa values for the Cys403 residue in Yersinia phosphatase for different models of the structure the data refer to a temperature of 293 K and an ionic strength corresponding to 150 mM of monovalent salt. See the text for the detailed description of the conditions under which each pK estimation was made. The experimentally determined value is 4.67 [39]... Table 2. Predicted intrinsic and apparent pKa values for the Cys403 residue in Yersinia phosphatase for different models of the structure the data refer to a temperature of 293 K and an ionic strength corresponding to 150 mM of monovalent salt. See the text for the detailed description of the conditions under which each pK estimation was made. The experimentally determined value is 4.67 [39]...
Altogether, the three different models discussed so far are interconnected as sketched in Fig. 2. Now, we can by-pass the problems connected to caustics For e being small enough QCMD is justified as an approximation of QD if we exclude energy level crossings and discontinuities of the spectral decomposition. [Pg.388]

To be introduced to molecular surfaces and to different models for visualization... [Pg.15]

Chemical structures can be visualized in various different models. [Pg.160]

Proposed flux models for porous media invariably contain adjustable parameters whose values must be determined from suitably designed flow or diffusion measurements, and further measurements may be made to test the relative success of different models. This may involve extensive programs of experimentation, and the planning and interpretation of such work forms the topic of Chapter 10, However, there is in addition a relatively small number of experiments of historic importance which establish certain general features of flow and diffusion in porous media. These provide criteria which must be satisfied by any proposed flux model and are therefore of central importance in Che subject. They may be grouped into three classes. [Pg.50]

They then compared measured and predicted fluxes for diffusion experiments in the mixture He-N. The tests covered a range of pressures and a variety of compositions at the pellet faces but, like the model itself, they were confined to binary mixtures and isobaric conditions. Feng and Stewart [49] compared their models with isobaric flux measurements in binary mixtures and with some non-isobaric measurements in mixtures of helium and nitrogen, using data from a variety of sources. Unfortunately the information on experimental conditions provided in their paper is very sparse, so it is difficult to assess how broadly based are the conclusions they reached about the relative merits oi their different models. [Pg.101]

Dewar s treatment of transition state structure, using reactivity numbers, has the logical defect that in the intermediate kinds of transition states for which it provides evidence the electron localisation is only partial. However, in obtaining the values of the reactivity numbers (which are approximate localization energies), the process of localization is considered to be complete thus, values of parameters which strictly are relevant only to the Wheland type of transition state are incorporated into a different model. ... [Pg.133]

There were two schools of thought concerning attempts to extend Hammett s treatment of substituent effects to electrophilic substitutions. It was felt by some that the effects of substituents in electrophilic aromatic substitutions were particularly susceptible to the specific demands of the reagent, and that the variability of the polarizibility effects, or direct resonance interactions, would render impossible any attempted correlation using a two-parameter equation. - o This view was not universally accepted, for Pearson, Baxter and Martin suggested that, by choosing a different model reaction, in which the direct resonance effects of substituents participated, an equation, formally similar to Hammett s equation, might be devised to correlate the rates of electrophilic aromatic and electrophilic side chain reactions. We shall now consider attempts which have been made to do this. [Pg.137]

The introduction of a methyl substituent into the empirical calculations may be performed according to two main different models the pseudoheteroatomic model and the hyperconjugated model (161-166). Both approximations have been used in rr-electron methods (HMO, w, PPP). On the other hand, in the all-valence-electrons... [Pg.42]

We shall consider a number of different models in this volume. Before proceeding, it might be helpful to remember the status of the model in the methodology of science. Several things come to mind ... [Pg.87]

The viscosity given by Eq. (3.98) not only follows from a different model than the Debye viscosity equation, but it also describes a totally different experimental situation. Viscoelastic studies are done on solid samples for which flow is not measurable. A viscous deformation is present, however, and this result shows that it is equivalent to what would be measured directly, if such a measurement were possible. [Pg.189]

In the next sections we shall discuss the second virial coefficient in terms of several different models. Before turning to these models, however, it is important to summarize the foregoing conclusions ... [Pg.551]

To arrive at an expression for AS, we follow a series of steps which parallel-for a different model-the development of the Flory-Huggins model for AS,... [Pg.554]

Size Distribution Relationships. Different models have been used to describe the size distribution of particles experiencing single and multiple fractures. A model based on fracture at the site of the weakest link and a distribution of weakest links in the system gave results that could be described as well by the Rosin-Rammler relation (56). The latter is based on the concept that fracture takes place at pre-existing flaws that are distributed randomly throughout the particle. [Pg.222]

Comparison of Models Only scattered and inconclusive results have been obtained by calculation of the relative performances of the different models as converiers. Both the RTD and the dispersion coefficient require tracer tests for their accurate determination, so neither method can be said to be easier to apply The exception is when one of the cited correlations of Peclet numbers in terms of other groups can be used, although they are rough. The tanks-in-series model, however, provides a mechanism that is readily visualized and is therefore popular. [Pg.2089]

Human error probabilities can also be estimated using methodologies and techniques originally developed in the nuclear industry. A number of different models are available (Swain, Comparative Evaluation of Methods for Human Reliability Analysis, GRS Project RS 688, 1988). This estimation process should be done with great care, as many factors can affect the reliability of the estimates. Methodologies using expert opinion to obtain failure rate and probability estimates have also been used where there is sparse or inappropriate data. [Pg.2277]

Because of these limitations, different models may appear to describe the unit operation equally well. Analysts must discriminate among various models with the associated parameter estimates that best meet the end-use criteria for the model development. There are three principal criteria forjudging the suitability of one model over another. In addition, there are ancillary criteria like computing time and ease of use that may also contribute to the decision but are not of general concern. [Pg.2578]

Two physically reasonable but quite different models have been used to describe the internal motions of lipid molecules observed by neutron scattering. In the first the protons are assumed to undergo diffusion in a sphere [63]. The radius of the sphere is allowed to be different for different protons. Although the results do not seem to be sensitive to the details of the variation in the sphere radii, it is necessary to have a range of sphere volumes, with the largest volume for methylene groups near the ends of the hydrocarbon chains in the middle of the bilayer and the smallest for the methylenes at the tops of the chains, closest to the bilayer surface. This is consistent with the behavior of the carbon-deuterium order parameters,. S cd, measured by deuterium NMR ... [Pg.488]

The model-dependent aspect of ellipsometric analysis makes it a difficult technique. Several different models fit to one set of data may produce equivalendy low MSEs. The user must integrate and evaluate all available information about the sample to develop a physically realistic model. Another problem in applying ellip-sometry is determining when the parameters of the model are mathematically correlated for example, a thicker film but lower index of refraaion might give the same MSE as some other combinations of index and thickness. That is, the answer is not always unique. [Pg.405]

Compare the current system to the original design Check to see that all equipment called for in the original design was actually installed. See whether original equipment may have been replaced by a different model (i.e., a model with less capacity or different operating characteristics). [Pg.220]

Thus, based on the above, it is not surprising that even under the best conditions an uncertainty factor of approximately 2 is likely in estimates of the plume rise. Despite this somewhat pessimistic introduction, estimations of plume rise are worthwhile and an integral part of the dispersion analysis. Table 2 presents some of the well-known plume rise formulas used in different model approaches. The two major controlling variables which appear in many, if not all, of the plume rise formulas surveyed are ... [Pg.296]

Different models have been published using two or more zones. [Pg.613]

T he best way to determine the capture efficiency is to use the same com tamiHants that are encountered in practical applications. The usually mi known emission rate in Eq. (10.132) can be evaluated by the use of different models especially in the case of evaporation, or by weighing the waste material or by measuring the contaminant concentrations and airflow rates in all exhaust ducts in the space and using Eq. (10.131) to calculate... [Pg.1017]


See other pages where Model different is mentioned: [Pg.2364]    [Pg.2754]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.657]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.2564]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.511]    [Pg.315]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.343 , Pg.345 ]




SEARCH



A Different Business Model

Adjustment for Differences in Body Size PBPK Models

Assessment of Different Model Approaches

Atomic charges from different models

Chromatography difference equation model

Combined models, mixing differences

Comparison between Different Models

Comparison of different models

Comparison of the Different Models

Difference model, modified Bloch

Different Levels and Types of Kinetic Models

Different models absolute

Different models relative

Different models, for

Different models, for molecules

Different predictive models

Different types of model

Dynamic difference equation model for chromatography

Equilibrium-dispersive model finite difference methods

Finite difference techniques diffusion modeling

Finite differences model

Flory model for molecules of different sizes

How different coarse-grained models can be compared

Interfacial stresses difference method model

Inversion barriers different models

Mathematical modeling finite-difference methods

Matrix models linear difference equations

Modeling at different levels of complexity

Modeling different scales

Modeling finite-difference

Need for Different Model Types

Normal stress difference From model

Numerical models stochastic difference equation

Oscillation Model different zones

Polymer melt, dense different chain models

Reduced-order models different forms

Rheological models normal stress difference

Species differences models

Strain difference, diffusion models

Strain differences knockout mouse model

Summary of the Theoretical Properties for Different Time Series Models

The FEBEX benchmark test. Case definition and comparison of different modelling approaches

The different models of adsorption

© 2024 chempedia.info