Accident and worker’ compensation

The safety effect of employee participation in financial returns is theoretically ambiguous and—except for employee-owned firms— there is little prior research on participation in financial returns. The financial return estimates derived from employee ownership are fraught with problems of interpretation, as discussed above. We focus on variation in the degree of involvement in financial returns, aside from employee ownership. If firm profitability increases by taking more employment risks, then accidents and workers compensation costs could rise. We don t expect, however, liiatthat will happen we expect that more financial participation by employees will lower workers compensation costs through either of the channels outlined in Chapter 1 technical efficiency will increase as workers have an increased incentive to raise output, or moral hazard (principal-agent) outcomes will improve as workers have an increased incentive to lower eosts. 

Note Claims cost is the experienced average cost of claims, accidents, and workers compensation for drivers under one year of service. 

Reduce injuries, lost workday accidents, and workers compensation claims. Prevention of damage or destruction to company property or equipment. Increased productivity through reduction of injuries. 

Reduce injuries, lost workday accidents, and workers compensation claims by %. 

OSHA legal liability in the event of a workplace accident civil, criminal, OSHA, and workers compensation liability. 

Fortin, Bernard, and Paul Lanoie. 1992. Substitution between Unemployment Insurance and Workers Compensation An Analysis Applied to the Risk of Workplace Accidents. Journal of Public Economics 49(3) 287-312. 

Monetary losses resulting from an incident other than medical costs and workers compensation payments. See also Accident Costs. 

Trailing indicators are the traditional metrics that measure past safety efforts (Dupont Corporation 2000). When using trailing indicators, data is collected after the fact (after a number of accidents or illnesses, after two years of workers compensation, etc.). Trailing indicators provide an organization with feedback in terms of how good performance has been over a period of time. Examples of trailing indicators include accident records, loss reports, injury and illness statistics, injury costs, and workers compensation costs. 

With these activity-based performance measures, there is also a variety of safety metrics that can be used to assess program performance. As identified by OSHA in studies ofVPP organizations, OSHA injury incidence rates, lost work day rates, and workers compensation losses are a few safety metrics that have been correlated to the performance of the VPP criteria activities. These measures can easily be expanded to include unsafe behaviors, accident trends, and near misses. 

As business competition has increased, loss control has been seen as a logical place to curtail costs, especially direct losses from equipment damage, medical costs, and workers compensation premiums. Prevention of accidents results in real, observable savings. Safety experts approximate the hidden cost of accidents as being conservatively five to ten times the direct cost incurred. Hidden costs include lost production, retraining, and supervisor s time lost, just to name a few. 

The direct (insured) cost of accidents is by far the easiest to track. These direct costs are for medical care, repairing or replacing damaged equipment, and workers compensation premiums. There is no possible way to not see the cost of an ambulance, hospital bill, or repair bill when it comes. Likewise, employers know the dollar amounts being put out for workers compensation. 

Workers Compensation laws ensure that employees injured or disabled on the job receive appropriate monetary benefits, eliminating the need for litigation. These laws also provide benefits for dependents of those workers who are killed because of work-related accidents or illnesses. Some laws also protect employers and fellow workers by limiting the amount an injured employee can recover from an employer and by eliminating the liability of coworkers in most accidents. State Workers Compensation statutes establish this framework for most employment. Federal statutes are limited to federal employees or those workers employed in some significant aspect of interstate commerce. The injury or illness must have resulted from employment. 

Once the chief executive believes in the need for an improved safety culture, there must be a commitment of the necessary time and resources to initiate the changes. The time and effort needed to accomplish this task will likely be difficult, if not impossible, to accurately quantify. The expected gains, however, should be much easier to quantify. If you achieve zero incidents, your organization should have no accidents, losses, workers compensation claims, equipment damage, or other losses. These are all concrete numbers that you can estimate, but raw numbers of losses are only a small percentage of what losses truly cost an organization. 

Provide employee accident experience for the past 5 years, including the current year. The submittal shall specifically include OSHA recordable cases rate, lost and restricted workday cases rate, vehicle accident rate, and number of fatalities with a description of each. The workers compensation interstate experience modification rate should be less than 1.0, and applicable SIC codes should be noted. 

Fatal accident rate Lost-time injury rate Capital cost of accidents Number of plant/community evacuations Cost of business interruption Cost of workers compensation claims Number of hazardous material spills (in excess of a threshold) Tonnage of hazardous material spilled Tonnage of air, water, liquid and solid effluent Tonnage of polluting materials released into the environment Employee exposure monitoring Number of work related sickness claims Number of regulatory citations and fines Ecological impact of operations (loss or restoration of biodiversity, species, habitats)... 

Similarly, in Krushwitz v McDonald s Restaurants of Oregon, the court refused to compensate the estate of an employee who fell asleep at the wheel and was killed in an automobile accident as he was returning home after working multiple shifts (51). Although a separate civil case held McDonald s liable for the injuries caused by Krushwitz, the Oregon Supreme Court upheld denial of Krushwitz s workers compensation claim. Because Krushwitz had completed his work and was returning home at time of his death, he was outside of the workers compensation realm. 

Because an effective safety program in the plant or facility must include training, the ultimate objective of training is to influence the attitudes of employees around the clock. Off-the-job accidents cost industry many times more than on-the-job injuries. Although workers compensation is not involved, absenteeism from off-the-job injuries results in productivity losses and insurance cost increases. Employees injured off the job may, with the assistance of unscrupulous lawyers, sometimes claim the injury occurred during work time. Such fraud can be combatted by effective record keeping and supervisory vigilance. 

It would be useful to check these impressions against the official statistics on occupational risk collected by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), but these are notoriously unreliable. Indeed, the National Research Council, an offshoot of the National Academy of Sciences that reports on public policy issues, found the BLS data inadequate for monitoring the effectiveness of safety programs (Saddler, 1987). There are several problems. First, the data are collected as part of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) reporting system, which subjects them to distorting incentive effects. Firms are required to maintain logs of fatal and nonfatal accidents, but they have an incentive to underreport this information since it could be used as evidence to support workers compensation or tort claims by workers, and because... 

There are two ways workers can be compensated for risk on the job. They can receive compensation in advance ex ante) for taking on the risk, before they know whether or not they will actually be hurt. They can also be compensated after the fact (ex post), in which case only those workers who suffered injuries or illnesses (or their estates) will receive the extra money. These two forms of compensation serve the same functions, equity and efficiency, and workers should be generally indifferent over which form is adopted. To see this more clearly, let us return to our simplified world in which workers are equivalent in all respects, labor markets are competitive, and jobs differ only with respect to the risk of an accident. The utility a worker derives from a job can be represented as... 

Workers compensation is Just such a system. It provides mandatory no-fault disability and death coverage for injuries and, to a lesser extent, illnesses arising on the job, financed entirely by employer contributions. To the extent that it is experience-rated, each employer s payment into the system is equal to the anticipated claims of his or her workers (tt c). All of the provisions of workers compensation are well-known in particular, workers can know with a high degree of certainty with what likelihood and to what extent they will be compensated in the event of an accident on the job. Thus the conventional economic view, predicated on the market determination of wages and working conditions, predicts that neither employers nor workers should care one way or another about the existence of the workers compensation system or the benefits it provides. 

No uniform standard of compensation of work-related accidents, the majority of enterprises to industrial injury accident compensation has many man-made factors and random factors, generally at a failed to follow State, the amount of compensation is generally low, and the compensation is often not in place in time. Conflicts between employers and employees in turn, affects the social harmony and stabiUty, and become an urgent social problems. Lower compensation amount, the objective is also to make some employers do not pay attention to safety work, or even ignore the occurrence of accidents, further exacerbated by the frequent occurrence of accidents, injuries caught in the vicious cycle, is not conducive to safety. Meanwhile, the workers life, health, safety and other legal rights are not adequately protected. 

The instructor should place Overhead 5 on the overhead projector and explain direct costs (such as workers compensation) and indirect costs (such as overtime or training). The instructor should also explain the pain and suffering experienced by the injured employee and his family. The instructor should end the discussion with, So, if we can stop accidents, what should we do ... 

Colorado has a program that allows firms to adopt basic injury and illness prevention program components in return for a workers compensation premium reduction. The cumulative annual reduction in accidents was 23 percent and the cumulative reduction in accident costs was between 58 and 62 percent. 

---