Toxic chemicals risk control

An appropriate risk assessment regarding the use of a toxic chemical for control of household pests would include a consideration of the inherent toxicity of the chemical and what other factor Define chemistry. 

Define what is meant by a cohort study. Define what is meant by a case-control study. What are the advantages and disadvantages of each type of study with respect to protecting the public from toxic chemical risk ... 

Controlling exposure is the principal strategy for managing toxic chemical risk. Risk consists of two components the toxicity of a chemical and the conditions of its use. Toxicity is an inherent property and cannot be controlled. Exposure can be reduced by managing the conditions under which a chemical is used. 

The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) was enacted in 1976 to identify and control toxic chemical ha2ards to human health and the environment. One of the main provisions of TSCA was to estabUsh and maintain an inventory of all chemicals in commerce in the United States for the purpose of regulating any of the chemicals that might pose an unreasonable risk to human health or the environment. An initial inventory of chemicals was estabhshed by requiring companies to report to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) all substances that were imported, manufactured, processed, distributed, or disposed of in the United States. Over 50,000 chemical substances were reported. PoUowing this initial inventory, introduction of all new chemical substances requires a Premanufacturing Notification (PMN) process. To be included in the PMN are the identity of the new chemical, the estimated first year and maximum production volume, manufacture and process information, a description of proposed use, potential release to the environment, possible human exposure to the new substance, and any health or environmental test data available at the time of submission. In the 10 years that TSCA has been in effect, the USEPA has received over 10,000 PMNs and up to 10% of the submissions each year are for dyes (382)... 

The chlorinated chemicals assessed do not have the same risk profile. For the more volatile chemicals the safety margins between the actual exposure and the level at which no effect on the environment would be expected is quite high. For more persistent chemicals there is a need to look to the environmental compartment where they can be accumulated (mainly in sediments and biota). For some of these chemicals the safety margin is quite low and in worst-case situations serious effects may occur. For the very persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic chemicals (like dioxins, PCBs and DDT), acceptable environmental concentrations are so low and difficult to control that the industry is committed to reducing as far as possible releases to the environment through application of Best Available Techniques (BAT), mainly with respect to dioxins. For other chemicals (PCBs, DDT), production has already been halted for some years. 

As risk assessment becomes more sophisticated and is extended to more chemicals, it will also be extended to smaller and smaller risks. Since it is not possible to regulate all risks, an important use of risk analysis must be to decide which chemicals should be regulated and to what degree. Under the Tbxic Substances Control Act (TOSCA), all new chemicals must be considered. The prioritization scheme for chemical testing is based upon a set of dichotomous criteria, toxicity, chemical reactivity, etc., which involve qualitative rather than quantitative risk analysis. As procedures for more quantitative analysis become available, the prioritization scheme will become more precise, (NAS/NRC, 1984). 

Toxicity assessment is the determination of the potential of any substance to act as a poison, the conditions under which this potential will be realized, and the characterization of its action. Risk assessment, however, is a quantitative assessment of the probability of deleterious effects under given exposure conditions. Both are involved in the regulation of toxic chemicals. Regulation is the control, by statute, of the manufacture, transportation, sale, or disposal of chemicals deemed to be toxic after testing procedures or according to criteria laid down in applicable laws. 

Passage of the Pollution Prevention Act (PPA) by the U.S. Congress in 1990 ushered in a new era in the philosophy of controlling risks from toxic chemicals. The PPA declared it to be the policy of the United States that pollution should be prevented at the source when possible, and it defined source reduction as any practice that ... 

We are working with the Food Quality Control Department of the Ministry of Health to study the contamination of OCPs and PCBs in local fish and chickens. This project is in line with our current effort to assess the health risk arising from consumption of food contaminated with POP chemicals. The health risk assessment of POPs through dietary intakes project involved analyses of OCPs and PCBs in various foodstuff, initially raw materials which will be extended to cooked food. Unfortunately, we do not currently have the capability to analyze PCDD/PCDF in our laboratory but there are two high resolution mass spectrometers in the country that are capable of analyzing PCDD/PCDF. National and international collaborations will definitely improve the country capacity to monitor POPs not only those listed in the Stockholm Convention but other toxic chemicals found in the environment. 

Human activities are associated with the use and disposal of a variety of chemicals and chemical products. This is the situation for a householder, a laboratory student, and also the industry worker. Many materials have properties that make them hazardous. They can create physical (fire, explosion) or health hazards (toxicity, chemical bums). However, there are many ways to work with chemicals which can both reduce the probability of an accident and reduce the consequences should an accident occur. Risk minimization depends on safe practices, appropriate engineering controls for chemical containment, the proper use of personnel protective equipment, use of the least amount of material necessary, and substitution of a less-hazardous chemical for a more hazardous one. Before beginning any chemical processing or operation, ask What would happen if. .. The answer to this question requires understanding of the hazards associated with chemicals, the equipment, and the procedure involved. The hazardous properties of the material and its intended use will dictate the precautions to be taken. 

The MOE manages chemicals in Korea. The Toxic Chemicals Control Act (revised in 2004) is the basic law regarding chemicals management in Korea.86 The objective to this act is To prevent risk caused by chemicals to human health or the environment and to control hazardous chemicals so that everyone can live in a healthy environment. The major tasks of the Toxic Chemicals Control Act include the following ... 

The five chapters of this act include a framework plan for hazardous chemicals control, TRI, etc. new chemical notification, risk assessment, etc. safe control of toxic chemicals, banned or restricted chemicals, responses to chemical accidents, etc. supplementary provisions penalty provisions. 

Japan s Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI) was formed in 1949 and reorganized as the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) in 2001. METI is responsible for The Chemical Substances Control Law. It focuses on properties of chemical substances such as persistence, bioaccumulation, long-term toxicity to humans, and toxicity to plants and animals (hazards) and the likelihood of the chemical substance causing damage by remaining in the environment (risk).87 The law stipulates regulatory classifications and the measures to be taken for each classification. The classifications include the following ... 

Rapid industrialisation around the world is fuelled and accompanied by an equally extensive development and use of synthetic chemicals to control diseases, increase food production and for regular use in day-to-day products. Clearly, the use of chemicals is prevalent in many aspects of life and therefore, the role of chemicals is undeniably important. Some chemicals are known to be toxic to human health, some pose unknown health risks and some have made their way into our bodies and into the environment. There are concerns that information on the uses, releases and impacts of chemicals on health and the environment is scarce and incomplete. 

M. Fiihr, Industrial Self-Control in the Regulation of Chemicals, Risk Assessment and Risk Management of Toxic Chemicals in the European Community Experiences and Reform, Ed., G. Winter, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft Baden-Baden, Germany, 2000, p.165. 

In particular, the requirement under Article I to destroy all chemical weapons would make such weapons less accessible to terrorist groups. The requirements of Article VII to criminalize the prohibitions of the CWC and enact effective penal legislation would reduce the possibility that a CWC State Party could inadvertently become a safe haven for those who use chemical weapons as a tool of terror, and would hence help reduce the threat posed by chemical terrorism. Likewise, the transfer (export control and monitoring) obligations under Article VI would serve to reduce the risk of diversion of toxic chemicals (either weaponized chemical weapons, precursors of military chemical agents, including those listed in the CWC Schedules, or other toxic chemicals) for terrorist uses. 

We cannot procrastinate in our mission of cleaning toxic chemical pollution, but we cannot afford to make many mistakes cither. Time and money waited chasing ilown the wrong chemicals is time and money wasted in controlling risks of cancer, birth defects and other feared diseases. 

The Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances develops national strategies for toxic substance control and promotes pollution prevention and the public s right to know about chemical risks. 

However, none of these statutes were so directly focused on the chemical industry as the 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) in the United States and the Sixth Amendment to the Dangerous Substances Directive enacted by the European Parliament in 1979. These statutes did not focus on the industry s wastes, pollution or occupational exposures as much as on the intrinsic hazards - the toxicity, chemical stability, and bioavailability - of the industry s chemical products as they were used in commerce. These laws were intended to provide government agencies with the authority to collect relevant health and safety data on chemical products, require testing where data were missing, and condition and restrict the use of chemical substances so as to reduce unreasonable risks to the public and environment. 

The Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) was passed in 1976 and is contained in 15 USC 2601 et seq. It regulates toxic substances, other than wastes, that are not adequately covered by other statutes. Promulgation of TSCA gave the EPA the authority to manage chemicals from production to final disposal. In fact, if a compound (e.g., carbon tetrachloride) is found to pose unreasonable risk to human health or the environment, the EPA can immediately remove it from commerce. The TSCA s requiring a premanufacture notification (PMN) 90 days prior to manufacture has minimized the occurrence of immediate emergency removal of toxic chemicals. The PMN contains information on the physical/chemical properties, health... 

---