Exposure conditions

R. P. Tye and C. F. Baker, "Development of Experimental Data on Cellular Plastic Insulations Under Simulated Wiater Exposure Conditions," ia Ref 33. 

Films or membranes of silkworm silk have been produced by air-drying aqueous solutions prepared from the concentrated salts, followed by dialysis (11,28). The films, which are water soluble, generally contain silk in the silk I conformation with a significant content of random coil. Many different treatments have been used to modify these films to decrease their water solubiUty by converting silk I to silk II in a process found usehil for enzyme entrapment (28). Silk membranes have also been cast from fibroin solutions and characterized for permeation properties. Oxygen and water vapor transmission rates were dependent on the exposure conditions to methanol to faciUtate the conversion to silk II (29). Thin monolayer films have been formed from solubilized silkworm silk using Langmuir techniques to faciUtate stmctural characterization of the protein (30). ResolubiLized silkworm cocoon silk has been spun into fibers (31), as have recombinant silkworm silks (32). 

If possible, there should be measurement of the toxic effect in order quantitatively to relate the observations made to the degree of exposure (exposure dose). Ideally, there is a need to determine quantitatively the toxic response to several differing exposure doses, in order to determine the relationship, if any, between exposure dose and the nature and magnitude of any effect. Such dose—response relationship studies are of considerable value in determining whether an effect is causally related to the exposure material, in assessing the possible practical (in-use) relevance of the exposure conditions, and to allow the most reasonable estimates of hazard. 

Dose—response evaluation is used in describing the quantitative relationship between the amount of exposure to a substance and the extent of toxic injury or disease. Data may be derived from animal studies or from studies in exposed human populations. Dose—response toxicity relationship for a substance varies under different exposure conditions. The risk of a substance can not be ascertained with any degree of confidence unless... 

Persistent effects do not resolve, and may even become more severe after removal from the source of exposure. They can occur as a consequence of acute or repeated-exposure conditions. Thus, the use of the term persistent should be clearly differentiated from the implication of the use of the description of an effect as chronic. It should be noted, however, that some chronic effects may be persistent an example is malignant neoplasia. 

Cumulative effects are those where there is progressive injury and worsening of the toxic effect as a result of repeated-exposure conditions. Each exposure produces a further increment of injury a dding to that already existing. Many materials known to induce a particular type of toxic effect by acute exposure can also eUcit the same effect by a cumulative procedure from repetitive exposure to a dose less than that causing threshold injury by acute exposure. 

Acute Toxicity Studies. These studies should provide the following information the nature of any local or systemic adverse effects occurring as a consequence of a single exposure to the test material an indication of the exposure conditions producing the adverse effects, in particular, information on dose—response relationships, including minimum and no-effects exposure levels and data of use in the design of short-term repeated exposure studies. 

Chronic Toxicity Studies. With the exception of tumorigenesis, most types of repeated exposure toxicity are detected by subchronic exposure conditions. Therefore, chronic exposure conditions are usually conducted for the following reasons if there is a need to investigate the tumorigenic potential of a material if it is necessary to determine a no-effects or threshold level of toxicity for lifetime exposure to a material and if there is reason to suspect that particular forms of toxicity are exhibited only under chronic exposure conditions. 

Pharmacokinetic studies should allow an assessment of the relationship between the environmental-exposure conditions and the absorbed dose, and how these influence the doses of test material and metaboHtes received by various body tissues and fluids, and the potential for storage. Numerous texts are available on the design and conduct of metaboHsm and pharmacokinetic studies (117—119). 

Ha2ard is the likelihood that the known toxicity of a material will be exhibited under specific conditions of use. It follows that the toxicity of a material, ie, its potential to produce injury, is but one of many considerations to be taken into account in assessment procedures with respect to defining ha2ard. The following are equally important factors that need to be considered physicochemical properties of the material use pattern of the material and characteristics of the environment where the material is handled source of exposure, normal and accidental control measures used to regulate exposure the duration, magnitude, and frequency of exposure route of exposure and physical nature of exposure conditions, eg, gas, aerosol, or Hquid population exposed and variabiUty in exposure conditions and experience with exposed human populations. 

Consideration of the above information allows the exposure conditions to be defined and reviewed in the light of the known toxicity of the material being examined. 

Repeated exposure to elevated temperature has a cumulative effect. For example, at a given set of exposure conditions, the property losses ate about the same after six exposure periods of one month each and after a single 6-month period. 

Flammability = 4, ie, very flammable gas, very volatile, and materials that in the form of dusts or mists form explosive mixtures when dispersed in air Health = 2, ie, hazardous to health, but may be entered freely with self-contained breathing apparatus Reactivity = 0, ie, is normally stable when under fire-exposure conditions and is not reactive with water... 

The film properties required for some appHcation can only be deterrnined by the performance of the appHed coating in practice. Because requirements and exposure conditions vary widely, devising laboratory tests to predict film performance is difficult and frequendy not possible. Data banks of actual field performance as functions of coating compositions, appHcation variables, and environmental factors can be very usehil. 

Liquid Hazards. Pure liquid ethylene oxide will deflagrate given sufficient initiating energy either at or below the surface, and a propagating flame may be produced (266,267). This requites certain minimum temperatures and pressures sensitive to the mode of initiation and system geometry. Under fire exposure conditions, an ethylene oxide pipeline may undergo internal decomposition either by direct initiation of the Hquid, or by formation and subsequent decomposition of a vapor pocket (190). 

Materials that on exposure under fire conditions would offer no hazard beyond that of ordinary comhiistihle material 0 Materials that will not burn 0 Materials that are normally stable, even under fire exposure conditions, and which are not reactive with water... 

The basis for design overpressure described in this section is related to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Codes and ANSI B31.3, Code for Petroleum Refinery Piping. Compliance with these codes is a requirement, or is recognized as the equivalent of a requirement in many locations. Where more stringent codes apply, the local requirements must be met. Therefore, local codes must be checked to determine their requirements. For example, some countries do not permit the use of block valves underneath pressure relief valves, unless dual valves with interlocks are installed. Also, in some cases, 20% accumulation under fire exposure conditions is not permitted, and accumulation allowed may be lower than the ASME Codes. In the United States, the ASME Code is mandatory, since it is a requirement under the Occupational Safety and Health... 

The mechanisms behind the different types of risks are also quite varied, because manufacturers may apply different conditions and agents, and each manufacturing stage may involve different job functions and therefore different exposure conditions. Distance to emission sources and physical parameters such as rate of release, air currents, and meteorological variations have a profound influence. The variability of exposure conditions is made even greater by work patterns, individual practices, and simultaneous exposure to several substances acting together. 

Using formalized risk assessment techniques for industrial ventilation projects may complicate the issue more than necessary. The work environment and its exposure conditions are the focus. However, when evaluating new technology, including waste management, the risk assessment approach may be valuable. 

The required exposure times are difficult to estimate. They are best found by trial and error. Documentation of fluorescence quenching at A = 254 nm usually only requires one trial. The exposure time found to be adequate here is normally suitable for all following exposures of fluorescence quenching if the exposure conditions are maintained constant (camera type, film type, distance of objective and lamp, aperture etc.). The exposure time required for fluorescent chromatograms is primarily dependent on the intensity of the fluorescence and, therefore, has to be optimized for each chromatogram. It is best to operate with a range of exposure times, e.g. aperture 8 with exposures of 15,30,60,120 and 240 seconds. Experience has shown that one exposure is always optimal. 

Since 1970 tlie field of healtli risk assessment Itas received widespread attention witliin both tlie scientific and regulatoiy committees. It has also attracted tlie attention of the public. Properly conducted risk assessments have received fairly broad acceptance, in part because they put into perspective the terms to. ic, Itazard, and risk. Toxicity is an inlierent property of all substances. It states tliat all chemical and physical agents can produce adverse healtli effects at some dose or under specific exposure conditions. In contrast, exposure to a chemical tliat lias tlie capacity to produce a particular type of adverse effect, represents a health hazard. Risk, however, is tlie probability or likelihood tliat an adverse outcome will occur in a person or a group tliat is exposed to a particular concentration or dose of the hazardous agent. Tlierefore, risk can be generally a function of exposure and dose. Consequently, healtli risk assessment is defined as tlie process or procedure used to estimate tlie likelihood that... 

Alumiojuffl resists corrosion not because of its position in the electrochemical series but because of the ra Hd formation of a coherent, inert, oxide layer. Contact with grafihite, Fe. Ni. Cu, Ag or Pb is disastrous for corrosion resistance, the effect of contact with steel, Zn and Cd depends on pH and exposure conditions. Protection is enhanced by anodizing the metal this involves immersing it in 15-20% H2SO4 and connecting it to the positive terminal so that it becomes coated with alumina ... 

Effect of the exposure conditions The absolute values for the rate of rusting given in Table 3.3 would be affected by the mass of the specimen itself and by other factors such as the orientation of the steel, the climatic conditions prevailing at the time of exposure, and the duration of exposure. 

---