Test protocol

Forensic Serology. Blood, often associated with crimes of violence, is powerfiil physical evidence. Its presence suggests association with the criminal act and blood can be used to associate suspects and locations with the bleeder. Blood is a complex mixture of cellular material, proteins, and enzymes and several tests are available for suspected bloody evidence. A typical test protocol involves (/) determining whether blood is present, (2) determining if it is human blood, (J) typing the blood, and (4) when appHcable, performing DNA typing. 

There have been numerous communications on the subject of biodegradation test methods, including aerobic compost (30), anaerobic bioreactor (31), general methodology and future directions (32—34), and a fine review article (24). ASTM (22) and MITI (35) have also set forth standard testing protocols for plastics, as shown in Table 2, whereas OECD test methods (29) are more suited to water-soluble polymers. 

Samples logged into the system are assigned a unique number which is often physically attached to the sample using a bar-code label. The testing protocol is contained in the LIMS and is based on the point in the process from which the sample was taken. This information and the identification of the type of sample enable the LIMS to schedule the testing of the material. 

A sealant s adhesion is commonly studied by 180 degree peel tests such as ASTM C794 or by tensHe/adhesion joints tests such as ASTM C719. The adhesion test protocol should simulate actual field conditions as closely as possible. Sealants often have good adhesion to dry substrates, but this adhesion may be quickly destroyed by water. Because most sealants are exposed to water over their lifetime, adhesion testing should include exposure to water for some length of time. ASTM C719 is one of the better tests to determine a sealant s adhesion durabHity as it exposes sealants to seven days of water immersion. 

Hospital sterilizer loads vary in composition, thus the challenge presented to the test organism can vary considerably, depending on the type and contents of packages in which they are placed. The benefits of a standardized test-pack constmction and test protocol are obvious, and such recommendation is made by AAMI for steam and ethylene oxide sterilizers (11). More recentiy in European (CEN) and International (ISO) standards, biological indicators are considered as additional information supplemental to the measurement of physical parameters. Indeed, for sterilization using moist heat (steam), the biological indicator information is not considered to be relevant. 

Another test protocol is that specified by the International Safe Transit Association (ISTA), East Lansing, Michigan. This also simulates transportation and handhng conditions. Transportation companies—truck, rail—accept ISTA test results and will transport packages bearing the ISTA marks. 

Warnings are noted in the literature to be careful in the interpretation of data from electrochemical techniques applied to systems in which complex and often poorly understood effects are derived from surfaces which contain active or viable organisms, and so forth. Rather, it is even more important to not use such test protocol unless the investigator fuhy understands both the corrosion mechanism and the test technique being considered—and their interrelationship. 

Before elec trochemical techniques are used in the evaluation of any given, viable MIC environment/metal system, such a test protocol... 

Therefore, the seventh edition no longer includes these endless tabulations of data rather, there is an extensive coverage of corrosion mechanisms, the manner in which these various factors effect the corrosion system, as well as more detail as to the testing protocol necessary to assist in a sound MOC selection. 

Operating Guidelines The test protocol should be developed in consultation with the principal operators and supervisor. Their cooperation and understanding are required for the test to be successful. Once the protocol is approved, analysts should distribute an approved one-page summary of the test protocol to the operators. This should include a concise statement of me purpose of the test, the duration of the test, the operating conditions, and the measurements to be made. The supervisor for the unit should initial the test protocol. Attached to this statement shoiild be the tag sheet that will be used to record measurements. 

Preliminary Test Operation of the unit shoiild be set at the test protocol conditions. A preliminaiy set of samples should be taken to identify problems with instruments, measurements, and sample locations. This preliminaiy set of measurements should also be an yzed in the same manner that the full-test results will be analyzed to ensure that the measurements wiU lead to the desired results. Modifications to the test protocol can be made prior to exerting the effort and resources necessary for the complete test. 

The invertebrate phyla are often neglected in ecotoxicological testing protocols. A token invertebrate species such as the copepod Daphnia may be used to evaluate the effects on extremely diverse phyla. This neglects the diversity of biochemical and physiological functions that may render different phyla vulnerable to different classes of compound at different stages of their life cycles. 

AFM through force or displacement modulation techniques. Numerous methods have evolved that take advantage of the greater sensitivity modulation techniques provide, allowing dissipative processes to be examined. However, evaluation of the probe/sample response requires care with test protocols and instrument calibration, as well as application of appropriate contact mechanics models only a few of these techniques have evolved into quantitative methods. 

Snhseqnent chapters cover installation considerations (Chapter 6), inspection and maintenance practices (Chapter 7), regnlations, standards, and codes, inclnding certification test protocols (Chapter 8), and some illnstrative examples (Chapter 9). Chapter 10 provides a snmmary of the present state-of-the-art and what other information and research is needed, followed hy appendixes, a glossary, and snggested additional reading. 

Lactory Mntnal Research (formerly Lactory Mntnal Research Corporation) pnblished a test procedure for flame arresters for storage tank vent pipes in 1990 (LMRC 1990). The Lactory Mntnal Research test protocol... 

Flame arresters cannot be designed from first principles and can only be proven by tests simnlating the conditions of nse. The riser should ensure that a flame arrester has been properly tested to meet the intended purpose, and should be prepared to stipulate the required performance standard or test protocol to be followed. 

In almost all cases, if a flame arrester is placed in-line rather than at (or close to) the open end of a vent pipe, a detonation flame arrester is needed. Detonation flame arresters mnst be able to stop both deflagrations and detonations. They require extensive testing and mandatory testing protocols may apply. 

The USCG test protocol for detonation flame arresters requires the following ... 

A protected-side restricdon, snch as a valve, can severely reduce a flame arrester s capabilides by magnilying reflected initial pressure on the arrester element. In snch a sitnadon, a downstream restriction should be included in the test protocol (see Chapter 6). 

Many test protocols are not applicadon-specific and do not provide die user with a clear idea of how to select a flame arrester (see Chapter 8). 

UL will nsnally mn the tests at their own test facilities in accordance with UL 525. Wlien a flame arrester snccessfully passes the tests it is given a Listing mark and is so pnblished in their Gas and Oil Eqnipment cata-logne. UL will also witness tests at other test facilities, if a flame arrester mannfactnrer so wishes, nnder the UL Witnessed Test Data Program. If the tests are condncted in accordance with UL 525, then the flame arrester is listed similarly as if the tests had been done at UL s laboratory. If a witnessed test is done at another laboratory in accordance with another test protocol (not UL 525), then the flame arrester is designated as Classified. All flame arresters that have a UL Listing or Classified mark may be fonnd on their web site www.nl.com... 

DBAs which are UL listed/classified or FM approved are contained in a published list. In addition to passing the basic approved/testing protocols, FM approved or UL listed/classifled devices will have follow-np inspec-tions/reviews to ascertain that the tested design has not been modified, and that the devices are constructed according to the original design. USCG approved devices are not listed and have no follow-np service. 

Dainty, E. E. and Lobay, G. 1991. An Investigation of Flame Arrester Continuous Burn Test Protocols. Tech. Rept. MRL-91-136, Canada Center for Mineral and Energy Technology (CANMET), Ottawa, Ontario (December 1991). 

Forster, H. 1993. Comparative Analysis of Test Protocols for Flame Arresters. Proe. Mariehem 93 Conf., Session 8, Paper 1, November 30-December 2, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 

---