Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surfactants effect of temperature

Il in, M.M., Semenova, M.G., Belyakova, L.E., Antipova, A.S., Polikarpov, Yu.N. (2004). Thermodynamic and functional properties of legumin in the presence of small-molecule surfactants effect of temperature and pH. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 278, 71-80. [Pg.224]

Joubran, R.F., Cornell, D.G. and Parris, N. (1993) Microemulsions of triglyceride and non-ionic surfactant-effect of temperature and aqueous phase composition. Colloid Surf. A, 80, 153— 157. [Pg.294]

For nonionic amphiphiles, the effects of temperature on the phase behavior are large and the effects of inorganic electrolytes are very small. However, for ionic surfactants temperature effects are usually small, but effects of inorganic electrolytes are large. Most common electrolytes (eg, NaCl)... [Pg.150]

The effect of temperature, pressure, and oil composition on oil recovery efficiency have all been the subjects of intensive study (241). Surfactant propagation is a critical factor in determining the EOR process economics (242). Surfactant retention owing to partitioning into residual cmde oil can be significant compared to adsorption and reduce surfactant propagation rate appreciably (243). [Pg.194]

R. Zana, C. Weill. Effect of temperature on the aggregation behavior of nonionic surfactants in aqueous solutions. J Physique Lett 46 L953-L960, 1985. [Pg.550]

The effect of temperature and the ratio of reagents on the yield of mono-and diesters of phosphoric acid and nonionic surfactants are discussed in Ref. 7. Phosphorylation of OH-containing nonionic surfactants with P4O10 gives a mixture of mono- and diesters of phosphoric acid with the surfactants. The optimum ratio of surfactant to P4O10 was 2.5-3 1. [Pg.560]

Isaacs and Smolek [211 observed that low tensions obtained for an Athabasca bitumen/brine-suIfonate surfactant system were likely associated with the formation of a surfactant-rich film lying between the oil and water, which can be hindered by an increase in temperature. Babu et al. [221 obtained little effect of temperature on interfacial tensions however, values of about 0.02 mN/m were obtained for a light crude (39°API), and were about an order of magnitude lower than those observed for a heavy crude (14°API) with the same aqueous surfactant formulations. For pure hydrocarbon phases and ambient conditions, it is well established that the interfacial tension behavior is dependent on the oleic phase [15.231 In general, interfacial tension values of crude oiI-containing systems are considerably higher than the equivalent values observed with pure hydrocarbons. [Pg.330]

Figure 4 Effect of temperature on the interfacial tension of an Alberta heavy oil in produced water containing LTS-18 surfactant. Data are from three separate replicate experiments conducted under the same conditions. Figure 4 Effect of temperature on the interfacial tension of an Alberta heavy oil in produced water containing LTS-18 surfactant. Data are from three separate replicate experiments conducted under the same conditions.
Effect of Temperature. In the absence of surfactant, interfacial tensions of the Athabasca 1 211. Karamay 1 51, and other heavy oils 1 321 show little or no dependence on temperature. For surfactant-containing systems, Figure 6 shows an example of the effect of temperature (50-200°C) on interfacial tensions for the Athabasca, Clearwater and Peace River bitumens in Sun Tech IV solutions containing 0 and 10 g/L NaCI. The interfacial tension behavior for the three bitumens was very similar. At a given temperature, the presence of brine caused a reduction in interfacial tension by one to two orders of magnitude. The tensions were seen to increase substantially with temperature. For the case of no added NaCI, the values approached those observed T211 in the absence of surfactant. [Pg.335]

Ziegler, V.M. and Handy, L.L. "The Effect of Temperature on Surfactant Adsorption in Porous Media," SPE paper 8264, 1979 SPE Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition of AIME, Las Vegas, September 23-26. [Pg.676]

Schonherr J, Baur P (1996) Effects of temperature, surfactants and other adjuvants on rates of uptake of organic compounds. In Kerstiens G (ed) Plant cuticles an integrated functional approach. BIOS Scientific Publishers, Oxford UK, chap 6... [Pg.50]

W.D. Bancroft The Theory of Emulsification, V. J. Phys. Chem. 17, 501 (1913). K. Shinoda and H. Saito The Effect of Temperature on the Phase Equilibrium and the Types of Dispersions of the Ternary System Composed of Water, Cyclohexane and Nonionic Surfactant. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 26, 70 (1968). [Pg.46]

It is worth noting that the effect of temperature on ionic and polyethoxy-lated nonionic surfactants is just opposite. As temperature increases, the nonionics become more lipophilic whereas the ionics turn more hydrophilic. By mixing the two types of surfactants in a proper proportion, these effects could cancel each other out, and the mixture is said to be insensitive to temperature. This interesting feature of ionic-nonionic surfactant mixtures may be considered as a synergy, since it could be very important in practice. Analysis of this feature is not included here, because plenty of information may be found in the literature on applications of such mixtures to equihbrated and emulsified systems [10,71-74]. [Pg.102]

For a given surfactant, the ability to form a single-phase w/o microemulsion is a function of the type of oil, nature of the electrolyte, solution composition, and temperature (54-58). When microemulsions are used as reaction media, the added reactants and the reaction products can also influence the phase stability. Figure 2.2.4 illustrates the effects of temperature and ammonia concentration on the phase behavior of the NP-5/cyclohexane/water system (27). In the absence of ammonia, the central region bounded by the two curves represents the single-phase microemulsion region. Above the upper curve (the solubilization limit), a water-in-oil microemulsion coexists with an aqueous phase, while below the lower curve (the solubility limit), an oil-in-water water microemulsion coexists with an oil phase. It can be seen that introducing ammonia into the system results in a shift of the solubilization... [Pg.158]

Pons et al. have studied the effects of temperature, volume fraction, oil-to-surfactant ratio and salt concentration of the aqueous phase of w/o HIPEs on a number of rheological properties. The yield stress [10] was found to increase with increasing NaCl concentration, at room temperature. This was attributed to an increase in rigidity of films between adjacent droplets. For salt-free emulsions, the yield stress increases with increasing temperature, due to the increase in interfacial tension. However, for emulsions containing salt, the yield stress more or less reaches a plateau at higher temperatures, after addition of only 1.5% NaCl. [Pg.180]

Supercritical carbon dioxide modified with 10 vol% methanol has been employed for the removal of the amine surfactant in hexagonal mesoporous silica (HMS). The effects of temperature and pressure on the extraction efficiency have been extensively studied. It has been found that within an hour, as high as 96% of the amine surfactant can be extracted at a relatively mild condition of 85°C and 100 bar. At constant pressure, high extraction efficiencies are obtained at 50 and 85°C while at constant temperature, high efficiencies occur at 100 bar and 250 bar. This work establishes the feasibility of using supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) for the removal of the amine surfactant. In fact, it has been discovered that SFE produces EIMS of more enhanced mesoporosity as compared to that of calcination. [Pg.131]

The effect of temperature on the thermodynamic properties and the CMC is shown in Figure 18.13, where 4>L, < >CP and (f>V at three temperatures are graphed as a function of the molality m for n-dodecylpyridinium chloride. We can interpolate the results in Figure 18.13a to determine that L at the CMC is near zero for this surfactant at a temperature near, but just above, 298.15 K. When 4>L = 0, the CMC is at its minimum value. We will better understand why as we consider theories for describing the curves shown in Figures 18.11 and 18.13. [Pg.343]

Figures 5 and 6 show the effect of temperature on the removal of solid C20 (melting point = 37 °C) by C E04. These plots of normalized intensity of the v CH2 band versus time were obtained from two series of experiments, in which the initial layer thickness was varied somewhat. As discussed above, these plots must be regarded as qualitative descriptors of the removal process, due to the optical complexity of the interface. The removal process may involve not only solubilization, but also a surfactant - induced displacement of C q crystallites from the IRE surface, which cannot be treated as a gradual thinning of the C20 layer. Repeated experiments on the effect of temperature on removal rate indicate that if the conditions of layer preparation (hydrocarbon concentration in hexane, speed of withdrawal from the solution) are held constant, then reproducible band intensities of the initial layers are obtained. The shape of the removed plots (Figures 5 and 6) are affected by the initial layer thicknesses. More rapid removal was usually observed for thinner layers of smaller initial Qq band intensity. Figures 5 and 6 show the effect of temperature on the removal of solid C20 (melting point = 37 °C) by C E04. These plots of normalized intensity of the v CH2 band versus time were obtained from two series of experiments, in which the initial layer thickness was varied somewhat. As discussed above, these plots must be regarded as qualitative descriptors of the removal process, due to the optical complexity of the interface. The removal process may involve not only solubilization, but also a surfactant - induced displacement of C q crystallites from the IRE surface, which cannot be treated as a gradual thinning of the C20 layer. Repeated experiments on the effect of temperature on removal rate indicate that if the conditions of layer preparation (hydrocarbon concentration in hexane, speed of withdrawal from the solution) are held constant, then reproducible band intensities of the initial layers are obtained. The shape of the removed plots (Figures 5 and 6) are affected by the initial layer thicknesses. More rapid removal was usually observed for thinner layers of smaller initial Qq band intensity.
The primary effect of temperature on the detergency performance of C12E04 toward C20 is one of acceleration of penetration of the surfactant into the hydrocarbon layer. Increasing the temperature probably also causes a small increase in the CPP of the C12E04 molecules involved in the formation of a relatively small amount of an intermediate phase at the Cw surface. Subsequent penetration of surfactant and water into causes a rapidloss of adhesion of the hydrocarbon to the IRE. [Pg.265]

The results obtained with C19 and as model soils suggested that the crystal form of the hydrocarbon can affect surfactant penetration and hence removal. Hexacosane (C26), with a melting point of 57 °C, allows investigation of the effect of temperature over a wider range than the systems described above. Additional details about the relationship of surfactant phase behavior to solid soil removal can be obtained, and the efficiency of the displacement mechanism can be explored further, using C2g as a model soil. [Pg.270]

The study of adsorption kinetics of a surfactant on the mineral surface can help to clarify the adsorption mechanism in a number of cases. In the literature we found few communications of this kind though the adsorption kinetics has an important role in flotation. Somasundaran et al.133,134 found that the adsorption of Na dodecylsulfonate on alumina and of K oleate on hematite at pH 8.0 is relatively fast (the adsorption equilibrium is reached within a few minutes) as expected for physical adsorption of minerals with PDI H+ and OH". However, the system K oleate-hematite exhibits a markedly different type of kinetics at pH 4.8 where the equilibrium is not reached even after several hours of adsorption. Similarly, the effect of temperature on adsorption density varies. The adsorption density of K oleate at pH 8 and 25 °C is greater than at 75 °C whereas the opposite is true at pH 4.8. Evidently the adsorption of oleic acid on hematite involves a mechanism that is different from that of oleate or acid soaps. [Pg.124]

Shinoda and Kuineda [8] highlighted the effect of temperature on the phase behavior of systems formulated with two surfactants and introduced the concept of the phase inversion temperature (PIT) or the so-called HLB temperature. They described the recommended formulation conditions to produce MEs with surfactant concentration of about 5-10% w/w being (a) the optimum HLB or PIT of a surfactant (b) the optimum mixing ratio of surfactants, that is, the HLB or PIT of the mixture and (c) the optimum temperature for a given nonionic surfactant. They concluded that (a) the closer the HLBs of the two surfactants, the larger the cosolubilization of the two immiscible phases (b) the larger the size of the solubilizer, the more efficient the solubilisation process and (c) mixtures of ionic and nonionic surfactants are more resistant to temperature changes than nonionic surfactants alone. [Pg.772]

Effect of temperature on the stability of foam bilayers. The effect of temperature on the rupture of foam bilayers has also been studied [414] with the help of microscopic NaDoS NB films with a radius of 250 pm. The dependence of the bilayer mean lifetime ton the surfactant concentration C in the presence of 0.5 mol dm 3 electrolyte (NaCI) at 10, 22 and 30°C has been obtained, the temperature being kept constant within 0.05°C. As in the above mentioned case, the NB foam films formed via black spots and the measurements were carried out after a sufficiently long time in order to allow equilibration of the system. At each of the NaDoS concentrations used and at the corresponding temperature, x was determined statistically and the comparison of the experimental with the theoretical x Q dependences was done by means of non-linear optimisation of the constants A, B and Ce. [Pg.255]

The experimental results discussed pertain to foam and emulsion bilayers formed of surfactants of different kinds and provide information about quantities and effects measurable in different ways. It is worth noting that analysing the observed effect of temperature on the rupture of foam bilayers enables the adsorption isotherm of the surfactant vacancies in them to be calculated. This isotherm shows a first-order phase transition of the vacancy gas into a condensed phase of vacancies, which substantiates the basic prerequisites of the theory of bilayer rupture by hole nucleation. [Pg.261]

In the studies described here, we examine in more detail the properties of these surfactant aggregates solubilized in supercritical ethane and propane. We present the results of solubility measurements of AOT in pure ethane and propane and of conductance and density measurements of supercritical fluid reverse micelle solutions. The effect of temperature and pressure on phase behavior of ternary mixtures consisting of AOT/water/supercritical ethane or propane are also examined. We report that the phase behavior of these systems is dependent on fluid pressure in contrast to liquid systems where similar changes in pressure have little or no effect. We have focused our attention on the reverse micelle region where mixtures containing 80 to 100% by weight alkane were examined. The new evidence supports and extends our initial findings related to reverse micelle structures in supercritical fluids. We report properties of these systems which may be important in the field of enhanced oil recovery. [Pg.95]


See other pages where Surfactants effect of temperature is mentioned: [Pg.105]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.181]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.130 ]




SEARCH



Effect of surfactant

Surfactant effectiveness

Surfactants temperature effects

Surfactants, effects

Temperature surfactants

© 2024 chempedia.info