Surfactants ionic/nonionic

Surfactants employed for w/o-ME formation, listed in Table 1, are more lipophilic than those employed in aqueous systems, e.g., for micelles or oil-in-water emulsions, having a hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) value of around 8-11 [4-40]. The most commonly employed surfactant for w/o-ME formation is Aerosol-OT, or AOT [sodium bis(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate], containing an anionic sulfonate headgroup and two hydrocarbon tails. Common cationic surfactants, such as cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) and trioctylmethyl ammonium bromide (TOMAC), have also fulfilled this purpose however, cosurfactants (e.g., fatty alcohols, such as 1-butanol or 1-octanol) must be added for a monophasic w/o-ME (Winsor IV) system to occur. Nonionic and mixed ionic-nonionic surfactant systems have received a great deal of attention recently because they are more biocompatible and they promote less inactivation of biomolecules compared to ionic surfactants. Surfactants with two or more hydrophobic tail groups of different lengths frequently form w/o-MEs more readily than one-tailed surfactants without the requirement of cosurfactant, perhaps because of their wedge-shaped molecular structure [17,41]. 

Wang, L., Tahor, R., Eastoe, J., Li, X., Heenan, R.K. and Dong, J. (2009) Formation and stability of nanoemulsions with mixed ionic—nonionic surfactants. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 11, 9772-9778. 

The deviations from the Szyszkowski-Langmuir adsorption theory have led to the proposal of a munber of models for the equihbrium adsorption of surfactants at the gas-Uquid interface. The aim of this paper is to critically analyze the theories and assess their applicabihty to the adsorption of both ionic and nonionic surfactants at the gas-hquid interface. The thermodynamic approach of Butler [14] and the Lucassen-Reynders dividing surface [15] will be used to describe the adsorption layer state and adsorption isotherm as a function of partial molecular area for adsorbed nonionic surfactants. The traditional approach with the Gibbs dividing surface and Gibbs adsorption isotherm, and the Gouy-Chapman electrical double layer electrostatics will be used to describe the adsorption of ionic surfactants and ionic-nonionic surfactant mixtures. The fimdamental modeling of the adsorption processes and the molecular interactions in the adsorption layers will be developed to predict the parameters of the proposed models and improve the adsorption models for ionic surfactants. Finally, experimental data for surface tension will be used to validate the proposed adsorption models. 

Mixtures of ionic-nonionic surfactants were recently examined in [44]. 

It is worth noting that the effect of temperature on ionic and polyethoxy-lated nonionic surfactants is just opposite. As temperature increases, the nonionics become more lipophilic whereas the ionics turn more hydrophilic. By mixing the two types of surfactants in a proper proportion, these effects could cancel each other out, and the mixture is said to be insensitive to temperature. This interesting feature of ionic-nonionic surfactant mixtures may be considered as a synergy, since it could be very important in practice. Analysis of this feature is not included here, because plenty of information may be found in the literature on applications of such mixtures to equihbrated and emulsified systems [10,71-74]. 

Having shown that ionic/nonionic surfactant mixtures show negative deviations from ideality (when both components are hydrocarbon—based) and fluorocarbon/hydrocarbon—based surfactant mixtures show positive deviations from ideality, what would a ionic fluorocarbon/nonionic hydrocarbon surfactant pair be expected to do In one example of this case (57). the electrostatic stabi1ization forces overcome the hydrophobic group phobicity effects and negative deviation from ideality is observed. 

When an ionic/nonionic surfactant mixture adsorbs on a metal oxide surface, the admicelle exhibits negative deviation from ideality (74). This means that the adsorption level is higher than it would be if the admicelle were ideal, at a specific surfactant concentration below the CMC. Above the CMC, the adsorption level is dictated by the relative enhancement of micelle formation vs. admicelle formation. In this region, the level of adsorption can be viewed as the result of the competition between micelles and admicelles for surfactant. In analogy, the surface tension above the CMC can be viewed as competition between the monolayer and micelles for surfactant. 

In order to define a ionic/nonionic surfactant solution with high salinity/hardness tolerance, the following criterion should be followed. The mixed micelle should have as large of a negative deviation from ideality as possible. Surfactant mixture characteristics which result in this have already been discussed. The nonionic surfactant should have a high cloud point. Otherwise the amount of nonionic surfactant which can be added to the system is limited to low levels before phase separation occurs. If possible, a mixed ionic surfactant should be used for reasons Just discussed. There is no such benefit to using mixed nonionic surfactants, although this is not necessarily detrimental either. 

The mass action model (MAM) for binary ionic or nonionic surfactants and the pseudo-phase separation model (PSM) which were developed earlier (I EC Fundamentals 1983, 22, 230 J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 1642) have been extended. The new models include a micelle aggregation number and counterion binding parameter which depend on the mixed micelle composition. Thus, the models can describe mixtures of ionic/nonionic surfactants more realistically. These models generally predict no azeotropic micellization. For the PSM, calculated mixed erne s and especially monomer concentrations can differ significantly from those of the previous models. The results are used to estimate the Redlich-Kister parameters of monomer mixing in the mixed micelles from data on mixed erne s of Lange and Beck (1973), Funasaki and Hada (1979), and others. 

The purpose of this paper is to develop realistic specific models of mixed micellization which (i) can describe properties of ionic/nonionic surfactant mixtures and effects of salt (ii) lead to tractable calculations and (iii) can be used for extracting information on micelle mixing and monomer concentrations from the limited experimental data which are usually... 

Marszall (1988) studied the effect of electrolytes on the cloud point of mixed ionic-nonionic surfactant solutions such as SDS and Triton X-100. It was found that the cloud point of the mixed micellar solutions is drastically lowered by a variety of electrolytes at considerably lower concentrations than those affecting the cloud point of nonionic surfactants used alone. The results indicate that the factors affecting the cloud point phenomena of mixed surfactants at very low concentrations of ionic surfactants and electrolytes are primarily electrostatic in nature. The change in the original charge distribution of mixed micelles at a Lxed SDS-Triton X-100 ratio (one molecule per micelle), as indicated by the cloud point measurements as a function of electrolyte concentration, depends mostly on the valency number of the cations (counterions) and to some extent on the kind of the anion (co-ion) and is independent of the type of monovalent cation. 

Marszall, L. 1988. Cloud point of mixed ionic-nonionic surfactant solutions in the presence of electrolytes. Langmuir4 90-93. 

Gran UP. [Sanyo Chem. Industries] An-ionic/nonionic surfactants scouring agent, soaping agent for fabrics. 

Levelox. [Yoshimura Oil Chem.] An-ionic/nonionic surfactant blend leveling agent... 

Kunieda, H., Ozawa, K., Aramaki, K., Nakano, A., and Solans, C. (1998) Formation of microemulsions in mixed ionic-nonionic surfactant systems. Langmuir, 14, 260-263. 

The electrical conductivity method can be applied to a system consisting of ionic surfactants and ionic/nonionic surfactant mixtures. Also, this method is suitable for a mixture of ionic surfactant and polymer. 

---