Water and cyclohexane

Predicted solvation free energies and solvent-accessible surface areas (SASA) of 2,4-pentanedione tautomers in cyclohexane and water. a-h... 

While the PM3-SM4 model does appear to slightly underestimate the polarity of the enol component, there is some cancellation of errors upon considering the differential transfer free energies between cyclohexane and water. As noted above, experiment indicates that the differential free energy of transfer of the dione and the enol is 3.1 kcal/mol the PM3-SM4 model predicts this value to be 2.8 kcal/mol, in excellent quantitative agreement. AM1-SM4 is less satisfactory in this regard, predicting only 1.9 kcal/mol. 

Cyclohexane and water do not mix together. We say that they are immiscible. Because cyclohexane has a lower density than water, it forms a layer above the aqueous potassium iodide solution when the two are mixed together. 

Fig. 2. Oil-rich region of the Gibbs phase triangle of the ternary mixture Tween 85, cyclohexane and water...

To add to the confusion, some workers take 6, as the negative of the definition (8.35). Some workers use factors of 105 or 107 instead of 106. Some workers use 8, to mean the shift in hertz their 8, is equal to (8.35) multiplied by spectromcter- Pri°r t0 introduction (by Tiers in 1958) of TMS as the reference for proton shifts, a variety of reference compounds (such as benzene, cyclohexane, and water) were used. When examining reported shifts, the definitions used should be noted. 

Ito s group [83] reported the micellar polymerization mechanism was operative during the radical polymerization of PEO macromonomers in cyclohexane and water under similar reaction conditions. The reaction medium has an important effect on the polymerization behavior of macromonomers. Cyclohexane was chosen as a nonpolar type of solvent. The polymerization was found to be independent of the lengths of p-alkyl group (R) and the PEO chain in benzene. On the other hand, the rate of polymerization in cyclohexane increased with increasing number of EO units. This may be attributed to the formation of aggregates (micelles) and/or compartmentalization of reaction loci,i.e., polymerization in distinct aggregates (polymer particles). The C12-(EO)14-MA macromonomer polymerized faster in bulk than in benzene but far slower than in water. 

Calculations were carried out for a system consisting of the anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate, 1-pen-tanol (cosurfactant), cyclohexane, and water containing 0.3 M NaCl. As mentioned atthe very beginning, thechoice of this system was dictated by the possibility of identifying various types of phase behaviors for the same chemical components by merely changing the amount of added alcohol. In all calculations, we assumed the coexistence of an excess dispersed phase. This means that the droplet microemulsion phase is part of a two-phase system and that the amount of dispersed phase present in the droplet is the maximum achievable. 

DYNAMIC ADSORPTION OF TERT-BUTYLBENZENE, CYCLOHEXANE AND WATER VAPOURS ON FIXED ACTIVATED CARBON/MOLECULAR SIEVE BEDS... 

Two different adsorbents, activated carbon Norit R 0.8 Extra (Norit N.V., The Netherlands) and molecular sieve (type 4A, Merck), were used to study tert-butylbenzene, cyclohexane, and water vapour breakthrough dynamics. Structural parameters of the carbon adsorbent were calculated from benzene vapour adsorption-desorption isotherms measured gravimetrically at 293 K using a McBain-Bakr quartz microbalance, and nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms recorded at 77.4 K using a Micromeritics ASAP 2405N analyzer described in detail elsewhere.22,24 Activated carbon Norit has a cylindrical... 

The concept of measuring such rates is not new, particularly in the pharmaceutical field. Van de Waterbeemd [14] measured rates of transfer of various drugs from octanol to water and empirically related these rates to the partition coefficient. Similarly Brodin [15], using a different experimental method, obtained rates of transfer for another series of compounds between cyclohexane and water. The rotating diffusion cell has been introduced for similar purposes [16-18]. It is necessary to look into the broader background of liquid-liquid interfacial kinetics, in order to illustrate aspects of the issues under consideration. The subject has been reviewed in part by Noble [19]. 

A series of 16 molecules, which include different monofunctional compounds, were chosen to determine the enthalpy of solvation in water. Besides four hydrocarbons (hexane, heptane, octane and cyclohexane) and water, the series of molecules include alcohols (2-methylpropan-2-ol, 1-butanol and 2-butanol), ethers (diethylether, tetrahydrofuran and tetrahydropyran), amines (propylamine, butylamine, diethy-lamine and dibutylamine) and piperidine. This choice allows us to examine the differences between different functional groups, as well as the influence of the molecular size on the enthalpic contributions for a given series of monofunctional compounds. Free energies of hydration as well as the corresponding enthalpies taken from the data compiled by Cabani and coworkers [26] are shown in Table 4-1. 

In Table 1 are given values of the pertinent constants for two common solvents cyclohexane and water. It will be seen that, for freezing-point depressions of about 2 K, omission of the correction term kfATf eads to errors of the order of 1 percent in m or M. 

Table 2-7. Thermodynamic parameters for dissolution of gaseous methane in cyclohexane and water at 25 °C [225].

Furfiier evidence fiiat supports these calculations derives from studies of the ternary mixtures of the cationic double-chain surfactant DDAB (didodecyl dimethyl ammonium bromide), cyclohexane and water. Within the cubic mesophase region of fiiis surfactant-water-oil mixtiure, all the cyclohexane is adsorbed between the surfactant chains, so that the system is a pseudo-binary one, for which our theoretical analysis ought to hold. (The effective surfactant parameter for fliis surfactant in the presence of cyclohexane is slightly larger tiian unity.) Close scrutiny of the cubic phase region within this ternary phase diagram has revealed the presence of at least one - and... 

A paper by the China Petrochemical Dev Co [3h] reported that the use of pure oxygen for cyclohexane oxidation leads to an increased yield and selectivity to Ol/One with respect to the traditional air-based technology, under inherently safe conditions. The latter are achieved by the addition of water, which avoids the formation of flammable mixtures in the overhead vapor space and in the vapor bubbles. In fact, cyclohexane and water form a minimum-boiling azeotrope, the vapor pressure of which is higher than that of cyclohexane. The increased vapor pressure acts as an inert component. 

Sorption isotherms for water and cyclohexane are shown in Figure 3 and for nitrogen in Figure 4. They have a characteristic shape typical of zeolites. Cyclohexane and water sorption measurements (at 20 and 12 mm Hg and 25°C) are shown in Table I. 

The overhead product of the third column is an azeotropic mix of higher alcohols, cyclohexane and water which is fed to a second phase separator. The light phase in this separator, consisting essentiaUy of cyclohexane, is recycled to the second column whereas the aqueous phase is fed either to the first column or to the first phase separator. The diagram does not show the equipment to handle the cyclohexane and to remove the residual alcohol from the waste water. This plant arrangement yields a product containing less than 0.1 wt. % of water. 

FIGURE 6 Dependence of porosity of PHEMA hydrogels determined from cyclohexane ( ) and water regain measured by centrifugation ( ) or suction (T) and mercury porosimetry (A) on the content of NaCl (250-500 pm) porogen in the polymerization feed. 

As shown in Fig. 1, photooxidation of LHC-bound Chl-a at pH 7.8 and pheophytin formation of LHC-bound Chl-a at pH 1.3 are hardly enhanced by fatty acids of 6 to 12 carbon atoms, whereas fatty acids of 14 to 18 carbons accelerate these reactions significantly. Within the Cj g fatty acids tested, desaturation improves the ability of the acids to destroy photo- and acid stability of the LHC. These results do not appear to be explained simply by differences in the partitioning of the different fatty acids between lipophilic LHC and aqueous solvent. Namely, while the molar solubility of saturated fatty acids in both, lipophilic cyclohexane and water decreases by a factor of 20 for acids from 12 to 18 carbons, the solubility ratio for either fatty acid in these solvents changes only slightly (calculated from Ref. 4). 

---