Safety audit principles

Monitoring and testing systems including safety audits principles of design and requirements for effectiveness. 

The safety status of the process should be periodically reviewed against the guiding principles for the original design. Monitoring of add-ons can detect potentially dangerous modifications. Process hazards analysis or process safety audits are useful tools for this review. Documentation of inherently safer principles is critical to ensure that future changes don t nullify the positive features of the initial installation. 

Road Safety Audit is a systematic process for checking the safety of new schemes on roads. It should be based on sound safety principles and should ensure that all highways schemes operate as safely as is practicable by minimising future accident numbers and severity. 

The Road Safety Audit process in the UK started to gather pace when safety engineers realised that they were carrying out accident remedial schemes on relatively new roads. Adopting the principle of prevention is better than cure, they decided to use some of the safety experience they had gained from the remedial work, and design safety into new road schemes. 

THE PRINCIPLE PURPOSE OF A SAFETY AUDIT TO IMPROVE THE SAFETY CULTURE... 

HD 19/15 provides advice and guidance on how to undertake Road Safety Audits on trunk roads (including motorways). On local road schemes there is more flexibility in the way Road Safety Audits are undertaken, and more advice can be found in the Institution of Highways and Transportation (IHT) Road Safety Audit guidelines (IHT, 2008). Some local authorities have their own procedures for carr3ring out Road Safety Audits in their own areas. However, there are six fundamental principles that should always be applied when carrying out Road Safety Audits, regardless of the jurisdiction. 

Without road safety engineering experience and an understanding of safety principles, a Road Safety Audit can become simply a design check. Road safety experience is essential in enabling Road Safety Auditors to identify road safety problems and in assisting to make appropriate recommendations. Chapters 5 and 6 provide extensive information... 

At present, a Road Safety Audit Certificate of Competency is only strictly needed to undertake Road Safety Audits on the motorway and trunk road network in the UK, on national roads in Ireland and on the TERN in other European countries. However, it seems likely that other clients will be seeking assurances about the qualifications of Road Safety Auditors in the future and could also require at least one member of the team to have a Certificate of Competency. In 2013, Solihull Borough Council introduced new Road Safety Audit procedures, adopting the principle that Road Safety Audit Teams would require members with a Certificate of Competency. However, they went a stage further than most other roads authorities had done to that point, insisting that all Team Members of the audit team hold the qualification. 

Audits by INPO and the U.S. NRC aie a culmination of a high degree of self-auditing by the plant operators and the utihties themselves, often assisted by special third-party safety review boards set up to help carry out safety assessments (21). Self-auditing and self-criticism are essential to the process. These reflect the fundamental reactor safety principle that the owner-operator of the plant has the ultimate responsibiUty for plant safety. 

The substitution of asbestos fibers by other types of fibers or minerals must, ia principle, comply with three types of criteria (36) the technical feasibihty of the substitution the gain ia the safety of the asbestos-free product relative to the asbestos-containing product and the availabiHty of the substitute audits comparative cost. 

Quality Management system priorities to consider are management responsibility, quality system principles, auditing, contract review, design control, corrective action, document control, quality records, training, product safety and liability, and statistical techniques, because these are critical aspects of the Quality Management system where Xmple Inc. already has some systems in place. 

Tweeddale H.M., 1995. Principles and practises for designing of process safety monitoring and auditing programmes, Proceedings of the 8th International symposium on Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the process industries, Antwerpen, pp. 71-82. 

In 1981, the OECD Principles of GLP were finalized and led to the OECD Council Decision on the Mutual Acceptance of Data (MAD) which states that Data generated in the testing of chemicals in an OECD member country in accordance with OECD Test Guidelines and OECD principles of Good Laboratory Practice shall be accepted in other member countries for purposes of assessment and other uses relating to the protection of man and the environment . The OECD recommended in 1983 that implementation of GLP compliance should be verified by laboratory inspections and study audits. The EC later ratified the OECD principles and a number of Directives (e.g., 2004/9/EC, 2004/10/EC) indicates that tests must be carried out in compliance with the principles of GLP and that also that EU Member States must incorporate into their laws the requirement for all nonclinical safety studies to be conducted in compliance with GLP, and that premises conducting such studies must be inspected by a national authority. 

Inspections for compliance with GLP Principles may take place in any test facility generating health or environmental safety data for regulatory purposes. Inspectors may be required to audit data relating to the physical, chemical, toxicological or ecotoxicological properties of a substance or preparation. In some cases. Inspectors may need assistance from experts in particular disciplines. 

Procedures/responsibilities the CER does include a section titled Environmental Audit that identifies the key role of internal auditors, and a section on training that emphasises the financial commitment, particularly to safety training. Even so, although reference is made to EniChem s internal EMS, there is no clear definition of responsibilities within the organisation or of procedures designed to ensure compliance with the guiding principles outlined in the policy statement. 

Years ago, safety pioneers saw the need for structured SMS that were risk based, management led, and audit driven. Based on sound management principles, they realized that safety must be measured if it was to be improved. This measurement had to gauge effort rather than experience in the form of injury rates alone. Modern systems do just that and form a sound basis for safety benchmarking internationally. 

The principle of safety definition states that decisions concerning the safety program can only be made if the basic causes of loss-producing events are clearly identified. An audit helps identify these basic causes. 

I was offered the opportunity to address the mine management during my visit, and a suitable seminar was arranged. The company s managing director also attended the seminar. After a short presentation and much discussion, the mine accepted the radical principles of the Five-Star Safety System, and for the first time in almost 70 years embarked on a risk-based, management-led, audit-based safety system. 

The purpose of an audit is to ensure compliance with standards and to challenge existing policies, procedures, and practices and their underlying concepts and principles. An audit can look at leadership, compliance with policy, rules and standards, and the effectiveness of safety and health procedures. It may uncover opportunities to improve in the future. Auditors must handle their visit cautiously. They are not trying to place blame or ridicule people in the department or business unit. 

The Standard considers that an effective quality system should comprise management responsibility quality system principles quality system audits quality/cost considerations raw material quality control inspection and testing control of non-conforming product handling, storage, packaging and delivery after sales service quality documentation and records personnel training product safety and liability and statistical data/analyses. 

Process verification testing is often called screening. Screening involves 100% auditing of all manufactured products to detect or precipitate defects. The aim is to preempt potential quality problems before they reach the field. In principle, this should not be required for a well-controlled process. When uncertainties are Hkely in process controls, however, screening is often used as a safety net. 

---