Safety attitude

The second problem is that there is considerable evidence to show that the relationship between attitudes and behaviour is more complex than a 

This SAGE ebook i copyright and is supplied by NetLixaiy Unauthorised distribution forbidden. 

The relationship between attitudes and behaviour, therefore, is not as simple as might initially be thought and hence we will need to examine the subject in a little more detail. 

Attitude is the psychological tendency that is expressed by evaluating a 

In many respects this definition is very close to that of everyday usage. (Recently, however, a new and somewhat different use of the term attitude has being creeping into parlance from the USA. A person is referred to as having attitude, normally implying an uncooperative arrogance.) Attitudes may be held about tangible objects, such as football teams, or abstract concepts, such as democracy. 

---

In addition to good, when employees are considered for promotion, their safety attitude and record is considered... 

Demonstration of poor safety attitude. Emphasizes safe work practices, and personal responsibility. Safety precautions and personal protection for chemical handling, polymers, caustic soda, forklifts, personal hygiene, hearing, and first aid. 

Ten employees on Outward Bound challenge in Colorado, an experience reflecting on safety skills and awareness needing back at their jobs. Teamwork, staying calm, knowing your limits, replacing casual habits with careful skills, proper equipment, safety attitude, and safety as a duty. 

Middlesex University Business School (2004). Cultural influences on health and safety attitudes ami behaviour in small businesses, RR150, ISBN 0 7176 2742 X, HSE Books, 20 or at wwwJise. v.uk/re8eaich/nhtni/iTl50,htni. 

For employees, the policy statement is the declaration of an intent to achieve a goal. However, employees are skeptical of bureaucratic policies and look for more solid evidence of management commitment. Thus, the timing and sequence of health- and safety-related decisions demonstrate how the policy will be implemented and the importance of health and safety considerations. A health and safety pohcy with no follow-through is worthless and in fact may be damaging to employee morale by showing employees a lack of management commitment. This can backfire and can lead to poor employee safety attitudes and behaviors. Thus, an employer has to put the money where the mouth is to demonstrate commitment. If not, a policy is an empty promise. 

Positive safety attitudes through motivation and rewards... 

While an interview can measure arange of safety-related dimensions (see Chap. 3, Tables 3.3 and 3.4 for questions that can be used to measure an applicant s experience and expectations, respectively, in an employment interview), they are not particularly well suited to the measurement of aspects of safety such as safety motivation, participation, and compliance. The key problem is the possibility that the applicant will respond in a socially desirable way, and their response may have little relationship to their future on-the-job behavior. Rather than questioning job applicants directly about their safety attitudes (e.g., asking questions like Should safety have a high priority ), a structured interview can make use of either situational or behavioral questions to gain a perspective on the applicant s safety attimdes. Both situational and behavioral questions are based on scenarios or critical incidents which come directly from the job which the individual is being recruited for. The primary difference is that when using the behavioral format, the individual is asked what they have done in the described simation in the past, while in the situational format the applicant is asked what they would do in the particular situation. 

Burt, C. D. B., Chmiel, N., Hayes, P. (2009). Implications of turnover for safety attitudes and behaviour in work teams. Safety Science, 47, 1002—1006. 

Trust plays a central role in safety (Conchie et al. 2006). Studies have shown links between positive safety outcomes, and tmst in management (e.g., DePasquale and Geller 1999 Kath et al. 2010 Luria 2010), and tmst in co-workers (e.g., Tharaldsen et al. 2010). Tmst is also a key aspect of a positive safety culture (Bums et al. 2006), influences safety attitudes (Walker 2013), and influences the effectiveness of risk communication (Conchie and Bums 2008 Twyman et al. 2008). While there are clear safety benefits associated with tmst, safety benefits can also come from distmst (Conchie and Donald 2008), and this is likely to particularly be the case in relation to new employees in their initial period of employment. Tmst can reduce an... 

Co-workers will immediately determine the safety attitudes of a new employee Co-workers immediately determine the safety attitudes of a new employee... 

The intrinsic safety of the produce of enterprise security, safety of human nature, the people and objects and the combination, in order to build a production safety accident defenses. Safety Culture human security principles (Luo Lin 2010) in enterprise is indicated in Figure 1. Objective of the safety culture in construction is to create the intrinsically safe standard of the intrinsically safe always wanted to secure safety awareness, everywhere you want to secure the safety attitude, conscientiously study the safety of security awareness, comprehensive security capabilities reality do to secure the safety of operations, everything into the safety security purposes. 

Safety management normally experiences more resistance than any other aspect introduced into an organization. The safety culture that is embedded in the organization tends to prevail in the future. Safety attitudes and behaviors experienced in the past tend to be carried over to the future. These can only be changed with a deep, ongoing, and concerted effort to make the implementation of the safety system work. 

The safety culture change journey is a tough, long, and sometimes tedious one. Everyone involved with the organization must be on board or the change will not happen. This change in safety attitudes cannot occur at the worker level only. It must start with the leadership and cascade down to all echelons within the organization, and must involve contractors and temporary employees as well. 

A positive safety culture seems like a good idea. Surely to have a safety aware workforce, imbued with safety attitudes, open about error and so forth must be helpful But is there any evidence that changing the culture is likely to improve the quality of healthcare or the safety of patients A few years ago the answer to this was simply no, or at best only indirect evidence. Now however, a cadre of brave researchers undaunted by conceptual and methodological minefields have begun to address this issue. But it is difficult and there are no simple answers. 

The idea of teaching specific safety attitudes and behaviours is unusual in healthcare but deeply embedded in a number of hazardous industries. For instance, the Western Mining Corporation in Western Australia is an exemplar of creating error wisdom within its organization and front line staff. Their motto is Take time, take charge, which aims to get workers to stop and think, to... 

Team leadership in all its forms is particularly critical in high risk activities. For example, team leaders influence safety attitudes and behaviour in the workplace, such as compliance with safety related rules and procedures and are key to the effective management of emergencies (Flin and Yule, 2004). Rigid hierarchies in healthcare teams may not be conducive to high quality care however, leadership, clarity of purpose and roles remain critical. 

Formal safety education for advanced students and laboratory workers should be made as relevant to their work activities as possible. Training that is conducted simply to satisfy regulatory requirements tends to subordinate the relevant safety issues to details associated with compliance. Such bureaucratic safety management has actually worked against fostering positive safety attitudes in many well-experienced laboratory workers and has undermined the credibility of warnings about bona fide hazards by emphasizing pro forma violation of rules. 

Around 2004 the first safety culture tools designed for healthcare began to appear. Maity of these tools are in the form of survey instruments or questioimaires, the two most well-known being the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC) developed by the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ - Sexton et al. 2006). Both instruments are described in detail within the book and illustrated with... 

Sexton, J.B., Helmreich, R.L., Nielands, T.B., Rowan, K., Vella, K., Boyden, J., Roberts, PR. and Thomas, E.J. 2006. The Safety Attitudes Questioimaire Psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research. BMC... 

Numerous studies have shown that safety climate survey results predict safety-related outcomes (Yule et al. 2007), for example, accidents and injuries (Huang et al. 2006), safety performance (Nahrgang et al. 2011 Shaimon and Norman 2009) and workers safety behaviour (Griffin and Neal 2000). Previous studies on the relationship between positive safety climate and lower accident rates demonstrated that employees with a positive safety attitude were less likely to be involved in accidents (Barling et al. 2002 Hofmann and Stetzer 1996 and Lee 1998). 

Research has been carried out to test the psychometric properties of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire and AHRQ Hospital Safety Culture Survey (Nieva and Sorra 2003 Sexton et al. 2006 Sorra and Nieva 2004). However, there have been important misapplications of survey tools in healthcare. A proliferation of climate surveys now exist, including many where the factor stmcture and construct validity have not been tested. Many hospitals have developed their own bespoke survey tools and these are poorly designed because basic survey design rules have not been followed. One common issue is surveys that do not counter-balance positive and negative statements, thus increasing the risk of response set bias where the... 

Key quotes from the focus groups give insights into translating safety attitudes into safety behaviours ... 

Norden-Hagg, A., Sexton, J.B., Kalvemaik-Sporrong, S., Ring, L. and Kettis-Lindblad, A. 2010. Assessing safety culture in pharmacies The psychometric vahdation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) in a national sample of commnnity pharmacies in Swedea Biomed Central Clinical Pharmacology, 10, 1-40. 

Safety as a shared value -Employee perceptions of management safety commitment -Management perceptions of employee safety commitment -Persoimel s reported safety attitudes in safety culture surveys -Management raising safety issues in their t s... 

---