Safety culture assessment

Nieva, V.F. and Sorra, J. (2003) Safety culture assessment a tool for improving patient safety in healthcare organizations. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 12(Suppl. II), iiI7-ii23. 

Antonsen, S., 2009. Safety culture assessment - Mission impossible Safety culture and the failure offoresight. In press -Safety Science. 

From an academic viewpoint, culture is a value-free concept (a nominal variable) whereas safety is not. The required purpose of safety culture assessments is not descriptions but evaluations, preferably with recoimnendations on how the underlying culture can be improved to support safety (more). 

Most organisational safety culture assessments are not carried out for their own sake. Management is either interested in a diagnosis to compare it with a previous one or to benchmark with peer organisations, or the diagnosis is followed by... 

Case Study of Safety Culture Assessment Japanese Example... 

What lies behind the result of a patient safety culture assessment In this chapter we have examined the notion of a safety culture from a systems thinking perspective. In doing so, we depict it as the interpretation of the dynamic relationship between goals, priorities and activities within an organisation. Therefore it is not so much a fixed, essential quality as an ongoing achievement between the organisational members (whether management or frontline ) in the context of the broader envirorunent. 

In conclusion, this chapter demonstrates that the IRT approach can provide additional insights to psychometric properties of the HSOPSC. Both, the classical and modem approaches, are needed to form a complete picture of the properties of a set of items. Understanding the basic principles of IRT will hopefully foster its use more widely within the field of patient safety culture assessment. This will ultimately enhance our ability to measure this important constmct accurately. 

The measurement of safety culture has now become a core component of patient safety and additional patient safety culture assessment instruments will be needed to accommodate organisational sehings that cover the continuum of care in multiple settings. It will also be necessaiy to examine differences, as well as similarities, in staff perceptions of patient safety culture across different settings of care. In addition, it is necessary to examine in these other healthcare settings the relationships between patient safety culture and patient perceptions of care, as well as clinical outcome measures, as has been done in the hospital setting. 

For these reasons, the EUROCONTROL Safety Cnlture Programme aims to survey all EUROCONTROL member states by the end of 2014, prior to significant SESAR or FAB impact. This was endorsed at a workshop held in Luxembonrg in November 2012 with 20 ANSPs, where it was concluded by the member states that they needed to understand their own safety cultures first before moving to FABs and FAB-based safety culture assessments. 

Nieva, V. F., Sorra, J., Safety Culture Assessment A Tool for Improving Patient Safety in Healthcare Organizations, Qmlity and Safety in Healthcare, Vol. 12, Supplement II, 2003, pp. 17-23. 

The Safety Culture Maturity model is a participatative, solution-focused safety culture assessment and improvement method. What makes it different from other safety culture assessment processes is that it has a strong focus on solutions, involves a high degree of workforce participation, and provides an opportunity for... 

To determine whether it is appropriate to conduct an assessment of safety culture, it is necessary for the investigator to be able to determine the signs that there may be such a problem. It is possible to cross-reference the elements of safety culture to causes in a standard RCA approach, and to turn these cross-references into a checklist for use by the investigator. This provides a direct link for the investigator from the analysis technique with which they are working to safety culture assessment, indicating the areas of safety culture that are likely to require most attention. 

The data for this activity are captured during the incident investigation, however it is extremely unlikely that any form of safety culture assessment would take place whilst the investigation were still active. It is anticipated that if the checklist revealed that there were a large number of causes linked to the Safety Culture Maturity Model then there would be a recommendation arising from the investigation that safety culture be assessed at some future date. It is also possible that the data from a number of investigations would be examined for trends, and if any such trends were present, then a safety culture assessment may be recommended. 

The procedure also needs to provide guidance on the identification of potential safety culture issues for follow-up after the investigation. The procedure should not be aiming to provide guidance on how to conduct the safety culture assessment, just to identify the issues that require attention. 

Periodic safety culture assessment to maintain identify potential problems and formulate solutions. 

It is also recommended that safety culture assessments focus on all levels of the organization in question rather than merely frontline operators the HSE (2005a) pointed out that culture is likely to vary widely across an organization so assessments should be made across the entire organization. 

These five safety culture dimensions comprise the basis for the review by SCART (Safety Culture Assessment Review Team), a service offered by the IAEA. 

A written job safety analysis (JSA) can reveal a lot about a company s safety culture. The safety culture assessment should determine how many JSAs have been developed and for what tasks. There should be a JSA for every work task. The more developed your safety culture is, the more JS As your company will have. We include some OSHA information about JSAs in Appendix A and discuss JSAs in detail in Chapter 7, Training. ... 

As an alternative to studying accident cases, OSHA has come up with a method to analyze weakness in what they call the Safety and Health Program. I believe that what OSHA refers to as a Safety and Health Program Assessment could also be considered a safety culture assessment. I have found much of this information to be useful, but I must warn readers in advance that OSHA has set the bar for excellence quite high. Be advised that in some cases reaching the top level may be nearly impossible. So, do not be too disappointed if you find a variety of sections where the survey indicates a need for improvement. 

---