Risk assessment purpose

Validation should be carried out for each component of the residue definition in each sample matrix used for risk assessment purposes. 

Today, when a pesticide with no detectable residues is registered for use, a Tolerance or maximum residue limit (MRL) is established at the lowest concentration level at which the method was validated. However, for risk assessment purposes it would be wrong to use this number in calculating the risk posed to humans by exposure to the pesticide from the consumption of the food product. This would be assuming that the amount of the pesticide present in all food products treated with the pesticide and for which no detectable residues were found is just less than the lowest level of method validation (LLMV). The assumption is wrong, but there is no better way of performing a risk assessment calculation unless the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) of the method were clearly defined in a uniformly acceptable manner. 

If no detectable residues were present, the value used for risk assessment purposes would be 0.05 mg kg This would allow only four uses with no detectable residues and even fewer uses where residues were present. If an appropriate LOD and LOQ had been calculated and reported as follows ... 

While profound immunosuppression can lead to an increased incidence of infectious or neoplastic diseases, interpreting data from experimental immunotoxicology studies or epidemiological studies for quantitative risk assessment purposes can be problematic. This is because inadvertent exposures to immunotoxic agents may often be expressed as a mild-to-moderate change, reflected, for example, by a 15 to 25% decrement in an immune parameter compared to control values. To help address the clinical consequences of mild-to-moderate immunosuppression, we examined available experimental, clinical and epidemiological studies that examined the association between suppression of immune function and infectious disease, independent of the etiology of suppression. 

So my message to the chemical industry broadly and in particular to the segment of small businesses is to not let the PMN requirements limit your creative spirit in the development and commercialization of new chemicals. The Office of Toxic Substances in EPA stands ready to assist you at no cost in filling out the forms and distinguishing clearly what is minimally essential for risk assessment purposes from what is optional. We have trained consultants in the northeastern and mid-west sections of the country ready to travel to your location and advise you in a confidential way on PMNs. Our staff in Washington can be immensely helpful and you should feel free to discuss your specific situation with them. And, to top it off, we have one recently-retired experienced chemcial industry man concentrating his entire effort to assist the small business man in any TSCA-related matter. His name is Dr. Bob Toomey give him a call on the Industry Assistance Office toll-free line. 

For risk assessment purposes, the relative potency of AP and APEO has been evaluated by several authorities, initially on the basis of aquatic toxicity. In the UK, the Environment Agency used a QSAR approach [26] to derive the potencies listed in Table 7.3.2. Environment Canada used two approaches to characterise risks of NP, NPEO, and NPEC [27]. In the distributional approach, relative toxicities were proposed based on categorising acute and chronic toxicities. These are listed in Table 7.3.2. In addition a conservative approach was used. 

Preliminary predictions of absorption of a substance can be made from its physico-chemical properties if no other information is available. Also elaborate computer programs are available that make predictions about, e.g., dermal penetration or metabolic pathways. However, these systems have often not been extensively validated against appropriate experimental data and it is not always certain if the results obtained in such models reflect the situation in vivo. On this basis, modeled data should only be used for risk assessment purposes where it is supported by other kinds of evidence. 

Many of the proposed toxicity tests have been criticized for nonspecificity and lack of reproducibility. Concern has also been raised about their relevance for generating useful data for hazard and risk assessment purposes. The diversity of the possible modes of action (e.g., receptor binding. 

Because information is available about the toxicity of the parent chemicals of group V, VI, and VII biomarkers or of the biomarkers themselves, these biomarkers potentially have properties that allow their use for risk-assessment purposes. 

In the environment, organisms are seldom exposed to single substances in fact, mixtures are the rule rather than the exception. Mixture extrapolation is necessary for risk assessment purposes, but techniques for mixture extrapolations are not strongly validated, except for those for some classes of substances in single species. There is an almost complete lack of data on mixture effects at the community and ecosystem levels. Nonetheless, the available data indicate strongly that mixture extrapolation should be seriously considered as an alternative to no mixture extrapolation. 

Risk assessment. The model accounts for most of the major features of chromium(VI) and chromium(III) absorption and kinetics in the rat, and reduction from the chromium(VI) to the chromium(III) valence state, but the bioavailability/absorbability of chromium from environmental sources is mostly unknown, except for bioavailability/absorbability of a few chemically defined salts. Furthermore, the mechanisms by which chromium reserves from bone tissue are released into plasma as well as age, physiological conditions and species variations are important considerations in the refinement of any PBPK model for risk assessment purposes. 

For risk assessment purposes, an important objective in evaluating the environmental fate of PCDD/Fs is predicting the major pathways of human exposure. It is well established that the food chain, especially meat and dairy products, accounts for more than 90% of human exposure to PCDD/Fs and perhaps as much as 99% of human exposure to 2,3,7,8-TCDD.34 In industrialized countries, the average daily intake via food (the major route of exposure to dioxins and furans) ranges from 1.5 to 2.5 pg TEQ kg-1 body weight. 

Pelekis M, Krishnan K. 1997. Assessing the relevance of rodent data on chemical interactions for health risk assessment purposes a case study with dichloromethane-toluene mixture. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 25 79-86. 

Exposure estimates that are required for risk assessment may be obtained from chemical-specific field studies, or from extrapolations from other field studies. This requires high-quality exposure data that have been obtained under conditions relevant for the exposure and use scenarios under consideration (Krieger et al, 1992 Eenske and Teschke, 1995 Krieger, 1995 Turnbull et al, 1995). For risk assessment purposes, the exposure data obtained for relevant use scenarios can be compared with an appropriate accepted exposure level (e.g. Acceptable Operator Exposure Level (AOEL)) based on the toxicological profile of the compound. 

For risk-assessment purposes, actual dermal exposure needs to be estimated. Procedures to obtain these values differ. In the PHED, they are based on values... 

For risk-assessment purposes, the best choice is a field study which is carried out for the specific purpose of obtaining exposure values under representative conditions for the use scenario and active substance that are being considered. In view of the possible range of exposure due to the large number of potential variables, it is absolutely required that the study include between about 10 and 30 replicates spread over a reasonable time period accounting for variation in climatic conditions and the relevant application technique. The number of replicates per person should be as small as reasonably possible. Workers should be monitored during whole work shifts while using the relevant and/or required personal protection... 

As a result, to date epidemiological studies of pesticide exposures have only been indicative of the presence of elevated health risks. Quantitative studies contributing to evidence on exposure-response relationships which could be used for quantitative risk assessment purposes are not widely available. This implies that the epidemiological potential has not been explored to its limits, as has been done for certain other agents such as asbestos and lead, for which present legislation has been based, to a large extent, on quantitative evidence of health risks in humans obtained from epidemiological studies. 

In addition to in vivo and in vitro experimentation, mathematical models and quantitative structure-permeability relationship (QSAR) methods have been used to predict skin absorption in humans. These models use the physico-chemical properties of the test compound (e.g. volatility, ionization, molecular weight, water/lipid partition, etc.) to predict skin absorption in humans (Moss et al 2002). The models are particularly attractive because of the low cost and rapidity. However, because of the above-mentioned factors influencing dermal absorption, mathematical models are of limited use for risk assessment purposes. Since these models are currently not accepted by regulatory agencies involved in pesticide evaluations, they will not be further discussed in this chapter. 

In vivo skin absorption studies for risk assessment purposes are most often performed on laboratory rats. While the USEPA (1998) states that the rat is the only acceptable species, the OECD (2004b) mentions that also other animal species can be used when they have been proven to have more similar skin absorption rates to human. An advantage of the rat is that this is the species used in most toxicological and kinetic studies. On the other hand, it is known that data from rat studies generally overestimate human skin absorption (ECETOC, 1993 van de Sandt et al, 2000). As indicated before, and to the best of our knowledge, no extensive validation of the rat in vivo study has been performed in which reproducibility and the relationship to human skin absorption have been established. 

Another concern relates to the effect of the ratio of active to inactive chemicals in the data set. Some SAR models are most predictive when that ratio is unity (3, 22). Hence, for a model that will be widely used for hazard identification and risk assessment purposes, it would be of importance to determine whether its performance is optimal. Thus, if the number of inactives exceeds the number of actives, the number of inactives can be decreased by randomly removing the appropriate number of inactives and determining the performance of the resulting SAR model. The random deletion of inactives and the model derivation should be repeated several times to ascertain that a robust model has been derived. We found that because the nature of the toxico-phores is determined primarily by the actives and because the "quality" of the toxicophores... 

Ecological risk assessments, like human health risk assessments, are based on scientific data that are frequently difficult and complex, conflicting or ambiguous, or incomplete. Analyses of such data for risk assessment purposes depend on professional judgment based on scientific expertise. Professional judgment is necessary to ... 

The reducible fraction can be recovered in three steps easily reducible fraction (manganese oxides), moderately reducible fraction (amorphous iron oxides), and poorly reducible fraction (crystalline iron oxides). A few SEPs address all three fractions (Miller et al., 1986 Zeien and Briimmer, 1989 Krishnamurti et al., 1995). A number of SEPs are only able to differentiate between easily reducible and moderately reducible fractions (called readily and poorly available forms ofTE, respectively) (Shuman, 1983 Salomons and Forstner, 1984 Kersten and Forstner, 1986). Due to the lack of selectivity of reagents, with consequent overlapping of separated fractions, all reducible forms are typically separated together (Ure et al., 1993 Rauret et al., 1999). Despite the fact that the SEPs may be simplified, in this way, simultaneous recovery of readily and poorly available forms of TE seems rather disadvantageous for risk assessment purposes. 

It will continue to be of considerable importance to establish a specific role for chromosome loss in tumor development. The analysis of aneuploidy in interphase cells of solid tumors using FISH will be greatly advantageous in this respect. For cancer risk assessment purposes, results from aneuploidy assays can be considered particularly useful when the mode of action of a chemical is known to result in chromosome loss or nondisjunction. 

It is of note that this considerable reliance on laboratory animal data for risk assessment purposes for enviromnental chemicals is in sharp contrast to the situation with ionizing radiation. The cancer risk estimates for ionizing radiation (X rays and y rays) are based to a very great extent on human tumor data obtained from the Life Stage Study (LSS) of the atomic bomb survivors in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan... 

---