Quantitative measurement

There are many instances in which quantitative measurements are required in natural product chemistry, particularly in the biomedical field. MS is a well-established tool in this area and offers a unique combination of sensitivity, specificity and dynamic range. In the past GC/MS has usually been the method of choice and procedures and problems involved in such analyses are well documented 1,2, 50). Frequently, the most difficult item in the whole procedure is the choice, and possible synthesis of an appropriate internal standard (homologue, isomer, closely related analogue, or isotopically labelled analogue). Furthermore, the selection of a derivative with suitable GC and MS properties for both sample and standard is required. 

In this book we are primarily interested in using spectroscopic and diffraction methods to determine the structures of molecules. But those same methods can also give us quantitative information about the amounts of substances in our sample, so we note here the general principles of such measurements. The amount and quality of quantitative information vary enormously from one method to another. We might get absolute measurements of concentrations in our sample or we may just get relative concentrations of several components we might get the information directly from an experiment, or we may have to do careful calibrations first and we might be able to determine the presence and perhaps the amount of impurities in our sample. It depends on the physics of the specific experiment and on the nature of the sample specimen. 

That illustrates one important principle sharp lines good, broad lines bad. High-resolution techniques such as NMR spectroscopy, rotational spectroscopy, mass spectrometry and powder diffraction make observation of multiple components relatively easy with broad lines, as in many electronic spectra, gas diffraction, and to some extent vibrational spectroscopy, it is much trickier. 

The attraction of using NMR in this way is that we do not need to know anything about how any of the compounds specifically respond to radio-frequency excitation. We can measure the concentration of a brand new compound as easily as that of a known one. That is not the case for most forms of spectroscopy. A molecule may have many absorption bands in its infrared or Raman spectra, and the intensities of all of them depend on how much of the compound is present in the sample each also depends on a specific property of that molecule. They can be measured for a known, pure sample, or they can be computed, but 

In absorbance spectroscopy such as UV/vis, the measured absorbance A for a particular band is related to the transmittance T (which is the ratio of transmitted radiation, / to the incident radiation /q) by 

It is also directly related to how much of the compound is being observed in the spectrometer by the Beer-Lambert law 

The concentrations of eluted solutes are proportional to the areas under the recorded peaks. Electronic integrations in GC instruments print out the areas of peaks, and the retention times of peaks are also generally printed. It is also possible to measure peak height to construct a calibration curve. The linearity of a calibration curve should always be established. 

The method of standard additions is a useful technique for calibrating, especially for occasional samples. One or more aliquots of the sample are spiked with a known concentration of standard, and the increase in peak area is proportional to the added standard. This method has the advantage of verifying that the retention time of the unknown analyte is the same as that of the standard. 

A more important method of quantitative analysis is the use of internal standards. Here, the sample and standards are spiked with an equal amount of a solute whose retention time is near that of the analyte. The ratio of the area of the standard or analyte to that of the internal standard is used to prepare the calibration curve and determine the unknown concentration. This method compensates for variations in physical parameters, especially inaccuracies in pipetting and injecting microliter volumes of samples. Also, the relative retention should remain constant, even if the flow rate should vary somewhat. 

An internal standard is usually added to standard and sample solutions. 

The ratio of the analyte peak area to internal standard peal area is measured and will remain unaffected by slight variations in injected volume and chromatographic conditions. 

The most accurate presentation of absorption by atoms is given by eqn. (6). However, this is difficult to apply in practice. 

The process of absorption measurements in atomic absorption can be compared to absorption measurements in the standard colorimeter or ultra-violet/visible spectrophotometer. The equipment consists of a radiation source, sample cell and detector readout. The radiation from the source is measured without the sample in the sample cell and the intensity designated 70. The sample is then placed in the sample cell and energy is absorbed. The new intensity of radiation is measured and designated I. I0 — I equals the amount of source radiation absorbed by the sample. 

In atomic absorption a similar process takes place, except the radiation source is usually a specific line source and the sample cell is an atomizer such as a flame. As with the colorimeter, the intensity of radiation is measured 

The quantitative relationship is expressed by the Beer—Lambert Law, A — abc, where A is absorbance, a the absorptivity constant, b the cell path length and c the sample concentration. More simply, it states that the amount of light that is absorbed by a sample is a function of the number of absorbing atoms in the light path. Clearly, the number of atoms is a function of the sample cell path length and the concentration of the sample. 

In atomic absorption analysis, the sample cell is an atomizer which in most cases has a very reproducible path length, 6, and Beer s Law relationships are followed in most cases. The percentage absorption reading is converted to absorbance, log10(/0// ) and then related to the sample concentration. For example, a sample absorption of 12.9% = 0.06 absorbance, and 1% absorption = 0.0044 absorbance. The most important point to note about the Beer—Lambert Law is that the concentration of the sample is directly proportional to absorbance A and not to percentage absorption. 

---

However, in the early stages of design, decisions that have important safety implications must be made based on an incomplete picture. Let us explore simple quantitative measures which can be used to assist decision making in the early stages of design. 

The predicted cumulative cash-flow curve for a project throughout its life forms the basis for more detailed evaluation. Many quantitative measures or indices have been proposed. In each case, important features of the cumulative cash-flow curve are identified and transformed into a single numerical measure as an index. 

In new developments, test separators may be substituted by multiphase metering devices which can quantitatively measure volumes of oil, gas and water without the need of separation. This technology is under development. 

But, with the use of digitization, 2D quantitative measurements are allowed for industrial radiography. These can be done by powerful tools, like estimation of defect extension, automatic segmentation, recognition of individual defects and image analysis (figure 7). For validation, results can be compared with destractive examination of metallic objects. 

Non-destructive testing - Radioscopic testing - Part 1 Quantitative measurement of imaging properties, prEN 13068-1... 

The physics of X-ray refraction are analogous to the well known refraction of light by optical lenses and prisms, governed by Snell s law. The special feature is the deflection at very small angles of few minutes of arc, as the refractive index of X-rays in matter is nearly one. Due to the density differences at inner surfaces most of the incident X-rays are deflected [1]. As the scattered intensity of refraction is proportional to the specific surface of a sample, a reference standard gives a quantitative measure for analytical determinations. 

The search for Turing patterns led to the introduction of several new types of chemical reactor for studying reaction-diffusion events in feedback systems. Coupled with huge advances in imaging and data analysis capabilities, it is now possible to make detailed quantitative measurements on complex spatiotemporal behaviour. A few of the reactor configurations of interest will be mentioned here. 

Tjandra N, Szabo A and Bax A 1996 Protein backbone dynamics and N-15 chemical shift anisotropy from quantitative measurement of relaxation interference effected. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 6986-91... 

For a detailed discussion on the analytical teclmiques exploiting the amplitude contrast of melastic images in ESI and image-EELS, see chapter B1.6 of this encyclopedia. One more recent but also very important aspect is the quantitative measurement of atomic concentrations in the sample. The work of Somlyo and colleagues [56]. Leapman and coworkers and Door and Gangler [59] introduce techniques to convert measured... 

Compared witii other direct force measurement teclmiques, a unique aspect of the surface forces apparatus (SFA) is to allow quantitative measurement of surface forces and intermolecular potentials. This is made possible by essentially tliree measures (i) well defined contact geometry, (ii) high-resolution interferometric distance measurement and (iii) precise mechanics to control the separation between the surfaces. 

For the special case of a two-state systems, a Flermitean phase operator was proposed, [143], which was said to provide a quantitative measure for phase information. )... 

Computational issues that are pertinent in MD simulations are time complexity of the force calculations and the accuracy of the particle trajectories including other necessary quantitative measures. These two issues overwhelm computational scientists in several ways. MD simulations are done for long time periods and since numerical integration techniques involve discretization errors and stability restrictions which when not put in check, may corrupt the numerical solutions in such a way that they do not have any meaning and therefore, no useful inferences can be drawn from them. Different strategies such as globally stable numerical integrators and multiple time steps implementations have been used in this respect (see [27, 31]). 

We shall explore the quantitative measures further. They are presented in the third column of Table 6-2. 

The PEOE method leads to only partial equalization of orbital electronegativities. Thus, each atom of a molecule retains, on the basis of Eq. (12), a residual electronegativity that measures its potential to attract further electrons. It has been shown that the values of residual electronegativities can be taken as a quantitative measure of the inductive effect [35]. 

Residual electronegativity values obtained by the PEOE method are useful quantitative measures of the inductive effect. 

The Cahn-Ingold-Prelog (CIP) rules stand as the official way to specify chirahty of molecular structures [35, 36] (see also Section 2.8), but can we measure the chirality of a chiral molecule. Can one say that one structure is more chiral than another. These questions are associated in a chemist s mind with some of the experimentally observed properties of chiral compounds. For example, the racemic mixture of one pail of specific enantiomers may be more clearly separated in a given chiral chromatographic system than the racemic mixture of another compound. Or, the difference in pharmacological properties for a particular pair of enantiomers may be greater than for another pair. Or, one chiral compound may rotate the plane of polarized light more than another. Several theoretical quantitative measures of chirality have been developed and have been reviewed elsewhere [37-40]. 

One example of a quantitative measure of molecular chirality is the continuous chirality measure (CCM) [39, 40]. It was developed in the broader context of continuous symmetry measures. A chital object can be defined as an object that lacks improper elements of symmetry (mirror plane, center of inversion, or improper rotation axes). The farther it is from a situation in which it would have an improper element of symmetry, the higher its continuous chirality measure. 

I liis simulation provides the quantitative measures required for evaluation of the extent of deviation from a perfect viscometric flow. Specifically, the finite element model results can be used to calculate the torque corresponding to a given set of experimentally determined material parameters as... 

One can even use this test as a quantitative measure. The chemist can weigh 5g or so of their P2P product, crystallize it and weigh... 

This section includes veterinary applications. The antiviral, bactericidal, and antimicrobial applications of 2-aminothiazoles and 2-imino-4-thiazolines are summarized in Table VI-7. They show a marked anti-trichonomicidal activity, which has even been quantitatively measured by the Hansch approach (797). The antiparasitic action of these compounds has been investigated for some compounds and is summarized in Table VI-8 interesting results were obtained with aminotrozal (1348). 

Analytical chemistry is often described as the area of chemistry responsible for characterizing the composition of matter, both qualitatively (what is present) and quantitatively (how much is present). This description is misleading. After all, almost all chemists routinely make qualitative or quantitative measurements. The argument has been made that analytical chemistry is not a separate branch of chemistry, but simply the application of chemical knowledge. In fact, you probably have performed quantitative and qualitative analyses in other chemistry courses. For example, many introductory courses in chemistry include qualitative schemes for identifying inorganic ions and quantitative analyses involving titrations. 

In Section lA we indicated that analytical chemistry is more than a collection of qualitative and quantitative methods of analysis. Nevertheless, many problems on which analytical chemists work ultimately involve either a qualitative or quantitative measurement. Other problems may involve characterizing a sample s chemical or physical properties. Finally, many analytical chemists engage in fundamental studies of analytical methods. In this section we briefly discuss each of these four areas of analysis. 

The potentiometric determination of an analyte s concentration is one of the most common quantitative analytical techniques. Perhaps the most frequently employed, routine quantitative measurement is the potentiometric determination of a solution s pH, a technique considered in more detail in the following discussion. Other areas in which potentiometric applications are important include clinical chemistry, environmental chemistry, and potentiometric titrations. Before considering these applications, however, we must first examine more closely the relationship between cell potential and the analyte s concentration, as well as methods for standardizing potentiometric measurements. 

The iodine number of fats and oils provides a quantitative measurement of the degree of unsaturation. A solution containing a 100% excess of IGl is added to the sample, reacting across the double-bonded sites of unsaturation. The excess IGl is converted to I2 by adding KI. The resulting I2 is reacted with a known excess of Na2S203. To complete the analysis the excess 8203 is back titrated with coulometrically generated I2. 

The goal of chromatography is to separate a sample into a series of chromatographic peaks, each representing a single component of the sample. Resolution is a quantitative measure of the degree of separation between two chromatographic peaks, A and B, and is defined as... 

As shown in Figure 12.8, the degree of separation between two chromatographic peaks improves with an increase in R. For two peaks of equal size, a resolution of 1.5 corresponds to an overlap in area of only 0.13%. Because resolution is a quantitative measure of a separation s success, it provides a useful way to determine if a change in experimental conditions leads to a better separation. 

---