Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Quantitation internal normalization

By specifically and selectively reconstructing the total ion peak observed after a loop flow injection to display only the m/z values of interest, the area count for that ion can be extracted from the composite total ion peak. The measured area count can then be used to estimate the quantity of specific alkaloid by comparison to a calibration curve. Thus, component compounds in a mixture are separated by mass, as opposed to chromatography, for quantitation. To normalize the variability of the API response, an internal reference standard is added to the sample prior to loop injection. Alkaloids for which standards are not available are reported as equivalents of a closely related and available standard used to generate the calibration curve, for example, deltaline and methyllycaconitine have been used as calibration standards to represent the non-MSAL and MSAL types of alkaloids, respectively, in the plant material. Calibration curves for these two compounds were linear (r > 0.990) and there appears to be no selective suppression of lower-level alkaloids (figure 13.21). Multiple analyses of Delphinium barbeyi samples returned a level ofprecision that was less than 10 % (relative standard deviation) for all components [56]. [Pg.398]

Relative MALDI quantitation has been shown for lipids (14) and small molecules in the MALDI linear ion trap. Good precision in MALDI quantitation requires normalizing for an internal standard. MS and MS improve precision by providing specificity (15). Including a deuterated internal standard in the isolation window for MS has also been shown to improve precision (16). [Pg.448]

Quantitative analysis Quantitative information is obtained from peak area measurements and calibration graphs using internal or external standards, or by standard addition or internal normalization. [Pg.149]

Because of the complex nature of the discharge conditions, GD-OES is a comparative analytical method and standard reference materials must be used to establish a unique relationship between the measured line intensities and the elemental concentration. In quantitative bulk analysis, which has been developed to very high standards, calibration is performed with a set of calibration samples of composition similar to the unknown samples. Normally, a major element is used as reference and the internal standard method is applied. This approach is not generally applicable in depth-profile analysis, because the different layers encountered in a depth profile of ten comprise widely different types of material which means that a common reference element is not available. [Pg.225]

HPA catalyzed liquid phase nitration was eairied out in a Teflon-lined stainless autoclave of 200 mL equipped with a magnetic stirrer. Reactants and HPA were quantitatively added to the autoclave, which was sealed and heated in an oil-bath. Products were analyzed by GC with OV-101 30 m capillary column and FID detector by using calibrated area normalization and internal standard method. All products were confirmed by GC-MASS analysis. [Pg.354]

It is clear that neither NMEA nor NDPA is appropriate for an internal standard in NDMA determination if criteria are interpreted strictly, but both compounds have been used for this purpose. Addition of a nitrosamine, not normally present in the sample, is helpful in detecting any gross errors in the procedure, but the addition should not be considered to be internal standardization. Utilization of NMEA or NDPA to indicate recovery of NDMA can lead to significant errors. In most reports of the application of these "internal standards", recovery of all nitrosamines was close to 100%. Under these conditions, any added compound would appear to be a good internal standard, but none is necessary. NDMA is a particularly difficult compound for use of internal standardization because of its anomalous distribution behavior. I mass j ectrometry is employed for quantitative determination, H- or N-labeled NDMA could be added as internal standard. Because the labeled material would coelute from GC columns with the unlabeled NDMA, this approach is unworkable when GC-TEA is employed or when high resolution MS selected ion monitoring is used with the equipment described above. [Pg.339]

As described above all samples were separated online using LCT ESI-TOF-MS then normalized for relative quantitation using a bovine insulin internal standard. Fractions were then collected for MAFDI-TOF-MS PMF, digested with modified porcine trypsin, and analyzed using the TofSpec2E. Following this analysis, three major classes of differentially expressed including proteins were revealed in these... [Pg.236]

Like many other chemical concepts the concept of strain is only semi-quantitative and lacks precise definition. Molecules are considered strained if they contain internal coordinates (interatomic distances (bond lengths, distances between non-bonded atoms), bond angles, torsion angles) which deviate from values regarded as normal and strain-free . For instance, the normal bond angle at the tetra-coordinated carbon atom is close to the tetrahedral value of 109.47°. In the course of force field calculations these normal values are defined more satisfactorily, though in a somewhat different way, as force field parameters. [Pg.162]

The PCR primers and the fluorogenic probes for the studied targets were designed using the Primer Express Software 1.7 (PE Applied Biosystem, Foster City, CA, USA). To normalize the quantitative data, specific probes for the TATA-bind-ing protein mRNA were used as an internal control. [Pg.240]

The CE method was validated in terms of accuracy, precision, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, specificity, system suitability, and robustness. Improved reproducibility of the CZE method was obtained using area normalization to determine the purity and levels of potential impurities and degradation products of IB-367 drug substance. The internal standard compensated mainly for injection variability. Through the use of the internal standard, selected for its close mobility to IB-367, the method achieved reproducibility in relative migration time of 0.13% relative standard deviation (RSD), and relative peak area of 2.75% RSD. [Pg.184]

In HPLC, a sample is separated into its components based on the interaction and partitioning of the different components of the sample between the liquid mobile phase and the stationary phase. In reversed phase HPLC, water is the primary solvent and a variety of organic solvents and modifiers are employed to change the selectivity of the separation. For ionizable components pH can play an important role in the separation. In addition, column temperature can effect the separation of some compounds. Quantitation of the interested components is achieved via comparison with an internal or external reference standard. Other standardization methods (normalization or 100% standardization) are of less importance in pharmaceutical quality control. External standards are analyzed on separate chromatograms from that of the sample while internal standards are added to the sample and thus appear on the same chromatogram. [Pg.274]

Quantitativity 1. The use of a common internal control sample enables normalization of gel-to-gel variations so that spot intensity directly reflects the protein expression level 2. The fluorescent signal that measmes spot intensity has wide dynamic range... [Pg.151]

An LC-MS method for quantification has been available for many years [79] using 13C2 cholesterol sulfate as an internal standard. The deuterated material is now commercially available (CDN or ISOTEC). Negative-ion ESI-MS is used for quantitation and m/z 365 (M-II, analyte) and 367 (M-H", internal standard) are monitored. The mean cholesterol sulfate level in 166 cases of RXLI was 4859 1589 pg/dl and for normal individuals 186 112 pg/dl (n = 109). [Pg.593]

Chemical Analysis of Extracts. The extracts were analyzed by capillary column GC-MS for OCs, TAAPs, and PAHs (see the list on page 313). The GC-MS parameters used at the two laboratories are shown in Table II. The identification and quantitation were all done by using automatic routines based on a mass spectra library created from authentic standards of the selected compounds. Compounds were located by searching the reconstructed ion chromatogram for each library entry within a narrow retention time window relative to the internal standard (anthracene-dio or phenanthrene-dio). Quantitation was achieved by comparison of characteristic ion areas in the field samples with ion areas of the internal standard. These ion areas were normalized by response factors established by comparison of ion ratios of a standard mixture of all 66 analytes at a concentration of 2.5 ng//zL. [Pg.310]

Qualitative ways of analyzing a problem in molecular vibrations, that is, methods for determining the number of normal modes of each symmetry type which will arise in the molecule as a whole and in each set of equivalent internal coordinates, have been developed. There is also the quantitative problem of how the frequencies of these vibrations, which can be obtained by experiment, are related to the masses of the atoms, the bond angles and bond lengths, and most particularly the force constants of the individual bonds and interbond angles. In this section we shall show how to set up the equations which express these relationships, making maximum use of symmetry to simplify the task at every stage. [Pg.317]


See other pages where Quantitation internal normalization is mentioned: [Pg.85]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.643]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.541]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.984]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.984]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.71]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.45 ]




SEARCH



Quantitation normalization

© 2024 chempedia.info