Qualitative Chromatography Analyte Identification

Additional certainty in using fj values to assign peak identity is obtained when retention times match on two columns with significantly different stationary phases, or a single planar stationary phase eluted by orthogonal, sequential application of two mobile phases. This is the principle and application of 2D chromatography discussed earlier in Section 

Many analyses of complex environmental mixtures specify splitting an injection to two different capillary GC columns operating in parallel to separate detectors. An analyte is considered to be measureable only if it elutes with the appropriate RRT on both columns and the measured quantities of it on each column differ by less than a specified amount. The latter condition ensures that there is no significant coelution with yet another compound on one of the columns. The second column in such a pair is called the confirmation column. 

Even more certainty of peak identification is obtained by using detectors that are selective for certain classes of compounds (e.g., only those with particular heteroatoms. 

Quantitation may be done crudely on the spots separated by planar chromatographic techniques such as TLC or slab gel electrophoresis (see Chapter 13). One might compare the optical density, the fluorescence, or the degree of stationary phase fluorescence suppression by the unknown spot to a series of standards of known concentration. In contrast, the electrical signals from the variety of detectors used in various column chromatography instruments can be precisely, reproducibly, and linearly related to the amount of analyte passing through the detector cell. If aU parameters of injection, separation, and detection are carefully controlled from run to run and especially if appropriate quantitative ISs are incorporated in the procedure, accuracy and precision better than 1% may be attained. 

---

A number of methods are used in classical analysis to perform these tasks. Qualitative as well as quantitative analysis of mixtures can be achieved by chromatographic methods such as gas chromatography (GC) and liquid chromatography (LC). Chemical sensors or biosensors can also be employed for selectively quantifying a compound in a mixture. However, such analysers have only been developed for a very limited number of analytes. Identification of pure compounds can be achieved by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements, by mass spectrometry (MS), infrared spectroscopy (IR), UV/vis spectroscopy or X-ray crystallography, to name a few. 

Buschmann, N., Merschel, L., and Wodarczak, S. (1996). Analytical methods for alkyl polyglucosides. Part II. Qualitative determination using thin layer chromatography and identification by means of in-situ secondary ion mass spectrometry. Tenside, Surfactants, Deterg. 33 16-20. 

In many analyses, fhe compound(s) of inferesf are found as par of a complex mixfure and fhe role of fhe chromatographic technique is to provide separation of fhe components of that mixture to allow their identification or quantitative determination. From a qualitative perspective, the main limitation of chromatography in isolation is its inability to provide an unequivocal identification of the components of a mixture even if they can be completely separated from each other. Identification is based on the comparison of the retention characteristics, simplistically the retention time, of an unknown with those of reference materials determined under identical experimental conditions. There are, however, so many compounds in existence that even if the retention characteristics of an unknown and a reference material are, within the limits of experimental error, identical, the analyst cannot say with absolute certainty that the two compounds are the same. Despite a range of chromatographic conditions being available to the analyst, it is not always possible to effect complete separation of all of the components of a mixture and this may prevent the precise and accurate quantitative determination of the analyte(s) of interest. 

It is of interest to examine the development of the analytical toolbox for rubber deformulation over the last two decades and the role of emerging technologies (Table 2.9). Bayer technology (1981) for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of rubbers and elastomers consisted of a multitechnique approach comprising extraction (Soxhlet, DIN 53 553), wet chemistry (colour reactions, photometry), electrochemistry (polarography, conductometry), various forms of chromatography (PC, GC, off-line PyGC, TLC), spectroscopy (UV, IR, off-line PylR), and microscopy (OM, SEM, TEM, fluorescence) [10]. Reported applications concerned the identification of plasticisers, fatty acids, stabilisers, antioxidants, vulcanisation accelerators, free/total/bound sulfur, minerals and CB. Monsanto (1983) used direct-probe MS for in situ quantitative analysis of additives and rubber and made use of 31P NMR [69]. 

Although often used as a qualitative (identification) tool, MS may act as a quantitative inorganic mass detector. Quantification of organic analytes often takes place in combination with chromatography or in tandem MS mode. It should be realised that mass spectrometry is certainly not a panacea for all polymer/additive problems, although it is developing into a major tool for this purpose. 

In food analysis, sensitivity is not the only requirement for analytical method development. Besides confirmation of the identity of pesticides, the identification of nontarget analytes is also important. One powerful tool is LC/MS, especially when it is combined with appropiate sample-treatment procedures it allows one to obtain detection limits adequate for trace-level analysis. Liquid chromatography-MS has demonstrated that it is an effective way to obtain both qualitative and quantitative information. 

Chapter 4.4 addressed various aspects of qualitative identification of pollutants with common analytical techniques, such as chromatography and elemental analysis. Another integral component of environmental analysis is pollutant quantitation. For the data to be valid and usable, the analytes must be not only correctly identified but also properly quantified. 

The introduction of GC as an analytical technique has had a profound impact on both qualitative and quantitative analysis of organic compounds. Identification of compounds by GC can be accomplished by their retention times on the column as compared to known reference standards, by inference from sample treatment prior to chromatography, " or by the concept of retention index. " The latter method and tables of retention indices " with associated conditions have been reported. " Although qualitative data and analytical techniques for identification of compounds are well-established " and relative retention data for over 600 substances also have been published, " the main utility of GC undoubtedly lies in its powerful combination of separation and quantitative capabilities. Use in quantitative analysis involves the implementation of two techniques being performed concurrently, i.e., separation of components and subsequent quantitative measurement. 

The diode array detector (DAD), which arose from the analyst s needs to reduce data observations times in chromatography, has become a powerful tool in a research environment and in the quality assurance laboratory. Diode array adds a new dimension of analytical capability to liquid chromatography because it allows qualitative information to be obtained beyond simple identification by retention time. 

The IMER approach does not require that the enzyme be placed in close proximity to the detector if the transducer signal is generated by a soluble product or cosubstrate of the enzymatic reaction. In the latter case, a variety of flow systems and postreactor detectors can be utilized to produce simultaneous determinations of the concentrations of several analytes. For example, an IMER can be combined with a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) instrument (perhaps also in combination with mass spectroscopy) for purposes of both qualitative and quantitative analysis. The chemo-, stereo-, and regio-selectivities of enzymes facilitate separation and/or identification of analytes that may be present as different isomers (e.g., in peptide analysis based on use of peptidase IMERs in combination with these techniques to obtain structural information about the sequence of amino acids in peptides). 

Improvements in analytical techniques have led to the characterization of plant and insect surface compounds and provided new insights in chemical ecology. Moreover, an enormous number of plant terpenoid analyses are associated with their pharmaceutical and fragrance applications. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of cuticular waxes and terpenoids are usually achieved by gas chromatography (GC) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Peak identification is based primarily on retention times, retention indices and comparison of recorded spectra with an MS library. This review will describe gas... 

Gas chromatography (GG-FID and GC-MS) can be used for both qualitative and quantitative analyses. Complete identification can be effected if GC retention data and mass spectral data are together taken into consideration. GC-FID identification is based on the comparison of retention times of analytes and authentic standards determined under identical GC conditions or by their co-chromatography. Unfortunately, standards of cuticular wax constituents are rarely commercially available. Some standards may be produced in the laboratory from pure components or natural extracts. For example, the carbon number in the analyses of wax esters can be assigned by comparison of their retention times with that of a synthetic wax ester of known structure (Evershed, 1992a). Beeswax is well-characterized so it can be used as a standard mixture. In beeswax wax esters, the predominant fatty acid moiety is hexadecanoic acid and the chain lengths of the alcohol moieties range from C26 to C36. 

Over the last two deeades, there has been a major shift in how mass spectrometry (MS) is used for drug metabolism applications. Previously, MS was confined to the narrow role of metabohte identification for compounds in the development cycle. At this time, most quantitative assays were performed by using high-performance hquid chromatography (HPLC) combined with an ultraviolet (LTV) detection system. Currently, HPLC MS is the primary tool for both quantitative and quahtative drug metabohsm applications. This shift occurred primarily for two reasons (1) the commerdahzation of the electrospray ionization (ESI) source and the abihty to perform HPLC—ESI—MS provided a whole new set of analytical capabihties for both quantitative and qualitative apphcations and (2) at the same time, drug metabolism... 

---