Principal properties others

Vinyl Ethers. The principal commercial vinyl ethers are methyl vinyl ether (methoxyethene, C H O) [107-25-5], ethyl vinyl ether (ethoxyethene, C HgO) [104-92-2], and butyl vinyl ether (1-ethenyloxybutane, C H 20) [111-34-2]. (See Table 8 for physical properties.) Others such as the isopropyl, isobutyl, hydroxybutyl, decyl, hexadecyl, and octadecyl ethers, as well as the divinyl ethers of butanediol and of triethylene glycol, have been offered as development chemicals (see Ethers). 

Pure carbon disulfide is a clear, colorless Hquid with a deHcate etherHke odor. A faint yellow color slowly develops upon exposure to sunlight. Low-grade commercial carbon disulfide may display some color and may have a strong, foul odor because of sulfurous impurities. Carbon disulfide is slightly miscible with water, but it is a good solvent for many organic compounds. Thermodynamic constants (1), vapor pressure (1,2), spectral transmission (3,4), and other properties (1,2,5—7) of carbon disulfide have been deterrnined. Principal properties are Hsted in Table 1. 

Typical values for the principal properties of cellulose acetate compounds are tabulated in Table 22.2 in comparison with other cellulosic plastics. Since cellulose acetate is seldom used today in applications where detailed knowledge of physical properties are required these are given without further comment. 

It is through the solid state characteristics of polymers that we - as users - primarily interact with them. For convenience, we can divide the principal properties of polymers into five categories mechanical, optical, surface contact, barrier, and electrical. Weather resistance is a sixth category that can influence each of the other five categories. In order to understand these properties we must be able to quantify them. In this chapter we shall concentrate on measurement techniques, since it is through these methods that we learn how a polymer will behave during use. 

The principal feature of this relationship is that F values are derived solely from molecular formulae and chemical structures and require no prior knowledge of any physical, chemical or thermochemical properties other than the physical state of the explosive that is, explosive is a solid or a liquid [72]. Another parameter related to the molecular formulae of explosives is OB which has been used in some predictive schemes related to detonation velocity similar to the prediction of bri-sance, power and sensitivity of explosives [35, 73, 74]. Since OB is connected with both, energy available and potential end products, it is expected that detonation velocity is a function of OB. As a result of an exhaustive study, Martin etal. established a general relation that VOD increases as OB approaches to zero. The values of VOD calculated with the use of these equations for some explosives are given in the literature [75] and deviations between the calculated and experimental values are in the range of 0.46-4.0%. 

Such are the principal properties of forged platinum, or of the metsl made into utensils, wire, or thin leaves but in its ether states, such as platinum black and spongy platmam, it exhibits other properties, which are highly interesting and characteristic of this metal. 

Pharmacologic properties other than the property of principal interest... 

Pharmacologic Properties Other Than the Property of Principal Interest. The available preclinical and clinical data that describe other pharmacologic properties of the drug should be discussed with emphasis placed on those actions that are related to unwanted effects and drug-drug interactions. 

Paper derives its principal properties from the cellulose fiber of which it is made. In comparison with many other fibers, cellulose fibers are not highly pliable or fatigue resistant. They are partly crystalline and partly amorphous and both portions are rather rigid when dry. The amorphous regions are relatively open, however, and they absorb moisture of humidity, which acts to flexibilize the fiber and the paper it forms. 

The variation of the principal properties in a set of compounds is quantified by the score values. This variation can be displayed by plotting the scores of different components against each other. Such score plots are very useful for selecting test compounds for experimental studies. Strategies for the selection of test system based upon principal properties are discussed in Sect. 4.6. 

Other Examples of the Use of Principal Properties Characterization by principal properties has been reported for classes of compounds in applications other than organic synthesis Aminoacids, where principal properties have been used for quantitative structure-activity relations (QSAR) of peptides [64], Environmentally hazardous chemicals, for toxicity studies on homogeneous subgroups [65]. Eluents for chromatography, where principal properties of solvent mixtures have been used for optimization of chromatographic separations in HPLC and TLC [66],... 

Some of what we see as the principal properties and characteristics of import in the development and selection of viscoelastic materials for structural damping are listed below. Table IV notes "passive" properties and characteristics, that is, those that pertain to the material itself and to its performance in the specified operating conditions. Somewhat in contrast. Table V lists "Active or Interactive" properties and characteristics that concern the interaction of the viscoelastic material with other materials and with the environment of the treatment. These tabulations are surely incomplete, but are intended to suggest the breadth of considerations that may be involved in material selection. 

Here comes the important point The variations of measured macroscopic molecular properties can reasonably be assumed to be reflections of variations of the intrinsic properties at the molecular level. Descriptors which depend on the same molecular property are most likely to be correlated to each other. The principal components describe the systematic variation of the descriptors over the set of compounds. Descriptors which are correlated to each other will be described by the same principal component. The principal component vectors are mutually orthogonal, and different component will therefore describe independent and uncorrelated variations of the descriptors. Hence, different components will portray a variation in the data due to different intrinsic properties. These intrinsic properties, which manifest themselves as a variation of the macroscopic descriptors, are called the principal properties.[3]... 

A graphic illustration of how the principal properties vary over the set of compounds is obtained by plotting the scores against each other, see Fig. 15.7. 

The data of 103 solvents are sununarized in Appendix 15 A Table 15A1. Data for solvents 1-82 were taken from the the first edition of the book by Reichardt[22a] and these data were also used in the first determination of the principal properties of organic solvents.[20] The numbering of the solvent in [20] was the same as in the book by Reichardt. To make it possible to compare the results given here to the previous results, the same numbering has been kept for the first 82 solvents. The augmented data set used here has been compiled from the second edition of the book by Reichardt[22b] and from other sources, (see Appendix 15A Table 15A.1). 

Principal components models have been used to determine principal properties for classes of compounds in applications to other areas than organic synthesis. Some examples are given below. These examples will not be further discussed here. 

These data are given to offer an opportunity to the reader to decide whether or not the plots shown in this chapter are applicable to his/her synthetic problem. It might be necessary to include other descriptors and make a new PC model for obtaining the pertinent principal properties in his/her specific case. As it is the author s experience that compilation of descriptor data from the literature can be very time-consuming, the data given here might save some time. 

In the preceding chapter it was shown how the axes of the reaction space can be quantified by the principal properties. The variation of the principal properties over the set of possible test candidates is visualized by the score plots. Compounds with similar properties will be close to each other in these plots, while compounds whose properties are radically different will be projected far from each other. These projections therefore offer a means of ensuring that in the set of compounds actually selected for experimental work, a sufficient range of variation has been achieved in all properties initially considered. 

It has for long been assumed that morpholine is the preferred amine in this reaction, and that other amines generally give inferior results. With the aim of examining the scope of the reaction with regard to amine variation, the reaction was run with a series of amines selected by their principal properties. Acetophenone was used as the ketone substrate in these reactions, and quinoline was used as a solvent. The reason for using quinoline was that it permits a large span of the reaction temperature (b.p 237 ° C). 

It is possible to adopt a simplex strategy to explore the neighbourhood of a promising solvent. The score values are not continuous and it is therefore not possible to make reflections of the worst vertex in a strict geometrical sense. It is, however, possible to make a simplex search in an approximate way. In the exploration of the solvent space, there are two principal properties to consider. The simplex is therefore a triangle and will be defined by three solvent points in the score plot. Let one vertex correspond to the promising candidate, or to a hitherto known "useful" solvent. The other vertices are chosen not too far from the first one. Run the reaction in the three solvents selected and determine in which experiment the oucome is least favourable. Discard this point and run a new experiment in a... 

---