Peak areas variables

The average within-group repeatability of 0.5% most likely describes detector noise that leads to misassignments of the integration endpoints and peak-area variability, and can be considered acceptable for low-dose products. 

FIGURE 4 Schematic representation of the steps taken for data scrutiny. (A) Illustration of the batch sequence showing QC samples analyzed in the beginning and then sporadically through the batch. Test samples should be randomized in sets of 5-10 samples. (B) A peak table from the QC data is examined for peak area variability (filter CV<30%). Variables that show CV > 30% are excluded. (C) Variability of features is examined over the RT and ml axis. Red dots represent features with CV > 30% in the QCs, green dots are features that show CV < 30%. This examination could reveal potential analytical pitfalls, for example, in the case where a load of irreproduc-ible features are concentrated in a specific area. (D) Test samples show much higher variability than the QC samples as shown in the corresponding box plots. (E) When the QC data shows... 

The criteria for acceptable linearity of least squares fit and zero intercept when plotting ratios of analyte to internal standard areas vs. concentration are similar to the case for external standard calibrations described earlier. More than one IS can be used, both for calculating RRTs to compensate for retention time variations as well as the RRFs for improving quantitation. The variations that a quantitation IS can compensate for depend upon the point at which it is introduced in the analysis. If it is put into the final extract prior to injection on the chromatograph, it can correct for concentration variations due to evaporative volume changes, variations in injection volume, and variations in detector response. This is called an injection internal standard. If the internal standard is put into the initial sample, and into calibration standards prepared in an equivalent matrix, it can additionally correct for variations in recovery during the sample preparation process. This is called a method internal standard. Combined use of separate compounds for each purpose can aid in determining the causes of peak area variability. 

Unfortunately, neither the computer nor the potentiometric recorder measures the primary variable, volume of mobile phase, but does measure the secondary variable, time. This places stringent demands on the LC pump as the necessary accurate and proportional relationship between time and volume flow depends on a constant flow rate. Thus, peak area measurements should never be made unless a good quality pump is used to control the mobile phase flow rate. Furthermore, the pump must be a constant flow pump and not a constant pressure pump. 

Successful use of modern liquid chromatography in the clinical laboratory requires an appreciation of the method s analytical characteristics. The quantitative reproducibility with respect to peak height or peak area is quite good. With a sample loop injector relative standard deviations better than 1% are to be expected. The variability of syringe injection (3-4% relative standard deviation) requires the use of an internal standard to reach the 1% level (2,27). 

Amount of soluble polymer generated in this reaction (Figure 9) was only 18-19% solids, which was well below the 29% total solids found after reaction completion. Differences between calculated soluble solids and gravimetrically measured total solids were large, but variable, for all three polymerizations studied. Thus, amount of soluble polymer was not proportional to total solids. However, a good correlation between total solids and the sum of refractometer peak areas for both polymer peaks was obtained. Figure 10. This correlation included all three polymerizations and there was little or no batch bias. 

The aim of all the foregoing methods of factor analysis is to decompose a data-set into physically meaningful factors, for instance pure spectra from a HPLC-DAD data-set. After those factors have been obtained, quantitation should be possible by calculating the contribution of each factor in the rows of the data matrix. By ITTFA (see Section 34.2.6) for example, one estimates the elution profiles of each individual compound. However, for quantitation the peak areas have to be correlated to the concentration by a calibration step. This is particularly important when using a diode array detector because the response factors (absorptivity) may considerably vary with the compound considered. Some methods of factor analysis require the presence of a pure variable for each factor. In that case quantitation becomes straightforward and does not need a multivariate approach because full selectivity is available. 

Although there are other ways, one of the most convenient and rapid ways to measure AH is by differential scanning calorimetry. When the temperature is reached at which a phase transition occurs, heat is absorbed, so more heat must flow to the sample in order to keep the temperature equal to that of the reference. This produces a peak in the endothermic direction. If the transition is readily reversible, cooling the sample will result in heat being liberated as the sample is transformed into the original phase, and a peak in the exothermic direction will be observed. The area of the peak is proportional to the enthalpy change for transformation of the sample into the new phase. Before the sample is completely transformed into the new phase, the fraction transformed at a specific temperature can be determined by comparing the partial peak area up to that temperature to the total area. That fraction, a, determined as a function of temperature can be used as the variable for kinetic analysis of the transformation. 

The CE method was validated in terms of accuracy, precision, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, specificity, system suitability, and robustness. Improved reproducibility of the CZE method was obtained using area normalization to determine the purity and levels of potential impurities and degradation products of IB-367 drug substance. The internal standard compensated mainly for injection variability. Through the use of the internal standard, selected for its close mobility to IB-367, the method achieved reproducibility in relative migration time of 0.13% relative standard deviation (RSD), and relative peak area of 2.75% RSD. 

The precision of the assay for nonreduced samples was demonstrated by the evaluation of six independent sample preparations on a single day (repeatability) and the analysis of independent sample preparations on three separate days by two different analysts (intermediate precision). The RSD values for the migration time were 0.9%. The RSD values for peak area percent of the main peak and the minor peaks in the profile were 0.6 and 12.6%, respectively. The higher variability observed with the minor peaks was determined to be primarily related to the sample heating during preparation for the analysis. These results demonstrate that the use of uncoated fused-silica capillaries in combination with a sieving matrix can provide adequate precision and analyte recovery. 

Fenvalerate Data. Calibration data for the GC measurement of Fenvalerate were furnished by D. Kurtz (17). Average responses for five replicates at each of five standard concentrations are given in Table III. It should be noted that the stated responses are not raw observations, but rather on-line computer generated peak area estimates (cm ). (Had we started with the raw data [chromatograms], the problem would actually have been two-dimensional, including as variables retention time and concentration.) The stated uncertainties in the peak areas are based on a linear fit (o a+bx) of the replication standard deviations to concentration and the "local slopes" [first differences] in the last column of Table III are presented... 

Precision. The ability of the injector to draw the same amount of sample in replicate injections is crucial to the precision and accuracy for peak-area or peak-height comparison for external standard quantitation [10,11]. If the variability of the sample and standard being injected into the column is not controlled tightly, the basic principle of external standard quantitation is seriously compromised. No meaningful comparison between the responses of the sample and the standard can be made. The absolute accuracy of the injection volume is not critical as long as the same amount of standard and sample is injected. 

Fig. 6.1.9A-C Electrochemical detector (a) and florescence chromatograms (b), the latter generated following post-column oxidation. A Standards - 50 nM. 1 BH4 (retention time = 5.12 min) 2 dihydroneop-terin (retention time = 4.17 min), lox oxidized BH4 generated by electrochemical detector oxidation. N.B. This peak is variable in height/area and is not used for quantification ...

Thompson and Hatina (135) showed that the sensitivity of a fluorescence detector toward unesterified vitamin E compounds under normal-phase conditions was at least 10 times greater than that of a variable-wavelength absorbance detector. The relative fluorescence responses of the tocopherols at 290 nm (excitation) and 330 nm (emission), as measured by HPLC peak area, were a-T, 100 /3-T, 129 y-T, 110 and 5-T, 122. The fluorescence responses of the corresponding to-cotrienols were very similar to those of the tocopherols, and therefore tocotrienol standards were not needed for calibration purposes. The fluorescence detector also allows the simultaneous monitoring of ubiquinone derivatives for example ubiquinone-10 has been detected in tomato (136). 

Internal Standard (IS) The internal standard (IS) is a compound added in a fixed, known amount to every quantitation sample to serve as an internal control for the analysis. Most commonly, the IS is used to normalize response through determination of peak area ratio as described above. The ideal IS will track with the analyte(s) through the extraction, chromatography, and mass spectrometry to account for variable recovery, minor spills, and changes in response over time. Stable-isotope versions of the analytes are ideal IS for LC-MS quantitation, but in many cases structural analogs exhibit sufficiently similar chemistry to be useful in this role (Jemal et al., 2003 Wieling, 2002 Stokvis et al., 2005). 

The assumption for Eq. (1) is that the ELSD peak area is directly proportional to mass. For compounds of widely varying structures, charges, or vapor pressure, or for varying mobile phase compositions (e.g., gradient HPLC), the ELSD response can vary markedly (16-22). Thus, Eq. (1) is limited in its applicability. Similarly, mass spectral (MS) detectors are universal, but the response per unit weight depends greatly on the ionization type (e.g., electrospray, fast-atom bombardment, etc.) and on the ionization efficiency of the analyte. Refractive index is another universal detector, but it too suffers from variability in response depending on the mobile phase... 

The traceability of time measurement results can be established only if the pulser peak area can be compared with a stated uncertainty to die duration of a traceable time interval. Since the uncertainty of the pulser peak area calculated with general-purpose, peak analysing programs is inadequate, in principle, and does not account for the variability of the pulser peak area induced by the variability of its tails, the pulse peak area is calculated by a separate program. 

Internal standard calibration can be used to compensate for variation in analyte recovery and absolute peak areas due to matrix effects and GC injection variability. Prior to the extraction, a known quantity of a known additional analyte is added to each sample and standard. This compound is called an internal standard. To prepare a calibration curve, shown in Figure 4.6b, the standards containing the internal standard are chromatographed. The peak areas of the analyte and internal standard are recorded. The ratio of areas of analyte to internal standard is plotted versus the concentrations of the known standards. For the analytes, this ratio is calculated and the actual analyte concentration is determined from the calibration graph. 

Most chemometricians prefer inverse methods, but most traditional analytical chemistry texts introduce the classical approach to calibration. It is important to recognise that there are substantial differences in terminology in the literature, the most common problem being the distinction between V and y variables. In many areas of analytical chemistry, concentration is denoted by V, the response (such as a spectroscopic peak height) by y However, most workers in the area of multivariate calibration have first been introduced to regression methods via spectroscopy or chromatography whereby the experimental data matrix is denoted as 6X , and the concentrations or predicted variables by y In this paper we indicate the experimentally observed responses by V such as spectroscopic absorbances of chromatographic peak areas, but do not use 6y in order to avoid confusion. 

Example Ethanol is separated from a mixture of organic compounds by gas chromatography. The concentration of each component is proportional to its peak area. However, the chromatograph detector has a variable sensitivity from one run to the next. Is an internal standard required to determine the concentration of ethanol ... 

Solution Yes. The variable detector sensitivity may only be accounted for by adding a known concentration of a chemical not found in the mixture as an internal standard to the experimental sample and control samples. The variable sensitivity of the detector will be accounted for by determining the ratio of the peak area for ethanol to the peak area of the added internal standard. 

---