Method Development in Gas Chromatography

With the bewildering choice of parameters in gas chromatography, is there a rational way to choose a procedure for a particular problem In general, there are many satisfactory solutions. We now discuss some broad guidelines for selecting a method to use.18 The order in which decisions should be made is to consider (1) the goal of the analysis, (2) sample preparation, (3) detector. (41 column, and (5) injection. 

What is required from the analysis Is it qualitative identification of components in a mixture Will you require high-resolution separation of everything or do you just need good resolution in a portion of the chromatogram Can you sacrifice resolution to shorten the analysis time Do you need quantitative analysis of one or many components Do you need high precision Will analytes be present in adequate concentration or do you need preconcentration or a very sensitive detector for ultratrace analysis How much can the analysis cost Each of these factors creates trade-offs in selecting techniques. 

The key to successful chromatography of a complex sample is to clean it up before it ever Garbage in—garbage out  

The next step is to choose a detector. Do you need information about everything in the sample or do you want a detector that is specific for a particular element or a particular class of compounds  

The most general purpose detector for open tubular chromatography is a mass spectrometer. Flame ionization is probably the most popular detector, but it mainly responds to hydrocarbons and Table 24-5 shows that it is not as sensitive as electron capture, nitrogen-phosphorus, or chemiluminescence detectors. The flame ionization detector requires the sample to contain SlO ppm of each analyte for split injection. The thermal conductivity detector responds to all classes of compounds, but it is not sensitive enough for high-resolution, narrow-bore, open tubular columns. 

---

Solvent strength and selectivity are the properties commonly used to classify liquid stationary phases as selection tools for method development in gas chromatography [29,102-104]. Solvent strength and polarity are often used interchangeably and can cause confusion. Polarity is sometimes considered to be the capacity of a stationary phase for dipole-type interactions alone, while more generally solvent strength is defined as the capacity of a stationary phase for all possible intermolecular interactions. The latter definition is quite sensible but unworkable because there is no substance that is uniquely polar that might be used to probe the polarity of other substances. Indirect measurements of polarity, such as those scales related one way or another to the... 

The inlet is perhaps the most complex part of a gas chromatograph. It not only provides a means for introducing samples into the colunm but also conffols all the carrier-gas flow. There are a number of inlets available for gas chromatography, and each has appropriate samples. Optimizing the injection process remains generally the most difficult aspect of method development in gas chromatography, especially in trace quantitative analysis. While there is a great body of literature, there are relatively few conclusions abont method optimization that can be applied to all samples and sample types. 

State the order of decisions in method development for gas chromatography. 

After all these developments in Gas Chromatography and its hyphenated methods, these techniques have been finding many applications in various sample analysis in different real samples such as environmental, biological, foods, drugs, narcotics, plants, soils, sediments and the other samples. 

P4 A method for analyzing ergosterol in a single kernel and ground barley and wheat was developed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). (From Dong et ah, 2006)... 

As in gas chromatography (Section 24-5), the first steps in method development are to (1) determine the goal of the analysis, (2) select a method of sample preparation to ensure a clean sample, and (3) choose a detector that allows you to observe the desired analytes in the mixture. The remainder of method development described in the following sections assumes that steps 1 through 3 have been carried out. 

To improve the quality control process of gasohol and hydrated ethanol, an automated FIA system was developed using AOD and HRP enzymes, and addition of 4-aminophenazone and phenol. A colorimetric detection method was used in two different methods of analysis, with free (4) and immobilized enzymes. Both systems have shown good results when compared with established methods such as gas chromatography (GC) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (4,7). 

The performance of a flexible PVC compound is often defined by its plasticiser content and composition and a simple, accurate and fast method of plasticiser identification could, therefore, be an effective quality control and benchmark performance test in new product development studies. Gas chromatography was shown to provide the most effective identification method and it was demonstrated that it could be complemented by IR spectroscopy, liquid chromatography and physical observations to confirm identity. 4 refs. 

Before the development of gas chromatography and high-pressure liquid chromatography, the presence of peanut oil (as an olive oil adulterant) could be detected because peanut oil contains about 5% arachidic acid. Arachidic acid is insoluble in cold alcohol unlike stearic and palmitic acids (110). Methods for the detection of arachidic acid include the Bellier, Evers, Evers-Bellier, and Renard tests (110, 121). Arachidic acid is predominant in the lecithin and cephalic fractions of peanut oil (122). Detection methods for toxic oils as an adulterant in edible oils such as peanut oil have been reviewed (123, 124). 

GC-MS has found wide application in studies of monoamines in both animal models and in human neuropharmacology [452]. Interest has centred on the use of selected ion monitoring in the determination of trace amounts of the amines, their metabolites and related substances with a possible function as neurotransmitters. The SIM approach complements established assay methods such as gas chromatography with electron capture detection (ECD), fluorimetry or enzymic assay. A check on specificity is afforded and in many cases enhancement in sensitivity and precision of measurement can be obtained. Method development, principally relating to estimation of central amine turnover, is noted in this Section and an outline of work on human depression serves to illustrate the potential of GC-MS to the study of CNS dysfunction. 

Several methods have been developed which seek to escape the inherent nonlinearity of the nondispersive infrared analyzer by the use of other detectors. The flame ionization detector commonly used in gas chromatography has many useful characteristics, including sensitivity and linearity of response, but it does not respond equally to all carbon compounds it does not respond at all to carbon dioxide. Therefore, the organic compounds must be converted to a single organic compound... 

There are no convenient or reliable functional tests of pantothenic acid status, thus assessment is made by direct measurement of whole blood or urine pantothenic acid concentrations. Urine measurements are perhaps the easiest to conduct and interpret, and concentrations are closely related to dietary intake, Whole blood measurements are preferred to plasma, which contains only free pantothenic acid and is insensitive to changes in pantothenic acid intake. Concentrations of pantothenic acid in aU of the above fluids can be measured by microbiological assay, most commonly using Lactobacillus plantarum. Whole blood must first be treated with an enzyme preparation to release pantothenic acid fi om CoA. Other techniques that have been used to measure pantothenic acid in human samples include radioimmunoassay and gas chromatography, Other techniques that have been developed include gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and a stable isotope dilution assay. CoA and AGP can be measured by enzymatic methods. ... 

Fundamental research into adsorption and chemical modification has helped to elucidate chromatographic processes. This research has led to new developments in gas adsorption chromatography by A. Kiselev, Yashin (Experimental Design Office, Dzerzhinsk), Poshkus (Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, the Lithuanian Academy of Sciences, Vilnius) and co-workers (2, 17, 288-290). Together with theoretical investigations and molecular statistical calculations, this method can be used to determine the structural parameters of the adsorbate molecule (this direction of research is referred to as chromatoscopy). 

Analytical GC is essentially a combined, or hybrid, method based on the simultaneous application of two methods (1) a method for the chromatographic separation of components of the sample mixture in a gaseous flow moving with respect to a stationary phase and (2) a method for the quantitative (and qualitative) determination of the zones of the separated components. The role of the second, or detection, method is no less important than that of the first. As early as 1962 Zhukhovitsky and Turkeltaub wrote that the history of advances in gas chromatography is in fact the history of development of the detector [10]. Initially, analytical GC was r arded as a physical separation technique [10, 11]. However, such a restricted approach, although justified in the early years of GC, inevitably imposed certain limitations on its development and application, namely (1) the range of substances that can be analysed is confined to volatile compounds and compounds thermally stable at the separation temperature, (2) the selectivity of separation, determined only by physical factors, is not always sufficient and... 

---